Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of freedom
Freedom and its importance
Freedom and its importance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of freedom
Individuality and mastery in a society governed by norms and traditions In every situation we face, we are more often than not a slave to both our abilities and experiences. Although how we react is ultimately a decision made by ourselves, even our initial response may very well be influenced by everything from our parent’s beliefs to our current social circle. Today, the idea of being in charge of your own future and the power of the individual is heavily romanticized, but the British society in the 20th century was far more focused on social class. Therefore, control over situations was largely dependent on which position you held in society. However, even the people who held high positions in society were largely governed by the British …show more content…
However, mastery of life is not always equivalent with independence from how your life ought to be according to society. Actually, in a system so strongly built upon tradition as Britain’s, independence only brings mastery of yourself, but a lack of mastery when considering maneuvering and controlling the world around you. Mastery over your life is, especially if you care about social position, dependent on how well you adhere to the world around you. Just look at the Archbishop, George the fifth and the long list of knighted doctors Albert attended before seeing Lionel. Although they are slaves to the system and its way of thinking, they all command, within this system, a great deal of respect and had therefore influence on society. However, even though you could easily interpret this to mean that mastery over yourself, such as Lionel, requires one to step outside of society, and mastery over society requires one to become a part of it, the truth is a lot more nuanced. The most prominent example being Albert’s older brother, David, who does not at all care about the social etiquette. Of course his reputation as a womanizer and playboy is due to his own personality, but he is nonetheless not the master of the decision about whether he will remain king or marry Wallis Simpson. And surely one could argue that his decision to marry Wallis stem from his own love and preference for leaving responsibilities at the door, but Wallis certainly has her own mastery over him. She even shapes his worldview, an example of which being when he proclaimed to Albert that their father “was dying to separate me and Wallis”, and he believed it simply because Wallis told him. This clearly demonstrates that the characters in “The King’s Speech” all show different versions of what control might look
Waites B.A. "The Effect of the First World War on Class and Status in England, 1910-20," Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 11, No. 1. (Jan., 1976), pg. 34.
Power, the perception of superiority over another human, is the source of many conflicts between people. Feeling inferior causes people to act beyond their normal personality. John Knowles strongly demonstrates this point in his work, A Separate Peace. In the relationship between Finny and Gene, Gene sets himself up to be inferior in the balance of power which motivates him to act irrationally to take power back from Finny.
Do we plan how we live our own life without following the society or do we live a life that follow what people in the higher level of society consider to be proper. Choosing how to live our life? However even if you chooses to dictate your own life without following what the society tells you to do; can you really achieve that freedom? In two book the “Death of Van Ilyich” by Leo Tolstoy and “Hedda Gabler” by Henrik Ibsen we’ll see two different person who choose to walk two different path.
Humans are born into certain circumstances, genes, and an environment which shapes them (Cave). These factors also create natural biases which also influence them. However, “ there is a big difference between having less and none at all” (Nahmias). In the novel, the characters exercise their free will based limiting factors beyond their control. For example, Zeena and Mattie come and stay in Starkfield due to the gender roles at the time. They could not get jobs to support themselves, and therefore relied on living in the Frome household (Wharton). This demonstrates how limiting factors influence influence how people exercise their free
...ni and Steinbeck draw attention to the diminishing power of an individual in a large society. By using motifs and settings, the authors explain the ability the world has to influence humans’ behaviors and lives negatively. Hosseini convinces us to remain individuals, as Steinbeck professed, and not conform to the world in which we live. As Dahli Lamma once stated, “The ultimate authority must always rest with the individual's own reason and critical analysis”. Is he correct: is it necessary for humans to make individual decisions rather than follow the in the footsteps of others?
Society in today’s world takes everything for granted. We do not thank anyone for what we have. It is just part of our daily life. All the legal rights we have are given. But we often forget about our history and the struggle people went through to get what we have today; Women as being seen as equals, having the right to vote and be in certain career fields that only men used to work in. Before democracy became a part of our societies, countries were ruled by kings and what the king said became law. Life was based on a hierarchy, and depending how much money or land you had determined how good of a person you were and who you were allowed to affiliate with. The higher you are on the hierarchy the closer you were watched by the community. Everything you did determined how people would see you. Especially during the 16th century when the protestant reformation and the peasant war dominated, peoples’ views changed which transformed laws and people themselves.
The nineteenth century was a time of significant upheaval, embodied by individuals challenging the institutions of the Victorian era and striving to achieve self determination. The conflicting relationship between the individual and society becomes apparent through analysing the individual’s confrontation with the orthodox economic and philosophical Victorian paradigms. Elizabeth Gaskell’s novel, North and South (1855), Richard Redgrave’s painting The Outcast (1851) and Ada Nield Chew’s letter A living Wage for Factory Girls at Crewe (1894) critique the dominant attitudes of society, emphasising the importance of the individual to seek autonomy for social progression to occur as well as self satisfaction.
One does not reach a certain plateau in life simply by coincidence. One does not have the backbone for greatness by never striving for something out of the ordinary. One does not experience adventure without being willing to play his adventurous part. One does not gain without risk. Winston Churchill, the politician, member of the House of Commons, and Prime Minister of Great Britain during World War II, had incredible ambition, courage, and confidence in his early life. In the Anglo-Boer War, he risked, and he was rewarded, wrote and became well known, was social and made acquaintances, and led others and gained trust. Chruchill wanted to make an impact on others—and succeeded in impacting the world.
Emily Bronte's erudite novel, Wuthering Heights, is set between the late eighteenth century and the early nineteenth century. This era was a time where the British bureaucracy had been a clean-cut, unprinted mandate on how an individual would live and work in his life. Those who commanded British society were the royal members, followed by the nobility. The nobles had been followed by the gentry, otherwise known as the upper-middle class. Members of the gentry were in possession of servants and rather grandiose estates, however unlike the members of the aristocracy, they held no titles; their status was most vulnerable to alteration. For instance, a man may view himself as a gentleman; he believes this supposition due to his polite behavior and articulation. However, to his humiliation, he discovers that his fellow citizens do not view him in the same degree. A man at that time had only been a gentleman according to the number of servants he had, the yards of land he owned, where his money had come from (whether through inheritance, land, or trade), and finally his eloquence. Having only one of these qualifications would do very little in aggrandizing one's status. The Linton and Earnshaw's dependence on such a volatile system served as the driving force for their actions and as the stimulus for the characters' destructive nature.
Imagine living in a world where you are disliked, not because you are a criminal, but because you are merely different. Imagine a life where everything you think or do is controlled by the government and going against the group norms is punished by isolation, torture or death. There is no freedom, no independence and no individuality. Now envision that the society you are part of does everything in its power to make you believe that these are the ideal living conditions for you.
In the 1920’s, people lived life however they felt like. Coming off a colossal war, many of the citizens believed they had this right. Examining humanity during this time period shows that groups of people fell into a hierarchy. By living life recklessly the high society class hurts others along the way. The people in the Valley of Ashes have lost all optimism. And the middle class which is portrayed as straightforward hard workers is left with self pride. After further social examination, the ranking of humans is purely based upon their wealth and status; breaking down into three classes of people. A high class made of money; a lower class in desperation … And a middle class is that the only societal group to have balance between work and play.
Born on June 25, 1903 to parents Richard Walmesley Blair and Ida Mabel, “George Orwell” was born Eric Arthur Blair in Motihari, Bengal, India (Merriman, “George Orwell”). Orwell referred to his own family as a member of the “lower – upper – middle class” in his 1933 book The Road to Wigan Pier; this definition means that though his family was a literal member of the middle class, their atmosphere was that of “impoverished snobbery”(Merriman; “George Orwell”, Biography.com). The class Blair had been born into was called by the Indians “sahibs” (“George Orwell”, Biography.com). The year after his birth, Blair moved with his mother back to England, where he grew up with sisters Marjorie and later Avril until his father’s return in 1912 (Merriman, “George Orwell”). He began his education at age five at an Anglican parish school in Henley – on – Thomas; he started at the St. Cyprian school in Sussex two years later, at the age of 7 years (Merriman, “George Orwell”). The common use of corporal punishment throughout schools in England in the time period leads to the belief that Blair, subjected to this abuse of power, may have come to despise and resent the exercising of authority (Merriman, “George Orwell”). His first work, published while Blair was studying at the St. Cyprian sc...
Narrator, “He was not an ill-disposed young man, unless to be rather selfish, is to be ill-disposed: but he was, in general well respected; for he conducted himself with propriety in the discharge of his normal duties” (11). This section helped me understand Mr. Dashwood’s character and society’s requirements. This helped me realize that society's expectations and requirements are quite selfish. An example of which I took away was if you present yourself with propriety you would gain respect.
Throughout my life, I was convinced that a successful life was measured by adapting to, and meeting, the expectations of the bourgeois society in which I lived. From my youth, I had always been drawn to people of high standing in society; I adopted their views on life and established friendly relations with them. When I graduated from law school, I took money from my father for suits, new luggage, linens and toiletries, all from the finest shops. I did not rely on my own good sense to direct my ethical character. I believed that if I looked like/resemble those of high society, my life would go according to plan and my life would be fulfilled and have meaning.
The child and the serious man live without having to embrace their own freedom, so they set up their ends as absolutes as they live in a world to which they submit themselves. That being said, they also escape the anguish of freedom (the realization of the intimidation of freedom). They do so because they are protected “against the risk of existence by the ceiling which human generations have built over [their heads]” (36). They remain devoid of a sense of responsibility, living easily by the ready-made values around