Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Similarities, and differences between qualitative and quantitative research methods
Similarities, and differences between qualitative and quantitative research methods
Comparison between quantitative vs qualitative methods strengths and weaknesses
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Humanistic psychology surfaced in middle of the 20th century in response to the predominant views about human behavior at the time. Humanistic psychology argued against the notion that the subconscious drives human behavior and therefore rejected theories of psychoanalysis and behaviorism, both deterministic in nature. Humanistic psychologists regarded both these theories as pessimistic because they highlighted only on painful emotions and that personal choice was not taken into consideration. Humanistic psychology has holistic view of the individual and emphasizes basic humans needs of fulfillment and happiness. Positive psychology is a more recent area of psychology that studies how to encourage individuals and communities to succeed. The …show more content…
Theoretically, humanistic psychology is more inclined to qualitative research while positive psychology is more inclined to quantitative research (Waterman 2013). However, humanistic and positive psychology can be seen as parallel in their content because they both aim to understand and develop human growth (Waterman 2013). One of the premises of humanistic psychology is a total view of a person in regard for their value and dignity. The goal of a humanistic psychologist is to establish the fundamental potential for growth in every individual. This relates to positive psychology because it also has a concern with personal growth of character strength and virtues. In A Therapist’s Response to Alan Waterman, Serlin (2014) reflects on the application of humanistic psychology in therapy. Serlin (2014) says that in practice, she combined qualitative and quantitative methods of research in order for the individual to generate awareness of the self and others. Serlin also emphasizes how humanistic psychology examines both the client’s experiences of joy and existential dilemmas (2014). Positive psychology and humanistic psychology relate to each other in their existential roots and their roles against pessimism. Both are concerned with human welfare and the main expected outcomes of positive psychology are …show more content…
These latter tend to focus on human being' relationship with their psychology, behavior and cognition but rarely on their fuller experience of living" (Schneider 2014). Schneider encompasses here how humanistic psychology challenges the assumption that the scientific method is not the only way to gain data or insight into the human psyche. In its study of man, humanistic psychology focuses on one person and what the person is experiencing in the moment. Waterman (2013) argues a difference between humanistic and positive psychology because of the incorporation of mindfulness in the latter. Serlin (2014), a humanistic psychologist, said that she incorporated mindfulness and imagery in therapy. Mindfulness is the capacity to consciously think about what you are experiencing. Carl Rodgers incorporated this in his client-centered therapy because it deals with clients observing themselves willfully instead of the therapists analyzing their unconscious thoughts. Friedman (2014) argues that mindfulness techniques in positive psychology are roughly the same as the focus on the experiencing person in humanistic psychology. It studies and understands the whole person throughout the course of life.
Additionally, Humanistic Psychology studies how people value themselves. Today’s Psychologists are often faced with problems when diagnosing patients, and utilizing a Humanistic approach to their prognosis facilitates a more broad study of what may be occurring. Taking a step back, Jake is having a tough time with his classes; his classes are now more difficult than before, and they might be affecting how Jake perceives his own values. I.e. because Jake feels more nervous, he could be losing his sense of control, which goes against his personal growth and affects his values and image of himself. Applying the humanistic approach to Jake, his fulfillment as a student is his personal growth. However as the difficulty of his classes increase, so does his own personal perception on how much he is growing. For Jake, realizing that he’s not suited for a particular difficult class is upsetting and induces anxiety. Modern day Psychologists would concur because Jake is feeling less valued and lacking a proper humanistic view of himself, he is feeling uncomfortable, and thus more
The Humanistic Approach or (Person Centred Therapy) began in the 1950’s due to theorists views that there were limitations within the prior two approaches of C.B.T and Psychodynamic. The two main theorists associated with this movement are Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers who believed that humans were innately good and possessed a drive towards growth and fulfilment called self-actualization. Abraham Maslow based his findings of this on healthy people who had found a meaning to their life that gave them fulfilment thus achieving self-actualisation and noted that a hierarchy of needs had to be met beginning with basic needs like food, water, air etc.
Humanistic psychology relies on client centred therapy and the idea that each individual has the potential to achieve a position in their psyche named self actualisation. Humanistic psychology differs from psychodynamic theory in that it is optimistic about the human psyche and does not view conflict as inevitable. Humanistic psychology assumes people attach meaning to their unique perspectives on the world and that behaviour is strongly influenced by this. Carl Rogers defined the healthy personality as being one that had congruence between the perceived self and the experienced self and that the individual in question experienced unconditional positive regard from their parent or guardian. He defined an unhealthy personality as being one which lacked these components. Abraham Maslow alternatively suggested a hierarchy for which a person’s healthy personality could be measured by stages of psychological and physical needs (see diagram 2). He suggested that, for a person to achieve self actualisation and become a fully functioning person, they must first satisfy all the needs of each level in the pyramid before moving onto the next
It helps many people to find their strength and to help them use those strengths to better themselves. This group of people often refers to Maslow’s “Hierarchy of Needs”. They can see breaks in the pyramid, which can cause the hardships of anxiety. The pyramid works step by step up the pyramid starting at the lowest point, being physiological needs. It then continues up the pyramid through safety, love and belonging, ones self esteem, and ending at self-actualization. The humanistic view, in full can be described as a “crucial opportunity to lead us to our own healthy path”. In a humanistic therapy session the therapist uses a lot of empathy and hard listening. This allows the client to voice their concerns without the pressure of answering questions. But the therapists do help a lot too. With the help of humanistic therapist, the individual will learn to add or find positive experiences in their life. It can help those individuals find a sort of peace with who they are and with what
The psychoanalytic approach, proposed by Sigmund Freud, is based on the idea that childhood experiences significantly influence the development of later personality traits and psychological problems. In addition, psychoanalysis emphasizes the influence of unconscious fears, desires and motivations on thoughts and behaviors. The humanistic approach, presented by Abraham Maslow, emphasizes self actualization and free-will. It is based on the belief that each person has freedom in directing his or her future.
The humanistic perspective on personality deals exclusively with human behavior. Humanistic psychologists believe that human nature includes a natural drive towards personal growth, that humans have the freedom to choose what they do regardless of environmental factors, and humans are mostly conscious beings and are not controlled by unconscious needs and conflicts. They also believe that a person's subjective view of the world is more important than objective reality. Two of the humanistic theorists that have made an impact of humanism are Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow.
This psychology perspective emphasizes individuals ' inherent drive towards self-actualization, the process of realizing and expressing one 's own capabilities and creativity. It helps the client gain the belief that all people are inherently good. It adopts a holistic approach to human existence and pays special attention to such phenomena as creativity, free will, and positive human potential. It encourages viewing ourselves as a "whole person" greater than the sum of our parts and encourages self exploration rather than the study of behavior in other people. Humanistic psychology acknowledges spiritual aspiration as an integral part of the human psyche. It is linked to the emerging field of transpersonal psychology. As per usual, there are advantages and limitations to this particular theory. One of the greatest strengths of humanistic psychology is that it emphasizes individual choice and responsibility. Humanistic psychology satisfies most people 's idea of what being human means because it values personal ideals and self-fulfillment. Finally, humanistic psychology provides researchers with a flexible framework for observing human behavior because it considers a person in the context of his environment and in conjunction with his personal perceptions and feelings. As with any viewpoint, humanistic psychology has its critics. One major criticism of humanistic psychology is that its concepts are too vague. Critics
Kahn, E. & Rachman, A.W. (2000). Carl Rogers and Heinz Kohut: A Historical Perspective. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 17, 294-312. Scholl, M. B.; Ray, D. C. & Brady-Amoon, P. (2014). Humanistic counselling process, outcomes, and research.
The humanistic approach has both supporters and those who feel it is unsound. Focus on the fact that people are generally positive and emphasis on individual choice and responsibility, are some of the strengths of this theory (Heffner, 2015). Humanism also places a great deal of value on personal ideals and self-fulfillment (Heffenr, 2015). Maslow, Rogers, and others saw the individual as being good and very powerful and so felt that treatment should concentrate on the positive rather than the negative. The biggest criticism of humanistic psychology is that it is not a true science because it involves too much common sense and not enough objectivity and that conclusions drawn from subjective experiences are not able to be verified (“Criticisms
Humanistic and Existential Psychology are influential on each other, both including the “meaning of our existence, the role of free will, and the uniqueness of each human” (Burger, 2015). This paper reviews three articles written by influential psychologists of their time, Maslow, Rogers, and Frankl. The review of each will include a summary, how well the contents connect to the humanistic or existential psychology, and if their ideas still have a relevant application in today’s environment. The first article for review by Viktor Frankl, an existential psychologist, Logotherapy and Existentialism, was written in 1967.
Counseling and therapy The main focus of humanistic therapy is to assist the patient in development of a stronger and healthier sense of self or in other words help him in achieving highest level of self-actualization. EarlierApproaches Abraham Maslow’s Developmental Theory : highlights the importance of hierarchy of needs and motivations in development
Humanistic psychology would encourage the depressed person to seek out interesting and fun things to do that will make them feel happy and fulfilled. This could involve some form of therapy and focusing on the positive things in life. Another could be an individual who is bored with his job. The humanistic perspective would encourage such an individual to be creative and focus on the positive aspect of the type of employment and the resulting accomplishment. Rather than wait for others to effect a change, each individual is responsible for his or her personal happiness in life.
Humanistic approach An explanation of the origins and history of the humanistic approach, the movement was developed firstly in America known as the third force. Maslow developed a theory of human motivation in 1943, followed by Carl Rodgers significant factors of person-centred therapy in 1946. It was also known as the third force, because it was aimed to replace two main forces. The first one is behaviourism which is the idea that behaviour can be explained in terms of conditioning and can be altered through positive and negative reinforcement.
Humanist theories emphasize the importance of free will and individual experience in the development of personality. Humanist theorists emphasized the concept of self-actualization, which is an innate need for personal growth that motivates behavior (Rodriguez
What exactly is Humanistic Psychology? That is a question that cannot be so easily defined. The question to be asked first before any other is answered