Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Edna st vincent millay analysis love is not all
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
While love may be an extremely touchy subject as well as one that can be incredibly hard to interpret in a unique way, it is not impossible to broach the subject from a fresh perspective; In “Love is not all” Edna St. Vincent Millay is able to approach love in a way that initially seems extremely pessimistic and almost cold, but continues on to show the reader that she is not actually all that closed and even reveals some vulnerability by the very end. While the more negative approaches she uses would appeal to some people, it seems that if you actually take the time to read it a few times the cynical façade fades away and you can understand Millay’s interpretation of love as guarded but not completely negative.
Millay’s treatment of love in “Love is not all” appears to be as unique as her interesting perspective and way of looking at the subject. While the easiest route may be to read the poem and judge her for being cold and closed of the idea of love it makes more sense to give her the benefit of the doubt and assume that she is wary, but not closed to the idea as we know it. If you take her tone and diction, perhaps not as cynical but as a guarded reaction to love lost, the poem instantly takes on a completely different feeling and becomes more of a commentary on a universal feeling of heartbreak then it is pure cynicism. If you continue to read the poem keeping in mind the idea of her jaded attitude being the result of some sort of past unrequited love you can see that her tone isn’t as distant as it originally seems but is in fact hurt or wounded at best, the statement “I might be driven to sell your love for peace” (Millay, 12) can be seen as a statement from a miffed lover as opposed to one from an anti-love extremist....
... middle of paper ...
...ill the thickened lung with breath” (Millay, 5) this certainly does not seem to be a line that would be found in most love poems. Her treatment of love in this way, paired with the possibility of hope and redemption by the end of the poem makes for an interesting read that adds stimulating change to a usually formulaic genre.
Millay is able to push past the boundaries of love poems and with her words stride confidently towards poetry that is not enslaved by genre, expectations or judgment. In “Love is not all” her treatment of love is unique but still tender enough to appeal to a wide variety of new readers as well as those who enjoy classic love poems, she strikes a careful balance between radical and conventional and her handling of love flourishes because of it.
Works Cited
Millay, Edna St. Vincent
Virtual Campus. University of Ottawa. 10 Feb 2011
By using easy to comprehend language Millay convinces her readers to go along with turbulent and sometimes unrealistic action to convey common feelings for all people. No matter what theme the reader applies to this poem it is important in some way to every reader and has meaning in many situations.
I personally loved everything that this poem stood for. I liked that this poem had two average people at its center. They were not young or insanely beautiful, but they still showed how amazing love can be and how love goes beyond everything. When it comes down to it love has no gender, age, race, or time it is just about humans loving other humans. In this week’s chapter it is discussed how romance itself has a huge cultural impact and this poem definitely connects with this idea. This poem also follows the cliche of love. The way that love is blinding and will conquer all is presented in a real and believable way, but then it can also be considered unrelatable for some because how romance is set up to be and how high the standards are for true love. Furthermore, I like the idea of love going beyond age, beauty, and time but realistically for most people they will never experience a love so intense. People can though understand how what is portrayed in the media is not how everyone experiences love and that people who differ from this unrealistic standard can still be in love in their own intense beautiful way.
Part II: Explication The title of the poem “Love is Not All” asserts the impression that suggests the unimportant of love to its reader at first. However, the ending of the poem reveals the ironic truth that love is worthwhile. Millay’s intention is not to confuse readers by using a title that forcefully disrespects love. However, she projects the title of the poem to ascertain the grounds for her argument that love is important.
Edna St. Vincent Millay's "What Lips My Lips Have Kissed, and Where and Why" is an effective short poem, which feeds on the dissonance between the ideal of love and its reality, heartbreak. In William Shakespeare's "Let Me Not to The Marriage of True Minds," the effectiveness is weakened by its idealiality and metaphysical stereotype. In contrast to Millay, Shakespeare paints a genuine portrait of what love should be but unfortunately never really is. This factor is what makes his poem difficult to relate to, thus weakening the effect on the reader. These poems were published quite far apart from each other, three-hundred and fourteen years to be exact, which might explain the shift in idealism. Though both circumnavigate the concept of love, the effect left within both writers based on personal affairs dramatically differentiates the personas of both speakers.
While Lord Byron's poem enhances the beauty of love, Keats' does the opposite by showing the detriments of love. In “She Walks in Beauty,” the speaker asides about a beautiful angel with “a heart whose love is innocent” (3, 6). The first two lines in the first stanza portray a defining image:
Millay’s sonnet, “What lips my lips have kissed,” grows further involved and meaningful through the use of literary concepts. These profoundly dark and clouded sentiments highlighted in the demeanor of a speaker, the tone, sounds of language, vocabulary, figurative language, and structure used. These literary concepts would not have been as imperative as it is in delivering the speaker’s sentiments to the reader. Any artist who applies color, texture, medium, and space to bring their pieces of art to life in as much a poet must use these kinds of literary
Millay uses romantic language. That is evident in the first line, "Love is not all: it is not meat nor drink". The romantic aspect of love is shown in the language of this poem. The poem is not directly about two lovers. It is more indirect, this is what two lovers may face. Her language is picturesque. "Nor yet a floating spar to men that sink / And rise and sink and rise and sink again;" It is as if the poem was showing a picture of a man in the sea that is struggling to survive and throughout the course of bobbing up and down he continues to see a pole or paddle, but he just can't reach it. There are more ideas that can be pictured easily throughout the poem, because of the language that Millay uses. "Love can no fill the thickened lung with breath, / Nor clean the blood, nor set the fractured bone;" These lines create an interesting picture in your mind.
Love has the power to do anything. Love can heal and love can hurt. Love is something that is indescribable and difficult to understand. Love is a feeling that cannot be accurately expressed by a word. In the poem “The Rain” by Robert Creeley, the experience of love is painted and explored through a metaphor. The speaker in the poem compares love to rain and he explains how he wants love to be like rain. Love is a beautiful concept and through the abstract comparison to rain a person is assisted in developing a concrete understanding of what love is. True beauty is illuminated by true love and vice versa. In other words, the beauty of love and all that it entails is something true.
Some may say love is just an emotion while others may say it is a living and breathing creature. Songs and poems have been written about love for hundreds and thousands of years. Love has been around since the beginning of time, whether someone believes in the Big Bang or Adam and Eve. Without love, there wouldn’t be a world like it is known today. But with love, comes pain with it. Both William Shakespeare and Max Martin know and knew this. Both ingenious poets wrote love songs of pain and suffering as well as blossoming, newfound love. The eccentric ideal is both writers were born centuries apart. How could both know that love and pain work hand in hand when they were born 407 years apart? Love must never change then. Love survives and stays its original self through the hundreds and thousands of years it has been thriving. Though centuries apart, William Shakespeare and Max Martin share the same view on love whether i...
Love has many definitions and can be interpreted in many different ways. William Maxwell demonstrates this in his story “Love”. Maxwell opens up his story with a positive outlook on “Love” by saying, “Miss Vera Brown, she wrote on the blackboard, letter by letter in flawlessly oval palmer method. Our teacher for fifth grade. The name might as well have been graven in stone” (1). By the end of the story, the students “love” for their teachers no longer has a positive meaning, because of a turn in events that leads to a tragic ending. One could claim that throughout the story, Maxwell uses short descriptive sentences with added details that foreshadow the tragic ending.
Relationships between two people can have a strong bond and through poetry can have an everlasting life. The relationship can be between a mother and a child, a man and a woman, or of one person reaching out to their love. No matter what kind of relationship there is, the bond between the two people is shown through literary devices to enhance the romantic impression upon the reader. Through Dudley Randall’s “Ballad of Birmingham,” Ben Jonson’s “To Celia,” and William Shakespeare’s “Shall I Compare Thee to a Summer’s Day?” relationships are viewed as a powerful bond, an everlasting love, and even a romantic hymn.
Will's beloved is "more lovely and more temperate (18.2)" than a summer's day; "the tenth Muse (38.9);" "'Fair,' 'kind,' and 'true' (105.9);" the sun that shines "with all triumphant splendor (33.10)." We've heard all this before. This idealization of the loved one is perhaps the most common, traditional feature of love poetry. Taken to its logical conclusion, however, idealized love has some surprising implications.
She created a negative connotation of love and its importance in the beginning of the poem, but gradually transitioned to uncertainty allowing the reader to make his or her own decision on the subject. Is love more important than food or shelter, or health? Millay definitely does not answer this question, but in a sense it was not supposed to be answered. Love is as important as one wants it to be. This prominent idea that love is not a necessity of life, but it somehow manages to provoke such great desire and happiness, that it becomes important is the theme of the poem. It is an engaging and thought provoking poem that allows the reader to also examine him or herself, while Millay promotes a direct theme with
This first struck me, as Brooks would write a poem about love and how it feels to be in love, a fairy tale love. Instead, she writes of what it feels like to be in real love, the good, bad, and ugly. When you are young and you read the words “To be in love”, you interpret it differently. You only see the good, a perfect state of what love is; the “honeymoon” stage. In the poem it states “To be in love / is to touch things with a lighter hand”(1-2) which would support this stage in a relationship. Brooks starts the poem off with these lines to describe a more simple time, a euphoric state in the relationship. This is how everyone thinks when he or she is young. You have no true sense of what love really is or what it truly feels like to be in love. But this isn’t why Brooks put this title on this poem. She wants to explain the purest form and most related, relevant, and honest concept of being in love; so Brooks gives you some bad and ugly. The poem goes on to say “He is not there but / you know you are tasting together”(9-10) this is where things could get ugly. When in love you want your partner around, a lot, primarily during this honeymoon stage, but when they are not there it gets lonely. You have dedicated yourself to this person and they are not around to enjoy life with you. Younger people wouldn’t be able to handle this true love but any adult know that when you
Love is the ubiquitous force that drives all people in life. If people did not want, give, or receive love, they would never experience life because it is the force that completes a person. People rely on this seemingly absent force although it is ever-present. Elizabeth Barrett Browning is an influential poet who describes the necessity of love in her poems from her book Sonnets from the Portuguese. She writes about love based on her relationship with her husband. Her life is dependent on him, and she expresses this same reliance of love in her poetry. She uses literary devices to strengthen her argument for the necessity of love. The necessity of love is a major theme in Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s “Sonnet 14,” “Sonnet 43,” and “Sonnet 29.”