Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Tribes in india thesis introduction
The indigenous people's history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Tribes in india thesis introduction
A lot can be said about the 500 years of struggle and despair brought on Native Americans especially during the early 1870s through the late 1930s when the United States government declared to instruct various assimilation policies as a fixation to “Indian problems”. Due to the strong concerns of the children’s wellbeing and the failing patrilineal state system to recognize traditional Indian culture, the federal government ratified the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) of 1978. Today, the state of this law situates the protection and promotion of Indian children to remain within Indian country as well as has been a great benefactor in American Indian court cases involving Indian children. The ICWA was established due to the “disproportionately …show more content…
Granted by United States Congress, the American Indian people had complete “control of decisions involving Indian children” (Josephy). The 1978 law incorporates the larger issue of Indian sovereignty. Sovereignty is more than just the control of land, mineral rights, or hunting and fishing rights, it overall consists the aspect of social, political and tribal life. “It includes the right to one’s children, as well as jurisdictional control over decisions affecting children’s lives” (Holt). The Indian Child Welfare Act oversees the “order of preference for adoption priority descended from a member of the child’s extended family, an enrolled member of the tribe, Indian families not of the same tribe and finally, non-Indian adoptive parents” (Holt). These preferences for adoption referred those who were to be adopted as well as those in foster care. “These priorities dramatically reversed the federal and state policy that had led to the loss of thousands of Indian children from their tribal communities” …show more content…
For having the State of California to involved in this case was that both the foster parents were not allowing the child’s relatives to visit the child and not having to keep an ongoing relationship with the child’s siblings. Disappointed, the foster parents Summer and Russell Page had to give up their child to social services and soon after began a five-year battle with the court system. “The Choctaw Nation is pleased that the California District Court of Appeals has upheld the lower court’s decision to place Lexi with her extended family and sisters in Utah,” the tribe said in a statement released Friday night. “This has been the tribe’s objective under the Indian Child Welfare Act for more than three years. However, the trial court’s prior orders were repeatedly appealed and delayed by the foster family who knew the expected outcome under the law
It had previously been the policy of the American government to remove and relocate Indians further and further west as the American population grew, but there was only so much...
Through Laws, treaties and proclamations it becomes clear of the transfer of power between Native Americas and colonizing powers within the US and Canada. One significant treaty was Treaty NO. 9 in which Native Americans gave up their aboriginal title and land for money, hunting right, entrance into the christian school system and a Canadian flag presented to the Chief. The treaties described define the cascading effect of how western powers came into control of land at which Native Americans resided in. Specifically converging on the using Native Americans “elites” to influence other Native Americans into adopting western cultural beliefs, overshadowing the diverse Native American cultural practices. The overshadowing and belittling of Native American culture is not only expressed through the several treaties presented to Native Americans across history but also through real life accounts of Native American children adopted into the western school system. This sections places into the prospective the monopolization of Native American land and
Tribal lands were not all purely native Americans. Interracial marriages encouraged the potential for bully and abuse within their own tribal lands. This encouraged formal acts of government within the tribes such as, court trials that resulted in the extension of Native American sovereignty. But it also allowed for the tribes to govern themselves “legal grey areas” which were clearly evident to the Native Americans and many conflicts arose because of the procrastination of fixing the problem at hand. Native Americans have fought against the suppression of rights and discrimination but persevered adopting new rights to vote, along with the ability to self-govern their own communities and deal with their own domestic laws under the United States of
The case Worcester v. Georgia (1832) was a basis for the discussion of the issue of states' rights versus the federal government as played out in the administration of President Andrew Jackson and its battle with the Supreme Court. In addition to the constitutional issues involved, the momentum of the westward movement and popular support for Indian resettlement pitted white man against Indian. All of these factors came together in the Worcester case, which alarmed the independence of the Cherokee Nation, but which was not enforced. This examines the legal issues and tragic consequences of Indian resettlement.
Talking Back to Civilization: Indian Voices from the Progressive Era edited by Frederick E. Hoxie is a book which begins with an introduction into the life of Charles Eastman and a brief overview of the history of Native Americans and their fight for justice and equal rights, it then continues by describing the different ways and avenues of speaking for Indian rights and what the activists did. This leads logically into the primary sources which “talk back” to the society which had overrun their own. The primary sources immerse the reader into another way of thinking and cause them to realize what our societal growth and even foundation has caused to those who were the true natives. The primary sources also expand on the main themes of the book which are outlines in the introduction. They are first and most importantly talking back to the “pale faces”, Indian education, religion, American Indian policy, the image of the Indians presented in America. The other chapters in the book further expanded on these ideas. These themes will be further discussed in the following chapters along with a review of this
For several hundred years people have sought answers to the Indian problems, who are the Indians, and what rights do they have? These questions may seem simple, but the answers themselves present a difficult number of further questions and answers. State and Federal governments have tried to provide some order with a number of laws and policies, sometimes resulting in state and federal conflicts. The Federal Government's attempt to deal with Indian tribes can be easily understood by following the history of Federal Indian Policy. Indians all over the United States fought policies which threatened to destroy their familial bonds and traditions. The Passamaquoddy Indian Tribe of Maine, resisted no less than these other tribes, however, thereby also suffering a hostile anti-Indian environment from the Federal Government and their own State, Maine. But because the Passamaquoddy Tribe was located in such a remote area, they escaped many federal Indian policies.
In 1887 the federal government launched boarding schools designed to remove young Indians from their homes and families in reservations and Richard Pratt –the leader of Carlisle Indian School –declared, “citizenize” them. Richard Pratt’s “Kill the Indian… and save the man” was a speech to a group of reformers in 1892 describing the vices of reservations and the virtues of schooling that would bring young Native Americans into the mainstream of American society.
This program is part of the PBS series American Experience. In this episode, a critical eye is cast on the early efforts by Congress to "civilize" Native Americans. This homogenization process required the removal of Native American children from their homes and placing them in special Indian schools. Forced to stay for years at a time without returning home, children were required to eschew their own language and culture and learn instead the ways of the white man. Archival photographs and clips, newspaper accounts, journals, personal recollections, and commentary by historians relate the particulars of this era in American History and its ultimate demise. ~ Rose of Sharon Winter, All Movie Guide
The history of Indian Child Welfare Act derived from the need to address the problems with the removal of Indian children from their communities. Native American tribes identified the problem of Native American children being raised by non-native families when there were alarming numbers of children being removed from their h...
In regard to law, Deloria defines the relationship between the US Government and the Indians as paternalistic. The US Government treated and governed the Indians as a father would by providing basic needs but without given them rights. There has been some improvement with the Indian Reorganization Act in 1934. This act allowed the return to local self-government on a tribal level and restored the self management of their assets. By allowing the Indians to self govern it encouraged an economic foundation for the inhabitants of Indian reservations. Unfortunately only a few tribes have fully taken advantage of this act, while others continue to struggle for survival.
The Indian Removal Act drove thousands of natives off their tribal lands and forced them west to new reservations. Then again, there are those who defend Jackson's decision stating that Indian removal was necessary for the advancement of the United States. However, the cost and way of removing the natives was brutal and cruel. The opposition fails to recognize the fact that Jackson’s removal act had promised the natives payment, food, and protection for their cooperation, but Jackson fails to deliver any of these promises. Furthermore, in “Indian removal,” an article from the Public Broadcasting Service, a description of the removal of the Cherokee nation is given.
Our Indian legislation generally rests on the principle, that the aborigines are to be kept in a condition of tutelage and treated as wards or children of the State. …the true interests of the aborigines and of the State alike require...
Throughout history, the government has been in charge of creating and regulating different types of laws. Many of the laws have been created to protect those who reside in that country and therefore are expected to be followed. However, not everyone believes that they should follow the law and in return decide to either ignore them or rebel against them. When members of society violate the simple law that has been set in place to protect those who do not possess the capability to protect themselves, it becomes a dangerous and horrendous tragedy. One of the most horrific laws that people violate is that of child abuse and neglect.
The Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), while important during its inception, is no longer necessary or in the best interest of the child, because its application has proven to be arbitrary with no uniform application. This paper will discuss the history and purpose behind the implementation of the ICWA, as well as the jurisdictional and procedural issues of ICWA. Further, I will discuss the primary reasons why the ICWA is no longer necessary in its current state. Lastly, I will propose a uniform system that would limit the reach of ICWA while still protecting the Native American culture. I. History and Purpose of the Indian Child Welfare Act.
Political Sovereignty Sovereignty: supreme power or authority; the authority of a state to govern itself or another state . It is the history that proves that “tribal self-determination is, of course, an inherent attribute of tribal sovereignty, cherished and fiercely guarded by Indian people against all efforts to deprive tribes of this fundamental right” (La Velle). Tribal sovereignty is the immemorial right natives have endeavored to gain and to be self-governed. Federal Indian Laws are the yoke of the trials and tribulations that contributed to the identity of Indians today. Initially, it was the United States Government that legally gained access to tribal lands and membership rolls; now it is Tribes themselves who are following the