The story of Blindness by José Saramago signifies ignorance that can form in human communities and its harmful effects. This ignorance exhibits itself throughout the story in the fragility of societal organization, such as through the government’s attempt to quarantine the blindness, only to have the entire city succumb to the disease. This shows that the organizations in charge demonstrate ignorance by acting without knowing the full implications of a crisis.
Saramago also raises questions regarding the true nature of humans. He writes, “We know that human reason and unreason are the same everywhere” (169), meaning that fundamental moral beliefs are the same from person to person. He explores this idea by combining scenes of immorality in humans with symbols of animals for comparison between instinctual ignorance and morality. For example, in the scene in which a group of men rape women in return for food, he writes, “They were snorting like pigs,” and “They were jostling each other like hyenas around a carcass,” (p. 178-179) to convey that these people were no longer human because of their ignorance of human morals. Through these images Saramago is saying that this ignorance will be the undoing of humanity.
…show more content…
Images of violence occur throughout the story to show the harmful effects of ignorance, such the death of the car thief.
Greed and deception took over the car thief when he met the first blind man, which clouded his judgement and made him ignorant to suffering he caused. Once the car thief was blind and in quarantine he suffered from an infection in his leg and realized the error of his ways: “His conscience awoke and censured him bitterly for having allowed himself to steal a car from an unfortunate blind man” (73). This shows how ignorance in one area, in this case in the form of blindness, can reveal one’s misdeeds in another area, such as
morality. Another major symbol evident in Blindness that reveals themes of ignorance is political organization and power. When the city dissolves into chaos the blind try to organize. People come together in the town square, “groups of blind people who were listening to speeches from other blind people, at first sight, neither one nor the other group seemed blind, the speakers turned their heads excitedly towards their listeners, the listeners turned their heads attentively to the speakers” (298). The image of the town square shows how this type of gathering gives people a sense of control despite their blindness, but the fact that blind people are given authority over the blind expresses how everyone is just as ignorant as everyone else. The author also uses literary elements to convey the meaning of ignorance. For example, the way the author writes -- no quotation marks, all one paragraph, no names -- puts the reader in ignorance similar to that of the blind characters. The location in which the story takes place is also ambiguous, as is the governing power, which further emphasizes the idea of blindness and ignorance of what is going on. The reader is given limitations to how they perceive the world yet can still understand what is going on with some fluidity. This shows how ignorance in the form of blindness is hard, but one can get used to it.
He states, “A crowd in panic has no sense or conscience” (Esposito 71). This communicates the sheer horror and hopelessness of the trapped victims. The experiences of the witnesses compounds this image, making the book vivid and persuading the audience to consider the far-reaching nature of the tragedy. How prepared are we for disasters in the contemporary world? I could only shudder in fear as I visualized Esposito’s fear of ill-informed crowds. Esposito persuades me to embrace the concept of educating the masses to remain calm under storm to reduce the number of
In the Essay “The Human Cost of an Illiterate Society” by Johnathan Kozol. Mr. Kozol uses quotes, key points, experiences and his knowledge companied by effective forms of rhetoric throughout the essay to speak to highly educated and intelligent individuals who have to power to make a difference. He explains in detail how an illiterate society is affecting not only the illiterate’s life, but also the country’s democracy, and endangering the lives around them as well. He interviews individuals who share their experiences of fear, hopelessness, confusion and frustration when dealing with everyday life situations that most people could figure out on their own.
In Mark Twain’s essay, “The Damned Human Race,” he uses a sarcastic tone in order to show that humans are the lowest kinds of animals and ar not as socially evolved as they think they are, making his readers want to change. In order to inspire his audience, Twain motivates them by providing specific comparisons between animals and humans. These satiric examples emphasize the deficiencies of the human race and entice them to change for the better.
In the short story “Cathedral” by Raymond Carver, the narrator, Bub, is as metaphorically blind as his guest, Robert, is literally blind. Bub has many unwarranted misconceptions about life, blind people in particular. He also has many insecurities that prevent him from getting too close to people. Through his interaction with Robert, Bub is able to open his mind and let go of his self-doubt for a moment and see the world in a different light.
The narrator is biased against the blind from the beginning. For instance, he stereotypes all blind people thinking they ...
In conclusion, the novel Blindness and the movie Elysium, critic today’s world about healthcare and political system. There were important and common characteristics that they both demonstrated of the dystopian societies. In both the novel and the movie, the citizens live in a dehumanized state and the natural world has been banished and distrusted. These types of dystopian novel/movie show what can possibly happen in the future.
His, "idea of blindness came from the movies", where, "...the blind move slowly and never laughed" (Carver 98). These misconceptions of blindness form barriers between the blind and the sighted. Carver breaks down these barriers as he brings the vastly different lives of these two men together. Those of us with sight find it difficult to identify with the blind. This man, like most of us, can only try to imagine what life is like for Robert.
prove to be blind when it comes to the world they are in. By looking
...e by the desire to hunt and kill and how they are putting themselves at risk by venturing into unknown, unsafe land. Hence, the reoccurring them that humans are naturally savage is evident in this passage. With savagery comes danger, reinforcing the feeling that the boys will encounter trouble.
Books are more than simple stories, they have a message to send, whether it be in a direct or indirect way. Books can also tell us about the author’s life, beliefs, inner ambitions and fears; Moreover, they often project the writer’s vision about their environment, reflecting their society in which they lived. Writers like F. Scott Fitzgerald and Ernesto Guevara were capable, not only of portraying the society in which they are immerse, but also to convey them in an exquisite social critique. Such literary pieces of art do not criticize in a direct way, nor to specific people or events. They, however, present the vision of the author’s concern with social issues of injustice, misguided values and loss of direction.
The husband in Raymond Carvers “Cathedral” wasn’t enthusiastic about his wife’s old friend, whom was a blind man coming over to spend the night with them. His wife had kept in touch with the blind man since she worked for him in Seattle years ago. He didn’t know the blind man; he only heard tapes and stories about him. The man being blind bothered him, “My idea of blindness came from the movies. In the movies, the blind moved slowly and never laughed. Sometimes they were led by seeing-eye dogs. A blind man in my house was not something I looked forward to. (Carver 137)” The husband doesn’t suspect his ideas of blind people to be anything else. The husband is already judging what the blind man will be like without even getting to actually know him. It seems he has judged too soon as his ideas of the blind man change and he gets a better understanding of not only the blind man, but his self as well.
When defining the word blindness, it can be interpreted in various ways. Either it can be explained as sightless, or it can be carefully deciphered as having a more complex in-depth analysis. In the novel Blindness, Jose Saramago depicts and demonstrates how in an instant your right to see can be taken in an instant. However, in this novel, blindness is metaphorically related to ‘seeing’ the truth beyond our own bias opinions.
Kenneth Grahame’s use of personification by having animals represent humans in many of his stories can be interoperated as an analogy for how making selfish and rash choices, can cause humankind to look barbaric and primitive, just as animals.
The moment you are infected with a disease, you are label by the many imaginations of society. These imagination are not only creative and limitless in culture, but they ultimately create a division between normal and abnormal. In the novel illness as Metaphor, the American author Susan Sontag critiques how speaking disease metaphorically has many consequences by leading to the stigmatization of a disease beyond its scientific condition. Sontag teaches us that stigmatization of disease causes society to become counterproductive by developing an unfair bias when talking about disease and those afflicted with the disease. In particular, the way society discuss blindness based on metaphors create negative stereotypes of blindness and people afflicted with blindness, which by extension makes society counterproductive in understanding
The fixation on the old man's vulture-like eye forces the narrator to concoct a plan to eliminate the old man. The narrator confesses the sole reason for killing the old man is his eye: "Whenever it fell upon me, my blood ran cold; and so by degrees - very gradually - I made up my mind to rid myself of the eye for ever" (34). The narrator begins his tale of betrayal by trying to convince the reader he is not insane, but the reader quickly surmises the narrator indeed is out of control. The fact that the old man's eye is the only motivation to murder proves the narrator is so mentally unstable that he must search for justification to kill. In his mind, he rationalizes murder with his own unreasonable fear of the eye.