Hussein's Ba Athism Analysis

2149 Words5 Pages

Iraq’s destabilization became prominent after American intervention removed Saddam Hussein from power. Since Hussein’s termination, the region of Iraq has been unable to piece together a government strong enough to maintain control over civilian behavior, social infrastructure, or the co-related increase in the influence of sectarian militias and terrorist groups in the region. Regardless of what was gained or lost by removing Hussein from power, the greater problems with the U.S.’s intervention arose from the proceedings of our continued occupation. Through removing many of the government functions that had existed under Hussein in a massive purge of individuals who had once associated themselves with Hussein’s Ba’athist party (a process …show more content…

The political movements that Ba’athism has inspired have resulted in the creation of secular one-party states, characterized by socialist economics, and hierarchical government organization. In 1951, Ba’athism was brought to Iraq by Fuad al-Rikabi, who established the Iraqi Regional Branch of the Arab Socialist Ba’ath Party (Polk, 2006). After Iraq’s 1968 revolution, Ahmad Hasan al-Bakr and his cousin Saddam Hussein became president and vice president, respectively. Both of them were active members of the Ba’athist Party, and thus, Iraq’s new government was shaped to embody Ba’athist political ideals (Associated Press, 2006). Through their placement of Ba’athist ideology at the center of Iraqi government, Iraq’s new leaders effectively established a hierarchical structure of authority and an internal security apparatus that permeated all corners of Iraqi society. In 1979, Saddam Hussein became the president of Iraq, and through abuse of the dictatorial power provided to him by the hierarchical system of Iraq’s Ba’athist government, ultimately committed countless atrocities, ranging from the selective kidnapping and killing of political rivals to using chemical weapons against his own citizens (Kirby, …show more content…

To reach its effective goals, de-Ba’athification should have taken the form of a pragmatic vetting of Iraqi leaders, rather than a purge of the experienced officials whose expertise held together the fabric of Iraq’s inherently unstable society. Unfortunately, instead of de-Ba’athification’s proposed actions being drawn from a culturally knowledgeable prospective goal of shaping a successful new government, based on maintaining the already-present occupational roles that served to maintain stability and functionality within Iraqi society, its course of action was modeled based upon the post- World War II proceedings of de-Nazification. While being interviewed for a documentary by PBS Frontline, Paul Bremer explained that because Saddam Hussein had modeled the authoritarian nature of his regime after Adolf Hitler’s model of Nazi Germany, in their efforts to reconstruct an Iraqi government, the Coalition of Provisional Authority should naturally model de-Ba’athification’s operations based on the proceedings of de-Nazification in post WWII Germany (Bremer). However, when viewing such proceedings in hindsight, many see de-Nazification as having been

Open Document