Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Disadvantages and Advantages of the HPV vaccination
Is the hpv vaccine safe essay
Argument for hpv vaccine
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Disadvantages and Advantages of the HPV vaccination
Share what you know about the HPV vaccine after watching the video and reading the article. Is it safe? Should it be mandatory for all middle school and high school students? Finally, if you are comfortable share your experiences, good or bad, if you have gotten the vaccine. Lastly, comment on how you might approach this topic with your doctor for yourself and/or if you needed to approach the subject for your child.
While Gardasil tends to protect against the Human Papillomavirus it doesn’t appear to protect against all strains of the virus. After Gardasil hit the market individuals started feeling the side effects fairly rapidly, and it’s known to cause paralysis, seizures, and autoimmune diseases, but does the vaccine out way the risk of getting cervical cancer (The Dangers, 2012)?
…show more content…
Of course there are unreported cases, but according to the CDC using the statistics available a person has roughly a 0.0008% chance of having any type of complications from the vaccine which isn’t that significant but there is always that chance. When you compare the statistics of people getting cancer from the virus and the amount of side effects from the Vaccine the statistics change significantly. (With doing all of the calculations from the information I gathered from the CDC website and FDA website I concluded at the vaccine reduces just over 88 percent of the complications from the Human Papillomavirus of course these are all reported cases, and not exact figures). According to the statistics the vaccine tends to be more preventative then harmful but in regards to being mandatory for middle school and high school children it should be up to the parents to decide whether they want their child vaccinated or not. Although nothing is foolproof when adding a foreign substance to one’s body so there is a
Human papilloma virus is today’s most common sexually transmitted infection and reamins uncurable at this time. About 79 million individuals in the United States are currently infected with HPV; around 14 million individuals will become newly infected with HPV each year. As of early 2012, one preventative measure against HPV is a vaccine given in three shots over six months, recommended for both male and female children at the age of 11 or 12. While the HPV vaccine is not mandated at this time, many individuals have openly expressed their opinions about the possibility. A man by the name of Mike Adams wrote an article for the NaturalNews website in February of 2007 titled “HPV Vaccine Texas Tyranny” explaining his apprehensions for the possible mandation of the HPV vaccine. Correspondingly, Arthur Allen wrote “The HPV Debate Needs an Injection of Reality” for the Washington Post in April of 2007 to convey his standpoint on the topic. While both Adams and Allen agree that the HPV vaccination lacks credibility, track record, and substantiation of long term safety, Adams argues that the HPV vaccine should never be mandated, while Allen believes the vaccine could be sucessfully mandated in the future if civic observations advance over time.
The article’s information is presented with the goal of informing a reader on vaccines. The evidence is statistical and unbiased, showing data on both side effects and disease prevention, providing rates of death and serious illness from both sides. This evidence is sourced from a variety of medical organizations and seems reliable, logical, and easily understood, no language that would inspire an emotional response is used. The validity of studies is not mentioned in the article, but it does encourage readers to investigate further to help make a decision. The article allows a reader to analyze the presented evidence and come to their own
The unforgettable story of vaccines is a story of triumph and controversy. The saddest part of the story is persistent ignorance and a lack of education, comingled with the personal need of some parents to explain away the problems of their children, have caused the controversy to arise. The good news is that the triumphant reality of vaccines as a whole is still the larger enduring legacy. The human papillomavirus vaccine is not an exception to this rule; in fact despite all the controversy surrounding the vaccine, it is one of medicine’s greatest lifesaving gifts to us.
Most people know what vaccines are and have received them during our childhood years; but past that knowledge, most people do not think much about vaccines until we have children of our own. Some parents are more skeptical than others on the topic of vaccinations, but most parents choose this preventative measure in protecting their children from harmful diseases. However, in the case of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, there is quite a controversy as to if it is appropriate to administer the vaccine to pre-teen to teenage children. Genital human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually-transmitted infection in the United States; an estimated 14 million persons are newly infected every year (Satterwhite,
...g in the injected area. Gardasil is not 100% effective, and it may not protect against all HPV types, including high risk HPV's. This vaccine is not meant to cure any existing HPV virus. The vaccine is given in 3 shots, each with a 6- month period of time in between. People can get it as early as 9 years of age, both male and female, all the way to age 26. Gardasil is covered by most health insurances. For those uninsured Merck is willing to provide vaccines, since Gardasil is not very cheap (“Learn about Gardasil” 2012).
Although many people get vaccines when they are very young, it is important that everyone makes sure that they are up-to-date on all of their vaccines whether they are teens or adults. According to the CDC it is never too late to get vaccinated, whether you missed a vaccine or did not get all of the required booster shots. Vaccine preventable diseases have not gone away even though many do not infect the large numbers of people that they once did. It is important to make sure that you are protected against these diseases as some can make you very sick or even kill you. It is also important that you do not spread illnesses to your friends and family.
Many people come to the United States of America in order to live freely and make choices based on their personal morals. Considering the fact that America is known for being the “land of the free”, people should be able to choose whether or not they want to get vaccinated. People should have the right to reject vaccinations for whatever reason it may be, whether it’s religious beliefs, health concerns, or lack of belief in the vaccination systems. Personally, Vaccinations have benefited me and my health, and I choose to get vaccinated. I choose to get vaccinated because I strongly believe in a way it helps build my immune system and keeps me from getting sick or catching diseases. However, people have different beliefs than mine. Therefore
Vaccinations for children has become such an interesting topic over the last couple of years. Some parents are for vaccinations and other parents are totally against the idea. In today’s society, it is becoming more common for a parent to not have their children receive vaccinations. There are a handful of parents that say it is not safe for a child to receive so many doses of medicine at one time, so they opt out of giving their child the required vaccines. Although some parents strongly believe that vaccinating is not necessary, is it really okay for the child to never receive the vaccination at all?
In recent years, the correlation between vaccines and autism has become the subject of much debate. On one side, there are the anti-vaccinators, or anti-vaccers. On the other, there’s pretty much everyone else. Despite the fact that the anti-vaccination movement has little base in scientific fact, their campaign to end early infanthood vaccinations rages on. While doctors and scientists try desperately to make parents look at the research studies, vaccination rates continue to fall. But, even in these dark times, there is still hope that scientific fact will prevail and defeat the anti-vaccination fear mongers who have caused many children to fall ill and even die because their parents did not properly vaccinate them. This is one of the most saddening scientific failures of the twenty-first century. A failure to educate the public properly has resulted in child, even infant, fatalities. The anti-vaccination movement was started based on falsified data and continues only because of a lack of knowledge and proper education of the general public.
Those who actively pursue denying the rights of others while trying to further their cause lead to a hatred against their movement. Vaccines, while an important aspect in maintaining proper health they should not be absolutely mandatory. The choice of vaccination should be left to the parents, as it is their right to nurture and care for their kids as they see fit(Anthony). Furthermore, a governmental mandate on vaccination causes many issues, it denies rights to the parents, it denies right to the grown adults and it taxes those who don’t comply. This strategy is not a very American approach, it is a strict mandate, and order then to conform. This goes against the American concepts of individualism(Anthony), this concept is Communist. There are also many circumstances that mandatory vaccination neglects, this includes the civil liberties granted to all citizens by the first amendment, and the equal protection granted by the 13 amendment(US Constitution). There are many reasons why the idea of mandatory
Taking this vaccine may increase the risk of Guillain-Barre syndrome. Talk to the doctor and learn how to recognize the early symptoms of this disorder. If you experience
Each day researchers are finding out about vaccines and are realizing that there are a lot more risks than benefits. Dr Phillip F. Incao explains: “Today, far more children suffer from allergies and other chronic immune system disorders than from life-threatening infectious disease. It is neither reasonable nor prudent to persist in presuming that the benefits of any vaccination outweigh its risk” (qtd in Spaker). While infectious diseases are becoming uncommon there is no need for any person to get vaccinated. There have been many issues surrounding vaccinations all around the world.
At the present time there does not appear to be enough sufficient evidence to recommend that children not be vaccinated. The benefits of having a child vaccinated clearly outweigh any possible harm that the vaccinations might be causing. Children should continue to be vaccinated according to the schedule that has been set down by the CDC, so that everyone can be protected.
Airports have always been in the spotlight when diseases spread from one region to the next. This progression all begins when somebody with a contagious disease steps on to a plane to fly to his or her destination. Not only are they on the way to their destination, but their germs are also going with them. Without a way of preventing this infected person from flying out of an airport, their illness is easily transported to their next destination. Because of this, consistent health screening is vital for all arriving and departing international flights so that airports can find, isolate, and treat disease spread over infected areas to prevent damaging and contagious effects disease can have on a region 's residents.
According to www.aids.gov, 1.2 million people have HIV in the United States. 1 out of 8 living with HIV are unaware that they have the illness. HIV affects people and families all over the world, but should people be able to take their own HIV test? This topic has had a lot of controversy in the previous years. HIV is an illness that affects a lot of people. Walgreens got the permission to give HIV tests. The test is called OraQuick. It works this way, you buy a kit at Walgreens or other stores that supply it. Then in the kit there is a tube with liquid in it and a stick with pads. First you take the tube and put it in a tube holder, with the stick you rub your upper gums once and your lower gums once. After, you put that in the liquid and you get results in twenty minutes. It is very private and you wouldn’t have to tell anyone you even did the test. A doctor should always be aware of your conditions because being HIV positive can lead to depression and you can’t trust the take home kits as much as you can trust a doctor’s work.