Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social media impact on political participation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social media impact on political participation
It is widely believed and often circulated that the youth of today are uninterested in political events and are too wrapped up in their own self interest to pay any mind to the business of politics. While, this may ring true for certain individuals of "generation Y", or the "millennial" generation, to generalize the whole of the youth demographic is both negligent and false. In fact, research found that political involvement is of great importance to young Canadians; 74% of a poll group reported that "always voting in elections" is vital to being a good citizen; in addition, 63% voted that it is important to "be informed of current events", and 15% said they should be "active in political parties". (The Huffington Post Canada, 2012) According to those statistics, voter turnout for the young demographic should be marginally higher than the numbers reported in the last election, where only 38.8% of voters aged 18-24 cast a vote. (Bolen, 2012) This phenomenon oftentimes contributes to the stereotype of young people being uninvolved in politics, but could perhaps suggest that young people do not feel involved in the current political process and instead channel their energy into different sources. Due to the appalling voter turnout amongst young people, it must be of top concern among political parties to market towards a younger demographic if they wish to engage an untapped source of votes and retain political power despite the disappearing "baby boomer" generation and the growing integration of technology.
Typically, political parties have proven accustomed to catering towards the "baby boomer" generation with promises of pension programs and increased health care. While this method is effective at acquiring votes from older citiz...
... middle of paper ...
... Canada. Party Politics, 10(4), 427-444.
Harrell, A., Panagos, D., & Matthews, J. (2009). Explaining Aboriginal Turnout in Federal Elections: Evidence from Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba. Elections Canada.
O'Neill, B. (2007, June). Indifferent or Just Different? The Political and Civic Engagement of Young People in Canada. University of Calgary. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks.
Reilly, I. (2011). Amusing Ourselves to Death? Social Media, Political Satire, and the 2011 Election. Canadian Journal of Communication, 36(3), 503-512.
The Huffington Post Canada. (2012, December 20). Generation Y In Canada: National Poll Of Millennials Reveals A Troubled Generation (INFOGRAPHIC). (A. Rempel, Ed., & A. Data, Compiler) Huffington Post Canada. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/11/20/generation-y-canada-millennials-graphic-infographic_n_2136838.html
...adults compared to older adults were less likely to respond that voting was extremely important for good citizenship (133). He concludes that it is too late for the generation of young adults that do not feel voting is an important civic responsibility, however, that it is not too late to convince them that politics matter by showing them that they are giving their opportunity to make important decisions that may impact their lives to others who have different ideas. One may agree with Wattenberg’s idea that habits follow people throughout their lives instead of changing as they cycle in life. His personal accounts are an impactful way to illustrate the importance of building a sense of duty at a young age and carrying that responsibility throughout one’s life.
In Nicholas Carr’s article “How Social Media Is Ruining Politics”, Carr writes about the effects that social media has on politics. In his article, Carr focuses more on the negative effect that social media has when it comes to politics. Some points that he makes about social media include specific examples like the recent presidential campaigns, how other technological advances over the years have effected politics, and the effectiveness that social media has on politics
Many political analysts argue that engagement is an important characteristic of democracy, yet the younger generation is indifferent towards politics. They’re more interested in the latest iPhone technology than in campaigning or voting. In The Good Citizen: How a Younger Generation Is Reshaping American Politics, author Russell J. Dalton counters this with the idea that Gen X’ers are still engaged, just in a different way.
Pammett, Jon, and Lawrence LeDuc. 2003. Explaining the Turnout Decline in Canadian Federal Elections: A New Survey of Non-Voters. Ottawa: Elections Canada.
The young as well as the older people of Canada seem to be in a deadlock. The question of if the federal government should or should not lower the voting age is a question debated surely around the dinner tables of families in Canada, as well as in the ranks of the government. Some people even suggest that the age needs to be raised. What would make people want the voting age to be lowered to an even lower age than the young adult age of 18? On the other hand how can the youth of Canada who have their own individual views be able to make a difference without being able to vote? Both sides provide for an intriguing look into the facts and resolutions for an appropriate way to either change the voting age or keep it the same. Throughout this paper I will look at and analyze the arguments of the youth who claim to be 'disenfranchised', as well as others who see the lowering of the voting age to be detrimental rather than an improvement to the Government of Canada's political process. In 1854, before Canada became a responsible government the only people allowed to vote were people who had a high value of land which they owned, and had a high income. Women and people with other ethnic backgrounds and religious beliefs were also denied the right to vote. This did not mean that these people did not have their views and beliefs on who and what they wanted in their government but rather they were denied the right. These laws have changed since then drastically and Canada has become a democratic country (rule by the people). However, the frustration of not being able to vote and support their ideals and politicians does live on in the hearts and minds of thousands of young Canadians under the age of eighteen. The...
It is our civic right and duty to actively participate in governmental affairs. This recent election really highlighted the divide in opinion regarding the importance of governmental participation. “To many, our democratic system seems so broken that they have simply lost faith that their participation could really matter,” West writes in his essay entitled The Deep Democratic Tradition in America. Young people feel unimportant and irrelevant, which explains the lack in turnout from young voters ages 18-29. However, it wasn’t just young voters that didn’t turnout. Millions of eligible voters didn’t show up for the 2016 elections. A democracy without active participants is a democracy bound for
The right to vote for non-citizens has become an increasingly controversial topic due to the strong and often divisive opinions of permanent Canadian residents. The capacity to vote is one of the most important and valued freedoms granted to individuals. Although the acceptance of non-citizen resident voting is frequently encouraged in order to propel self-governing justice and immigrant inclusion, opponents claim that it is in a nation’s best interest to delay voting rights to non-citizens. According to this claim, by preserving voting rights to citizens, non-citizens would have the social responsibility to actively learn the essential community services and self-ruled obligations necessary to earn their citizenship. In spite of this claim, non-citizens should be allowed to vote because the right to vote offers immigrants a more welcomed chance to contribute in the decision-making processes that take place in Canadian legislature. Seeing that this legislature administrates the rights and freedoms of the immigrant populations, it would only be just if immigrants had the right to elect candidates who spoke on behalf of their best interests.
It’s very unsettling to know that there was a six percent decrease in young voters (ages 18-29) in the 2012 election compared to 2008 (Circle Youth data). In 2007 the National Conference of State Legislatures publicly released a report and data set on voter turnout in democratic countries. This is a quote from that report titled Getting out the Vote, “It should be noted that in 1972, 18-year-olds were added to the eligible voting population, thus decreasing the percentages. Nonetheless, voter tu...
“Amusing Ourselves to Death” by Neil Postman is a piece that focuses on the effects that technology has on public discourse and politics. He believes that the development of the television has habituated us to constantly needing to be entertained, which changes the way we take in information. It is no longer the substance that we value but rather the entertainment value. An important point that Postman evaluates in chapter 9 is that politics has become similar to show business. With politicians paying more attention to their image than political issues the integrity of modern politics can only be questioned. To update Postman’s arguments, although the television has allowed political figures to present the image their audience wants to see the internet has allowed for all aspects of one’s life to be accessible, which changes the way we view their credibility.
The first support Kamenetz argues is, the 2008 presidential campaign brought in the most voters under the age of 29 in history. If the voting age would be decreased, there would be more voters under the young adult category. There would be an increase of voters, including those under the age of eighteen.
In fact, “on average, educated, well informed, and interested in politics – all factors associated with high voter turnout.” But if this is the case, why is there a democratic deficit in the Canadian electoral system? The answer is simple: Most elections today rely heavily on media when it comes to national context which decreases the links between the parties and the voters.... ... middle of paper ... ...6.
Pammett, J., & LeDuc, L. (2003). Explaining turnout decline in Canadian federal elections: A survey of non-voters. Elections Canada, 40.
In the report by Paul Howe and David Northrup titled, “Strengthening Canadian Democracy: the Views of Canadians” Policy Matters 1:5, Canadians attitudes towards government including questions about electoral system reform, representation and the rate of veter turnout.(Howe & Northrup, 2000) After reading, this report it is clear that many Canadians find many issues of their government to be unacceptable. One of the most menacing concerns is in the form that government attains office. The voting process, the form in which Canadians are represented by their Members of Parliament, and the first past the post method of election.
Satire is the most powerful democratic weapon in the arsenal of modern media. Sophia McClennen, the author of America According to Colbert: Satire as Public Pedagogy, describes it as the modern form of public pedagogy, as it helps to educate the masses about current issues (73). In fact, ”a Pew Research Center for the People & the Press survey in 2004 found that 61 percent of people under the age of thirty got some of their political news from late-night comedy shows” (McClennen 73). This statistic shows how influential satirical shows such as The Colbert Report or South Park can be.
Older people do not think young people care about improving the nation, and that they are more interested in updating their Twitter feed. While millennials are interested in keeping up with their social media accounts, they are also interested in politics. The problem is that millennials do not trust the government to help them anymore. Seventy-five percent of millennials donated to charity in 2011, and sixty-three percent volunteered in some way (Goudreau). Young people do not believe the government is a good way to perform their civic duties. They believe improving the world around them will make their lives better. A recent study found that millennials value transparency when it comes to politics (Handke). They want to be able to see where their money is going, and who/what it is helping. Millennials are not getting any sort of transparency with the current government. Every politician is backed by a huge corporation with only their own gain in mind. Millennials are no longer interested in playing a game with the government. They are less interested in a big vs small government, and are more interested in a better government