Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A little learning poem analysis
Poem analysis essay
First poem for you analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A little learning poem analysis
Duffy, Fenton and Rossetti all present good and bad in their poems. In, the poem ‘Hour’ by Duffy we see a references, for example she uses a Greek myth. This shows how the poem might be tragic. The poem ‘In Paris with you’, there is repetition which shows how the writer is trying to get their point across. Moreover, Rossetti uses rhetorical question and also different similes and metaphors. Also, Fenton and Rossetti talk about how love can be good and bad. These ideas would be explored further throughout this essay.
In the poem ‘Sister Maude’ there are many ideas of bad presented. Rossetti, shows how a relationship between two sisters can be negative; ‘Sister Maude shall get no sleep’. This indicates that Sister Maude might have done something
…show more content…
bad and betrayed her which was killing the narrator’s lover. We see how the narrator does not forgive Sister Maude and they’re not very close. This is similar to the poem In Paris with you’; by they both talk about their relationships and how that it didn’t go too well. For example, how the narrator had a lover but got killed by Sister Maude. In each stanza it contains even lines that rhyme; this regular pattern helps to reinforce the traditional source for the poem because older poetry is often characterised by the use of strict structural devices like rhyme. Moreover, there are religious references in the poem, reflecting conventions with society at the time. Hour follows the structure of a Shakespearean sonnet; it has fourteen lines and a predictable rhyme scheme. In the poem “Hour”; Duffy represents good and bad.
The poem talks about how time goes quick for the two lovers, and how every minute is important to them. When it says “we find an hour together, spend it not on flowers”. This suggests that do not want to waste time on doing the typical romantic stuff and spend time with each other. This is because they know that they do not have enough time. Moreover, when the narrator refers to a mythology “Midas”. This implies that there time together might be tragic. The story ends as Midas changes his loved one to gold. This left him having no-one, this how love can end being a tragedy. This highlights that love does not end good always and something bad could happen. This links to “Sister Maude” by Rossetti it shows how love does not end well and something or someone can destroy …show more content…
it. In the poem “In Paris with you” Fenton shows good and bad ideas that can occur in relationships.
When, it shows that the narrator is “angry” because he has been “bamboozled”. This shows how he still has not forgotten about his past relationship. Also, how he is upset “I get tearful when I’ve downed a drink or two”. This implies that he is stressed and thinks the only thing to help him is to drink alcohol to make him feel better and not think about the past. He also describes himself as “marooned”; this heightens that he thinks that he is alone even though that he is with someone. Furthermore, when the narrator talks about how he is on a “rebound”. This shows how he is still thinking about his past relationship and is not over it. Additionally, he repeats three times “Don’t talk to me of love”, this implies that he is fed up of people talking about love because he didn’t end well for him. The poem has four stanzas of five or six lines, with a longer stanza of nine lines in the centre, acting as a chorus in which the mood of the poem changes. The repeated line “I’m in Paris with you”, this reflects the speakers insistent concentration on the present. There is a colloquial language, suggesting this is an informal poem. For example “had an earful” and “say sod off to sodding Notre Dame”.
To conclude, the three poems show how love can always not end in a good way. Fenton, Duffy and Rossetti all have something in common, which is how they present the good and bad in
people.
The first stanza describes the depth of despair that the speaker is feeling, without further explanation on its causes. The short length of the lines add a sense of incompleteness and hesitance the speaker feels towards his/ her emotions. This is successful in sparking the interest of the readers, as it makes the readers wonder about the events that lead to these emotions. The second and third stanza describe the agony the speaker is in, and the long lines work to add a sense of longing and the outpouring emotion the speaker is struggling with. The last stanza, again structured with short lines, finally reveals the speaker 's innermost desire to "make love" to the person the speaker is in love
In all poems the theme of Disappointment in love is seen throughout. Duffy focuses on the pain, despair and acrimony that love can bring, whereas Larkin focuses on the dissatisfaction before, during, and after a romantic relationship. Both Duffy and Larkin differ in tone. Duffy takes a more aggressive and dark stance to portray what love can do to a person after a disappointing love life. Duffy also uses this sinister and aggressive stance to try and convey sympathy for the persona from the audience in ‘Never Go Back’ and ‘Havisham’ Whereas Larkin conveys his discontent in love through his nonchalant and dismissive tone, but still concealing the pain that has been brought by love in ‘Wild Oats’ and ‘Talking in bed’.
At the beginning of the poem, the audience is able to witness an event of a young boy asking his father for story. While the father was deemed a “sad” man, it is later shown that his sadness can be contributed to his fear of his son leaving him. The structure then correlated to the point of going into the future. The future was able to depict what would happen to the loving duo. The father's dreams would become a reality and the son's love and admiration would cease to exist as he is seen screaming at his father. Wanting nothing to do with him. The young, pure child can be seen trying to back lash at his father for acting like a “god” that he can “never disappoint.” The point of this structure was not really a means of clarification from the beginning point of view, but more as an intro to the end. The real relationship can be seen in line 20, where it is mentioned that the relationship between the father and son is “an emotional rather than logical equation.” The love between this father and son, and all its complexity has no real solution. But rather a means of love; the feelings a parent has for wanting to protect their child and the child itself wanting to be set free from their parents grasp. The structure alone is quite complex. Seeing the present time frame of the father and son
Many of the poems in this section are deep, and some may even consider them inappropriate. We see a new style of writing that we don’t get earlier on in the book, where Montilla creates and describes to us her hopes and dreams, and even her darkest fantasies. This section stresses the idea of humans seeking other humans, and implies that forever isn’t always in our thoughts. For some time, we read about love, until the last poem of the book leaves us thinking if it’s the most important thing to question. The poem “No More Love Poems” hits hard when she mentions being a victim, and living in a world where love is also supposed to mean peace. The last line is the most powerful of all, where she writes “Not one more, because in my world: we kill each other-“ The end of the book oversees everything that you have just read, and while you may have still been lingering on one of the previous love stories, she wants you to think otherwise, and maybe wonder why this poem is the last in her
Christina Rossetti is known as one of the primary female figures of the Victorian Period. The majority of her poetry falls into one of two categories: religion and relationships. Many of her poems on relationships included a theme of death, yet often centered on the relationship between the dead or dying and their loved ones. She wrote a number of poems on love, as well, but these often bring forth a sense of loss, avoidance, fear, or disbelief. Based on some of these love poems and the fact that she was reportedly in love twice during her lifetime, it seems clear that Christina Rossetti was no stranger to the desires of humanity. We, as people, tend to have a natural urge to be seen on a very personal level, to be understood for that which makes us unique, and to be loved in spite of these things. Rossetti’s “religious poetry acknowledged these longings and formed an outlet for them. Many of her ‘poems explore what she saw as the great danger that the Victorian cult of love and marriage posed to the souls of woman’” (Touché 4). She held very strongly to her faith and is reported to have turned down two men whom she dearly loved because of religious differences that she could not overcome. “As a deeply religious woman she was afraid somebody ‘could co...
The story of this poem tells about a young boy that is lured in by the sensuousness of the moon, and then dies because of his own desire for her. The symbolic meaning is much more hidden and disguised by the literary elements of the poem. The storyline and aspects of the literal story add meaning when searching for the figurative meaning. The warning learned from this poem is that infatuation with anything can lead to a downfall. The moon seemed to offer a comfort that attracted him, but it was only a disguise to lead him to death. The passion the young boy felt for the moon can easily be modified to describe the passion a person can feel for anything. The young boy saw safeness in the moon that brought him closer to her. Any obsession will seem to offer the same comforts that the young boy also saw, but this poem warns that death can always disguise itself.
Carol Anne Duffy presents love and romance in a unique way that differentiates valentine from any other love poem. Throughout this poem carol expresses love though the original metaphor of an onion. This essay analyses how she does this so effectively and how she presents a range of ideas about love and romance.
I have chosen to compare and contrast three "love" poems with three "lust" poems from our text, An Introduction to Poetry (9th edition, Kennedy and Gioia, Longman Publishing). I feel that poems about true love often incorporate themes of duration, unity and longevity; all lasting sentiments. Conversely, poems of a lusty nature convey the sentiment that the feeling is transitory, and must be pounced on immediately (before we get a chance to think about it too much).
The first twenty lines of the poem start to talk about how much this girl means to this perticular man. The main character in the poem talks about how he will wait forever to be with her. He mentions that “We would sit down and think which way To walk and pass our long love’s day.” (st. 3-4) His views as of now are that he wants to take his time and he doesn’t have go anywhere. This man certainly wants to plan things out so that it will be perfect. Another line from the poem that makes him the gentleman that he is portraying to be is “An hundred years should go to praise Thine eyes and on thy forehead gaze. “(st.13-14) I think he is saying that we will give praise to her eyes that are so magnificent. Her eyes are so beautiful, because of which he will praise them for hundred years before they can truly be together. Later on it mentions that he will praise her breast each for two hundred years. The mood is set that this man certainly wants to be with this woman. He is telling her how he feels and wants her to understand that he really wants to be with her.
Millay is able to push past the boundaries of love poems and with her words stride confidently towards poetry that is not enslaved by genre, expectations or judgment. In “Love is not all” her treatment of love is unique but still tender enough to appeal to a wide variety of new readers as well as those who enjoy classic love poems, she strikes a careful balance between radical and conventional and her handling of love flourishes because of it.
When presented with the task of comparing love poetry, the images that instantly sprung into mind were the usual: chocolates, flowers, romance and typical clichés such as “love conquers all” or “all is fair in love and war”. ‘The Seduction’ and ‘Cousin Kate’ however, challenge the reader’s expectation of love poetry by exploring it in more of a deceiving way in which the men take advantage of the women, as opposed to unrealistic and perfect relationships.
The complexity of Carol Ann Duffy’s poem Valentine, is not hidden in its essence, the comparison of love to an onion, but in the way she illustrates and supports her metaphors. Through the usage of both literary and structural devices, Duffy explores the meaning of love through the lense of her speaker, who, on valentines day, is trying to convey the true meaning of love through her symbol of choice: an onion. While her structure may seem unorthodox to some, her operation of both long, metaphorical sentences and short, stoccato ones makes the poem on one hand sweet and pleasurable to read and on the other, unnerving and sad.
William Blake leaves the reader pondering which idea of love is better. Is being “clod-like” the best way to love, as oneself provides solely for the others happiness and development? Or is being “pebble-like” the best way to love, as one’s basic human needs cannot be ignored, thus creating a world out of despair due to the lack of love? In “The Sick Rose,” Blake desecrates the rose’s innocent love with a “dark secret love.” He argues that with reason, love can become sinful and unmentionable. Love can also become destructive and destroy the life of someone in a relationship. Through both of these poems, Blake shows love as either being completely inexperienced or wholly experienced. However, neither poem ends joyfully as William Blake’s poems exemplify the Romantic Era’s concern with inner struggle and examining human potential. Blake shows that in order to gain the most out of love, it must contain both inexperience and experience. Love must be both selfless and selfish, as these aspects of love are vital to each other and cannot be kept apart. Blake establishes that one does not have to singularly choose between inexperience or experience; instead, there needs to be balance between the two as they both define love and coexist in a synergistic
This idea of time running out is also emphasised further in the middle of the poem, as well as right at the end. At first he mentions that she shall not live for ever, and the day will come where she will die, and then they can no longer enjoy each others love.
Then later he questions himself what is love, then he wants a kiss.This poem is a comparison to my topic and in many different ways, such as expressing the main characters love to the girl that he loves. One comparison is in line 2 and this is really saying that the girl that he loves has a true love coming for her and that the true love is him. Another example that the poem compares to my topic about love is in line 5 when it says journeys end in lovers meeting. This can relate to love because love can be a person meeting up with someone for the first time and fall in love instantly. In line 5 “Journeys end in lovers meeting”, this can be when the character meets with his loved one in the journey he went through will end because once they meet with each other they will fall in love. The contrast in this poem is that love is between two people, who have a strong feeling with each other. In this case, it’s really just the guy who is saying that he's the true love, he's the one in love, and there's no evidence of what the girl wants or how she feels. This poem is written in literally because the poem is straightforward and understandable. But also the poem is positive because of the character and the one he loves not to get into