Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of women quotes in hamlet
The role of women quotes in hamlet
The role of women quotes in hamlet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of women quotes in hamlet
Crumbling Under the Superstructure
Superstructure, Religion, Rugged Individualism within William Shakespeare’s Hamlet
The bourgeoisie: comprised of the ruling class, the class that owns everything and everyone. Being the most important in the means of production, the bourgeoisie exploits the working, “wage-earning” class, otherwise referred to as the proletariat. Within this context, in William Shakespeare’s play Hamlet he utilizes this concept surrounding the bourgeoisie through the ideas of the super structure, religion, and rugged individualism to showcase the crumbling society in Denmark which eventually leads to Ophelia and Hamlets deaths as well as the demise of Denmark as a whole.
Within the text Shakespeare spares no chance to poke fun at the superstructure. The superstructure mocks woman because they are not worthy of such a high stature, they can have money and they can even be in a place of exaggerated power but only because man has gotten them to this point. This is shown within the play during one of Hamlets soliloquies when he exclaims, “Frailty, thy name is woman!” (Shakespeare Act I Scene II, 146). In this line he is referring to his mother Gertrude and her lack of will power to mourn the death of his father. But not only
…show more content…
is he referring to his mother because if that was so then the line would have exclaimed Gertrude, but it didn’t it grouped all woman into the group of “frailty.” This is exactly what the super structure would want you to perceive woman as, weak minded human beings with lack of will and lack of ability to stand on their own two feet. The way that Shakespeare presents this concept is in a very sarcastic tone because Hamlet is being overly dramatic in everything he is saying in this scene. The superstructure throughout the whole play believes that they are untouchable, as all the drama ensues throughout the play everyone tends to point fingers at others within the superstructure. Denmark is the perfect example of how the superstructure believes that they are above the law and that they can never be in the wrong. Polonius believes that his stature in the hierarchy is enough for him to get rid of all of his problems. When he sends Hamlet to England he thinks that he is in the clear that with his hand written note that he is sending with his messengers will be enough to cover up the mess that he created. A major downfall of the superstructure is this feeling of invincibility that comes with it. This is what leads to the tragic deaths of a majority of the citizens of Denmark at the end of the play. Throughout Hamlet Shakespeare plays with the concept that the bourgeoisie runs organized religion. There is an inner struggle within many characters in regards to the views of the catholic faith and the protestant faith. This is most valid in the burial scene of Ophelia with the gravediggers and their commentary as they bury the privileged young girl. While preparing Ophelia’s grave the first clown presents the question, “Is she to be buried in a Christian burial when she willfully seeks her own salvation?” (Act IV, Scene I 1). The grave diggers are muttering over whether it is a valid burial or not because it is speculated that Ophelia has committed suicide and chose her own salvation. It is not right that she gets a proper Christian burial because she is a sinner that is going to burn in hell for her action, but because she is a part of the superstructure it simply does not matter. It is also ironic how religion can control you even in death, when organized religion is actually hell on earth as well. This can kill a society much like it left the society divided in Denmark. When faith is present normal actions can seem heroic while depressing and intense actions can be seen as demonic. When a solider goes to battle it is said that they are fighting and killing in the name of God, this is something that they are doing for not only their nation but also the lord. It is interesting that the killing of many people can be seen as a heroic act but the ending of one’s own life is seen as selfish and sinful. It just shows how much the bourgeoisie can have control over one nation just by being present in organized religion. There is a strong sense of rugged individualism that is present throughout the entirety of the play, brought by the main character, Hamlet, through his self-centered personality and the fact that he can only think of his own wants and needs, caring less about anyone else’s. It is this same selfishness that leads to his death. More so, it can easily be argued that this one trait is what lead to all of Denmark’s demise. Gertrude was too invested in herself and needed someone to be there for her, when she marries Polonius this can be seen as a type of rugged individualism because she did it against many people’s wishes. And this is actually what sparks Hamlets insanity, on top of his father’s death. But he is not the only one revealing these rugged individualistic tendencies. Polonius, is always trying to control his daughter for his own gain, and this then leads to her death. Signs of this are shown as early as scene one when Polonius is talking to Ophelia about her relationship with Hamlet. Polonius says, “Marry, I will teach you: think yourself a baby that you have ta’en these tenders for true pay, which are not sterling.” (Act I, Scene 3 105). Polonius utters about the foolishness of his daughter, once again showing the superstructures need to control the people around them. Because of Polonius’s selfish ways Ophelia is forced to take her own life because she would rather not live at all if she cannot live with love. This self-centered, every man for themselves type of thinking is what leads to the untimely deaths of the people of Denmark. Ultimately, Shakespeare was able to create this vision of a patriarchal society that was both enticing and shined a light on the bigger spectrum of the superstructure and its effects on society in the late 16th century.
The play would not have nearly had the same effect if he did not reveal his underlying thoughts on society through the idea of the bourgeoisie. With all of this being said, Shakespeare utilizes the strategic combination of the literary Marxist devices of the superstructure, religion, and rugged individualism throughout his piece of work Hamlet to help portray the writers true underlying views of the patriarchy and its hand in aiding in the downfall of Denmark depicted throughout the entirety of the
play. Work Cited Shakespeare, William, and Susanne Lindgren Wofford. Hamlet: Complete, Authoritative Text with Biographical and Historical Contexts, Critical History, and Essays from Five Contemporary Critical Perspectives. Boston: Bedford of St. Martin's, 1994. Print.
The bourgeoisie are particularly important because not only did they modernized society but industrialized it as well. They took revered occupations and turned them into paid wage-labor, for example being a physician or poet. Marx’s view on the bourgeoisie is that they emerged after numerous revolutions involving modes of production as well as exchange. They create the world according to their image, which strips society
Hamlet, Prince of Denmark by William Shakespeare is a play about a man's revenge for his father's murder and all the tragedy that comes along with it. The play takes us through the emotions and doubts Prince Hamlet finds within himself after speaking with the presumed ghost of his father, the former King of Denmark. Through Hamlet we meet Horatio, a friend of Hamlet's and a fellow student. When reading [ref] the conversations between Hamlet and Horatio, it becomes clear how Hamlet feels about his father's murder and his plans to avenge this murder. We also meet Laertes, son of Polonius and sister to Ophelia. Through interactions with Laertes we see another side to Hamlet. The similarities and the differences between them both help to show off more of Hamlet's personality and feelings about the revenge. Through both Horatio and Laertes we see not only Hamlet's plan for revenge but also some of his feelings of doubt and confusion between what he thought he wanted and what he was actually capable of.
When looking at the play Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, through a Marxist critical lens, there are many Marxist themes that apply. In Hamlet, there is a big difference between the monarchy and the peasants. Even in Hamlet’s time, the high class is treated in a better way than the low class. The royalty members’ poor decisions are easily overlooked or covered up, like Claudius covering up the murder of his brother. Hamlet is the only character that directly hates the monarchy and goes against it, making him more sympathetic to the lower classes.
In conclusion, Hamlet is undeniably the crown of indulgence into contemporary behaviors and insight into human complexities. Shakespeare’s exquisite use of theme, entertainment and characterization not only develops the intricate plot and body of the play, but also invites the audience into a realm of knowledge and understanding. Ultimately, the pursuit of knowledge is the greatest asset known to humankind. Its infinite possibilities excite the imagination and for that reason, one should value contemporary literary works. But it is important to respect and study the foundation of these pieces, for they base their content off of the classics.
From the very beginning of the play, it is very obvious that there is some sort of social disarrangement occurring in Denmark. The most consequential state of confusion in Hamlet is the death of Old Hamlet. The king falls almost directly underneath God in the Great Chain of Being. With the original king removed from the hierarchy, God and other angelic beings are disconnected from their control over the people, thus ensuing chaos. At the beginning, when Claudius says, “Though yet of Hamlet our dear brother’s death The memory be green, and that it us befitted To bear our hearts in grief and our whole kingdom To be contracted in one brow of woe” (Shakespeare 1.2.1-4), and “Now follows, that you know, young Fortinbras, Holding a weak supposal of our worth, Or thinking by our late...
Through Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, if looked at carefully, one can see many aspects of Marxist thought in the story. When analysing Hamlet through a Marxist critical lens, you need to pay close attention to the interactions between characters in different classes. (add sentence)
The Marxist Hamlet In his article "'Funeral Bak'd Meats:' Carnival and the Carnivalesque in Hamlet," Michael D. Bristol mingles Marxism and Bakhtin's notion of double discoursed textuality into a unique reading of Shakespeare's drama as a struggle between opposing economic classes. Bristol opens with a two paragraph preface on Marxism, highlighting Marx's own abnegation of Marxism: "Marx is famous for the paradoxical claim that he was not a Marxist" (Bristol 348). While he acknowledges some of the flaws inherent in Marxist criticism, Bristol uses the introductory paragraphs to assert the "enormous importance" of "the theory of class consciousness and class struggle" which Marxist theory includes (349). Having prepared readers for a discourse whose foundation lies upon "the most fundamental idea in Marxism," Bristol recasts Hamlet as a class struggle.
“Frailty, thy name is woman” (I.ii.150). The most significant reason for Hamlet’s first soliloquy is based on how he feels about “woman”, mostly referring to his mother. Hamlet shows no respect towards his mother. Shakespeare tries to show Hamlet and other male characters as assertive men. However, in Shakespeare different plays women play a variety of roles. Throughout the play Hamlet, Shakespeare demonstrated brutal treatment towards women by the male characters in the play, whether it be verbally or with emotional abuse. Not only were the women manipulated by the male characters, but they were also controlled by their beloved ones.
Incest, hatred, trickery, revenge, justice and a thousand more themes all appear in Shakespeare’s Hamlet. Each character is complex and troubled by something. They all have their own sins which they face. The story follows each character, whether evil or good, and creates a dramatic atmosphere in a whirlwind of external conflict which then stirs up emotions, fashioning an internal conflict. One most certainly drives the other. The main character, Hamlet, certainly is focused on the most in terms of internal conflict; however, the other characters give off many signs and speeches that tell us he’s not the only one. All of the scenes where we get the most in depth with Hamlet’s internal struggle.
Since Hamlet is notoriously the worst to the female sex, we will start with the assault on his character. Hamlet said "Frailty, thy name is woman,“ thus Hamlet believes his men are the epitome of stability and strength, right? Not really, but Hamlet's attitude toward women is definitely sexist and biased, and his hate seems to emanate from his revulsion at his mother's marriage to Claudius, which he considers “unfaithfulness” to his dead father. His attitude is totally unjustified.
Hamlet by William Shakespeare is one of the world’s most revered literature. The main character, Hamlet, is arguably one of the most intriguing characters the playwright ever developed. Hamlet is daring, philosophical, mentally unstable at times, and clever. Throughout the play though, these characteristics change and/or diminish as Hamlet is put through a plethora of unfortunate events. His father is murdered by Claudius, his mother soon after marries Claudius, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern betray him, and his girlfriend most likely commits suicide. While Hamlet is incredibly philosophical, indecisive, and full of resentment in the beginning of the play, he becomes violent, instinctive, caring and sympathetic towards the end of the play.
William Shakespeare’s tragic drama Hamlet invites various interpretations of the structure because of the play’s complexity. Let us in this essay analyze various interpretations of structure.
The play, Hamlet, written by William Shakespeare revolves around several themes. Specifically, incest and sexism play a major role in the play. The ideologies are first introduced through the actions of Hamlet, but they eventually transpire to other characters.
Hamlet was written in the early 1600's right before Shakespeare died. This play portrays society in such a way by showing how easily the public is fooled by people of authority. Shakespeare was writing this play as a form of entertainment but it is now seen as how society used to be. All of the deaths and the general setting of the play describes how society was back then and in essence, Shakespeare was just writing it to entertain and not to show how society was. When Hamlet ends up dying in the end of the play, it wasn’t there to show how society was but to merely entertain. Shakespeare showed how Europe was in the late 1500's to early 1600's, but in that time it was for pure entertainment. This so called entertainment showed society the possible uncertainties their lives were based upon.
Most of the worlds cultures follow a patriarchal society and this dates back to the beginning of time. In Hamlet the patriarchal society is clearly depicted by the characters throughout the play. Hamlet is portrayed as an indecisive character when it comes to making a serious decision, for example when he contemplates on killing Claudius. This shows the masculinity and femininity aspect of his character, which offends the ideals in a patriarchal society. Claudius, Polonius, Laertes, Ophelia and Gertrude follow the usual gender roles in a patriarchal society, as for Hamlet, his characteristics come from both gender roles.