Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative impact of nuclear energy
Nuclear energy negative effects
Nuclear energy introduction essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative impact of nuclear energy
Harman Sidhu
Robison
Sophomore Honors English
23 May 2016
Nuclear Energy
“The sun uses nuclear fission to fuse hydrogen atoms into helium atoms” (Davor). Since Einstein and others first realized the power of nuclear fusion, we have worked towards harnessing the energy of nuclear fusion to make power. However, it wasn’t originally meant to make power, instead we adapted the technology in the 1940s for the purpose of making atomic bombs. Since the cold war ended, nuclear disarmament has begun and nuclear energy has become much more prominent as an energy provider. Nuclear energy works by creating a reaction inside a reactor and using the heat produced by the reaction to drive turbines. Seems relatively safe but nuclear disasters such as the
…show more content…
But a common argument for nuclear energy is that it is actually cleaner compared to the nonrenewable energy industries such as the fossil fuel industry. Although it may be true that nuclear has much less carbon emissions it can be argued that it is overall much more destructive to the environment. Linda Harvey an environmentalist and a journalist who has written multiple times on nuclear energy states that “Apart from Innumerable poorly publicized incidents, the major ones are Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukushima. Chernobyl has by some estimates resulted in up to 800,000 premature deaths” (Harvey). Not only is the environment effected but the humans that live near a nuclear disaster are also effected. Radiation destroys living tissues and is detrimental to human or any life (Harvey) . Harvey also points out that. “The nuclear industry not only digs up and distributes buried natural radioactivity while mining uranium, it renders the uranium hundreds of thousands of times more radioactive by the process of nuclear fission in currently operating power-generating reactors . The waste it leaves is fiercely radioactive and must be segregated from all biological organisms for thousands of years” (Harvey). Nuclear energy not only destroys the area where the waste is stored but it also renders most of the place where it’s mined out of useless and bare of life. Wherever the waste is stored life cannot grow so it’s much worse for the environment compared to carbon emissions from fossil fuels which have only shown to raise the global temperature not completely devastate an ecosystem. But the waste isn’t the only problem that nuclear energy has as explained by the Green peace organization. “In the contaminated regions around Chernobyl, for example, there has been a sharp increase in thyroid cancer, severe mental retardation due to prenatal exposure,
There are many sources of energy today, and the best source of it is constantly being sought after, one source stands out above the rest. Nuclear energy is simple in theory, yet it may be one of the most controversial sources of power. Nuclear energy works using reactors built to split the atoms (nuclear fission) of the fuel to produce heat. This heat evaporates the cooling agent (usually water) into steam which turns turbines to create electricity. Nuclear energy should be allowed, because it produces an abundance of electricity, as well as being a clean source of energy with no harmful emissions. Nuclear energy is the future of clean, environmentally friendly energy.
Nuclear power has no place in having a safe, clean, sustainable future. Today, the manufacturing of nuclear power plants has become a critical topic throughout the world that many strongly believe should be stopped. Nuclear Power is not safe anywhere in the world nor is it environmentally friendly. Nuclear power plants are truly something that could cause mass destruction in the world and has the potential to wipe out a whole country with ease. Despite proponents’ that claim that nuclear power is safe, there is a history that proves otherwise and marks a number of disasters caused by nuclear power plants.
Atomic bomb was the biggest turning point in modern history. A nuclear weapon is an explosive device that derives its destructive force from nuclear reactions. The use of nuclear weapons to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan wasn’t like any other weapons; it was more than that. Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki killed in total of 130,000 people in Japan. The aftermath of the atomic bomb, nuclear weapon, was much more serious and danger than anyone thought it was.
On and off, could it be that simple? Energy is there whenever we need it, so we think. It’s not as simple as turning the light switch, replacing light bulbs, and paying the electric bills. Our energy today is made mostly from coal, natural gas, oil, wind, solar, and nuclear. With depleting natural resources, we must begin to consider what will power our future. Although there are many challenges yet to be encountered and technology yet to be discovered, many say nuclear energy is becoming a major part of our future. However, nuclear meltdowns and disasters have many people and scientists questioning the possibility of having a nuclear powered world. What are the concerns and positive aspects of nuclear energy today? Could nuclear energy become a part of our future energy source?
Carbon, Max W. Nuclear Power: Villain or Victim?: Our Most Misunderstood Source of Electricity. Second ed. Madison, WI: Pebble Beach, 1997.
Nuclear waste still remains radioactive when disposed, and takes 10,000 years to neutralize. The waste can also be turned into weapons or bombs, these bombs can do lots of destruction. Bombs and weapons can be used by terrorists to blow up places, the bombs are so powerful they could blow up most if not all of a state. Not only is nuclear energy dangerous, it is very costly too. It takes about $9 million dollars to build a power plant,and $2 billion dollars to operate it.
8) "Interesting Energy Facts." : Nuclear Energy Has Great Potential. N.p., n.d. Web. 06 May 2014.
The energy industry is beginning to change. In today’s modern world, governments across the globe are shifting their focuses from traditional sources of power, like the burning coal and oil, to the more complex and scientific nuclear power supply. This relatively new system uses powerful fuel sources and produces little to no emissions while outputting enough energy to fulfill the world’s power needs (Community Science, n.d.). But while nuclear power seems to be a perfect energy source, no power production system is without faults, and nuclear reactors are no exception, with their flaws manifesting in the form of safety. Nuclear reactors employ complex systems involving pressure and heat. If any of these systems dysfunctions, the reactor can leak or even explode releasing tons of highly radioactive elements into the environment. Anyone who works at or near a nuclear reactor is constantly in danger of being exposed to a nuclear incident similar to the ones that occurred at the Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi plants. These major accidents along with the unresolved problems with the design and function of nuclear reactors, as well as the economic and health issues that nuclear reactors present serve to show that nuclear energy sources are not worth the service that they provide and are too dangerous to routinely use.
The production of nuclear has polluted vast amounts of soil and water around the world. Contaminants
The greatest disadvantages of nuclear energy are the risks posed to mankind and the environment by radioactive materials. ‘On average a nuclear plant annually generates 20 metric tons of used nuclear fuel cla...
The first reason is that, as mentioned above, nuclear power can cause major accidents like the Fukushima nuclear disaster, and is treacherous. It is considered safe when they are operating
Nuclear power, the use of exothermic nuclear processes to produce an enormous amount of electricity and heat for domestic, medical, military and industrial purposes i.e. “By the end of 2012 2346.3 kilowatt hours (KWh) of electricity was generated by nuclear reactors around the world” (International atomic energy agency Vienna, 2013, p.13). However, with that been said it is evident that the process of generating electricity from a nuclear reactor has numerous health and environmental safety issues.
To save words we not go into the basic details of these radiations but these radiations make the radioisotopes our friend or foe. These radiations revolve round the issue of their use and disposal. Interestingly, both use and disposal are issues of concern. Disposal is an issue because the waste is non-biodegradable and the harmful radiations from them could cause cancer and alter genes in the DNA etc. The use of radioactivity is by itself an issue. Is it safe to use? Where shall the nuclear power plant be located? Where will the waste go?
Media coverage of such cases have made the public less comfortable with the idea of moving further towards nuclear power and they only opt for reducing human activities to reduce global warming. It is true that there have been some notable disasters involving nuclear power, but compared to other power systems, nuclear power has an impressive track record. First, it is less harmful and second, it will be able to cater for the growing world population. Nuclear power produces clean energy and it delivers it at a cost that is competitive in the energy market (Patterson). According to the US Energy Information Administration, there are currently 65 such plants in the Unite States (National Research Council). They produce 19 percent of the total US energy generation.
The environment can also be damaged by radioactive waste. For instance, after the Chernobyl Accident, many trees located in 10 kilometers surrounding the plant were killed by the radiation levels. Nuclear energy is involved with the emission of carbon dioxide and the damage of environmental organisms through radiation damage, proving that nuclear