Imperialism In A Passage To India

1401 Words3 Pages

Terry Greene
Mr. Manwell
Eng 3
Period 3
4-14-14
AMDG
Failure

British economic interest began in the 1600s when the East India Company set trading posts in three different Indian states. What would India have that Europe would want? The simple answer to that particular question is its spices. Asia was like the Middle East and spice was like the oil of present day trading, and India was one of the most productive markets in the world at that time. During the first hundred years of European presence, the India’s ruling Mughal Dynasty kept the western powers and European traders under control. However, by 1707 the Mughal Dynasty began to fail and in 1757 the East India Company became the leading power in India.(Embree 176)With this shift in …show more content…

E.M. Forester’s novel, A Passage to India, demonstrates the relationship between two very different cultures and their inter-workings as a society, and how they fail to peacefully cohabitate the same country.
A Passage to India, inspired by Forester’s experience in India, focuses on the relationship established by the British colonies and the Indians in Chandrapore and draws attention to the difference between the European and Indian way of thinking. In this particular novel, Imperialism dominates both cultures’ ways of life. Imperialism favors the British better than the Indians, and white superiority motivates the main characters. The novel explores the ways in which imperialism informs the human value, or rather, human character under The British Raj, both its derogatory and unifying effects. The ghost of the Colonial Other comes to permeate all the relationships within A Passage to India, creating a gulf over which positive human contact tries, but ultimately fails, to jump. (Lehmann 85) Although the two groups have a different thought processes, the two extremely diverse ethnicities share the same pessimistic outlook on the other The Indians have a pessimistic outlook on the evolution of the …show more content…

Interracial relationships almost always fail do to the social milieu of the two races being separate and not equal. The most important relationship in the novel is between Dr. Aziz and Cyril Fielding. Their friendship only happens only because each individual had an open mind and both are very naïve; however each individual’s naïve attitude clashes with the other. Fielding is an outsider among his fellow peers because he does not view Indians as inferior. He truly believes that people from different cultures can come together and get along. “The world, [Fielding] believed is a globe of men who are trying to reach one another and can best do so by the help of good will plus culture and intelligence.” (Forester 44) This overly optimistic heavily romanticized attitude counts as half the reason why their friendship fails. The other half is Aziz’s negligence. Aziz believes that a long lasting friendship could happen if the two are racially and socially equal, however he knows deep down that this will never happen. “In every remark [Aziz] found true meaning, but not always the true meaning. And his life though vivid was largely a dream.’’ (Forster 73) Aziz is a dreamer who lies to himself constantly and deliberately chooses to deny and ignore all the signs that their friendship will never endure. Aziz also tries to achieve the same intimate relationship that he has with Cyril Fielding with other English

Open Document