Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical concerns of negligence
Ethical concerns of negligence
Essay on medical negligence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical concerns of negligence
The practice of medicine and surgery has long been considered a noble service, even a “calling”. Beyond its scientific and technical contributions, the medical fraternity has created a moral niche for itself—it has been accorded the respect of society. However, in the recent past, this perspective has changed for many the world over. There has been a sharp decline in the ethical value related to the medical profession, especially in India, and this trend is directly correlated to the problem of medical negligence. The very nature of the medical profession makes it vulnerable to civil and criminal litigation. Keeping this fact in mind, it is essential to take into consideration both sides of the coin—cases in which the medical professional …show more content…
It is an unacceptable behavior, not expected out of a prudent professional. What is expected out of him is a reasonably skillful behavior—adopting ordinary skills of the profession with ordinary care. Thus, medical negligence means lack of sufficient care and attention on the part of the attending/operating doctor or the hospitals as the result of which the patient has to undergo mental, physical and financial loss, or even face death. In order to establish medical negligence in a case, the following elements must be present: (i) Duty: A doctor patient relationship must be present between the doctor and the patient. (ii) Breach of Duty: After the presence of duty of the doctor towards his patient is established, the doctor should have cause breach of that duty or the doctor should have been reckless in performing his duties towards his patient. (iii) Injury Resulted due to Direct Breach of duty: This requires that damage has been caused as a direct result of the doctor being negligent towards his patient. (iv) Damage: In a case of negligence what is required to be proved is the presence of
Medical malpractice cases are difficult for the families who have lost their loved one or have suffered from severe injuries. No one truly wins in complicated court hearings that consist of a team of litigation attorneys for both the defendant and plaintiff(s). During the trial, evidence supporting malpractice allegations have to be presented so that the court can make a decision if the physician was negligent resulting in malpractice, or if the injury was unavoidable due to the circumstances. In these types of tort cases, the physician is usually a defendant on trial trying to prove that he or she is innocent of the medical error, delay of treatment or procedure that caused the injury. The perfect example of being at fault for medical malpractice as a result of delaying a procedure is the case of Waverly family versus John Hopkins Health System Corporation. The victims were not compensated enough for the loss of their child’s normal life. Pozgar (2012) explained….
The first component of the four D’s of negligence is duty. The dentist owed a duty of care to every one of his patients. Duty of care is a legal obligation a health care worker, in this case, the dentist, owes to their patient and, at times,...
Healthcare creates unique dilemmas that must consider the common good of every patient. Medical professionals, on a frequent basis, face situations that require complicated, and at times, difficult decision-making. The medical matters they decide on are often sensitive and critical in regards to patient needs and care. In the Case of Marguerite M and the Angiogram, the medical team in both cases were faced with the critical question of which patient gets the necessary medical care when resources are limited. In like manner, when one patient receives the appropriate care at the expense of another, medical professionals face the possibility of liability and litigation. These medical circumstances place a burden on the healthcare professionals to think and act in the best interest of the patient while still considering the ethical and legal issues they may confront as a result of their choices and actions. Medical ethics and law are always evolving as rapid advances in all areas of healthcare take place.
Medical malpractice has been a controversial issue in the healthcare setting for centuries. Apparently, there are laws to protect patients’ from medical mistakes and errors that are the result of negligence. After researching various laws and medical liability cases based on allegations of negligence, this paper will discuss and provide details on the medical malpractice case of Dorrence Kenneth versus Charleston Community Memorial Hospital. The case analysis will briefly explain information from the beginning to end, including: laws that were violated, codes in the healthcare industry that were breached by the physician and Charlesto...
In order to prove a negligence case the plaintiff must prove four things: (1) duty - that the defendant owed
Medical malpractice lawsuits are an extremely serious topic and have affected numerous patients, doctors, and hospitals across the country. Medical malpractice is defined as “improper, unskilled or negligent treatment of a patient by a physician, dentist, nurse, pharmacist, or other health care professional” (Medical malpractice, n.d.). If a doctor acts negligent and causes harm to a patient, malpractice lawsuits arise. Negligence is the concept of the liability concerning claims of medical malpractice, making this type of litigation part of tort law. Tort law provides that one person may litigate negligence to recover damages for personal injury. Negligence laws are designed to deter careless behavior and also to compensate victims for any negligence.
This negligence is due to the examiner's prejudiced and biased attitude, and misunderstanding of the code of ethics. For instance, there was a clinical rotation case, in which the medical specialist had pretended to be busy with paperwork only to avoid taking a patient into the examination room, because the patient was handicapped. As soon as the person entered the room, the sonographer did not make eye contact with the patient. Even though it was her turn to complete an echo, she did not approach the patient and thus he naturally felt uncomfortable. Instead, she deliberately decided to disregard his presence and engage in administrative activities. This is not a morally valid excuse, by which this particular patient can be delayed any type of healthcare, service, or assistance. In this situation, the caregiver believed that she will have to provide extra care, more attention, and dedicate additional time for performing the echocardiogram. The sonographer's choice to avoid the patient due to physical appearance and immobily, lacked any professional integrity and was
The act of medical responsibility originated in Rome and England dating back to the time of 2030 BC. The act states that a learned professional should always care with responsibility and care toward their profession. Around the year of 1200 AD, Roman law considered medical malpractice to be wrong and expanded their views about it all throughout Europe. It was said by the Code of Hammibal that if a person commits malpractice knowingly or unknowingly they would lose their job, hand, and an eye. Malpractice had also occurred throughout the U.S around the 19th century, due to the negligence of the state’s governments. Medical malpractice litigation has since been sustained for a century and a half by an interacting combination of 6 principal factors.” “Three of these factors are medical: the innovative pressures on American medicine, the spread of uniform standards, and the advent of medical malpractice liability insurance.” “Three are legal factors: contingent fees, citizen juries, and the nature of tort pleading in the United State.” (Mohr). The U.S is very familiar with malpractice b...
To succeed in a negligence action, you must prove each of the following. The first element, did George owe the plaintiff a legal duty of care? Legal duty of care paradigm includes that a person acts towards others with attention, prudence, and caution. George owed a duty of care to people by leaving his car in park.
An act or omission (failure to act) by a medical professional that deviates from the accepted medical standard of care.
Negligence, as defined in Pearson’s Business Law in Canada, is an unintentional careless act or omission that causes injury to another. Negligence consists of four parts, of which the plaintiff has to prove to be able to have a successful lawsuit and potentially obtain compensation. First there is a duty of care: Who is one responsible for? Secondly there is breach of standard of care: What did the defendant do that was careless? Thirdly there is causation: Did the alleged careless act actually cause the harm? Fourthly there is damage: Did the plaintiff suffer a compensable type of harm as a result of the alleged negligent act? Therefore, the cause of action for Helen Happy’s lawsuit will be negligence, and she will be suing the warden of the Peace River Correctional Centre, attributable to vicarious liability. As well as, there will be a partial defense (shared blame) between the warden and the two employees, Ike Inkster and Melvin Melrose; whom where driving the standard Correction’s van.
In our given scenario we are asked to discuss legal principles influencing the likelihood of any successful action against Steve in the grounds of negligence. Steve’s negligent driving caused a series of events that caused losses to the other people presented in the scenario and they take actions against Steve in the grounds of negligence. At first we must understand what negligence is. The tort of negligence provides the potenti...
Generally speaking, negligence, error, incompetence, these are the words commonly associated with malpractice, yet many have no idea what the true definition states. Malpractice can be defined, according to the legal nurse consultant of Independent Medical Evaluations Inc., Jan Parrish (2010), “as a violation of professional duty or a failure to meet a standard of care or failure to use the skills and knowledge of other professionals in similar circumstances.... ... middle of paper ... ...
In the case of suing for negligence, it is essential that a plaintiff show that the defendant caused the sufferance/injury the plaintiff has suffered. Each case has a practical response as to
The second element required of a plaintiff to prove medical negligence is the breach of the duty of care in a medical negligence case. If a doctor fails to practice medicine by the standard of care, he/or she breached her duty to their patient. A great example of this is Doctor B (defendant) should be treating Patient A (plaintiff) for pneumonia but treats Patient A (plaintiff) for a common cold. State laws often require medical negligence plaintiffs to provide a sworn statement stating that the medical standard of care was breached and caused harm (Supremus Group, LLC, 2008).