Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Is globalization undermining state sovereignty
Is globalization undermining state sovereignty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Is globalization undermining state sovereignty
There has been a long debate whether globalization is undermining the monopoly of local power of a sovereign state. This debate is due to the fact that the term globalization itself is subjective and broad. There are two distinct approaches in this debate. Hyper globalists argue that the demise of the state sovereignty is the product of globalization. On the other hand, sceptics reject the idea of the “globaloney” of the globalization: they emphasize on the importance of the sovereign state in the international politics (McGrew, 2011). This essay examines the arguments which justify the hyper globalists’ position. We will firstly define the terms globalization and sovereignty. Secondly, we will pinpoint on which aspects of the sovereign state has been undermined by the process of globalization. Then , we will conclude by analysing the various strategies a state can implement to respond to the globalization challenges.
Firstly we need to define “state sovereignty”. Therefore, we will be relying on the Westephelian notion of the term. “Westphelian sovereignty located supreme legal and political authority within territorially determined states” (McGrew, 2001). The Westphelian notion emphasises on the territorial borders and the concept of sovereign ruling. The leaders have the full authority over their own issues; however, it is consent that no ruler has the right to intervene in the affairs of other sovereign states. Moreover, the notion emphasizes that there is no legal and political authority beyond the state (Ritzer, 2010). This approach to state sovereignty will help us to analyse if globalization is bringing demise to the state sovereignty.
One approach to globalization is that it is “simply the widening, deepening, and s...
... middle of paper ...
...oreign policy can mainly be labelled as “fear”. The fear for being a European- English country located in the Asia Pacific.
To conclude, the world is now constituted of more than 190 states which are mainly independent on actors ranging from multinational corporations to non-governmental organizations, from terrorist groups to drug deals, from regional to international institutions. Nowadays, the monopoly of power of a certain sovereign state is being influenced by a larger international community. Political, social, and economic factors known to erode the concept of state sovereignty such as the spread of transnational ideas, spread of technology, economic dependency etc... Finally, a state should create a well-balanced policy or strategy to respond to the challenges of globalization. The policy should fulfil the state national interest, and its people will.
All the legal transformations identified in this paper, I argue, point into one direction: a less salient principle of sovereign equality and ever-increasing important transnational regimes. Today, the absolute authority of a state over its territory and population is under more limitations than it was seventy years ago.
...each into the international community. This is evident in the types of nationalism I’ve explored, both new nationalism and cosmopolitanism. They are opposing views of what nationalism is or can become in the future, but both have qualities that allow smaller nations to continue their existence in the international society. I have inadvertently expressed my opinion that nations are structurally political and that it is in the interest of their leaders to appeal to their unique traditions in order to maintain their power. Either way, the choice between these two approaches rests on the hands of the nation and its relationship with the international society. Globalization does not hinder the existence of the nation but rather helps it establish a place in the structure of power in a world which is still dominated by politically and economically dominant super powers.
The belief of a nation running their own state is a right for most of us. However, this is only a new conviction. The right for one to sovereign their own nation has come due with hard work. Illicit imperialism has stricken humanity for numerous years. Due to the aspiration of power certain nations today do not self-govern their own state. But why would there be a desire for this power? Some of the main items include natural resources, increased assets, and military expansion. Ideally this is great if this is voluntary external rule, but when it’s no longer voluntary this is when the boundary has been crossed. This is why every nation should have control over their own state if they desire.
...t state autonomy cannot be restricted by anything but the community (state) itself. As one might assume, it follows from these differing standpoints that the way each theory view intervention, etc., will be in opposition. (Steve Smith, The Globalisation of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations p. 173A)
Globalization has effect the role of the state immensely; as the process of present’s challenges to state sovereignty and autonomy. In spite of borders becoming more ill-defined and fluid in as a result of the process of globalization (Weiss 2000, 2-3). The state will remain relevant and necessary because citizens need a place to cast their votes, taxes have to be paid to particular authorities, which can be held accountable for pub...
The international system is an anarchical system which means that, unlike the states, there is no over ruling, governing body that enforces laws and regulations that all states must abide by. The International System in today’s society has become highly influential from a number of significant factors. Some of these factors that will be discussed are Power held by the state, major Wars that have been fought out in recent history and international organisations such as the U.N, NATO and the W.T.O. Each of these factors, have a great influence over the international system and as a result, the states abilities to “freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social, and cultural development”.
This essay will describe the characteristics of the modern nation-state, explain how the United States fits the criteria of and functions as a modern nation-state, discuss the European Union as a transnational entity, analyze how nation-states and transnational entities engage on foreign policy to achieve their interests, and the consequences of this interaction for international politics.
“The process of globalization and the increasing role of non-state actors in global governance are undermining the role of the state as the principal actor in global policymaking.”
Sovereignty is a term that is very broad and it causes to have a variation of definitions. According to the authors, sovereignty means having complete power over all of those under its regime. The state is a concept that is frequently correlated to sovereignty as it is given the ability to exercise complete authority over its people and the territory it’s under, after the Treaty of Westphalia was signed in 1648. Colonialism is another concept that has sovereignty, as it was present in many countries and has extracted the sovereignty belonging to indigenous people that focused on the community and the preservation of the land. Sovereignty is also responsible for giving power to white settlers to create both informal institutions (such as social
There is an undeniable fact that there has been a rise in globalization. It has become a hot topic amongst the field of international politics. With the rise of globalization, the sovereignty of the state is now being undermined. It has become an undisputed fact that the world has evolved to a new level of globalization, the transferring goods, information, ideas and services around the globe has changed at an unimaginable rate. With all that is going on, one would question how globalization has changed the system that is typically a collection of sovereign states. Do states still have the main source of power? What gives a state the right to rule a geographically defined region? It is believed by many that due to the introduction of international systems and increasing rate of globalization, the sovereignty of the state has been slowly eroded over time. My paper has two parts: First, it aims to take a close look at how globalization has changed the way the economy worked, specifically how it opened doors for multinational corporations to rise in power. Second, to answer the question, is it possible for it to exist today? And even so, should it?
To complete a Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats (also known as SWOT) analysis presented to a developing country by globalisation, we must first understand the actual concept of globalisation itself. So how can we define this term? Joseph Stiglitz, a winner of the Nobel Prize defines Globalization as “the closer integration of the countries and peoples of the world ...brought about by the enormous reduction of costs of transportation and communication, and the breaking down of artificial barriers to the flows of goods, services, capital, knowledge, and people across borders.” Hence, we can understand that globalisation can be described as an expanding global marketplace for the trading of anything from transport of goods internationally,
The friction's that arise due to the process of globalization are enormous, the burden of this process falls upon the countries, governments, and the actual citizens. The latter is the hardest to fall or we may say the one that will carry most of the burden no matter how the leaders justify this movement. The upraise of the global market lead to the division of the world in to three categories: first world country -developed -, second world country -communist-, and thirdly the third world country -developing-. Later this division was shifted to the first and the third divisions only. The attempts by the governments of the third world countries to become uniformly united with the first world countries is what lead them to step over its own sovereignty. How is that threat accompanied with globalization ?
Explain the concept of culture. Why is it important to avoid ethnocentricity and gain cultural literacy?
Al-Rodhan, Nayef. Definitions of Globalization:A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition. Geopolitical Implications of Globalization and Transnational Security . Geneva: GCSP, 2006.
Globalization is a global process that is changing the world. I would also like to discuss what are the benefits and drawbacks of globalization in the world from different perspectives.