In The Desert, By Stephen Crane

648 Words2 Pages

Stubborn, lazy, short tempered, jealous, shopaholic, antisocial, emotional, sensitive, and shallow are all words that can describe a few faults of human nature. The list goes on and on. Humans are flawed creatures. In the theory of naturalism, Human nature contains numerous foibles; it is not perfect. Many people tend to shame these faults and hide them from others, but is that really the best thing to do? Should flaws be hidden and denounced? In the poem “In the Desert” by Stephen Crane, a squatting creature and his actions portray that humans are imperfect beings with faults, however, these faults should be embraced and celebrated rather than disowned and condemned.
Humans have the ability to put up a mask and show what they want people to see, but every human has a creature within themselves that shows their true, “naked” self (Crane 2). Although there is a vulnerable side to every human that is the purest form of who they are, there is also a “bestial” creature inside that shows human origin and how people can be quick to judge others in order to protect themselves (2). “Squatting on the ground,” the creature in the desert is exposed, unable hide his faults (3). He is ready to show the narrator who he is as he “[holds] his heart in his hands” (4). When the …show more content…

The creature holds his heart, not just an organ, but the center of his being, his body and soul, and bites into it. When asked if it tastes good, he responds immediately that “‘it is bitter -- bitter’" (5). Through the tart flavor, the creature instantly realizes that he is flawed. His heart is not good, but it is bitter, a word usually associated with something unpleasant. Although the creature sees his heart as churlish, the narrator does not realize that until he is told. People are quick to discover the imperfections within themselves but not always the ones in

Open Document