Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Limitation on freedom of speech
How does censorship affect schools and libraries
Need for internet censorship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Limitation on freedom of speech
Internet Censorship
"Internet Censorship." What does this mean to us? What is restricted? Censorship is summarily defined as the suppression of objectionable material. That means that material such as pornography, militant information, offensive language, anti-religion, and racism would be restricted in use. Freedom would not only be restricted to material placed on the web, but also what you could access, and where you could explore. Should the right of Freedom of Speech be taken away from us on the Internet? Having stated this, should there be any restrictions and if so, what's the limit of censorship?
The Internet, with its unlimited access to any kind of information, is today’s most commonly used tool used worldwide. This poses some complex questions that challenge liberal and conservative alike, the most recent defenders of the First Amendment, and the most passionate exponents of censorship. With the rush by our President to make the Internet accessible to every U.S. student, the problem extends far beyond libraries and into our schools. This censorship problem would seem to have no easy solution. First, let's assume pornography is a bad thing. It encourages poor behavior and disrespect toward women in general. Yes, any respectable human being would agree with that. But why does this have to be a problem in our schools? Isn't it the responsibility of the parents to guide their children? Isn’t it up to the parents to teach their kids stuff like that is morally wrong? Kids should already know behavior like that does not belong at school. Schools have a fear of this happening so they take action and put a block on all key words that are linked with pornography. Great, now how will students learn about subjects such as bre...
... middle of paper ...
...ear, write or see or do. If censorship of the internet tends to lean the way it is now, just think of how big of a grip the government will have on who we are. It will be impossible to act on our creative thoughts and speak our minds. I guess that means you can take the 1st Amendment and throw it in the trash.
The best thing about living in America is the right to freedom. We are free to explore the Internet and go to any site you so desire. We are free to learn hacking techniques, about tools, or even acquire hacking information. Which is not always a bad thing. You have the right to go on Yahoo Chat and let the person your chatting with know that you don’t like them. It’s that thing we call freedom of speech. So why do we want to get rid of educational information, and put a hold on Internet users freedom of speech when it not being done out in the real world.
Objectionable content found in challenged books across the country can range from some vulgar language, to rape and incest, and even to explicit sex scenes. However objectionable these topics may be, high schoolers are already exposed to them in some way, whether it be through listening to popular music on the radio, watching television, or browsing the internet. Many parents, and even board members of some schools, object certain books for a variety of reasons. What they have failed to realize is this: if they are so concerned about what their children read in school, are they as concerned about monitoring what they hear on the radio, see on television, and search online? Many schools across the country are now taking the technological route when it comes to teaching. This often means students can have access to the internet while in their classroom. This point goes back to the prior statement of ...
"Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself." The basic rights guaranteed to Americans in the Bill of Rights is what holds the United States together. When Salman Rushdie wrote Guardian, he knew this. Unfortunately, the majority of congress and the President himself have forgotten the basic rights of Americans. When President William J. Clinton signed the Communications Decency Act that was proposed but the 104th Congress, he severely limited the rights of Americans on the Internet. The internet, just like books, magazines, artwork, and newspapers, should not be censored.
The internet was created for the cold war, in the event that the U.S. were attacked, there would be no communication among the nations leaders, because traditional communication would be disrupted by a nuclear blast. Since that time, the internet survived only though commercialization, the original form of the internet was scrapped when the cold war ended. Now, with this medium in the hands of anyone who wants to pay for service, the Internet has exploded with controversial materials that some people think should be censored. When I started this project, I asked the question should the Internet be regulated and if so, how and why? First we'll look at why the Internet needs regulation, Then how would our government go about doing so? There are several issues that are controversial with the internet. There is pornography, racism, and hate material floating around out there that is accessiable to children all too easily. For the purposes of this paper, I will only discuss the pornography issue, since talking about all of the censorship issues would take more than a short research paper to discuss.
...t those that seek to censor some of the information found on the internet. Nunziato (2009) concludes that in order to fulfill the Internet’s promise of being “the most participatory market-place of mass speech that this country-and indeed the world- has seen,” the companies that serve as gatekeepers for free expression need to be regulated to ensure that they fairly administer any censorship such that it “does not detract from the free speech values that are necessary to facilitate the public discussion and informed deliberation that democratic government presupposes and the First Amendment requires”.
McCarthy, M. (2005). THE CONTINUING SAGA OF INTERNET CENSORSHIP: THE CHILD ONLINE PROTECTION ACT. Brigham Young University Education & Law Journal, (2), 83-101.
How does Internet censorship effect education? That is the question that needs to be answered. Censorship cannot be completely done away with in schools, society, and the law would simply not allow it. The internet also cannot be completely censored, because the technology for that simply does not exist. People have various stances on this issue and they can be split up into four general groups: The Government, parents, students, and teachers. They all have different views on the issue, although who is right or wrong has not yet been decided.
According to Amnesty International (2014), internet censorship is the control and suppression of online information or services by government or other stakeholder institutions. It is enforced by monitoring chat rooms and forums, deleting blogs, blocking websites and re-routing search results. Throughout the world, discussion on the issue has been heightening in recent times, fuelled by arguments claiming its worth and infringement of liberty. In some circumstances, censorship can work to the advantage of the individual, protecting them against online theft, cyberbullying, and stalking, while ensuring dangerous or offensive content cannot be accessed. Further to these, in dangerous political circumstances censorship can help mitigate against terrorism and foreign aggression. It can also help business and the artistic community, assisting with the protection of copyright and intellectual property. However, these security advantages do come at the cost of civil liberty and can be abused to make censorship a detriment to society. Censorship can limit basic human rights, create ignorant and intellectually starved societies, and in some instances give governments absolute political control.
Thesis: Government Censorship would damage the atmosphere of the freedom to express ideas on the Internet; therefore, government should not encourage censorship.
As recent events have shown, The Internet has played a vital role in various social movements across the Middle East. Social networks such as Facebook and Twitter are becoming the new soapboxes for people to stand upon and speak their mind. As with all opinions though, there are people who disagree with them, and want to discuss the opposing side or stop them altogether. A corrupt government or other leaders in power can try to use Censorship to stop an opinion from being heard. This is the case of a recent situation in Egypt where the Internet was turned off for two months. While the Egyptian government thought that turning off the internet would stop protests about its political policy, it only fueled the fire after which the government was then overthrown. But what is censorship in both a literal context and an anthropological context? What are the types of internet censorship other than a complete shutdown and how many people actually use the internet in Egypt?
Censorship is the attempt to stop a particular work from being printed, viewed, heard or taught in school. There are many types censorships like: moral, political, book, films, music and internet. It’s a very controversial topic because what one believes to be vulgar and unnecessary to demonstrate/share, another may not have an issue with. For instance, liberals would argue against censorship while conservatives favor it; but it is all about perspective. I believe that there should be censorship to certain material like television shows and children cartoons. The internet and media should not be censored. People should be able to handle the content of the internet as well as being old enough to use. Regarding the media we all need to be aware of what is occurring, be able to express ourselves and show our creativity.
To sum it all up, internet censorship is a global problem in our time but although it has a negative impact on the society, it can be helpful in ways. Internet censorship is different in each country but it is all for one cause- to protect the society. Forms of censorship that have been implemented or are being considered, include blocking and filtering specific sites and monitoring email and web surfing, should be examined and considered with an eye to both precedent and the historical role of free expression in a free nation(Examining Internet Censorship, n.d)
There are two real issues at stake when looking at this controversial topic. The first issue is finding a way to protect our children from potentially damaging material. There are advocates to censoring the Internet and removing this type of material because it will help shelter our children from this type of content. On the other hand, Free Speech advocates believe that it is the individual citizens right to have access to this typ...
An article written by MindShift titled “What’s the Impact of Overzealous Internet Filtering in Schools?” Quotes a statement from Kristen Batch saying “The over-filtering that occurs today affects not only what teachers can teach but also how they teach. It creates barriers to learning and acquiring digital literacy skills that are vital for college and career readiness, as well as for full participation in 21st-century society.” This supports the idea of over restrictive web filters, not only do they decrease ways of learning but they are seen as a “barrier”. Some may feel that these should not be referred to as restrictions, but something a bit more broad such as censorship. Reasons and point of views such as these explain why many may see restrictions as way too restrictive of what students and teachers can access to increase their learning
"The internet was modernized and popularized during the early to mid-1990's with the creation of the 'world wide web.' Since then, our dependence on internet use for research, entertainment, and communication has skyrocketed. Because the internet is still in its youth, no one really knows what to do regarding government monitoring of internet content and, while the argument could be made that monitoring browser searches and sites visited would help keep our country secure, the reality is that government monitoring of public internet use is much too expensive and goes against basic fourth amendment rights.
Perhaps somebody wants to check their Twitter account at school. Understandably, they get the standard firewall page: “Page Blocked: Social Media.” However, when somebody needs to do research for their project on breast cancer, they find a reputable medical journal. They get the firewall page: “Page Blocked: Adult.”