Importance of the Induction in William Shakespeare's The Taming of the Shrew

1368 Words3 Pages

Importance of the Induction in

The Taming of the Shrew

Many acclaimed scholars argue that the Induction in William Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew is unnecessary and irrelevant to the main plot. (Bloom, 28) Shakespeare placed the induction into The Shrew for a specific dramatic purpose. The comedic tone of the play would be lost without the induction, resulting in a more literal interpretation of the play thus leaving the reader unable to distinguish the author’s true intention. One cannot fully grasp the meaning of Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew until one understands the importance of the tie between the induction and the main plot. Shakespeare reveals this tie with the use of theme, character ties, gender roles, and imagery.

Several themes are apparent which help tie the Induction to the plot. The most emphasized theme is that of Appearance vs. Reality. An example of this Appearance vs. Reality in the induction is the practical joke The Lord plays on Sly where Sly appears to be a Lord who has just woken up from a coma when in reality he is merely a beggar dressed in lords clothing. Shakespeare inserted this obvious example of Appearance vs. Reality so the reader would be aware of the theme later on in the play. Shakespeare uses this increased awareness of the theme in showing the reader Katherine’s true feelings. On the surface it appears that Katherine is directly opposed to marry Petruchio. Katherine even says that she was “… forced/ To give [her] hand opposed against [her] heart/ Unto a mad-brain rudesby, full of spleen,” (III.ii.8-11) when Petruchio is late arriving to their wedding. If Katherine truly were opposed to her union with Petruchio she would have not been this upset about being jilted. This fear of being jilted stems from having fallen in love with Petruchio. This goes against the appearance of hate that Katherine puts up throughout the play against Petruchio.

Another link between the Induction and the main plot is the outstanding similarities between the characters in each part. An example of this tie is the parallel of The Lord in the induction to Petruchio in the main plot. In the Induction The Lord proves himself to be a clever manipulator treating the passed out beggar as a plaything, much as the way Petruchio treats Katherine. In the process of “taming...

... middle of paper ...

...t at the end of the book when he bets against Petruchio (the boar) that Bianca is more obedient than Katherine she refuses to come and Lucentio loses the bet. The second picture illustrates the myth of Apollo and Daphne. In this myth Apollo falls in love with Daphne who resists his affections and flees from him. When he finally catches her she transforms into a laurel tree so she would be unable to be exploited by Apollo. Apollo then acknowledges defeat and says that since she can’t be his wife he will decorate himself with her leaves (www.loggia.com). This is much the same as Petruchio and Katherine. Katherine is resistant to Petruchio throughout the play. When Petruchio finally “catches” her she acts obedient so that he cannot torment her anymore. Petruchio also “decorates” himself with his wife’s new show of obedience with the bet at the end of the play.

The ties between the Induction and the main plot are undeniable. Shakespeare clearly uses the Induction as a means to set up the themes and ideas expressed in the plot. Whether it is by theme, character similarities, gender roles, or imagery Shakespeare put in the Induction for a specific reason.

Open Document