David Hume Problem Of Induction Essay

917 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Summary of david hume sceptical doubts concerning the operations of the understanding

Problem of Induction
In this paper, I will discuss Hume’s “problem of induction,” his solution to the problem, and whether or not his solution to the problem is correct. In David Hume 's 'An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding ', Hume states that no actual proof exists to suggest that future occurrences will happen the way previous occurrences did. His solution to this “problem of induction” is that our beliefs about cause and effect are based out of pure habit of thought that we have become accustomed to. It is my belief that his solution is correct even if it does bring into question how we seemingly “reason” things with experience in our everyday lives.

Before we can begin to discuss Hume and the “problem of induction”, let 's …show more content…

Part of the reason that we expect certain things to happen just as they have before is because they have happened that way before. A great example of this is the weather. Most people expect, out of habit and past experience, the weather to be hot during the summer and cold during the winter. But those of us who reside in Texas, and other states known for their ever fluctuating weather, know that those expectations aren 't always met with the results we predict or …show more content…

One being that we assume our most trusted friends and allies will never hurt us. If your best friend were to knock on your door, you would most likely let them in with the belief that they mean you no harm. You assume they won 't hurt you because you don 't see why they would. Nothing tells you that your best friend should want to hurt you. But nothing tells you your best friend couldn 't possibly hurt you. Just because someone has proven to be trustworthy in the past doesn 't necessarily mean their actions will continue to be just as trustworthy. However, we assume that their actions will indeed be trustworthy because they 've habitually behaved in a way that we are accustomed

Show More
Related

  • David Hume's Argument Against Belief in the Existence of Miracles

    1988 Words  | 4 Pages

    One of the most important aspects of Hume's argument is his understanding of probability. Hume states that belief is often a result of probability in that we believe an event that has occurred most often as being most likely. In relation to miracles this suggests that miraculous events should be labelled as a miracle only where it would be even more unbelievable for it not to be. This is Hume's argument in Part 1 Of Miracles, he states that if somebody tells you that a miracle has occurred you do not have to physically go out and look at the evidence to determine it, all you really need to do is consider the concept of the miracle and if it is a violation of the laws of nature, we have to reason in acco...

    Read More

  • Hume's and Anscombe's View on Causation

    1237 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hume’s notion of causation is his regularity theory. Hume explains his regularity theory in two ways: (1) “we may define a cause to be an object, followed by another, and where all the objects similar to the first are followed by objects similar to the second” (2) “if the first object had not been, the second never had existed.”

    Read More

  • Examples Of Trust In The Tragedy Of Brutus

    1287 Words  | 3 Pages

    Trust is a trait one should obtain for the people they know are the most honest. To trust someone means to put ones full confidence and reliability on an acquaintance such as someone one is close with. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus, one of the leading characters put his complete trust in the people trying to tell him what he should believe. Brutus joined the conspirators to help take down Julius Caesar because he believed it was what was good for Rome based on what he was deceived. This resulted in the killing of Caesar and the death of himself and others. Not considering the right kind of trust in someone can lead to very troubling things. Cassius told a lie as if it was a truth so Brutus

    Read More

  • Argument of the Hume's Response to the Missing Shade of Blue

    1260 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hume supports his claim with two arguments. Firstly, he states that when we reflect on our thoughts, they always become simple ideas that we copied from a first-hand experience of something, thus the idea has been copie...

    Read More

  • The Question of Free Will: Descartes, Hume, and Nietzsche

    2066 Words  | 5 Pages

    Russell, Paul. “Hume on Free Will.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, CSLI, Stanford University, 14 December 2007.

    Read More

  • The Egocentric Predicament

    482 Words  | 1 Pages

    In science, Hume recognized a problem with scientific causality. He saw science as being based on inductive reasoning, which results in generalized rules or principles.

    Read More

  • David Hume: Compatibilism And Hume

    1937 Words  | 4 Pages

    This causation may be by an external driving force, such as a divine power, or simply a chain of events leading up to a specific moment. The problem is then further divided into those believing the two may both exist, compatibilism, or one cannot exist with the other, incompatibilism. In his work, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, David Hume presents an argument for the former, believing it is possible for both Free Will and Necessity to exist simultaneously. This presentation in favor of compatibilism, which he refers to as the reconciling problem, is founded on a fundamental understanding of knowledge and causation, which are supported by other empiricists such as John Locke. Throughout this paper, I will be analyzing and supporting Hume’s argument for compatibility.

    Read More

  • Determinism Theory

    1107 Words  | 3 Pages

    The theory of determinism simply stated is the notion that all current events and everything we experience is determined by past occurrences and we have no control or freedom of choosing what happens in the future(McLeod). It is argued that determinism states that the future can predict and everything that has already happened in the past has an explanation to it. The predictability of events, however, is the principle and we can’t actually predict everything. It follows natural science laws to determine how predictable an occurrence is. If occurrence A is often followed by occurrence B, then A follows B, therefore if A occurs, the probability of B occurring can then be predictable. Several laws and statistical factors are ignored

    Read More

  • David Hume and Future Occurrences

    1020 Words  | 3 Pages

    In An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding, David Hume demonstrates how there is no way to rationally make any claims about future occurrences. According to Hume knowledge of matters of fact come from previous experience. From building on this rationale, Hume goes on to prove how, as humans we can only make inferences on what will happen in the future, based on our experiences of the past. But he points out that we are incorrect to believe that we are justified in using our experience of the past as a means of evidence of what will happen in the future. Since we have only experience of the past, we can only offer propositions of the future. Hume classifies human into two categories; “Relations of Ideas,” and “Matters of Fact.” (240) “Relations of ideas” are either intuitively or demonstratively certain, such as in Mathematics (240). It can be affirmed that 2 + 2 equals 4, according to Hume’s “relations of ideas.” “Matters of fact” on the other hand are not ascertained in the same manner as “Relations of Ideas.” The ideas that are directly caused by impressions are called "matters of fact". With “matters of fact,” there is no certainty in establishing evidence of truth since every contradiction is possible. Hume uses the example of the sun rising in the future to demonstrate how as humans, we are unjustified in making predictions of the future based on past occurrences. As humans, we tend to use the principle of induction to predict what will occur in the future. Out of habit, we assume that sun will rise every day, like it has done in the past, but we have no basis of actual truth to make this justification. By claiming that the sun will rise tomorrow according to Hume is not false, nor is it true. Hume illustrates that “the contrary of every matter of fact is still possible, because it can never imply a contradiction and is conceived by the mind with the same facility and distinctness as if ever so conformable to reality” (240). Just because the sun has risen in the past does not serve as evidence for the future. Thus, according to Hume, we are only accurate in saying that there is a fifty- percent chance that the sun will rise tomorrow. Hume felt that all reasoning concerning matter of fact seemed to be founded on the relation between cause and effect.

    Read More

  • Induction Essay

    874 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although, Salmon feels it’s necessary to cross examine Hume’s stance to show that there may indeed be a legitimate excuse to why we use induction when acquiring knowledge in our lives. Hume asked an important question “How do we acquire knowledge of the unobserved?” Through skepticism he found reasons to dig around to proving that induction is the only option on how we gain our knowledge, but he never came up with a conclusion to how or why. Reason being that for induction to be viable, our past can be predictions for our future events because the future will resemble our past. If we as humans lacked the sense familiarity in our day to day events will be impossible to get through, meaning everyday would have a new event happening and we wouldn’t be able to rationalize how to progress for the future without using induction. we need induction to predict our future decisions, by us using induction it give us a sense of normalcy. Salmon made note when he was explaining why he believed that Hume was incorrect and why he believes Hume was confused by the overall idea of induction. Inductive reasoning relies upon probability. Hence, there is a slight chance that your prediction will be wrong, regardless of that. On the other hand, Max black’s argued that “Inductive correctness does admit of degrees; one inductive conclusion may be more strongly supported than another (The Problem of Induction, Black)

    Read More

  • Hume Vs Kant

    1749 Words  | 4 Pages

    In order to go beyond the objects of human reason, Hume proposed that reasoning was based upon cause and effect. Causal relations help us to know things beyond our immediate vicinity. All of our knowledge is based on experience. Therefore, we need experience to come to causal relationships of the world and experience constant conjunction. Hume stated that he “shall venture to affirm, as a general proposition which admits no exception, that the knowledge of this relation is not in any instance, attained by reasonings ‘a priori’, but arises entirely from experience.” (42)

    Read More

  • David Hume's Argument on Passion and Morality

    1149 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hume, David. “A Treatise of Human Nature. Excerpts from Book III. Part I. Sect. I-II.”

    Read More

  • Problem of Induction

    1208 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the selection, ‘Skeptical doubts concerning the operations of the understanding’, David Hume poses a problem for knowledge about the world. This question is related to the problem of induction. David Hume was one of the first who decided to analyze this problem. He starts the selection by providing his form of dividing the human knowledge, and later discusses reasoning and its dependence on experience. Hume states that people believe that the future will resemble the past, but we have no evidence to support this belief. In this paper, I will clarify the forms of knowledge and reasoning and examine Hume’s problem of induction, which is a challenge to Justified True Belief account because we lack a justification for our beliefs.

    Read More

  • Kant Answer Hume On Causality

    1060 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hume states that in nature we observe correlated events that are both regular and irregular. For instance, we assume that the sun will rise tomorrow because it has continued to do so time and time again and we assume that thunder will be accompanied by lightning for the same reason. We never observe the causation between a new day and the sun rising or between thunder and lightning, however. We are simply observing two events that correlate in a regular manner. Hume’s skepticism therefore comes from the belief that since we do not observe causal links, we can never truly be sure about what causes anything else. He then goes so far as to say that if this is the case, it must be a fact that nothing causes anything else. In Hume’s theory, there is not only no objective causation, but no objective principle of cause and effect on the whole.

    Read More

  • David Hume's Theory of Knowledge

    1350 Words  | 3 Pages

    David Hume, following this line of thinking, begins by distinguishing the contents of human experience (which is ultimately reducible to perceptions) into: a) impressions and b) ideas.

    Read More

More about David Hume Problem Of Induction Essay

Open Document