Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The positive and negative effects of greed
The positive and negative effects of greed
Effects of greed
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The positive and negative effects of greed
Love – The Most Important Pillar of a Successful Relationship
Decisions made in present can have huge impacts on the future; especially decisions that pertain to one’s whole life. One such decision is the decision of getting into a relationship or getting married. There are many questions that arise in one’s mind while making this decision. How wealthy is that person? How is the personality of that person? How good-looking is that person? How is the job position of that person? How is the family of that person? In today’s modern society, these questions get so important that people ignore the fact of whether love is present in their relationship. Such an attitude can make life really miserable; it can never lead to a successful relationship.
…show more content…
When greediness and a want of money become more important than the feeling of love, so many problems arises in the lives of those people that there might not be any possible solution for them. Certainly, things that look fascinating may not be the right choice every time. Money has a lot of attractive power; and this makes it have a much larger influence on people’s mind than it should. As said by Garth Brooks, the famous American Country singer, “You aren’t wealthy until you have something money can’t buy.” The main character of “The Bloody Chamber” was a seventeen year old girl when she decided to marry a guy named Marquis. She was fascinated by his lifestyle, his property, and his wealth; but she did not feel anything for Marquis. When asked by her mother whether she is sure that she loves Marquis, she replies back that “I’m sure that I want to marry him” (Carter 13). She even ignored the fact that he was considerably older than her and was married thrice before. Her desire to become rich and to have a financially secure life made her marry Marquis even though she did not love him. She never thought that this decision could get her into many kinds of problems. She never thought about what kind of husband she wanted. Undoubtedly, money can make people so blind that they lose their decisive power, and make poor decisions. Relationships that rely on such poor decisions and extreme greed can never be …show more content…
Usually, it turns out to be the death or a really desperate condition of the controlling person as no one can live a happy life by making others unhappy. Everyone has to pay off for the deeds they perform. Sykes had to pay off for his bad actions when the rattlesnake attacked him instead. Delia ignored his yearning for rescue and silently waited under the China berry tree for his death. It is certainly true that “if someone in your life makes you unhappy than they make you happy, it doesn’t matter how much you love them, you must let them go. Not because you no longer care, but finally because you are keeping your needs and happiness first.” This moment marked Delia’s freedom; it marked the end of her sufferings that she faced due to Sykes. Certainly, bad actions always results in misery and punishment. Marquis faced a similar condition when he was shot by the main character’s mother when he was trying to murder the main character. The murder of both the dominant partners perfectly shows that the relationships that do not keep love as the main bond of feelings always end up in a wretched condition. They are very far from being eternal or successful; in fact, they are indeed
Finally Delia becomes free from Sykes when his plan for Delia to be bit by a snake backfires, and he is the one who is bitten and dies.
Money can cause people to act selfish and arrogant, especially when they have so much money they do noteven know what to spend it on. In the novel,
largely inferior to men at the time when this story was written. The story revolves around a couple Delia and Sykes, who have been unhappily married for 15 long years. It focuses on the turning point in Delia’s life when her husband wants her to go away from his life but eventually falls in his own trap and dies.
...sgressions against his wife, Delia must also face the consequences of her decision. It is here that the reader must decide Delia’s fate. Hurston illustrates Delia’s struggle throughout the story, and the reader’s sympathy for Delia increases. Both the mood and the tone of the story are very dark, and Hurston uses this to bear down on the reader, pushing the reader to ‘root’ for Delia. When the snake attacks Sykes, the reader feels triumphant for Delia and may believe that good has prevailed over evil. One must question if relishing in Delia’s victory implies that one would also give in to temptation as Delia did. Hurston poses the question to the reader to consider if he or she is strong enough to resist the temptation of evil.
The lives we lead and the type of character we possess are said to be individual decisions. Yet from early stages in our life, our character is shaped by the values, customs and mindsets of those who surround us. The characteristics of this environment affect the way we think and behave ultimately shaping us into a product of the environment we are raised in. Lily Bart, the protagonist in Edith Wharton’s The House of Mirth, is an exceedingly beautiful bachelorette who grows up accustomed to living a life of luxury amongst New York City’s upper-class in the 20th century. When her family goes bankrupt, Lily is left searching for security and stability, both of which, she is taught can be only be attained through a wealthy marriage. Although, Lily is ashamed of her society’s tendencies, she is afraid that the values taught in her upbringing shaped her into “an organism so helpless outside of its narrow range” (Wharton 423). For Lily, it comes down to a choice between two antagonistic forces: the life she desires with a happiness, freedom and love and the life she was cut out to live with wealth, prestige and power. Although, Lily’s upbringing conditioned her to desire wealth and prestige, Lily’s more significant desires happiness, freedom and love ultimately allow her to break free.
Sykes had a mistress named Bertha who he spoiled all the time, but the people in town always wondered why he never paid attention to Delia. Walter Thomas, one of the men from the store, said, “Ah 'd uh married huh mahself if he hadnter beat me to it.” (Hurston) All the men in town were jealous of Sykes because of Delia. But Sykes, on the other hand, didn 't see what he had right in front of him. The plotting of Delia 's death was all done by Sykes. He went out of his way to get a rattlesnake and place it in the clothes hamper with the lid on, hoping it would strike her while washing clothes. When Delia saw the snake, she scurried outside and hid in the barn until Sykes arrived home. Delia calmly stated, “Ah done de bes ' ah could. If things aint right, Gawd knows it aint mah fault.” (Hurston) After the freak accident of Sykes being struck by the rattlesnake and suffering a long and painful death, Delia, hearing all the screaming and moaning coming from inside her “broken” home, sat under a Chinaberry tree that was in the front yard. She felt a sense of relief after she heard Sykes crying for her help and her knowing that she could not do anything to help. Her fear of their relationship and of him that went on for 15 years, was finally over and she felt as if she achieved her
In the article “The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love” the author, Stephanie Coontz, talks about how love has rarely been the motivating reason for marriage, and how in many cultures it still isn’t. She also informs readers of the reasons why people got married in ancient cultures, different types of motivations for marriage in modern cultures, how the union between spouses often isn’t the most important relationship in other countries, and how marriage is often not monogamous.
“Love is an ideal thing, marriage a real thing; a confusion of the real with the ideal never goes unpunished,” said Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. An American wealth-research corporation, Prince and Associates, once did a research on a sample group of more than thirty women that if they would marry for money. Surprisingly, about approximately seventy-five percent of the group said “yes”. In fact, many women admit that they would rather marry a billionaire that they barely know than a penniless guy they truly love. We often read in novels and see it in those late night soap dramas, in the most romantic setting with exquisite background music, the main character solemnly promises his passionate love to the female actor with ninety-nine roses in his hand; the female character of course feels touched by his actions and blissfully accepts his proposal. Depressingly, those fairy-tales are too beautiful to become true. Take Mr. and Mrs. Bennet from Pride and Prejudice for an example, it is quite obvious that these two irresponsible adults did no marry for pure love. Mr. Bennet was more attracted to Mrs. Bennet’s physical appearance in his youth, and he rushed into courtship without further consideration. As time passes, Mrs. Bennet no longer has her good-looking face. Twenty years later, Mr. Bennet lost interest in her and regret ever marrying her. As you can see, in the twenty-first century, a time full with fierce competition, material gain is the first thing most women concern about when they marry, followed by physical attraction and security to a stable home.
“Money is the root of all evil”(Levit). Man and his love of money has destroyed lives since the beginning of time. Men have fought in wars over money, given up family relationships for money and done things they would have never thought that they would be capable of doing because of money. In the movie, based on F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel, The Great Gatsby, the author demonstrates how the love and worship of money and all of the trappings that come with it can destroy lives. In the novel Jay Gatsby has lavish parties, wears expensive gaudy clothes, drives fancy cars and tries to show his former love how important and wealthy he has become. He believes a lie, that by achieving the status that most Americans, in th...
Upon reading more closely, the story is revealed to present a tragic journey of a man who has lost his sanity but seeks solace in the materialistic comforts of his old life. The story succeeds in making a number of statements about human nature: that wealth is the most powerful measure of social status and anyone without it will face ostracization; that denial of one 's mistakes and unfortunate circumstances only leads to more pain; that even the most optimistic people can hold dark secrets and emotional turmoil inside them. All of these themes compel the reader to ponder their real-life implications long after the story is
Marriage and divorce are culturally ruled, as I have noted from my interviews with friends and family of different cultures who have married, perhaps some have divorced, and with each experience in love they have culturally accepted values that pertain to their overall ideals and values on love, marriage, shared values, etc. The purpose of this paper is to establish a clear understanding of human nature as it relates to the portrait of adulthood and mate selection; institution of marriage, procreation, and even divorce as it relates to acceptance of failed expectations and moving on. I was not surprised to learn that the people I interviewed were traditional in their beliefs that marriage is a serious commitment that should be respected and approached for longevity.
For centuries now, we have been taught by society that being monogamous is the socially accepted norm. In fact, having more than one marital or sexual partner in many cultures is considered to be taboo. Yet that leaves many people wondering how that tradition was even constructed and whether or not we should continue to live in a monogamous manner. In this paper, we are going to examine if being monogamous is truly a part of human nature and whether or not we are meant to be with only one marital or sexual partner throughout the course of our lives. Now more so than ever, society is moving in a direction that challenges traditional ways of life and many people are no longer following this socially constructed norm. In fact, monogamy has become a very popular, controversial topic that is continuously being addressed by the media and it has people second-guessing if remaining monogamous fits their ideal lifestyle. This is an especially important topic for our generation, due to the fact that we are currently at the stage in our lives where we set goals for ourselves that will pave the roads of our futures. Deciding whether or not to be monogamous is just as important as picking career paths and it holds just as much significance in the way it affects the rest of our lives. This is a problem in relational communication because whether we decide to be monogamous or non-monogamous, our decision will ultimately affect the way we interact with others and the way we approach intimate relationships. With today’s society slowly moving against monogamy, it’s time to decide if limiting ourselves to one marital and sexual partner is really in our nature, or if it’s just a tradition of the past that no longer holds the social significance that ...
From dreams deferred to identity affirmed Lorraine Hansberry’s, “A Raisin in the Sun,” presents readers with many differing themes. The most prevalent and reoccurring theme is the effect money plays on society’s views of manhood and happiness. Readers are shown multiple characters with a diverse view on manhood. From Walter Lee with his matching societal views that a man should be able to provide whatever his family needs or wants to Lena whose views are a biased compilation of her late husband’s behavior and her own ideals, that a man should maintain his honor and protect his children’s dreams.
This story theme is like the well-known cliché, “What goes around, come back around”. In other words, Destiny vs. Karma and Confidence-building vs. Existence are the central theme of this story, in my opinion. Destiny vs. Karma because throughout the story Sykes would do cruel things to his wife Delia, he would talk to her anyway and treat her bad. He knew his wife feared snakes, but instead still brought a snake into their home with the intent to either kill or scare Delia out the house. But in the end was his karma, everything that he did to try and destroy Delia, that snake end up biting and killing him. It seemed like Delia Jones had put her with her husband for a long time and through everything that he did to her she finally gained the
A third reason why a marriage based upon love is an inadvisable decision is because it is wise for a couple to have financial stability before entering into a marriage. A solid relationship requires a sense of stability and the capacity to provide a secure future for one’s family. This need for a stable marital environment is typically brought about by ensuring one or both spouses are financially stable and can care for the family as a whole.