Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nike vs adidas compare and contrast
Recommendation of Nike
Evaluation of Nike
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nike vs adidas compare and contrast
Inconsistent Shoe Quality From Nike Inc
General Comments
Due to the continuous amount of complaints we have been receiving every week since the release of the new Jordan line shoes on November 1st, 2008, we can’t help but be concerned. Nike is currently the largest and most respected athletic wear company in the world, but we might lose our respectable reputation if we do not fix this problem. Over the past years, our revenues have been increasing on average of about 8% a year; but recently over the last 5 years, our revenue growth has slowed down and our competitor’s revenues have increased dramatically gaining more dividends in the market. With a slower projected growth, we can not afford to lose any more of our business to our competitors. Therefore, immediate action must be taken to solve this problem at hand to keep our reputation of being the best and at the top of the industry.
Mission Statement
We at Nike are here to serve our customers and the community. We have been considered as the industry’s best and we hope to continue to uphold that position by delivering the best to our customers. The purpose of this report is to investigate the complaints we have been receiving about the inconsistent shoe quality from Nike Inc. and find solutions and recommendations to solve this problem. This report addresses the root cause of the problem, the implications resulting from the problem, and the recommended plan of action our investigation team has concluded on. This report has been written so as to guide the reader through the problem, stress on the resulted implications, and recommend a solution for the problem.
Background
Nike Inc. was founded in 1964 by track athlete Phil Knight and his coach Bill Bowerman. The company initially started off as a distributor for a Japanese shoe manufacturer called Onitsuka Tiger. Nike first started selling their products out of coach Bowermans Dodge Caravan at athletic events such as track meets or football games. With the support of the top NCAA athletes in the Oregon area wearing Nike shoes, the shoes became very popular and in 1966, the company became independent and opened their own retail store in Portland, Oregon. During the 1970’s, the company’s revenue increased rapidly and soon the company had professional athletes endorsing their products. With all the mainstream success and recognition, Nike Inc. grew into the Fortune 500 company it is today.
The problem of the inconsistent shoe quality from Nike Inc.
In an increasingly competitive market with strong rivals such as Reebok, Adidas, Nike’s latest strategy is offering consumers the shoes they desire. This is done by providing customers with the option of designing their own shoes. At Nikeid.c...
Nike is a worldwide known business that many people around the globe are attracted to purchase. They make a variety of products ranging from shoes and clothes to sports gear, sports products, and many different accessories. Nike is designed for everyone ranging from infants to elderly. Because of their range of age for products, this makes them a huge competitor. Being able to appeal to all ages and styles of people.
The corporation should invest more money in research and innovation since this is what has helped them to make a product that rivals their competitors. At the same time, it is imperative for them to improve their machinery for cheap labor costs which will help the company increase its production allowing it to meet the demand in the market. By improving production leading to lower costs of making shoes, apparel, and equipment, Nike will achieve higher demand assuming a quality product is maintained in that process. They will stand a better chance of competing in the industry (Hill, 2009). The organization is already in a better position for meeting the demand, customer taste, and needs. The company should improve quality by focusing on developing lightweight products that are more durable compared to those offered by the competitors. Also, Nike can keep up their success by continuing to reinvent and improve their items and continue to meet the current demand by using new technology. It can also use the Internet to communicate with consumers (Hill, 2009). By developing new technology, Nike will allow the customers to suggest and design their shoes online. To achieve this goal, it is fundamental to enhance areas such as their website to make it more user-friendly. Finally, the company should pay attention to small startup organizations that enter the
Only a week earlier, on June 28, 2001, Nike had held an analysts' meeting to disclose its fiscal-year 2001 results.1 The meeting, however, had another purpose: Nike management wanted to communicate a strategy for revitalizing the company. Since 1997, its revenues had plateaued at around $9 billion, while net income had fallen from almost $800 million to $580 million (see Exhibit 1). Nike's market share in U.S. athletic shoes had fallen from 48%, in 1997, to 42% in 2000.2 In addition, recent supply-chain issues and the adverse effect of a strong dollar had negatively affected revenue.
Nike was first known as Blue Ribbon Sports, founded by University of Oregon track athlete Philip Knight and his coach Bill Bowerman in 1962. It officially became Nike, Inc. in 1978 while taking its name after the Greek goddess of victory. Mark Parker is the current CEO and Phil Knight still continues to hold a position at the top of the organization, as the company Chairman.
Many global companies like Nike, Inc. are seen as role models both in the market place as well as in society in large. That is why they are expected to act responsibly in their dealings with humanity and the natural world. Nike benefits from the global sourcing opportunities, therefore areas such as production and logistics have been outsourced to partner companies in low-wage countries like China, Vietnam, Indonesia and Thailand. As a result the company is limited nowadays to its core competencies of Design and Marketing.
Phil Knight started his shoe company by selling shoes from the back of his car. As he became more successful in 1972 he branded the name Nike. In the 1980’s Nike Corporation quickly grew and established itself as a world leader in manufacturing and distributing athletic footwear and sports' attire. The Nike manufacturing model has followed is to outsource its manufacturing to developing nations in the Asia Pacific, Africa, South and Latin Americas; where labor is inexpensive. It quickly became known for its iconic “swoosh” and “Just do it” advertisements and products. Its highly successful advertising campaigns and brand developed its strong market share and consumer base. But, the road has not always been easy for Nike; in the late 1990’s they went through some challenging times when their brand become synonymous with slave wages and child labor abuses. During this period, Nike learned that it paramount that the company understands its stakeholders’ opinions and ensures their values are congruent with their stakeholders. Nike learned that their stakeholders were concerned with more than buying low cost products; their customers were also concerned with ethical and fair treatment of their workers. Because Nike was unwilling to face the ethical treatment of its employees, the company lost its loyal customers and damaged its reputation. Nike has bounced back since the late 1990’s and revived its reputation by focusing on its internal shortfalls and attacking its issues head on. Nike nearly collapsed from its missteps in the late 1990’s. They have learned from their mistakes and taken steps to quickly identify ethical issues before they become a crisis through ethics audits. This paper is based on the case study of Nike: From Sweatsh...
... shoe that will be made as a special edition. They would not have to mass product the shoe and it would build hype. Another suggestion would be for Nike to use their endorsed athletes more to their advantage by linking their social media accounts to the Nike’s accounts. For example, Nike can have LeBron James tweet Nike once a month promoting the brand and increasing the brand awareness via more eventual twitter followers. Nike is paying these athletes hundreds of millions of dollars and if the athletes are not willing to do this then it can be a good future contract stipulation.
There are as many brands as there is ants in the world, but the two brands that pop out are adidas and nike. Those two brands have been going head to head for ages to see who is the better brand. It’s been tested, compared, and debated which brand is better. Whether it’s the quality of the materials or the cost of it, the debate is ongoing. Both brands have been fighting for the top ever since they were both created and I don’t blame them it’d be fantastic to be the best brand in the world. When Nike and adidas are contrasted, it becomes clear that the Adidas brand are better for the overall consumer and enhances sport performance than Nike.
An article recently published in The Wall Street Journal focused on the effects of Nike
Nike’s Asian operations had previously continued to soar generating US$300 million in 1994 in revenues to a whopping US$1.2 billion in 1997. However based on the Asian economic crisis, this had adversely affected revenues, while regional layoffs were inevitable. Nike also performed well in the European market generating about US$2 billion in sales and a good growth momentum was expected, however, some parts of Europe were only slowly recovering from an economic downturn. In the Americas (Canada and the U.S.A.), Nike experienced a growth rate for several quarters. The U.S. alone generated approximately US$5 billion in sales. The Latin American market at this point was exposed to economic volatility; however Nike still saw them as a market with “great potential for the future”.
Nike’s positioning in the market has more of a mass appeal compared to their main competitor Adidas who strive to make products for elite athletes. The positioning strategy for Nike is currently working at a satisfactory level as Nikes global annual sales between 2013-2014 was reported as 27.8 billion (Statista, 2014) compared to Adidas’ 19.95 billion (Statista, 2014). The global market for sports apparel is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 4% between 2012-2019, Nikes compound annual growth rate during 2010-2012 was 12.3% which is an excellent result as the brand’s growth was larger than the market as well as outgrowing Nike’s closest competitors Adidas, Puma and Asics (Forbes,
Nevertheless, Nike is an extremely diverse company with outstanding organizational structure, impressive marketing strategy, and innovative products. The organizational structure of the Nike Corporation helped them become a leading innovator for the world with creative apparels and shoes. Their intelligent marketing strategies assist them in advertising their products to motive their customers and sell them. Their innovative product motivates customers with great performance footwear and quality designs to take on any obstacles. The Nike Corporation discovers various ways to improve their organizational structure to inspire the world.
Nike is the world famous company. It is an American multinational corporation which is occupied in the design, development, manufacturing and worldwide marketing and selling of the footwear, equipment and many more other services. The Nike Company was founded on 25 January 1964. The first founder Bill Bower man and the second founder Phil Knight. The Nike name comes from the Greek word goddess of victory. The mission of the Nike Company is to bring inspiration and innovation to every athlete in the world. There are two sides to Nike: the public face and hidden misery. It is the number one shoe maker in the world. This Company creates designs for all age groups, for instance, for men, women and for Children.
In reviewing the case of New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. it is clear that there are a few major problems that the company is facing. First of all, New Balance falls behind its other major competitors, Nike, Adidas and Reebok, in the area of marketing. Unlike its competitors, New Balance does not undertake celebrity endorsements. This puts them at a disadvantage when it comes to brand building. This also causes the company to lose out somewhat on gaining awareness on a global scale as it lacks endorsements in major sporting events. Most global brand names generate strong brand recognition through celebrity endorsements in sporting events that would give them the needed momentum to carry their brand name further into the global market.