Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Masculinity is explored by
Masculinity is explored by
Masculinity is explored by
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Overtime, we have seen the influence and power that authors held through their writing(s). Authors such as William Shakespeare, Charles Dickens, and J.K Rowling have had lasting impacts on society whether it be through the entertainment business (ex. J.K Rowling and the Harry Potter franchise) or through studies inside and outside of the classrooms. Gloria Anzaldúa adds to the list of influential authors as her novel Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza has “the power to change minds” (Cantú and Hurtado 1), and has been taught in classrooms particularly geared towards women studies and feminist theory. Borderlands is a metaphor that conveys the limitations- socially, culturally, geographically, and sexually- within the border of two counties, particularly the U.S Mexican border. Gloria furthers her discussion in chapter six and seven by expressing her frustration of being stuck between these borders, the battle of feminism, and the loss of herself due to her oppressors. Gloria Anzaldúa stated “As a …show more content…
mestiza I have no country…yet all countries are mine. As a lesbian I have no race…I am cultureless” (Anzaldúa 81). Gloria expresses her frustration at the limitations she has because of the borders society place upon an individual’s place of origin, sexuality, gender, and culture. Gloria’s confusion of being a Chicana, American, and Indian is seen through the mixture of English, Spanish, and Chicana languages that she implores in her writing in chapter six and seven to allow for her readers to comprehend the irritation she feels for a being a mestiza. Not only is her frustration of being a mestiza seen through her writing style, Gloria further convey her feelings when she mentions “cradled in one culture, sandwiched between two cultures, straddling all three cultures and their value systems, ta mestiza undergoes a struggle of flesh, a of borders, an inner war” (Anzaldúa 78). On top of being of various cultures, another inner war that she faces is being a lesbian in a society that fails to accept her sexuality- looking upon it negatively and making her feel like an outcast as it is out of the norm. In addition to Gloria’s frustration to being a mestiza and a lesbian, her womanhood also appears to further her annoyance.
Gloria’s culture degrades women as they value a patriarchal system that promotes the confinement of women and “machismo” (83). Being opposite of a man means “you are defective” (83). The value of woman is lowered and they are instead convinced that their duty lies in household chores/ motherhood. Gloria takes an interesting view of male dominance seeing it instead as a man’s inferiority and low self-esteem. Thus, seeing that a man’s lack of respect and dignity creates this “false machismo,” where sexism is formed- causing brutalization and degradation of women (83). Chapter seven expresses the battle and struggles that Gloria faces in addition to other women for their feminist behaviors/views in a male-dominated world. However, she motivates her readers to overcome those limitations and “develop equal power with…those who have shamed us”
(84). Additionally, Anzaldúa struggle of being a woman on top of being a mestiza and lesbian causes to feel at a loss of herself. White supremacy, homophobia, and patriarchy are the metaphorical borders that she has to tackle. Her feelings of being cultureless, an outcast, and without race because of her sexuality conveys her way of wanting to overcome these borders/oppressors to finally free, find, and be who she really. In chapter six, titled “The Path of Red and Black Ink,” goes over the writing process and purpose she hopes to achieve. Gloria sees her writing as needing “to be ‘fed,’ la tengo que bañar y vestir” (67). Hoping that as the ancient Aztecs “believed that through metaphor and symbol, by means of poetry and truth, communication…could be attained,” she can get communicate with her audience through her metaphors of the borderlands and within her writing (69). Her writing that is inspired by “living in a state psychic unrest in a Borderland,” reveals the truths of the borders (white supremacy, patriarchy, homophobia, cultural/geographical divisions) to reach her audience- both teaching and inspiring them to do better and be better while achieving the concept of Self.
Until the last hundred years or so in the United States, married women had to rely on their husbands for money, shelter, and food because they were not allowed to work. Though there were probably many men who believed their wives could “stand up to the challenge”, some men would not let their wives be independent, believing them to be of the “inferior” sex, which made them too incompetent to work “un-feminine” jobs. In the late 19th century and early 20th century, feminist writers began to vent their frustration at men’s condescension and sexist beliefs. Susan Glaspell’s “A Jury of Her Peers” and Zora Neale Hurson’s “Sweat” both use dialogue to express how women are capable of and used to working hard, thinking originally, being independent
Reyna Grande 's novel, Across a Hundred Mountains, focuses on the dynamic of the development and rethinking of the concept of a traditional Latino patriarchal family built up around male dominance. In low income and uneducated cultures, there are set of roles that throughout time have been passed by from generation to generation. These gender roles most often consist of the men being the breadwinner for the family. While the women stay home to cook, clean, and raise the children. Women are treated as possessions with limited rights and resources. Throughout the novel, Grandes challenges gender roles in the story of a young woman named Juana who, despite all adversity, fights stereotypes and is able to rewrite her own ending.
Martinez, Demetria. 2002. “Solidarity”. Border Women: Writing from la Frontera.. Castillo, Debra A & María Socorro Tabuenca Córdoba. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 168- 188.
Society continually places restrictive standards on the female gender not only fifty years ago, but in today’s society as well. While many women have overcome many unfair prejudices and oppressions in the last fifty or so years, late nineteenth and early twentieth century women were forced to deal with a less understanding culture. In its various formulations, patriarchy posits men's traits and/or intentions as the cause of women's oppression. This way of thinking diverts attention from theorizing the social relations that place women in a disadvantageous position in every sphere of life and channels it towards men as the cause of women's oppression (Gimenez). Different people had many ways of voicing their opinions concerning gender inequalities amound women, including expressing their voices and opinions through their literature. By writing stories such as Daisy Miller and The Yellow Wallpaper, Charlotte Perkins Gilman and Henry James let readers understand and develop their own ideas on such a serious topic that took a major toll in American History. In this essay, I am going to compare Gilman’s “The Yellow Wallpaper” to James’ “Daisy Miller” as portraits of American women in peril and also the men that had a great influence.
The Life of Two Different Worlds In “Into the Beautiful North,” Luis Alberto Urrea tells a well-known story of life for thousands of Mexican people who seek a better future. He presents his novel through the experiences of the lives of his main characters that have different personalities but share a common goal. Through the main characters we are presented with different situations and problems that the characters encounter during their journey from Mexico to the United States. Urrea’s main theme in this novel is the border that separates both the U.S. and Mexico, and the difficulties that people face in the journey to cross.
The eternal endeavor of obtaining a realistic sense of selfhood is depicted for all struggling women of color in Gloria Anzaldua’s “Borderlands/La Frontera” (1987). Anzaldua illustrates the oppressing realities of her world – one that sets limitations for the minority. Albeit the obvious restraints against the white majority (the physical borderland between the U.S. and Mexico), there is a constant and overwhelming emotional battle against the psychological “borderlands” instilled in Anzaldua as she desperately seeks recognition as an openly queer Mestiza woman. With being a Mestiza comes a lot of cultural stereotypes that more than often try to define ones’ role in the world – especially if you are those whom have privilege above the “others”.
Traditionally, men have held the power in society. Women have been treated as a second class of citizens with neither the legal rights nor the respect of their male counterparts. Culture has contributed to these gender roles by conditioning women to accept their subordinate status while encouraging young men to lead and control. Feminist criticism contends that literature either supports society’s patriarchal structure or provides social criticism in order to change this hierarchy. “The Yellow Wallpaper”, by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, depicts one women’s struggle against the traditional female role into which society attempts to force her and the societal reaction to this act.
The late nineteenth century was a critical time in reshaping the rights of women. Commonly this era is considered to be the beginning of what is know to western feminists as “first-wave feminism.” First-wave feminism predominately fought for legal rights such as suffrage, and property rights. A major hallmark of first-wave feminism is the concept of the “New Woman.” The phrase New Woman described educated, independent, career oriented women who stood in response to the idea of the “Cult of Domesticity,” that is the idea that women are meant to be domestic and submissive (Stevens 27). Though the concept of the New Woman was empowering to many, some women did not want to give up their roles as housewives. These women felt there was a great dignity in the lifestyle of the housewife, and that raising children was not a job to scoff at. Mary Freeman's short story “The Revolt of 'Mother',” tells the story of such a domestic woman, Sarah, who has no interest in leaving her position as mother, but still wishes to have her voice heard in the private sphere of her home. Freeman's “Revolt of Mother,” illustrates an alternative means of resistance for women who rejected the oppression of patriarchy without a withdrawal from the domestic lifestyle.
The normalization of the expected and restrictive feminine behavior shifts the blame from the individual over the structural problems of patriarchy, which masks its involvement. Sandra Bartky suggest that feminine subjects must undergo a process of “de-skilling” (Bartky 1990, 77). The skills acquired under a patriarchal system are become difficult to resist as they become tied to a person’s identity but are crucial in reversing the effects of self-surveillance, gaining power over their own bodies, and to begin the deconstruction of patriarchal
Monique Wittig, a radical feminist, illuminates, “For what makes a woman is a specific social relation to a man, a relation that we call servitude”. The concept of justifying the female inferior image based on biology and the ‘w...
Using both English and Spanish or Spanglish the author Gloria Anzaldua explores the physical, cultural, spiritual, sexual and psychological meaning of borderlands in her book Borderlands/La Frontera: A New Mestiza. As a Chicana lesbian feminist, Anzaldua grew up in an atmosphere of oppression and confusion. Anzaldua illustrates the meaning of being a “mestiza”. In order to define this, she examines herself, her homeland and language. Anzaldúa discusses the complexity of several themes having to do with borderlands, mestizaje, cultural identity, women in the traditional Mexican family, sexual orientation, la facultad and the Coatlicue state. Through these themes, she is able to give her readers a new way of discovering themselves. Anzaldua alerts us to a new understanding of the self and the world around us by using her personal experiences.
...present powerful characters, while females represent unimportant characters. Unaware of the influence of society’s perception of the importance of sexes, literature and culture go unchanged. Although fairytales such as Sleeping Beauty produce charming entertainment for children, their remains a didactic message that lays hidden beneath the surface; teaching future generations to be submissive to the inequalities of their gender. Feminist critic the works of former literature, highlighting sexual discriminations, and broadcasting their own versions of former works, that paints a composite image of women’s oppression (Feminist Theory and Criticism). Women of the twenty-first century serge forward investigating, and highlighting the inequalities of their race in effort to organize a better social life for women of the future (Feminist Theory and Criticism).
Jamaica Kincaid’s “Girl” shows in society how a woman should be placed and what it means to be a woman. A women doesn’t question her partner, instead she is subservient to him. A woman’s duties include staying at home taking care of the children and cooking; while the man works and brings home the money. A feministic approach to Kincaid’s “Girl” points to the idea of the stereotypes that women can only be what they do in the home, they should only be pure and virtuous, and their main focus should be satisfying their husband.
As women, those of us who identify as feminists have rebelled against the status quo and redefined what it means to be a strong and powerful woman. But at what cost do these advances come with?... ... middle of paper ... ... Retrieved April 12, 2014, from http://www.feminist.com/resources/artspeech/genwom/whatisfem.htm Bidgood, J. 2014, April 8 -.
Women have always been essential to society. Fifty to seventy years ago, a woman was no more than a house wife, caregiver, and at their husbands beck and call. Women had no personal opinion, no voice, and no freedom. They were suppressed by the sociable beliefs of man. A woman’s respectable place was always behind the masculine frame of a man. In the past a woman’s inferiority was not voluntary but instilled by elder women, and/or force. Many, would like to know why? Why was a woman such a threat to a man? Was it just about man’s ability to control, and overpower a woman, or was there a serious threat? Well, everyone has there own opinion about the cause of the past oppression of woman, it is currently still a popular argument today.