Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Victimization research paper
The relationship between media and crime
How the media presents crime to the public
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Victimization research paper
The media is the publics most influential and primary source of information on crime and criminal activities in the community. Therefore, the way crime is reported can alter society’s view of it altogether. However, the media often presents inaccurate information about frequently occurring crimes based on what is deemed as ‘newsworthy’ (Hayes & Prenzler, 2014, pg. 8). This is where crime is reported selectively and consists of certain ‘news values’. An example of these ‘news values’ include the proximity, timeliness and impact of the crimes. This partly explains why crime stories are so popular in the media, as most contain the majority of the aforementioned ‘news values’. However, this can be problematic as the types of crime that are more …show more content…
However, while crime statistics are the only way to measure crime, it remains unreliable due to the ‘dark figure of crime’ (Hayes & Prenzler, 2014, pg. 40). This refers to the amount of crime occurring in the community which remains undetected or is not reported. The use of victimisation surveys determines which types of crime are most likely to be reported, and why certain crimes are not being reported. For example, thefts of motor vehicles are one of the highest reported crimes due to insurance purposes, whereas assault victims are less likely to report crimes against them for various reasons, such as knowing the offender, believing the crime was not serious enough, or fearing reprisal from the offender (Hayes & Prenzler, 2014, pg. …show more content…
In 2012, police reports showed that property crime consisted of the larger percentage of crimes at approximately 80%, whereas violent crime only made up 20%, and murder only accounted for 0.05% of crimes (Hayes & Prenzler, 2014, pg. 67). Other less harmful crimes such as theft were also accounted for at 51.58%. One explanation for the over reporting on violent crime is that media programs reflect what is important to audiences. Violent crime is a more serious concern for most community residents than property or white-collar crime. This then leads into the concept of media for profit. The media in Australia has a highly concentrated ownership, with only two corporations (News Corp and Fairfax) owning 11 of the 12 city newspapers, and the television and radio media is similarly controlled by a small number of corporations. The concentrated ownership of the media increases the need for profitability, in particular, for larger corporations likely to be in debt (Hayes & Prenzler, 2014, pg. 7). This, in turn, leads to an increased dependence on attracting larger audiences through a decrease in programming such as critical journalism, and an increase in sensationalised news stories. Studies have shown that actual increases or decreases in crime rates have little effect on the amount of crime being
You can see specific examples in the subtitles and subtext from different news articles. The way they cover different stories and the stories they choose to cover. The way we perceive crime and such has a very large connection to how it is presented to us. The more negative the coverage, the more negative we are going to feel about it. Like for instance, ever since the 9/11 terrorist attack, the media coverage of Muslims has gotten significantly worse, further extending racial barriers.
In reference to the media’s role, they have been highlighted for playing a part in maintaining these views by portraying victims in a certain way according to the newsworthiness of each story and their selectiveness (Greer, 2007). Furthermore, there has been an increase in both fictional crime programmes and crime documentaries, with Crimewatch particularly becoming a regular part of British viewing. In the modern context, crime has continued to represent a large proportion of news reporting and with the aid of social networking sites and self-publicity via the internet, journalists are now more able to dig even deeper into the lives of people on whom they wish to report. Newspapers continue to keep the public informed with the latest headlines and the internet has also provided opportunities for members of the public to have their input in blogs.
White, R., and Perrone, S. (2009) Crime, Criminality and Criminal Justice. Melbourne: Oxford University [Chapter 2 ‘Crime and the Media’]
The general public of Australia has a common aspect when associated with their sources of knowledge of crime. Many would agree the media, especially newspapers and television, are their most frequent and well known source of crime activity. The media updates society with data about the extent, frequency and types of crimes committed (Moston and Coventry, 2011, p.53). Studies highlight our grasp of crime is majorly derived from the media, with a lack of exposure to police statistics or victimisation surveys. There is a concern in correlation to this fact since the media has inconsistency and inaccuracy in reporting crime. Due to this, the media can misrepresent victims and perpetrators, downsizing them to recognisable stereotypes (Moston and
Most people use second hand information as their core source of information about crime, this source of information usually being the media. When carrying out sample research in Birmingham, Susan Smith (1984) discovered that 52% of people obtained most of their information about crime from the media, 36% obtained it from hearsay or alleged experiences of friends and neighbours, 3% from their own experiences, and 1% from the police service themselves (cited in Jones, 2001; 8). However the media tend to exaggerate upon areas of criminal activity causing a moral panic. ‘A moral panic is a semi- spontaneous or media generated mass movement based on the perception that some individual or group, frequently a minority group or subculture, is dangerously deviant and poses menace to society. These panics are generally fuelled by the media, although not always caused by, media coverage of social issues… These panics can sometimes lead to mob violence… (newsfilter.co.uk).
The media plays a huge role in forming people's perceptions of crime. Without the media we would remain ignorant to occurrences outside our direct social groups. The media and especially news coverage therefore provides us with an important point of contact with the rest of society. In evaluating its effect on popular perceptions of crime it becomes important to consider where most of the information comes from and how representative it is on actual criminality. If it takes "facts" (the truth, the actual event, a real thing) or if it is heightened to a crime myth. With a myth being based upon "exaggeration" or heightening of "ordinary" events in life. Crime myths become a convenient mortar to fill gaps in knowledge and to provide answers to question social science either cannot answer or has failed to address. Myths tend to provide the necessary information for the construction of a "social reality of crime (Quinney, 1970)." As crime related issues are debated and re debated, shaped and reshaped in public forms, they become distorted into myth, as largely seen in the mass media.
Media portrayal of crime and criminal justice has become incredibly widespread in the last decade, with crime often considered both a source of news and entertainment. As a source of entertainment, crime and criminal justice have emerged as central themes across various sources of media. Most individuals do not have any direct experience with the criminal justice system, so their only source of information on this topic is the media. Particularly in television shows, portrayals of crime and criminal justice can be seen in everything from courtroom dramas to nightly news programs. Indeed, the popularity of crime shows has lead to some of television’s most enduring series, such as Law and Order and CSI. Because of this, fictional
In general, official statistics of crime recorded by the police and surveys of the public such as victim surveys and self-report studies are the three main measures of the extent of crime in Britain. The oldest method is to rely on official data collected by criminal justice agencies, such as data on arrests or convictions. The other two rely on social surveys. In one case, individuals are asked if they have been victims of crime; in the other, they are asked to self-report their own criminal activity. (Terence P. Thornberry and Marvin D. Krohn) Although these are a main secondary source of quantitative data, each of them may contain some drawbacks. Thus, this essay will introduce these three methods and demonstrates their disadvantages, such as the police crime statistics exclude the unreported and unrecorded crime;
It all starts with something as simple as hearing a story that sparks an interest, next the question: "why are we so fascinated by this crime or deviance," follows. Then it's elevated quickly when the belief of the formation of a friendship, understanding or even relating to the story. Empathy sets in. Gears begin to grind, to contemplate, create a reason to dig deeper, to know more, to investigate and find out the true story. The media has been very successful when it comes to gathering, engaging, and keeping the public's fascination. They can equally tap into the public's thoughts to help stimulate and persuade them. They're able to persuade the public because in their mind they have something to prove, whether it's
The media is our main source of knowledge about crime and other issues about the world. It shows us what is happening in the world which is beyond our direct experience and so it is very important. However the media can present a false view of reality and contain bias that the public needs to be aware of. The way the media represents crime can reinforce fear and create moral panic but as media consumers it is our job to critically analyze the content of the news and ask questions about the crimes that are shown in the media as to not be effected by the media in trying to shape our perceptions about crime.
The media, both in the mainstream and alternative sources, determine how the community views crime and how it represents the victims of crime, criminals and law enforcement officials. Media organisations have arguably become the main source of news, entertainment, recreation, and product information in society. For many people, media outlets such as newspapers, magazines, social media and television broadcasts inform viewers about events that affect their everyday lives. This essay will explore the many variations of how crime is misrepresented in society through mass media organisations. Over the years, research has shown an increase in crime is largely over-represented in media coverage, compared to actual crime rates in society.
When reporting crime events the media focus only on the negative scenarios that can impact the society, these events are to be know as “newsworthy” (Hall, 1978). Newsworthy crime news is formed through the selective approach taken by the editors where only the main idea of the topic is likely to be reproduced in the media. This is due to crime is not an open event as witnesses are limited hence the selective approach allows the editor to only report the thrilling parts of the crime. (Stuart Hall, 1978: p.53) quoted “‘News’ is the end-product of a complex proves which begins with a systematic sorting and selecting of events and topics according to a socially constructed set of categories”. As a result, this approach has formed bias opinions towards crime reporting as it’s presented in the editor’s point of view (Hall, 1978). The media hence only targets crime with events that is unexpected and events that’s viewed as out of the norm compared to the majority of the society. Alternatively, this changes the view of audiences as they view the society as a ‘problematic reality’ (Hall, 1978). The majority of world is therefore mislead by the fictional reporting of crime as many consumers
...it is the advent of television media that have sparked debate over the integrity of reliable news making. Print media was factual, although sometimes sensational, while electronic media made use of the technologies, such as videotapes and live footage to enhance and exaggerate the drama of the event even further. Many research studies have been conducted to show the effects of the media coverage on crime and how it influences the publics of fear of crime. Mass media has perpetuated a notion that crime is on the increase by portraying events and tragedies in the headlines that are sensational. The public buys into that idea, despite statistical accounts that reflect stable or low crime rates. The more stories people read and watch about crime, the more likely they are to think that crime is out of control. Politicians may then enact legal reforms to sooth the public’s outcry for crime control and prevention. As easy as it may be to hold the media accountable for barraging us with images and ideas that affect our views and beliefs, it important that the public take responsibility for the information that we consume. After all, there is always the “off” button on the remote control.
The public concerns about the huge upward trend of crime in the society since the 1970s, as the law and order in criminal justices, became more and more important on the political agenda (Hopkins 2013, p.118). However, according to Sutherland, Cressey, and Luckenbill (1992, p.48), they claimed that “the statistics on crime are probably the most unreliable and the most difficult to all statistics on social phenomena”. In the following paragraphs, I will start by explaining the definition of dark figure of crime, then discuss the data published by official departments because they are usually the principal source that used to show the crime statistics to the public with its limitations, along with talking about the usefulness of using Crime Survey
“The survey is carried out annually by interviewing approximately 45’000 adults about their first hand experiences with crime and also their attitudes towards crime. The survey also asks individuals if they have been subject to a crime within the last year”, Hale et al. (2013, p 46) However, in ways there are limitations to the Victim Surveys as they reply on persons honesty. A person my not answer the interview questions with accuracy as the encounter with crime may have been some time ago if the person is being a victim of ‘Hidden Crimes’ such a domestic violence indicated by Newburn (2013, p 69) which in consequence they may not wish to disclose this information to the interview either because they do not know the person or out of fear discovered by their abuser.