Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The merits and demerits of import substitution strategy for industrialisation pdf
Arguments for protectionism
Question of protectionism and free trade
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Constantin Freiherr von Stackelberg
Michaelhouse School
“Do import tariffs increase welfare in emerging economies?”
About:
-Consists of the Introduction, Literature review and Methodology
-The References needed are to be found before the article summaries in the literature review
Motivation why this was chosen and aim (Introduction):
The aim of this research task is to examine if and how you can improve economic welfare and growth through import tariffs and to identify which theories and methods of using import tariffs are the best suited to increase economic growth in a developing country. An import tariff is a tax imposed on imported goods and services (investopaedia). This paper will use GDP per capita as a proxy in measuring economic welfare of people and more specifically it will examine how the differences in applying import tariffs can lead to significant differences in their impact on economic growth developing countries.
The two economic theories that will mainly be looked at and examined are the “Classical Keynesian Theory” and the Import Substitution Industrialization Theory”. It will argue that these theories do not work well independently of one another. For instance, Malaysia (a country that has its own unique way of using import tariffs to help their economy grow) will serve as a case study to help discuss how import tariffs can help the welfare of a county.
This topic was chosen because import tariffs are often controversial as they can increase growth as domestic industries are protected from outside competition on the one hand while they pose a threat to global free trade by distorting prices to the disadvantage of the consumer. One example is the European Union (EU) which has created...
... middle of paper ...
...ves of import tariffs?
How are import tariffs used to increase an economies GDP?
In terms of protection are import tariffs the most effective barriers to entry?
Would import tariffs go under the topic of an imperfect market?
Which country used import tariffs to the largest and most effective extent?
In South Africa has there recently been an issue on import tariffs that made a difference in the economy?
What does the World Trade Organization have to do with import tariffs?
Is the European Union or the Southern African custom union better in the way they set about import tariffs and why is the way they use them better?
What exactly are the classic Keynesian theory and the Import Substitution theory?
What would you say is what they call the ‘Optimum Tariff’?
A list of possible references and resources:
This will be done when all the information is collected.
He then, states that the number of jobs lost barely even put a dent in the number of jobs produced by trade. Another important issue of the trade system is that the people who get rich from trade, keep getting richer while the poor stay poor. This is partially solved by protectionism (taxing imports), although it slows economic growth in the long run and protects some of the jobs that would be lost in the short run. To help understand the price of trade barriers, he explains this by stopping trade across the Mississippi River. This shows that the east side would then have to stop producing their goods and spend some of their time producing what the west side used to export. Although, there would be an increase in jobs, it would not be efficient because they are not using specialization to their full advantage. The author then moves on to the point that trade lowers the price of goods, due to it being cheaper to produce in other areas. He portrays this by showing why Nike can produce shoes in Vietnam instead of the United States. He further elaborates his point by proving that trade helps poor countries as
Country Reports on Economics, Policy and Trade Practices: Courtesy of UM- St Louis. (2000). Available:gopher://gopher.umsl.edu:70/00/library/govdocs/crpt/crpt0029
The reference list of this article includes 54 references. The reference cited most often throughout the article is reference number 10,
The Avalon Project, allowed Congress of the United States to take advantage of the people. The tariff angered many people. It didn’t consider everyone’s feelings, especially southerners. The people in the South argued that these tariffs are illegal. The people of South Carolina declared the tariffs useless because they weren’t fair, and southerners avoided the tariffs. To make sure that it was really illegal, the people of South Carolina made sure no one overstepped. Everything that was bound under the tariffs was nullified in South Carolina, from promises. It was made illegal for any official of the state and of the United States to tax anyone within the limits of the state of South Carolina. Legislators were informed by the people of South
Regional trade agreements have been prevalent since the early 1990s. A Regional trade agreement removes all barriers to trade and foreign investment, which means that poor economies are not allowed to use import tariffs to protect their growing industries or their farmers from floods of cheap imports. Free trade agreements also include additional rules on investment that pose a prospective threat to poor people’s access to public services. This clearly states that even though poor countries have the advantage of strength in numbers as compared to the rich economies and countries, the former are more likely to be pushed into accepting unreasonable demands of the richer economies. Therefore, it can be analyzed that a Regional Trade Agreement between equal partners can prove to be beneficial for both, but such an agreement between unequal partners ( rich and a poor economy) shall probably prove to be beneficial for the stronger economy.
The United States free trade agenda includes policies that seek to eliminate all restrictions and quotas on trade. The advantages of free trade can be seen through domestic markets and the growth of the world economy. T...
While free trade has certainly changed with advances in technology and the ability to create external economies, the concept seems to be the most benign way for countries to trade with one another. Factoring in that imperfect competition and increasing returns challenge the concept of comparative advantage in modern international trade markets, the resulting introduction of government policies to regulate trade seems to result in increased tensions between countries as individual nations seek to gain advantages at the cost of others. While classical trade optimism may be somewhat naïve, the alternatives are risky and potentially harmful.
In November of 2004, the United States ran a fifty-four billion dollar trade deficit, translating to over 600 billion for the entire year. This deficit is a result of the disparity between the amount of goods that the US imports and the amount it exports. To equalize this deficit in its current account, the American government sells assets from its capital account, often to foreign investors. This phenomenon is seen as a serious threat to the success and continued growth of the nation’s economy, tied in with popular concerns that the United States is losing its competitive and dominant edge in global economics. The traditional economic theory employed to solve this problem calls for a return to mercantile protectionism, through use of tariffs and subsidies to drive up the price of imports and lower the price of exports. Running contrary to this is a second option: increasing domestic savings and lowering government spending. These theories both aim to decrease American dependence upon foreign imports and investment, and ultimately equalize the enormous trade deficit that currently exists.
Even in a world focused on the benefits free trade and aimed at achieving the goal of free trade, states are protectionist by nature. Unfortunately, the design of the international system allows for stronger nations to be more protectionist, leaving the weaker states even more vulnerable. A study that is more intensive than a critical commentary should be devoted to analyzing the impact of free trade on developing nations. I was limited to the readings and prior knowledge, and thus couldn’t provide a sufficient analysis on the fair treatment of developing nations. I was skeptical of the one reading that focused on fairness of international institutions because of the statistics that indicate these nations have not done well in recent decades. I would like to look into this more given more time and resources.
level. The sand is Both developed and developing countries benefit from tariff reduction. The consumer will have more choices with more products and a wider price range.... ... middle of paper ... ... Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/0109121e.pdf?expires=1394821453&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=148EDDDFD930AFCF166F34498B8601B6.
International trading has had its delays and road blocks, which has created a number of problems for countries around the world. Countries, fighting with one another to get the better deal, create tariffs and taxes to maximize their profit. This fighting leads to bad relationships with competing countries, and the little producing countries get the short end of this stick. Regulations and organizations have been established to help everyone get the best deal, such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), but not everyone wants help, especially from an organization that seems to help only the big countries and those they want to trade with. This paper will be discussing international trading with emphasis on national sovereignty, the World Trade Organization, and how the WTO impacts trading countries.
Constitution Commerce The word constitution means that which is changeless, but the meaning of the constitution is always different in the different condition or different areas. The word constitution provides the different national rules and action for all the time, and it can use nation development at every stage. When the constitution makers make the constitute than they could have in at their mind exacting applications of a language used but in which no as such limitation connect them. So as we know that the word commerce is used for the buying and selling different things at the huge sale.
Import Substitution Describe import substitution (Inward looking) developmental strategy, clearly outlining the differences between the first and second stage. Assess its effectiveness in promoting economic development. Compare inward looking and outward looking strategies and discuss the assertion that the latter is superior. The First Stage of Import Substitution: All present day industrial and developing countries protect their manufacturing industries for the domestic markets. While the industrial countries of today rely primarily upon the usage of relatively low tariffs, developing countries apply high tariffs or quantitative restrictions which either limit or completely exclude competition from their imports.
Free trade is a form of economic policy which allows countries to import and export goods among each other with no government interference. In recent years there has been a general consensus in economist’s stance on free trade. They view free trade as an asset. Free trade allows for an abundance of goods with increased varieties and increased availability. The products become cheaper for consumers and no one company monopolizes an industry. The system of free trade has been highly controversial. While free trade benefits consumers it has the potential to hurt manufacturers and businesses thus creating a debate between supporters of free trade and those with antagonistic positions.
Provided below is a review of the existing literature from the point of view of the present