Hunger Games Axiology Analysis

641 Words2 Pages

As human beings, we thrive to find the meaning of our existence and also the truth. In the books and movies, The Hunger Games trilogy, the very heroic character Katniss Everdeen is on a quest to find truth. As she peels back the layers of lies that swaddle her world, she finds truth within herself and everything around her. To reflect on the novels and films, we must look at the principles of axiology and also examine the plot, characters and how they react to each situation; for reflecting on “the girl on fire” we must study the grounds of epistemology with her own identity. The whole story starts off with the day of the reaping when Prim, Katniss’ sister is selected to enter the Hunger Games, a game created by the government at the time to keep the society scared. One boy and one girl between the ages of 12 and 18 from each district are selected by an annual lottery to participate in the Hunger Games, an event in which the participants (or "tributes") must fight to the death in an outdoor arena controlled by the Capitol, until only one individual remains.
As Katniss takes her the place of her sister, I question the fact if that was her fate or freewill. Katniss’s willingness to substitute herself for Prim as an example of one precious thing that they believe is entirely immune from the tyranny of fate: our moral character, as reflected in the moral quality of our actions. Morality, they argue, is one dimension of our existence in which how we fare depends entirely on our own choices and not at all on those unpredictable forces beyond our control that we call fate. Fate could prevent Katniss’s action from achieving its intended purpose of keeping her sister alive, but nothing can ever rob her deed of its moral value. Accordin...

... middle of paper ...

...ots,” or the classical philosopher’s obligation to exercise reason to discover the forms of “the good and the beautiful” and live in conformity with those forms. Katniss compares her prep team to “a trio of oddly colored birds.” It’s an apt description, because for Capitol residents, being a real person means a kind of birdlike flight, freed from any kind of gravity—aesthetic, ethical, or relational—an effortless flapping of weightless wings on the way toward the always receding. Where does this desire to reject a stable identity and its limits come from? Ernest Becker (1925–1974), in The Denial of Death , described how human beings react against the “givens” of our biological inheritance, acting as though “the body is one’s animal fate that has to be struggled against in some ways,” an uncomfortable reminder that we’re vulnerable creatures who will eventually die.

Open Document