Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Character comparison of jack and ralph
Lord of the flies how does golding want the reader to reason to jack
How does golding use jack to present ideas about leadership in lord of the flies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Character comparison of jack and ralph
A human is a computer waiting to be programmed. This concept is signified by the characters Jack and Ralph, in William Golding’s novel, Lord of the Flies. It takes place during World War II after a plane crashes, stranding a group of British schoolboys on an isolated island. As time progresses, Jack and Ralph fall further and further in an animalistic state, suggesting that humans are conditioned by their environment to behave in ways appropriate relative to their surroundings. In the novel, Jack Merridew, who is first described as a tyrannic, unforgiving leader, is the first to fall into a state of animalistic savagery. After fulfilling his quest to kill a pig, Jack’s mind is “crowded with memories, memories that had come to him when they …show more content…
Remembering his encounter with the pig, Jack feels as if it was one of the happiest moments of his life. The fact that Jack is relating murder to a thirst quenching drink is concerning because it means that he had had a throbbing desire to kill, and that he is no longer tied to civility. During Jack’s first encounter to kill a pig, he is unsuccessful because he pauses for just a moment, still feeling connected to the rules of civilization. After Jack’s first successful kill, his innocence is completely gone, suggesting that humans adapt in ways deemed appropriate to their specific environment. One’s environment can get them to do things they would never expect, such as when Jack, “with full intention, hurl[s] his spear at Ralph” (181). Jack purposefully threw his spear at someone, who earlier in the novel, had tried to help him, had tried to help the group as a whole get rescued. At first, Jack kills pigs, but it soon progresses to the point where he feels inclined to go as far as trying to kill his once companion. As Jack gains more power and falls further into savagery, he starts to commit more savage acts. This implies that the environment can cause people to adjust, allowing their once
During the novel, the reader becomes increasingly aware of Jack’s dominating and violent tendencies. Specific actions taken are when Jack suggests using one of the younger children as a substitute pig, ties up Wilfred, and hunts Ralph. Things begin to get out of hand when the group’s game turns into a cruel beating. Not long afterwards, Jack suggests that the group
As soon as they realise what must be done to survive on the island, jack has the desire to kill a pig for meat. This is the first sign of his savagery. Soon his urge to kill a pig turns into the desire to kill and hunt other living
“I’m not going to play any longer. Not with you.” (127). Jack leaves Ralph’s tribe because Ralph is a coward and he makes the rules. Jack’s leadership qualities comes back with a force and he makes his own tribe. Jack does like anyone telling him what to do and he is frustrated because of Ralph taking over him. Another reason to make his own tribe is that Ralph does not appreciate Jack hunting and he accuses him to let the fire out. His leadership skills become stronger but in a negative way. His behavior has changed because of hunting and by spending time on the island. Jack has become a sociopath. Even his hunting style has become more violent. After hunting a sow, he tortures the pig physically until the pig has a painful death. He also cuts the throat of the pig and places the head on the stick as a sacrifice. This action shows psychopathic tendency and how he was not able to kill the pig in his first attempt in hunting and now he abuses the pig and sacrifices the head. “He squirmed and looked down.”(160). When Stanley, a member of Jack’s tribe asks Jack about the death of Simon, Jack replies him by nervously saying no. This response by Jack portrays that Jack is trying to tell himself that he his not responsible for his own actions. During Simon’s murder, Jack was wearing a mask on his face and that makes him not responsible for Simon’s murder. During the end of the novel, Jack starts wearing his mask all the time because he does not want to be responsible for his own actions. ““He’s going to beat Wilfred.” “what for?” Robert shook his head doubtfully. “I don’t know. He didn’t say. He got angry and made us tie Wilfred up. He’s been”-he giggled excitedly-”he’s been tied for hours, waiting-”” (159). This quote from the novel clearly shows how Jack has been treating his tribe members. He is beating them for no reason by tieing them up for hours. Jack shows no emotion and he has become cold blooded. The
Do we all have evil deep down inside of us? It is the killing of the first pig that leads to Jack wanting to do it more and more, which ultimately leads to something inside of him awakening.
Over millions of years, man has transformed from a savage, simple creature to a highly developed, complex, and civil being. In Lord of the Flies, the author William Golding shows how under certain circumstances, man can become savage. During nuclear war, a group of British schoolboys crash land on an uninhabited island to escape. Ralph the elected leader, along with Piggy and Simon, tries to maintain civilization, while Jack and his group of choir boys turned hunters slowly become savages obsessed with killing. Through characters’ action and dialogue, Golding illustrates the transformation of civil schoolboys into bloodthirsty savages.
What is human nature? How does William Golding use it in such a simple story of English boys to precisely illustrate how truly destructive humans can be? Golding was in World War Two, he saw how destructive humans can be, and how a normal person can go from a civilized human beign into savages. In Lord of the Flies, William Golding uses the theme of human nature to show how easily society can collapse, and how self-destructive human nature is. Throughout the story Golding conveys a theme of how twisted and sick human nature can lead us to be. Many different parts of human nature can all lead to the collapse of society. Some of the aspects of human nature Golding plugged into the book are; destruction, demoralization, hysteria and panic. These emotions all attribute to the collapse of society. Golding includes character, conflict, and as well as symbolism to portray that men are inherently evil.
Humans are intricate. They have built civilizations and invented the concept of society, moving accordingly from savage primal instincts to disciplined behaviour. William Golding, however, does not praise humanity in his pessimistic novel, Lord of The Flies, which tells the story of a group of British schoolboys who are stranded on an uninhabited tropical island without any adults – a dystopia. Golding evidently expresses three views of humanity in this novel. He suggests that, without the rules and restrictions on which societies and civilizations are built, humans are intrinsically selfish, impulsive and violent.
While Jack and Ralph are exploring the island, they encounter a piglet which Jack supposedly attempts to kill. After gaining the courage to kill the baby pig, Jack rectifies the situation by saying "I was just waiting for a moment to decide where to stab him (Golding 31)." This event clearly illustrates that along with inherent evil, "man is [also] capable of being good and kind, and has to choice and free will to choose which one he will become."(Ridley 97) Jack's mercy is short-lived, however, and when they encounter another pig, Jack and his hunters are relentless.
Ashamed of his mercy towards the animal, Jack “[snatches] his knife [and slams] it into a tree trunk” (pg. 31). His physical expression of embarrassment is a manifestation of his superiority complex; unable fulfill his duty as hunter or secure the position of chief, his bloodlust only deepens. With such a great desire to prove himself, Jack becomes evermore barbaric upon sampling the taste of control. As time progresses, Jack is adamant in pursuing the hunt despite opposition from Ralph. With no true concern for community, he justifies his bloodlust by claiming it for the good of the group: “We want meat ––” (pg. 51). Unlike Ralph who advocates building shelters, Jack has an overpowering desire to gratify his instincts and ego. This undermines his
As the story progresses it shows how the boys change from disciplined school boys to savages. Jack is the first to show the transition. When Jack, Simon and Ralph go exploring for the first time, they come across a piglet caught in a curtain of creepers. Jack couldn't kill it "because of the enormity of the knife descending and cutting into living flesh; because of the unbearable blood (31)." From that moment on, Jack felt he needed to prove to himself to the others that he's strong, brave and isn't afraid to kill. When Jack says, "Next Time (31)" it's foreshadowing his future of savage hunting.
Throughout William Golding's novel Lord of the Flies there is an ever-present conflict between two characters. Ralph's character combines common sense with a strong desire for civilized life. Jack, however, is an antagonist with savage instincts, which he cannot control. Ralph's goals to achieve a team unit with organization are destroyed by Jack's actions and words that are openly displayed to the boys. The two leaders try to convince the boys that their way of survival is correct.
Jack has always been an ill-natued boy even from the start of the book when he told Piggy to "Shut up, Fatty." (p.23). Dispite Jack’s unpleasent personality, his lack of courage and his conscience preventing him from killing the first pig they encountered. "They knew very well why he hadn’t; because of the enormity of the knife decending and cutting into living flesh; because of the unbearable blood." (p.34)
Jack begins the novel partially innocent, cruel enough to yell at the boys yet pure enough to hesitate when faced with the task of killing the pig. Jack obtains the tools necessary to kill the pig, yet claims to need help cornering the animal. Jack, not truly needing help to kill the pig but rather needing the support provided by the mob mentality, acquires the support of his choir and together the boys hunt and kill the pig, all the while chanting, “Kill the pig. Cut her throat. Spill her blood”...
of Louis XIV was that he thought human nature would always be the same. The
Jack corrodes the group using the beast as during the meal Jack screams “Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood!” Jack didn’t care to first scout out or pursue who the beast was and ended up killing Simon, who just came to explain his discovery of the beast. In this incident Jack caused the group to cross the boundary line to savages who lack rational thinking because of they had murdered Simon.