Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay from Henrik Ibsen, "the doll's house
SYMBOLISM IN THE PLAY _ A DOLL'S HOUSE _ by HENRIK IBSEN
Essay from Henrik Ibsen, "the doll's house
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Romantic movement of the nineteenth century in Europe involved those who wished to express their disapproval of industrialism. Romantics focus on individualism as well as images and ideas created by the imagination. Romantics are very centered around a certain beauty and power of nature as opposed to material objects. Romantics stay away from the more realistic part of life, this is greatly expressed in Romantic literature and art. Specifically, in Arthur Rimbaud’s “Ophelia” it is evident to see the fascination with nature as well as the individual. He states, “On the calm black wave where the stars sleep/ Floats white Ophelia like a great lily,/ Floats very slowly, lying in her long veils . . .”(891). Here there is evidence of a Romantic’s …show more content…
entrancement with both individualism, exemplified by this woman, as well as the natural world. Romantics believe in the natural goodness of human nature, and in the strength of humanity. To contrast Romanticism, Realists go against most Romantic principals. Realists compare with Romantics by also rejecting industrialism, however this is showed in a way that represents the harsh and negative effects in a very concrete and even sometimes morbid way. Romantics tend to replace the harsh effects of industrialism with a focus on nature. To continue, Romantics focus more on the individual while Realists tend to focus on the community. Realist views often express real world ideas and problems that are practical and are happening around them. Often, human flaws in society and human cruelty as well as political issues. The plots of Realistic literature may be very ordinary and practical as opposed to the more surreal fantasy of the imagination that is exemplified by Romantic literature. During the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, both Realism and Romanticism were fairly new styles of writing that captured the interests of many. One of the largest contrasting ideas these two styles of writing posses is the focus on individualism. A Realist work such as Guy De Maupassant's “Two Friends” as well as the play “A Doll House” written by Henrik Ibsen demonstrates a focus on the community, the greater good and a higher power. Opposing to those literary works, Romantic pieces “The Lorelei” by Heinrich Heine and the poem “I Have Visited Again” by Alexander Pushkin exemplify a Romantics strong focal point on individualism. Romantics convey the idea of individualism in their literary works. Specifically in the Romantic poem “The Lorelei” written by Heinrich Heine. The poem has many elements of nature while being centered entirely around a irresistible sea nymph. Heine writes A girl sits high up there; Her golden jewelry glistens, She combs her golden hair. With a comb of gold she combs it (879). In the poem the nymph is being glorified and the imagery shows her high and secluded. There is many Romantic elements in this poem, however individualism is largely expressed. There is a very evident focus on the subject as can be seen in some of the last lines: The boatman hears, with an anguish More wild than was ever known; He’s blind to the rocks around him; His eyes are for her alone. (879) There is a strong focus that sets the sea nymph on a pedestal of beauty and perfection, thus exemplifying the Romantics transfixation with individualism. Another example of this focus is seen in “Ophelia” by Arthur Rimbaud. Ophelia is a woman whose troubles with Hamlet are represented while being completely focused on her emotions alone. “And he has seen on the water, lying in her long veils,/ White Ophelia floating, like a great lily” (889). Here Ophelia is passed away, death being a lonely and individual event. Leading up to Ophelia's death is the description of nature embracing her and Ophelia is the only focus of the poem. While Romantics are focused on the individual, Realist literature puts more emphasis on what is best for the community as a whole, and less on the idea that the government only is there to serve the individuals who created it. In the short story “Two Friends” written by Guy de Maupassant, the theme contrasting Individualism in Romantic literature is seen when two men decide to keep silent about a password needed by German soldiers. This story addresses self-sacrifice, not only thinking what is best for oneself but what is best for everyone. In this case it was shown by the two fisherman who took a daily walk and ran into four German soldiers. These men happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time and were asked to tell the Germans the password needed to get back across French lines. The officer goes on to say “No one will ever know. You will go back placidly. The secret will disappear with you. If you refuse, it is immediate death. Choose.” (910) Clear of the penalty for not telling them, the two friends chose to continue to stay silent. They are making a decision of self-sacrifice and loyalty to their country. Though unclear if they actually know the password, even if they do not, the two simple French fishermen still choose to keep silent. A Realist is in favor of devotion and allegiance to the government because they ultimately know what is best not for them, but for their country. This contrasts to Romanticisms focus on Individualism because in this particular Realist piece the author writes a concern dealing with loyalty to the government. The play A Doll's House by Henrik Ibsen is a prime example of a Realist work that demonstrates the contrast to Individualism.
To start, in this play the main character Nora is portrayed to be the perfect nineteenth-century wife to her husband Torvald. Not only that, but Nora is also painted in a way that characterizes her as a bubbly air-head that is not able to take care of herself or have a mind of her own. Ibsen wirtes “HELMER: Nora, Nora, how like a woman! No, but seriously, Nora, you know what I think about that. No debts! Never borrow! Something of freedom’s lost—and something of beauty, too—from a home that’s founded on borrowing and debt. We’ve made a brave stand up to now, the two of us; and we’ll go right on like that the little while we have to. NORA [going toward the stove ]: Yes, whatever you say, Torvald.” (944)Since Realists go against individuals having freedom of action over a state control, Torvald Helmer can be seen as representing a government while Nora represents a citizen with no say in any matter. Torvald uses the term “like a woman” to denounce Nora's inability to handle money, thus belittling her. Nora still complies to Torvalds wishes, giving up her voice rather easily while she only does what is best for her greater power. Furthermore, Nora obtains money from her father before he dies to support the trip to Italy because Torvald was ill and needed to go in order to get help. This shows that Nora did was only thinking about her husband, the higher power she obeys, and put herself last. This also exemplifies a Realist concern with community benefit, not
individual. Returning back to Romanticism, “I Have Visited Again” by Alexander Pushkin is a literary example of individualism. Pushkin writes his own thoughts and observations when he returns to this place ten years later after exile. Romantics are more interested in an individual's thoughts, to be separated from the masses. “Here are the wooded slopes where often I / Sat motionless, and looked down at the lake”(877). Here Pushkin is reflecting and remembering what he would do when he lived in the place her returned to. This shows the relationship between individualism and Romanticism by having Pushkin's life remembered and described, which is the entire focus of the poem. To continue, Alexander Pushkin writes: But now that I am here again, the past Has flown out eagerly to embrace me, claim me, And it seems that only yesterday I wandered Within these groves (876). Pushkin is by himself, and the writing focuses on his own encounters, thoughts and past. ARealist writer would not separate and individual from a mass. Realism and Romanticism are two very different styles of writing that many took a liking to in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. While both were a reaction against industrialism, the movements dealt with the problem in very contrasting ways. Romantics portrayed a very strong focal point on individualism as opposed to the Realist concern with the community and its benefit.
In the play A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen, several literary lenses can be used to better help understand the storyline. The most prominent lens used throughout this play is gender. It plays a large role in the story A Doll’s House. Nora, the protagonist is faced with many challenges because of the normalities of 19th century society. She must overcome these difficulties throughout the play.
5. Ford, Karen. "Social contrains and painful growth in A Doll's House". Expanded Academic ASAP. Methodist College , Fayetteville , NC . 30 Octuber 2005
Phylogeny versus misogyny, arguable one of the greatest binary oppositions in a work of literature, is present in Henrik Ibsen’s 1879 Norwegian play A Doll’s House. The title itself suggests a misogynist view, while the work mainly consists of feminist ideology, as Ibsen was a supporter of the female as an independent, rather than a dependent on a male. Nora knew herself that her husband did not fully respect her, and this became a major conflict in the play as Nora progressively became more self-reliant in the play. Ibsen created Nora to give an example for all women, showing that they are more than what their husbands make of them. The misogynistic views in the play can be seen through Nora’s husband Torvald, due to the fact that he believed, as the majority of males did at the time, that women were not equal to them socially. This opposition caused a major conflict between the couple that progressed throughout the stage production.
The characters of this play help to support Ibsen's opinions. Nora's initial characteristics are that of a bubbly, child-like wife who is strictly dependent on her husband. This subordinate role from which Nora progresses emphasizes the need for change in society's view of women. For Nora, her inferior, doll-like nature is a facade for a deeper passion for individuality that begins to surface during the play and eventually fully emerges in the ending. An example of this deep yearning for independence is shown when Nora tells her friend, Kristina Linde about earning her own money by doing copying. Nora explains, "it was tremendous fun sitting [in her room] working and earning money. It was almost like being a man" (A Doll's House, 162). Mrs. Linde is an inspiration to Nora, because Kristina has experienced the independence that Nora longs for.
Weintraub, Stanley. ""Doll's House" Metaphor Foreshadowed in Victorian Fiction." Nineteenth-Century Fiction 13: 67-69. Web. 6 Jan. 2011.
An underlying theme in A Doll's House, by Henrik Ibsen, is the rebellion against social expectations to follow what one believes in their heart. This theme is demonstrated as several of the play's characters break away from the social norms of their time and act on their own beliefs. No one character demonstrates this better than Nora. Nora rebels against social expectations, first by breaking the law, and later by taking the drastic step of abandoning her husband and children.
Those of you who have just read A Doll's House for the first time will, I suspect, have little trouble forming an initial sense of what it is about, and, if past experience is any guide, many of you will quickly reach a consensus that the major thrust of this play has something to do with gender relations in modern society and offers us, in the actions of the heroine, a vision of the need for a new-found freedom for women (or a woman) amid a suffocating society governed wholly by unsympathetic and insensitive men.
“A principal tenet of Marxist criticism is that human consciousness is a product of social conditions and that human relationships are often subverted by and through economic considerations.”(Witham and Lutterbie) A Doll’s House, by Henrik Ibsen, can be interpreted and critiqued in many different ways. One of these ways is the Marxist approach. This way of thinking can basically be summed up by saying this: Money changes people’s thinking and actions. The main characters in A Doll’s House are all affected by this idea and it makes the acquisition of money and a higher social status the most important thing to them. Therefore, a Marxist theme is shown throughout the play through the speech and actions of Nora, Torvald, Mrs. Linde, and Krogstad.
In the time this play was written, women had very few rights in public society. Ibsen reflects this by portraying Nora as having very few rights in the household. Torvald runs everything, and Nora has no say in how the house is run.
In Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll House Ibsen describes the perfect family and the conflicts within. Ibsen examines the normal lives of the Helmer family through the eyes of the wife, Nora Helmer. She goes through a series of trials as she progresses through the play and with each trial she realizes something is missing in her life. Ibsen examines the struggles within the house.
[This is the text of a lecture delivered, in part, in Liberal Studies 310 at Malaspina University-College, Nanaimo, BC, Canada. References to Ibsen's text are to the translation by James McFarlane and Jens Arup (Oxford: OUP, 1981). This text is in the public domain, released July 2000]
A Doll House Essay Ibsen said that his mission in life was to “Inspire individuals to freedom and independence” which was shown throughout the play A Doll House. Since he wrote modern theatre, the characters were real and audiences could relate to them. He particularly questioned the role of men and women during his time. Ibsen used A Doll House to motivate women so they would seek more power and freedom in their relationships. Audiences could then look up to characters such as Nora and Mrs Linde whom were independent, some what ahead of their times.
sure the children don’t see it till it’s decorated this evening”(Ibsen 892). There is also a
He is a husband who is “proud to be a man”; and hence constantly patronizes Nora in a playful manner calling her “feather brain”, implying that as a feminine figure she is inferior to him. Although Nora is constantly chided as if she were a child, an audience with Ibsen’s context would see Torvald’s treatment of Nora as flattering and desirable.... ... middle of paper ... ... Once again, what conclusions modern feminists may draw from the play are shaped by their context.
Societal problems prevail throughout the history of the world and exist within all countries, regions, and cultures. The controversial aspects in societies are based on a large variety of subjects, and have to be identified in order to cause societal change. Therefore, Realism is the portrayal of difficulties in societies that are depicted in everyday life, which includes common situations and actions. Realism allows authors to describe and emphasize the incompetence of some aspects within communities, while enabling writers to call for societal reform. Henrik Ibsen portrays and addresses the concepts of Norway’s society in the 19th century in A Doll House, which is a tragic play translated by Rolf Fjelde. Ibsen desires to challenge assumptions as well as rules of Norwegian life, and most importantly wants to depict society accurately, as he meticulously incorporates everyday life. Therefore, A Doll House represents a Realistic drama due to the issues involving women, illnesses, and laws within the play, while conveying Ibsen’s desire of controversy and change in Norway’s society.