Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on wilfred owen war poetry
Note on war poets
Essay on wilfred owen war poetry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on wilfred owen war poetry
How do the later war poets differ in their treatment of war
from early war poets?
World War I was noticeable for the vast amounts of poetry that was
produced from many of the soldiers. The poets wrote vastly over the
years 1914-1918 and they all expressed many different opinions. It was
a way of getting their views across to other people. Some of the poems
even made aware of the fact and the true horror of the war. During the
first half of World War I, the poems that were produced had a very
patriotic and glorious view to them. As the war progressed, the poems
became more bitter as the true extent of what was really going on, was
unveiled. Some of the poets we will be looking at include Wilfred Owen
and Laurence Binyon.
For early war poetry, we have studied four poems. These are: 'The
Soldier', 'Rendezvous', 'For the Fallen', and 'Fall-In'. The poets who
wrote these poems are: Laurence Binyon, Rupert Brooke, Alan Seeger and
Harold Begbie. These poems in general, had a very glorious, patriotic
feel to them. Because the war had just started, people did not know
what the war was going to be like. Nor did they no how many people
would be killed. These poems were used as propaganda by the government
so that many young men would enrole for the army.
'For the Fallen' is an elegy. Being an elegy during the war, you might
have been mistaken for thinking that it is not a very glorious poem.
But this poem celebrates the death of the soldiers and is celebrating
the work that they have done for their country. This poem gives a
personification of England and describes the soldiers when they were
young. This poem constantly uses alliteration throughout. 'They fell
with their faces to the foe' is a good example. Th...
... middle of paper ...
...Hero' is a poem about a mother receiving the bad news that her son is
dead. This poem has an AABBBCCDEDEFF rhyme scheme. In the second
verse, the rhyme scheme has changed. This is because Sasson wanted a
change of meaning in the poem.
'Suicide in the Trenches' has a regular and constant rhyme scheme.
Every two lines are a rhyming couplet. This keeps the flow of the poem
constant. It is criticizing the British public who cheer for the
soldiers, just as they are about to go to war, but the public
themselves, do not know what the soldiers are about to face. It is a
very bitter poem.
'They' is another very bitter poem written by Sasson. This time,
Sasson is criticizing the church for making the war sound like a
crusade. The poem uses a rhyme scheme of ABABCCDEDEFF. It has two
versus and both end in a rhyming couplet. This is used for impact and
emphasis.
...ntation in 20th century war poetry undoubtedly shapes its type and purpose, be it for nationalistic propaganda or to prompt a global paradigm shift, the purpose can be seen to stem largely from the author’s involvement in combat or war life. Authors such as Owen Seaman, who have no first hand experience of the content of their poems, create patriotic propaganda in an attempt to keep young men enlisting, and others such as Rupert Brooke who exemplify blind optimism and nationalistic intentions in a romanticised view of what it would be to die.
Although there were still poets who wrote of the glories of fighting, poets such as Wilfred Owen, who fought and in the end was killed during the First World War, began to write realistically, showing war in a true light, removing any romanticism. In the poems I am going to look at, we can see a clear divide between the poetry of the pre 1900's and that of the post 1900's. A good example of this pre 1900 approach to war is "Before Agincourt" from William Shakespeare's play "King Henry the Fifth. " This is a speech written in blank verse, which is appropriate for such a significant subject.
The two poems, 'Dulce et decorum est' and 'Who's for the game?' are both very different war poems. Although they were both written about the First World War, they both had different purposes. The poems have aspects in which they are similar, but they also have very big differences.
War I. The to poems that I will be comparing are ‘England to her sons’
Through reading this poem several times I decided that the message from the poem is that war is full of horror and there is little or no glory. Methods which I found most effective were Full rhyme and metaphor.
Both poems used different techniques to stimulate the readers’ evaluation and realisation of the adverse outcomes of war, especially its effects on the soldiers. Sassoon’s poem title gave the reader an immediate conclusion about the contents of the poem of the hardship that the soldier faced, which brought upon his suicide. Whereas Owen’s gave the opposite impression at first, as the Latin saying translates into “it is fitting and honourable to die for your country.”
told he was out of action for six months. It was here that he first
f rounding up the sonnet as well as emphasising complete grief over the loss of Youth. The contrast with the first stanza's violence makes the reader see the different aspects of war - what happens on the battlefield, and what happens at home. Owen's poem, 'Anthem for Doomed Youth' is more appealing to me because it deals with two contrasting realities of war. His first stanza highlights the wastefulness of war (deaths of young soldiers) while the second stanza, the mourning for the dead. His sarcastic and later quiet tone reinforce the stark contrast between the different aspects of war.
Ultimately, we have two poems which can be compared on the grounds of their subject, but are poles apart regarding their message. The structure of these poems is not what would be typically expected from a war poem, but are structured on the basis of these typical structures in order to create some sense of familiarity. Brooke’s poem expands on this familiarity while Owen attempts to deliberately sabotage it. In regards to content, Brooke shows throughout his perception of the nobility of dying for one’s country, whilst Owen uses all of his poetic techniques to show the opposite.
The writers of 'Joining the Colours' and 'The Send Off' both use poetry to express their feelings about soldiers leaving for war. Each have similar attitudes about the subject, but use different approaches to try and get their message across. Both question the popular concept of war, including ideas such as heroism and glory. Katherine Hinkson, the poet who wrote 'Joining the Colours', shows the scene from two different perspectives, that of the audience watching the soldiers and also her own point of view. Wilfred Owen simply shares his thoughts by describing the soldiers leaving from a station, although the effect is no less powerful. As Hinkson is a woman, she focuses more on a mother or wives point of view, whereas Owen gives more of the soldiers perspective.
... shells “wailing” their “shrill, demented” mourning. The last sounds these soldiers are forced to listen to are their killers’ ridiculing at their naïve decision to fight. Weapons in Owen’s poems are personified to mock the war and reinforce its futility.
How Wilfred Owen Uses Language and Imagery in His Poetry to Communicate his Attitudes of War
Sassoon shows many examples of how the soldier in this poem gets pulled back into war-like terrors by meaningless things. The soldier is simply sitting in his home yet gets flashbacks of war and it haunts him. In this poem Sassoon is using a soldier as the example of repression as someone who has experienced war and the impacts it has on life after. “The poetic evolution related directly to Sassoon 's war experiences was initially gradual. His poetry became more serious and evocative in the early days of the war, but continued to inhabit the fatal logic of soldierly glory in poetic uniform” Avi Matalon claims (30). Poetry was influenced greatly by World War I and left poets creating new pieces that they never would have imagined
The poem comprises three stanzas which are patterned in two halves; the rule of three is ingeniously used throughout the poem to create tension and show the progression of the soldiers’ lives. There is a variety of rhyming schemes used – possibly Duffy considered using caesural rhyme, internal rhyme and irregular rhyme to better address the elegiac reality. The rhythm is very powerful and shows Duffy’s technical adroitness. It is slightly disconcerting, and adds to the other worldly ambience of the poem. Duffy uses a powerful comparative in each stanza to exemplify the monstrosity and extent of war, which is much worse than we imagine; it develops throughout each stanza, starting with a syntactical ‘No; worse.’ to ‘worse by far’ and ending on ‘much worse’. Similarly, the verbs used to describe the soldier’s shadow as he falls shows the reader the journey of the shadow, as if it’s the trajectory of soldiers’ lives. At first, the shadow is as an act...
The poem shows that the young man grows up to become a fighter who does not know when to stop all in the matter of a few lines that amount to one sentence. Then in an even shorter sentence, he dies in combat. Writing this as two sentences accentuates the idea that life is short, but can even be shorter if we can not get along. The speaker’s mourning tone probably ponders if the man avoided fighting maybe he could have lived longer as suggested when mentioning killing war elephants were not enough for the man who immersed himself in the battleground. By putting oneself in an environment of anger and aggression to the point of a questionable noticing of an arrow inside of oneself can only lead to a shortened