Importance of Jerusalem

890 Words2 Pages

“None have claim... All have claim!” (Scott). So proclaims Balian of Ibelin in the 2005 movie, Kingdom of Heaven, when an argument breaks out over who deserves the city of Jerusalem. The city itself, viewed without any spiritual connotations, is rather unremarkable. Yet more blood has been spilled over this ancient place, by people whose beliefs are so intricately intertwined, than anywhere on earth. It, to this day, fuels conflicts that are millenia old, and perhaps the best explanation again comes from Mr. Scott. “What is Jerusalem? Your holy places lie over the Jewish temple that the Romans pulled down. The Muslim places of worship lie over yours. Which is more holy?” (Scott). Although historical errors or dramatizations might abound in the movie, in this one moment of piercing insight the nail is hit firmly on the head by a simple fact; Jerusalem does not truly belong to anyone, nor does it truly mean anything. However, the meaning that human beings attach to the city itself, its monuments and how these permeate down into the earth itself make the city more valuable than anything tangible.

To the pre-diasporic Jews, Jerusalem had more reasons of importance than there are stars in the sky. No single place is more important to Judaism than Jerusalem; the city encompasses all that there is to be both a Jew and a member of that nation. To the Jews, Jerusalem is the land promised to them by God (Genesis 12:1-9). Many talmudic scholars also believe that the spiritual center of the city, the Temple Mount, is also Mount Moriah, which is where Abraham sacrificed Isaac to God and the Covenant between God and Abraham began (Hoppe, p.6). The temple mount is also, of course, where Solomon built his Temple to God, and where Herod rebuil...

... middle of paper ...

... by cementing itself in the Jewish holy city and creating Christian monuments like The Church of the Holy Sepulchre over locations like the Temple of Aphrodite that was built by the Romans. Attempts like this made the young Christianity both new, yet still with deep spiritual “roots” in the city. Thus, to the Christians, physical control of Jerusalem was inextricably tied to ideological control of the city. Being the ruling force in the city was as much a legitimization of Christian beliefs and the “successive” nature of Christianity to Judaism as it was about possessing the sites that are so holy to the Christian religion itself.

References:

Scott, Riddley, dir. Kingdom of Heaven. 20th Century Fox, 2005. Film.

The bible

Leslie J. Hoppe. The Holy City:Jerusalem in the theology of the Old Testament, Liturgical Press, 2000, p. 6.

Open Document