Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact on music piracy
Negative effects of illegal music downloading
Impact on music piracy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
This paper describes various forms of DRM (Digital Rights Management), the DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act), and methods of bypassing the afore mentioned subjects. Different forms of transmission of DRM protected material also has a direct relationship with what kind of files are protected by the DMCA and will be discussed. This paper will also discuss how law makers are attempting to halt illegal music sharing and how these attempts are in vain.
Illegal Music Swapping
Illegal digital music swapping is something that millions of people do every day, even children in the elementary school age range know how to “torrent” music from the internet. The definition of illegal music swapping is a very loose statement, since the DMCA (Digital Millineum Copyright Act) has guidelines that vary for different types of file. For instance a digital music file encrypted using the Apple DRM (Digital Rights Management) might receive more protection from the DMCA than a file that is encrypted with the Microsoft Windows Media DRM. DRM determines whether or not the device that the file is being accessed by meets the requirements for that file. In the application iTunes if your computer is not authorized to play music purchased by another user of the iTunes Store, the DRM in iTunes will detect this and will not allow you to play the song. DRM also covers a song released in one particular format for a particular player from being used for another player application, such as an iTunes DRM protected file will not play in Windows Media Player, even if the codec (language used to decipher different types of video and audio files such as .mp3, and .wma) is supported by a player the content has the DRM embedded inside of the file itself.
The fir...
... middle of paper ...
...ed “torrenting”. When something is “torrented”, it is spread across multiple computers in hundred of fragments. After someone has there “torrenting” software setup properly it tracks the fragments, downloads them, and re-assembles them into a duplicate of the original file. Torrenting is most common because it provides a degree of anonymity too music sharing, it is safety in numbers.
From the number of people involved in illegal digital music sharing, any law attempting tohalt this activity seems frivolous. Also after the original file has been modified, the DMCA does not see this file as breaking any laws because it is not exactly the same as the original. If a user torrented an original file they would be breaking the laws set forth in the DMCA, but if the user modified the file in a small way the DMCA would not be able to find this person guilty of anything.
About 5 years ago Napster, a network software application, was being used to download music files. The network was growing faster than anybody who ever started it would have imagined. When artists, songwriters, and all of the other people involved in making CD's realized that this wasn't going to slow down any time soon, they decided that they needed to stop Napster. Little by little, Napster was being less used and it became harder to find the songs wanted until nobody used it anymore. When all of this was happening, other applications were made available. Kazaa and Grokster are probably the two most used Peer to Peer, or P2P file sharing networks you can find, although there are many others.
In all, people should be prosecuted for downloading music illegally. Stealing is stealing and there is no other way to put it. Whether it's in a file or in your physical possession there is no difference between the two. People are losing their jobs and money due to the ignorance of people downloading illegal music files. The people know they are stealing and it should be stopped for smaller fees or shorter jail time. People need to be prosecuted for their
Along with the development of a file format (MP3) to store digital audio recordings, came one of the new millennium’s most continuous debates – peer-to-peer piracy – file sharing. Internet companies such as Napster and Grokster became involved in notable legal cases in regards to copyright laws in cyberspace. These two cases are similar in nature, yet decidedly different. In order to understand the differences and similarities, one should have an understanding of each case as well as the court’s ruling.
What is considered piracy under the DMCA law? Piracy occurs when someone other than the copyright holder copies the product and resells it for a fraction of the cost that the legitimate producer charges.” Ripping a movie off the DVD and posting online or borrowing a friend’s newest version of microsoft word and downloading it are examples of digital
Imagine you are driving down the road, listening to the radio, and a new song begins to play that catches your attention. You decide, after listening to this song, that you enjoy it, so you listen carefully to the DJ to hear what the name of the song is and whom it is by. When you get home, you log on to your favorite music-downloading site and download the song that you heard earlier in the day. Would you consider yourself stealing and disobeying copyright laws? Many artists believe that people who are downloading their music are stealing from them and they are striving to stop it. On the other hand, many artists and music lovers are happy with the new technology of music downloading. I believe that there is a way to reach a happy medium in-between these two groups to solve this problem. With a few website modifications, along with some minor changes in the music world, we will be able to leave this problem behind us.
The story really begins with Napster and its free software that allowed users to swap music across the Internet for free using peer-to-peer networks. While Shawn Fanning was attending Northeastern University in Boston, he wanted an easier method of finding music than by searching IRC or Lycos. John Fanning of Hull, Massachusetts, who is Shawn's uncle, struck an agreement which gave Shawn 30% control of the company, with the rest going to his uncle. Napster began to build an office and executive team in San Mateo, California, in September of 1999. Napster was the first of the massively popular peer-to-peer file sharing systems, although it was not fully peer-to-peer since it used central servers to maintain lists of connected systems and the files they provideddirectories, effectivelywhile actual transactions were conducted directly between machines. Although there were already media which facilitated the sharing of files across the Internet, such as IRC, Hotline, and USENET, Napster specialized exclusively in music in the form of MP3 files and presented a user-friendly interface. The result was a system whose popularity generated an enormous selection of music to download. Napster became the launching pad for the explosive growth of the MP3 format and the proliferation of unlicensed copyrights.
Nowadays, it is extremely easy to download free music from the internet. All someone has to do is download some peer to peer file-sharing application such as Kazaa, Edonkey, Blubster, or Bearshare, and you have unlimited access to download just about anything that you please. But is downloading free music from one of these applications legal? I think that it is. This paper will look at both sides of the argument.
The traditional two party digital rights management system contains only owner and consumer. But it is insufficient to satisfy today’s business needs and content delivery. Hence, multiparty multilevel digital rights management architecture has been proposed [3]. The term multiparty refers to the multiple parties in the architecture such as the owner, distributors, sub-distributors and consumers and multilevel refers to the multiple levels of distributors/subdistributors, involved in the distribution chain. The DRM system handles media data in a compressed and encrypted format. The owner distributes this compressed and encrypted domain to the buyer through the multilevel distributer network, where the distributers have no access to the original content. However for providing media authentication, traitor tracing or proving the distributorship the distributors needs to watermark this media content.
pirate software. A user who logs on to one of these BBS can download Full
The research topic chosen for this study is based on Digital Rights Management (DRM) and how it affects the stakeholders involved in digital purchases e.g. the content provider, the consumer etc. Current technologies and future trends in the areas of digital copyright security are also avenues of research that are pertinent to the topic.
Physical piracy-the copying and illegal sale of hard-copy CDs, videotapes, and DVDs-costs the music industry over $4 billion a year worldwide and the movie industry more than $3.5 billion. These numbers do not factor in the growing (and difficult to measure) problem of Internet piracy, in which music and movies are transferred to digital format and copies are made of the resulting computer file. Journalist Charles C. Mann explains why Internet piracy has the potential to be vastly more damaging to copyright industr...
Not only is downloading this media illegal, it is also morally wrong. It is our responsibility to know the difference between right and wrong - downloading this media is something that shouldn’t be done. The artists that create the CDs pay a lot of money to make the CDs for our pleasure, and in return they expect everyone to pay for their CDs (its how they make their money). In this respect, downloading illegal music through peer to peer networks is the equivalent to stealing a CD from an actual store.
P2P is used in a way that two or more computers are connected and sharing files without going through a separate server computer. Universities and Companies have been using this concept for more than 30 years. P2P network became famous after the invention of Napster in 1990. Technically most of the P2P networks are not pure peer networks because they use the central servers for some function, which makes them hybrid peer-to-peer.
Moreover, hackers came up with new ways to remove the digital copyrights so the same as before one downloads music and distributes them around. The industry gets its revenue from selling this content, whether it’s online or in stores, this funds new projects and allows for better products in the future. The public should be aware of this, downloading the content for free, and not buying it will decrease revenue for the companies, stopping them from undertaking future projects. “Production companies should lower the price on their products, I can’t buy music for at least 20$ per album and DVDs for 30$, I only make 200$ per month,” said George Issa, a music fan who spends most of his nights downloading music from the internet, “when there is an album or movie that I really like, I try to buy it legally, I don’t think I am doing anything wrong, they are wrong making money off our backs,” he added.
There are two common types of Internet sharing. The first is online sharing, and is basically done by uploading files you have into a certain website, like “Mediafire”, and it would be available for free download directly from the website. The second is P2P sharing, which is a peer-to-peer sharing network that is established by P2P applications such as, “BitTorrent,” “UTorrent,” or “LimeWire”, which allows people who have the requested file link and share files from all over the world. These two methods are considered illegal, and violate files owners copyrights, because the files that are being shared are not provided for free by the original owner, which may lead into a decline of sales of the product. Moreover, in certain countries like the United States or the United Kingdom, any violation of copyrights could lead to a severe punishment by the government. These punishments may spread fear into some people and make them stop illegal sharing, which will to some extent make those people who are actually using these methods to download, will shift into legal purchasing. Furthermore,...