Analysis Of Richard Pratt: Kill The Indian And Save The Man

1072 Words3 Pages

Richard Pratt: Kill the Indian… and save the man In 1887 the federal government launched boarding schools designed to remove young Indians from their homes and families in reservations and Richard Pratt –the leader of Carlisle Indian School –declared, “citizenize” them. Richard Pratt’s “Kill the Indian… and save the man” was a speech to a group of reformers in 1892 describing the vices of reservations and the virtues of schooling that would bring young Native Americans into the mainstream of American society. As I read through the excerpt Richard Pratt states that we as Americans “have not yet learned our lesson.” After many years of oppressing the black man, mistreating them, beating them, seeing the black race as something less of a human being, was highly hypocritical coming from Americans whom wrote in the doctrine of our Declaration that “ all men are created free and equal” and of the clause in our Constitution that forbade “any abridgment on the right of citizens on account of race, color, or previous condition.” African Americans were not offered schooling programs; they were separated from their family, sold to work as a slave for the …show more content…

His logos were, for one, very convincing. When he spoke of the African Americans ability to endure civil customs even when they were invisible to society became a perfect example of his following prospect on the Native Americans and his disapproval on the reservations, and his usage of pathos also played a key role in convincing us to give the Natives a shot at being one with the nation. Especially when he speaks directly to the audience and asks, “Why not try the Indians? Why not invite them into experiences in our communities? Why always invite and compel them to remain a people unto themselves?” If there were no reformers like Richard Pratt I believe that the Native Americans would be no more than the dirt we step on

Open Document