Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Greek Understanding Of Good And Evil
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Greek Understanding Of Good And Evil
The intellectual traditions of the ancient world tend to focus on answering four questions that play into the purpose of one’s life. The four questions being, who am I, where am I, who am I with and what is necessary to be happy. Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Epicurus and Epictetus all had different opinions on these questions which allowed me to develop my own understanding through dissection of their philosophies. These four questions were also addressed through several aspects of readings throughout the quarter. The purpose of good and evil, religion, civilization, government, honor, shame and pleasure all helped develop some concrete background for the philosophers to apply their thinking. In order to begin to understand philosophers, …show more content…
Gilgamesh began as a terrible king who was lustful and selfish yet, the people had no way to revoke his power as he owned everything and had warriors that could force the civilians to stay in accordance with his wishes. The city itself was civilized which meant that it was not in harmony with nature as modifications of nature, such as water wheels, were needed just to grow crops and provide for basic human needs. This brought up the nature of kingship and why it is necessary in civilization. In a group discussion, we decided that the purpose of having a king was to keep order and efficiency. Having one person who makes decisions allows for ease of those decisions and gives the civilians one voice that reigns supreme rather than having different members of upper government give different opinions. It is human nature to want a leader and to want one who is a judge to bring about justice to those who have done something that is considered evil. A king, being the only judge, must have good judgement in order to be a benevolent king because of the power that one would possess in that position. However, as history has shown, absolute power tends to corrupt absolutely. In the case of Gilgamesh, this was true as he was a corrupt king in the beginning of the story. However, because of the experiences that Gilgamesh went through, he became a king who was more honorable and created a city in which people had a better chance of pursuing happiness. The lenses through which Gilgamesh saw the world changed throughout his experiences ultimately making him a better
Gilgamesh is the king of Uruk, one who is macho, irresponsible, and simply not fit to be in the position that his blood status has put him in. His decisions are constantly making the people of Uruk
Gilgamesh is a character that evolves throughout The Epic of Gilgamesh. The lord of wisdom, Gilgamesh realized he did not know everything. He humbled himself to lessons of life. As Gilgamesh progresses he becomes less interested in worldly pleasure and more in tune with the value of life and the reality of death. Gilgamesh evolves into a better king because he allows all his challenges in life to make him better and more humbled. Gilgamesh says before his death, “For myself I have gained nothing; not I, but the beast of the earth has joy of it now.” (Gil.
The main character in the book The Epic of Gilgamesh, is Gilgamesh himself. In the beginning of the book one realizes that Gilgamesh is an arrogant person. Gilgamesh is full of himself and abuses his rights as king. He has sexual intercourse with the virgins of his town and acts as though he is a god. Throughout the story, many things cause Gilgamesh to change. He gains a friend, he makes a name for himself by killing Humbaba, and he tries to become immortal because of the death of Enkidu. Through these main actions his personality changes and he becomes a better person.
Gilgamesh was a very self confident and at times that self confidence led to him to have little compassion for the people of Uruk at he beginning of the story. He was their king, but not their protector; he kills their sons and rapes their daughters. He felt like he was superior to others due to the fact that he was two-thirds god, his mother was a goddess Ninsun and one third human. This fact is the key to all of his actions. This is also what sets him apart from the hero Odysseus.
With the recent death of Nelson Mandela a wave of sadness struck the districts. It seemed that not only a man had died but a way of life. For Nelson Mandela was not only a great leader. He was a seemingly god-like figure, capable of doing the right thing despite hatred or his own feelings. He did not look back on the shortcomings of his allies or frown at his captors, rather he learned from his mistakes and the suffering of jail and used the pain that this had brought him in order to do even better things. I can not help bought imagine what a different world we would be living in today if everyone had behaved in the same manner as Mandela. Behind the complex words and deep metaphors of the epic poem Gilgamesh lies a deeper story, one that teaches us a very important lesson: That we must learn from our sufferings.
Gilgamesh thinks he has everything that he wants in life until the gods send down his true love, Enkidu. Before meeting Enkidu, Gilgamesh was having fun ruling his city in a very arrogant manner. For example, "Gilgamesh was a tyrant to his people" (15). He would push his people half to death working on building city walls and fortresses. He would go "into the marketplace to the family house to sleep with the virgins" (17). When Gilgamesh had the dre...
He takes on the aspects of outward uncivility that matches his inside. Since Gilgamesh is not civilized, he doesn’t function as well in or outside of society. When he’s looking for immortality, he relies on his strength and his uncivilized nature rather than allowing civilization to lead him to immortality. If he had allowed himself to listen to the gods who were trying to help him, the perhaps he would have achieved immortality rather than “hindering his own progress by smashing the Stone Ones” (George, 75) who were planning on helping him. Some would argue that Gilgamesh’s civility does, however, grow immensely through the epic. Since he starts off as a king and is able to do anything he wishes due to not having anyone trying to usurp him. Even when Enkidu comes into the story to stop Gilgamesh, he never succeeds. Instead they join forces, yet Gilgamesh does not gain civility and instead stays incredibly savage and fights together with Enkidu, battling demons like Humbaba and killing him for glory. It’s not till Enkidu dies and Gilgamesh realizes that he can in fact be affected by death and the gods despite being two thirds god himself. There’s no real evidence that Gilgamesh truly change. While the epic ends with Gilgamesh wearing his royal robes “fitting his dignity” (George, 97) and eventually accepting that not only will he not be granted
In the beginning of the story, the titular character, Gilgamesh, is highly regarded as the great king who built the city of Uruk: “And who, like Gilgamesh, can proclaim, ‘I am king!’ Gilgamesh was singled out from the day of his birth, two-thirds of him was divine, one-third of him was human! The Lady of Birth drew his body’s image, the God of Wisdom brought his stature to perfection” (100-01). Immediately at the start of the story, Gilgamesh is polarized as an extraordinary being,
In Gilgamesh, he fights Humbaba with Enkidu, his best friend. Humbaba is the guardian of the Cedar Forest who was assigned by the god Enlil. Gilgamesh doesn't fight for the world, but he has his own reasons. In the text, it states, “Even if I fail I will have made a lasting name for myself’’ (181). In other words, Gilgamesh's motivation to slaughter Humbaba is not just to get rid of evil but to let his people remember him. Gilgamesh is being selfish because if he's dead, Uruk won't have a ruler, which means Uruk will be out of control. The choice Gilgamesh makes causes him not to care about Uruk but only himself. However, the encounter of Enkidu's death has turned Gilgamesh into another person. He couldn't confront the truth that Enkidu has died. Enkidu was more than a best friend to him, he was a brother whom he loved. Because of his love for Enkidu, Gilgamesh builds a statue so everyone in Uruk will remember him. This demonstrates Gilgamesh changing from selfish to selfless. This change is part of Gilgamesh's transformations towards becoming a hero. Gilgamesh changes as a result of Enkidu's death. According to the text, it states, “Gilgamesh interferes in the lives of his subjects beyond his right as king”(175). This proves that Gilgamesh was bothering and annoying the people of Uruk. Gilgamesh is going to become king soon and he shouldn’t disregard or interfere with his subject’s private life.
As an epic focused on the exploits of a partially divine king, Gilgamesh is deeply concerned with power and authority, particularly as they relate to what it means to be a good king. This theme is established at the outset of the epic, Enkidu’s creation is a response to the absoluteness of Gilgamesh’s power, although this successfully abates Gilgamesh’s brutal treatment of his people, it is Enkidu’s death that permanently alters his behavior. Enkidu’s demise at the hands of the gods is more than a deep personal loss, Gilgamesh’s impotence to prevent the death is an unprecedented inversion in the dynamics of power that catalyzes Gilgamesh’s shift from an abusive and irresponsible king to a mature ruler.
Some of Gilgamesh’s qualities are that he had a “beauty… surpassing all others” and was “two thirds… god and one third man” (13). Before Enkidu, Gilgamesh acted horribly. He was a terrible ruler and a terrible man. Gilgamesh was not all good, for example, “his lust leaves no virgin to her lover, neither the warrior’s daughter nor the wife of the noble…” (13). He was a terrible ruler. Gilgamesh was arrogant, but very powerful in his country. His people had no choice but to listen to him. They were forced to go along with his unlawfulness and stubbornness.
Firstly, I will talk about the things he did that I disliked. Gilgamesh was very arrogant, and his arrogance did not have a limit, he did whatever he want and whenever. “Gilgamesh sounds the tocsin for his amusement, his arrogance has no bounds by day or night (The epic of Gilgamesh by N.K Sanders pg. 62)”. Because of how arrogant he was, the citizens of his kingdom prayed to the gods to create someone to contend with him so he can stop disturbing them and so they can live in the kingdom with peace. “You made him, O Aruru, now create his equal; let it be as like him as his own reflection, his second self, stormy heart for stormy heart. Let them contend together and leave Uruk in quiet (The Epic of Gilgamesh by N.K Sanders pg. 62).” This quote shows how the people of the kingdom were
The story itself reflects an image of the cultural situation in which it was conceived. One major difference between this ancient society and our own is the way in which we sustain our leaders. Gilgamesh's character, whether based on an actual person or not, is portrayed as a very powerful and proud person. He was created to be better and stronger than common man and he is favored by the gods. This portrayal of a super-human king indicates a deep respect for leadership by those who told this story. Likely, these people lived under the rule of a monarchy in which the King was the all powerful leader and lawmaker. In today's society though, it is not common for one person to have unlimited power. Our governments are designed to divide ruling power between numerous parties; in order to keep any one person from becoming all powerful. Today's society would not tolerate a king who could do as he pleases, even if he were a noble and just man. In the story, Gilgamesh's super-human strength and power are not always convenient to his subjects. "His arrogance has no bounds", and "his lust leaves no virgin to her lover," yet the people respect his authority. The supremacy of Gilgamesh in the story reflects the feelings toward leadership held by that society which created the story. The respect they had for an all powerful monarch is hard for us to understand today. Our society looks down on those who rule as dictators and labels them tyrants and enemies. It is odd to imagine living in a society where a king is to be respected.
Aristotle’s thoughts on ethics conclude that all humans must have a purpose in life in order to be happy. I believe that some of the basics of his ideas still hold true today. This essay points out some of those ideas.
Many themes are incorporated into the story line of Gilgamesh. These include three very important concepts: death is inevitable, immortality is unachievable, and friendship is a necessity.