Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theories on the impact of motivation on employee performance
Theories on the impact of motivation on employee performance
Theories on the impact of motivation on employee performance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Organizational survival is a relative term which is being conceptualized by organizations differently. Organization has multiple goals or functions to achieve and also exist in an environment beclouded with unpredictable inputs. Organizations are social system and several parties have their stake in organizations, hence, they do not exist in isolation. For an organization to survive, it must have the capacity to adapt, maintain itself and grow, regardless of the particular function it fulfils(Khanka, 2008). Greenberg (1987) suggested that a surviving organization depends on employees’ performance which is directly affected by individual job satisfaction at workplace and their commitment to the organization. Organizational survival is critical to the fortune of any organization. In order to achieve increased and sustainable business result, organizations need to execute strategy and engage employees justifiably. Engaging employees to perform means that the management of the organization owes a duty to create the needed conducive working environment which results in job satisfaction, organizational commitment and high performance. No …show more content…
Research has shown that most employees in the business world are willing to work and produce expected and desired results for their organizations if, and only when they feel, the organization treat them fairly, listen to their plights, give them the opportunity to showcase their strengths, and that is why Milukat et al (1990) confirmed that such treatments in which the managers do not care for the dignity of the employees, be harsh to them and indulge in the breach of trust, are denoted as unfair interactions. According to Leventhal et al (1980), the requisites for employees perception of fairness are the procedures that are consistent, provide the information, equitable, based on rules, allow voice and are bias
There were a few issues of fairness presented in Michael Simpson’s case that happens in in real world work places that prevents employees from working to their full potential or causing them to leave the work place all together. In this case study Michael Simpson is faced with the dilemma of whether or not he should leave Avery McNeil, the accounting at which he is currently working at. Simpson had interviewed with many consulting firms before graduating college, and had chosen Avery McNeil because it had the potential to allow him the most rapid advancement in his career. Within two years of working their he was promoted to manager and he received a great pay raise. However, a few days later Simpson came upon a sheet with pay grades of other
Effective organizations are able to clearly define their ethical expectations by setting high moral standards, writing codes of conduct, and utilizing mentoring programs. “Masters provide your servants with what is right and fair, because you know that you also have a Master in heaven” (Col. 4:1). When organizations clearly define their ethical expectations to their subordinates, they are much more likely to treat their customers fairly. Customers who are treated fairly are much more likely to be loyal consumers of the products or services that the company provides. This helps to establish a loyal customer base that a business can depend upon, thus providing a predictable source of annual revenue. If an employer treats their employees with respect, honesty, and with candor they’ll give the customer 110% (Rion, 2001).
With all discrimination aside, what’s important is to show some honest respect, ethics, value, and loyalty to every employee.
With the concept of organization justice, Shkoler (2017), defines the concept of organizational justice as the “Perceptions of the degree to which an organization provides its employees with appropriate, fair and respectful treatment, adequate and accurate information, and resources and rewards.” (Shkoler & Tziner, 2017). With this, the researchers (2017) found that employees who perceived injustice in the workplace and acted to resolve the issues developed some behaviors that demonstrated negative feelings towards the organization. These behaviors included a lack of motivation and manifestations of mistrust towards the workplace or the manager. (Shkoler et al., 2017). The consequence of perceived injustice to employers is job burnout. Emotional intelligence was measured using the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form. Organizational justice was measured by the justice scale and burnout was measured with the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Work Misbehavior was measured by the Interpersonal and Organizational Deviance Scale. Meetings were conducted among threatened participants to gather the information about what might be going on in terms of employee’s personal, social, and mental health. This included issues of expertise, self-esteem,
The Equity Theory touches on the effects these situations have on the employee’s motivational level. In society today employees are constantly comparing how they are treated compared to others within the company (Carpenter, Bauer, Erodgogan & Short, 2013). A major challenge being faced is the fact that everyone will see themselves as unappreciated for the things they contribute to the company when in fact they may be receiving the same treatment as their colleagues (Pinder, 1998). A person tends to base fairness on how other people or groups, otherwise known as referents, are rewarded for their “input-to-output” ratio compared to their own. The ratio has to deal with the way a person feels they are giving back to society compared to the “outputs” or rewards they feel they are entitled to for their contribution. Another theory in the work place is the expectancy theory. This theory says that employees will consider if the hard work will pay off, second is if their efforts will lead to greater rewards, and third is if the award valuable to the individual. Managers can use these facts to their advantage to motivate employees by awarding their hard work (Carpente...
Fairness should be a standard, a staple for survival like food, clothing or shelter” (“What is Fairness?”, 2016). Employees need to fully see that their time and effort is being equally regarded in the organization compared to other employees in the same type of roles. Otherwise, resentment and bitterness begin to flare up due to unfair treatment, possibly as a result of another employee getting greater rewards and recognition for the same type of work that other employees are performing. Further, employees perceive fairness in the workplace
What is organizational behavior? Prior to this course, I had never known that much of what is organizational behavior and in which ways it can impact the organization. Initially, over the course my knowledge about OB was expanded.
Organizations go through different life cycles similar to those of people. For example, people go through infancy, child-hood and early-teenage phases, which are characterized by rapid growth over a short period of time. Similarly, Organizations go through start-up, growth, maturity, decline, renewal and death. Employees in these phases often do whatever it takes to stay employed. (Ciavarella, 2001)
...ople for stability. In this todays modernised world, change has become inevitable and there is no doubt that change has to occur in order to survive and achieve success through a number of ways such as focusing on internal strengths, exploiting external forces and making potential threats into opportunities. In the long run, there are clearly more benefits rather than disadvantages because change does not have to be met with negativity. It needs to be embraced through cooperation between managers and employees, clear organisational culture and rewards that improve performance that are not based on tightly structured procedures. Ultimately, overcoming the difficulties of organisational change shows how management systems and people rewarded for stability is not just black and white but is shades of grey and how it is approached will determine its success or failure.
If the organization succeeds then the employees also succeeds. Employees must see the bigger picture and must feel that they are part of the organization and not just a one man show.
The effective Human Resource Management in an organization requires an exceptional standard set for motivation, job design, reward system and equity. Nowadays, people are more willing to avoid unfair treatment in the workplace than any other aspect. The fundamental concept behind Equity is an attempt to balance what has been put in and taken out at the workplace with a feeling of justice being served. Unconsciously, values are assigned to many various contributions made to the organization, hence causing an air of misbalance in the environment. There has always been a disparity in the view on the desirability or the cost effectiveness of policy measures. The importance of equity or reducing discrimination has gained a lot of attention in the labour market (Milkovich, Newman & Ratnam, 2009).
...onship between the employer and the employee. Employers who recognize this and proactively use strategies to promote employee involvement and fair employment practices will be likely to reap the organizational rewards of doing so.
The equity theory is the theory that I connected with and it made the most sense to me. I feel that it is very important for any manager to treat everyone fairly. If an employee perceives that they are being treated fairly, they will be motivated, will feel good about their work and be productive. Of course, if the employee does not feel that they are being treated fairly the reverse will occur; the poor productivity will eventually be noticed within the organization.
The search for competitive edge starts from the search for high performing employees. Having them inside the organization sustains competitiveness and efficiency. What if such kind of employees leaves the organization? This shall endanger profitability and performance, thus reducing the level of the organization’s competitiveness (Hadia Iftikhar, et al., 2015). One idea to retain employees within the company is employee satisfaction or the so-called job satisfaction. However, the next question could be: does job satisfaction add value to the organization? Some satisfied employees could be performing less or just content towards their working environment. They should also be engaged in the organizational goal and aim at productivity and competitiveness. “An employee can be satisfied with a job without being engaged in the job. Employee engagement is much more than being content with pay and the ability to leave at 3 pm. That contentedness is merely job satisfaction, and though satisfaction is generally enough to retain employees, it’s not enough to ensure productivity. On the other hand, employee engagement does promote increased productivity (Charles Rogel,
Work plays an important role in our daily life, it is considered much more huge part of our personal life. During our daily work we make many relationships throughout our career history. Sometimes these relationships become lasting, and sometimes employment discrimination might happen. This relationships that we thought it last could be cut off by the devastation of claims of discriminatory treatment. Discrimination in the workforce has been an issue since the first people of workers in United States in the present day and as well in the past. Some employees were subjected to a harsh working conditions, verbal abuse, denial of advancement,, and many other injustices. There was also the fact that certain employees were being treated differently than other employees.