Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Successes and failures of pressure groups
Successes and failures of pressure groups
Discuss the effectiveness of the Law Commission
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Successes and failures of pressure groups
Influences of Law Reform Upon Parliament
There are many influences operating on parliament before and during
the legislative process. Explain and evaluate any three of these
influences, giving examples of how parliament has been persuaded to
introduce legislation.
Law reform means making a change to the law by improving what had
existed before. Law reform can be achieved by updating the law,
codification of the law and consolidation of statutes. There are many
different influences upon parliament for law reform. Three of these
influences are Law commissions, Royal commissions and pressure groups.
The law commission is the independent body established by the Law
Commission Act 1965 to keep the law of England and Wales under review
and recommend reforms when they are needed. The law commission is
important because it is the only full-time publicly funded body
established for the purpose of law reform. The law commission consists
of five commissioners plus support staff. The chairman is a high court
judge who is appointed for a term of three years. The other four
commissioners are solicitors, barristers or teachers of law. Each of
them is appointed by the Lord Chancellor for a term of five years and
may serve two terms. The law commission is an advisory body which
makes proposals for law reform but they also work on consolidation of
statutes and statute law revision. The law commission may select a
range of projects after consulting with bodies such as the bar, the
law society and academic lawyers and then produce a programme of
projects. A new programme is produced every four to five years. The
law commission decides what to put into its programme by considering
the importance of the issues, availability of resources and the
suitability of the issue. Teams of lawyers and research assistants
each headed by a law commissioner consider the reforms needed. Areas
of law are researched and a consultation paper is published with
proposals for reform. Anyone interested can respond and if a change to
the law is proposed a draft bill is added to the report and put before
You have been asked by the state representative to analyze and write a report on a very important piece of legislation. You have kept track of this legislation, but been having a...
A Constitution is a set of rules put in place to govern a country, by which the parliament, executive and judiciary must abide by in law making and administering justice. In many countries, these laws are easily changed, while in Australia, a referendum process must take place to alter the wording of the Constitution (Commonwealth of Australia, date unknown, South Australian Schools Constitutional Convention Committee 2001). Since the introduction of the Australian Constitution in January 1901, there have been sufficient proposals to alter and insert sections within the body to reflect the societal values of the day, ensuring the Constitution remains relevant to the Australian people. Although Constitutional reform can be made on a arrangement of matters, the latest protests on Indigenous recognition and racial references within the body of the Constitution has called into question the validity of racial inclusion, and whether amendments should be made to allow for recognition. This essay will focus on the necessity of these amendments and evaluate the likelihood of change through the process of referenda.
The procedure for approving a bill and making it a law involves many steps. The following description is a short summary from “How Our Laws are Made”, an in depth description of the legislative process that can found on the website of the Library of Congress. After a bill is drafted, a member...
In January 2011, the bill was referred to the committee, and the hearing was held in May of the same year for the House and Senate to change the wording of the 2008 version of the Massachusetts Law. Various interest groups a...
Bureaucratic agencies give information on the subject of the bill pressuring the congressional committees to listen to the interest groups and to pass the legislature.
First federal attempt to define eligibility for pretrial release using objective indicators such as danger to the community, as well as the risk of flight
The Effectiveness of the House of Commons as a Check on the Executive What is meant by the effectiveness of the commons check on the executive is basically, how able is the house of commons to prevent the Government (executive) from getting its own way or forcing its will upon the people of Britain. In theory the commons level of effectiveness is constant as each Member of Parliament has an opinion on every bill or motion that is put forward that is based on conscience. This is not practicable, however, as the party system and the party whips change this. The whips tell MPs which way to vote and can impose sanctions upon those MPs who rebel against the government.
...sues into one bill. The primary formal venture in the authoritative methodology happens when one or more parts of Congress present a bill. However from an advocate 's viewpoint, the work starts much sooner than that.
Reform Judaism started as a response to the Enlightenment that occurred in the late 17th and the early 18th century. The Jewish people needed to determine how to best combine new ideologies with their religious practices. The Jewish people suddenly had a new, non-Jewish world that they could be apart of. Some started to lose interest in religion. The Reform Judaism movement was created to adapt to these changes in society. The movement’s fundamental belief was that religious change is good (Kaplan 183). Platforms were created to define the boundaries for Reform Judaism and show how the Reform Movement is different than the traditional form of Judaism (Meyer & Plaut 195). The Reform movement has undergone many significant changes of their ideologies including Israel and the Halacha. These changes display their core idea of adapting Judaism to the social environments but simultaneously always keeping the Jewish community bound together. These changes are made from 1885 to 1999 with the Pittsburgh Platform, Columbus Principles, and Statement of Principles.
Parliamentary sovereignty, a core principle of the UK's constitution, essentially states that the Parliament is the ultimate legal authority, which possesses the power to create, modify or end any law. The judiciary cannot question its legislative competence, and a Parliament is not bound by former legislative provisions of earlier Parliaments. The ‘rule of law’ on the other hand, is a constitutional doctrine which primarily governs the operation of the legal system and the manner in which the powers of the state are exercised. However, since the Parliament is capable of making any law whatsoever, the concept of the rule of law poses a contradiction to the principle of parliamentary supremacy, entailing that Parliament is not bound by the Rule of Law, and it can exercise power arbitrarily.
head of the committee. He presented a report on the proposed articles to the Congress on July
There were many reasons why between 1830 and 1832 parliamentary reform became a big and unyielding issue on the political landscape. The industrial revolution was in full swing, discontent was rife and consequently revolutionary ideas were materialising. But how did the parliamentary reform gain momentum and become such a significant matter among so many other pressing conflicts and issues?
West Virginia Legislature. (2011). How a bill becomes a law. Retrieved October 14, 2011, from
First, in the long process of a bill becoming a law is introducing a bill. After someone from Congress in either chamber has come up with an idea for a bill they must introduce it. For members of the House of Representatives this is easy. All they have to do is put their idea in a mahogany box at the front of the chamber called the hopper. Now for a Senator to introduce a bill they must either hand it to the clerk of the Senate or they must talk about it in a presentation to their peers in a floor speech. Sometimes though Senators can cut down this process by adding their bill as an amendment to legislation that is already being processed. This saves them a lot of time. Also, new ideas for bills are labeled depending on what chamber they come from. Bills from the house will always be labeled with an H.R. with its number behind it. Well bills from the Senate will always be labeled with an S. followed by its number.
This source simply explains to me what my bill is and what stage of process it is in committee.