Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of colonisation on africans
Effects of colonisation on africans
Effects of colonisation on africans
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of colonisation on africans
When sitting down to write her college thesis, Caroline Elkins, intended to focus on the successes of the British Empire when educating its colonies in preparation for their impending independence; however, her discoveries concerning the brutal mistreatment of the Kikuyu people in the 1950s led to the publication of her novel Imperial Reckoning that uncovered 50 years worth of British brutality of it’s remaining colonies. As elucidated by Elkins, the massive cover-up done by the British government was entirely to keep up their image and reputation as the country that won World War II and saved the world from complete totalitarianism, when in reality they had indeed mimicked their very enemies with a virtual rebirth of the Holocaust in Kenya—less …show more content…
In typical British fashion, the independence process was projected to take at least a generation and in the meantime, planned on continuing to prosper off of its colonies. Losing India as their crown jewel in 1947 was the first big blow, and demonstrated to the other colonies how quickly independence was possible. Britain feared such massive and rapid decolonization as it would make them appear weak, both internally and externally. The Cold War was beginning to heat up—excuse the pun—between the US and the Soviet Union, leaving Britain flailing in the distance, determined to still have a paramount stance in international affairs. British efforts to conceal the incriminating evidence in Kenya were done so at a crucial point in history—Britain had a fragile image to uphold as the antithesis of typical European imperialists such as Germany or France who were remembered as the vicious colonists that ravaged through Africa in the early 20th century. Peaceful independence on British terms was the main priority in educating the colonies to be successful during post-British rule and continue as allies with positive relations as Britain had done with countries such as Australia and New Zealand; however, those were mainly white settled territories and Britain’s discriminatory values prevented them from viewing their African colonies as fellow counterparts of
The colonies weren’t close to accepting the attitude and policies that Great Britain was throwing at them. They felt that they too were Englishmen and should have all the rights any Englishman would have.
As time passed, however, Britain’s standing a Great Power quickly diminished. Despite this, British possession of nuclear weapons, United Nations Security Council membership, access to political an...
In document A, it shows European colonies holding 7 African colonies, France and Britain holding the most. France colonized more in the North West and Britain's was widely spread. In document B, Ruskin says “ Seizing every piece of fruitful waste ground she can set her foot on, and there teaching these her colonists that their first aim is to be to advance the power of England by land and sea.” This quote shows that England is trying to advance in any land that they can get their hands on, and to gain political power. Also in the second document of document B, Fabri says “It would be wise if Germans would learn about colonial skills from our British cousins and begin a friendly competition.” This exhibits many countries wanting to compete against the British for land and colonization, so they would learn from their skills in order to surpass them in
Britain was committed to imperializing countries that benefitted them. Benjamin Disraeli, the British prime minister during the 1870’s, persuaded Great Britain to imperialize because it was a way to guard vital British markets overseas, resources, and jobs, as well as enhance their well known reputation as being the most powerful country (Butler). Great Britain wanted to spread its culture and religion (Butler). As a result, Christianity was dispersed imperialized countries under the name of Great Britain. Another major reason Great Britain imperialized in Africa was because other European countries that were participating in the “Scramble for Africa” (Berard). This was the time period where certain European countries fought over what countries in Africa to imperialize. Britain wanted more power, and therefore, more land as well. Therefore, they resorted to imperializing lands such as those in Africa.
Imperialism in the late 19th century became a competition among European countries to take control of as many areas in Africa before the others did. For the most part, France, England, and Germany competed for bragging rights to these countries. They thought at the time that the more colonies a country had the more prestigious and noble that country looked. European countries were in pursuit of demonstrating their power. Not only this, but imperialism helped build a strong economy in the mother country because they could invade their colony and strip them of their natural resources in order to produce goods with. In turn, that country could then sell these good to the colony in order to make money. Rudyard Kipling talks about this fierce competition in “The White Man’...
Great Britain had economic interests in the Atlantic colonies since the 16th century. Through many laws, acts and conquests, Britain sought to control and influence the colonies. Britain ultimately failed in this endeavor. Though the British government could divide and allot the land as they pleased, they could not control it effectively. By the end of the French and Indian War, they had lost all of their ability to control the Atlantic colonies.
At the time, the British had no allies, and the other countries such as France and Germany, were getting economically more stable. By taking over Africa, and setting up colonies, they would have allies and a sense of protection. Germany and France were also some of the bigger powers in Europe, and the British feared them because they needed to keep up with the competition of their rival countries. They were pretty much forced to practice imperialism because of the growing threat of Germany and France. The British continued to be imperialists until the beginning of World War 1, in 1914, because they feared that they might lose their empire.
“The sun never sets on the British Empire,” Great Britain often bragged. By 1914, about 85% of the earth’s surface was colonized by Europe. Between 1884 and 1885, The Berlin Conference took place to carve up the African continent (Background Essay). Europeans saw high potential in Africa and thought the continent was empty, even though it was not. It was roughly “untouched” and they thought they could do anything they wanted (Doc.1). Great Britain’s colonization in Kenya affected the country’s religion and culture, education, and government.
... Although the imperialization of Africa started out as a beneficial deal to both Africa and Europe, it quickly took a turn for the worse as Europe started to take complete control of African colonies. The Europeans wanted African colonies for many reasons. They wanted new land and the natural resources that can only be found in Africa, they wanted the new market opportunities that having colonies in Africa would open up to them, and they wanted to stay in competition with other European countries. The motives of the Europeans quickly deteriorated as they started exploiting the native Africans and abusing the slave trade that they had promised to abolish with the three C’s.
Insurgencies are no strangers to history, and have incessantly proven to be turning points for those populations who are oppressed or subjugated, typically into a chance for positive change. However, history books tend to overlook Africa’s remarkable political growth in the modern era, even though their population has endured centuries of oppression and have rebelled similarly to that of the Soviet Union insurgencies in the twentieth century. A strong example of African political strife would be between the Mau-Mau and the British in Kenya. The Mau-Mau Uprising was a civil war fought in Kenya, which began on October 21st, 1952, and ended on January 12th, 1960. The rebellion had been fought by the African rebellion groups, the Mau-Mau, against the British government in an attempt to regain Kenyan land which had been procured from the original owners and permeated by white colonists. Their road to improvement had become blocked by colonialism, and the Mau-Mau chose to express their displeasure through violence and upheaval. Following the realization that they had become subjugated in their homeland, the Mau-Mau Uprising is a chief instance of African peoples opting to wage war for their freedom. It is an event which revealed how politically conscious Kenyans were at the time, and how they fought to create their own future apart from the colonialist world of which they were slowly becoming prisoners.
Its monarchy has led them to success with nationalism and patriotism, and even some of their own thought that ruling over more countries (particularly India) would make them “the greatest power in the world” (Roberts, p. 225). They were interested in imperializing and having control over others, to spread their beliefs and government across the seas. All they needed was “food, raw materials and cash” while they supplied “minerals and capital and sold services” and traded their goods with Europe (Roberts, p. 50). Trading with other countries and having to rely on Britain for large goods further pushed them as a clutch for some countries to continue their own rule. Queen Victoria, who ruled over Britain, believed that they could not be defeated; the thought of it did not even exist, which brought forth a very arrogant political party. They believed that to follow their type of rule will guarantee results of overall success and power against other countries (Roberts, p. 108). For example, the British antagonized the Egyptians by decreasing employment rates and raising taxes without the possibility of Egyptians becoming part of their own office. With the lack of the people representing themselves, the power of a foreign nation continued to dominate and further influence the colony’s
This essay will be about a comparative study of the representation of colonialism as a positive or negative force. The texts that are being used are my core text ‘Heart of Darkness’ by Joseph Conrad and ‘Collected Poems’ by Rudyard Kipling. The partner text will be ‘Swami and Friends’ by R. K. Narayan.
"The wind of change is blowing through this [African] continent, and whether we like it or not, this growth of national consciousness is a political fact. We must all accept it as a fact, and our national policies must take account of it" (Macmillan). This speech, made by the prime minister of England in 1960, highlights the vast changes occurring in Africa at the time. Changes came quickly. Over the next several years, forty-seven African countries attained independence from colonial rule. Many circumstances and events had and were occurring that led to the changes to which he was referring. The decolonization of Africa occurred over time, for a variety of complex reasons, but can be broken down into two major contributing factors: vast changes brought about in the world because of World War II and a growing sense of African nationalism.
Providing the reader with charts and maps, Abernethy gave a full visual understanding of the complex nature of colonialism and its’ revolving actors. Each paragraph delivered an immense amount of information that carried weight in it of itself. Backed by a ton of sources, Abernethy did not hesitate to gives his readers the complete embodiment of colonial conquests and not just solely through a “Eurocentric” lens. As a reader, I commend him for adding non-European perspectives to his analysis as well and how non-European conquests succeeded in some areas and failed in others in
In Oroonoko, Aphra Behn sheds light on the horrors of slavery and expansionism that Britain