More handpicked essays just for you.
Results of child labor in 1800
What was the impact of child labor on society in the late 1800s/ early 1900s
What was the impact of child labor on society in the late 1800s/ early 1900s
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Throughout the passage, Florence Kelley uses a variety of rhetorical strategies to collectively and deliberately get to the point regarding limits on child labor and improvements for the working women. The use of rhetorical devices target both her specific and indirect audience by appealing to her audience’s logical and emotional senses. By writing in a combination of facts and evidence with emotional appeal to draw her audience, Kelley delivers her message effectively and successfully using emotional appeal and logical reasoning as the vehicle to her message of child labor and improvements for working women. From the very beginning of the passage, Kelley uses a combination of emotional and logical sense to appeal to her audience. She states, “We have, in this country, two million children… who are earning their bread .” Kelley portrays the fact, two million children working, with the appeal to emotion, children working to earn their own bread. This combination shows the unacceptable fact that the outrageous number of two million children are working with the appeal to emotion of children working for their bread gets to …show more content…
She shows the jobs young girls do in the factories, “They spin… they weave… They stamp” By showing a list of work the young girls do, Kelley appeals to her audience’s emotional sense in order to deliver message of dissolving child labor. She also uses rhetorical questions followed by solutions in order to question what must be done and how to do it. She states, “what can we do to free our consciousness?... we can enlist the workingmen… to free the children”. By doing this, Kelley forcefully suggests that her audience consciousness are enslaved with the idea of child labor. She states her and her audience must solve the problem with unity to enlist the workingmen on the jobs. This gets back to to Kelley’s purpose of destroying child labor. By offering
In Florence Kelley’s 1905 speech to the Philadelphia convention of the National American Women Suffrage Association, she accentuates the obligatory need to reform the working conditions for young children.
Throughout Kelley’s speech, she utilizes imagery to help prove her view that child labor is wrong. She points out that while “we sleep” there are “several thousand little girls… working in the textile mills, all the night through, in the deafening noise of the spindles and the looms spinning and weaving cotton and wool.” The listener of the speech can visualize the dreadful scene in which thousands of little girls are working in the textile mills. This imagery evokes a sense of sorrow from the listener. Also, the word “deafening” adds to the listener’s understanding that not only are young children working, but they are working dangerous and dreadful jobs. She also depicts an image of a girl who “ on her thirteenth birthday” could work from “ six at night until six in the morning.” This detail suggests that there is little happiness in the lives of these young children
In the first paragraph, Kelley explains the ages of these labor-bearing children by saying that “they very in age from six...sixteen in more enlightened states.” The use of “enlightened” is purely sarcastic, and the speaker does not have any respect for those states that allow sixteen year old girls to do heavy-labor. For anyone in the audience that knows the literal definition of “enlightened,” they, too, would be squirming in their seats at the thought of child labor, even at sixteen years of age, being “enlightening.” In her fourth paragraph, she touches more on “enlightened” states by talking about Alabama. She uses “child[ren] under sixteen.. shall not work in a cotton mill at night longer than 8 hours,” and then says that Alabama “does better... than any other southern state,” to again show her sarcasm towards these states...
Jarratt, Susan C. “Rhetoric and Feminism: Together Again.” College English. Vol. 62. 3rd ed. National Council of Teachers of English, 2000. 390-393. Jstor. Web.
This passage occurs when Mrs. Pitezel learns about the death of her three children and is called in by Detective Geyer to identify the corpses. Larson’s purpose in this passage is to display that Holmes thought he was invincible and that he'd never be arrested for his crimes; in addition, Larson uses the passage to demonstrate modern society’s indifference to other people's actions. Although Holmes was extremely cautious when murdering his victims- making sure to leave no evidence behind- in the case of the three Pitezel children he murdered, he leaves behind some of the children's most identifiable features, explains Larson. Whether it was because of carelessness or the false feeling of security, Holmes foolishly left the perfect teeth of
Pollan’s article provides a solid base to the conversation, defining what to do in order to eat healthy. Holding this concept of eating healthy, Joe Pinsker in “Why So Many Rich Kids Come to Enjoy the Taste of Healthier Foods” enters into the conversation and questions the connection of difference in families’ income and how healthy children eat (129-132). He argues that how much families earn largely affect how healthy children eat — income is one of the most important factors preventing people from eating healthy (129-132). In his article, Pinsker utilizes a study done by Caitlin Daniel to illustrate that level of income does affect children’s diet (130). In Daniel’s research, among 75 Boston-area parents, those rich families value children’s healthy diet more than food wasted when children refused to accept those healthier but
Swift stresses that it is hard for mothers to provide for their children and it is not getting any easier. He feels that this is due to an overpopulation and lack of food. It is hard enough for these mothers to...
During Florence Kelly’s child labor speech she uses many different rhetorical strategies to express her feelings on child labor laws and conditions to working for women in different states . The strategies she uses are purposefully meant to affect the audience’s view on child laws and working women in order to achieve her goal.
As an activist against child labor it would only seem reasonable that Florence Kelley would deliver a speech on the evils of child labor-however- this speech about child labor is a mere pawn in Kelley’s strategy for her ultimate argument. Kelley knew that her audience was a group of women and because she knew her audience well she used emotional appeal to make her argument. Kelley’s entire speech may look as if she’s fighting against child labor but it’s just a mere deploy; the true purpose of Kelley’s speech is about women’s suffrage. Her use of language and emotional appeal are what ultimately help her in her success with her argument.
Freedman, Russell, and Lewis Wickes Hine. Kids at Work: Lewis Hine and the Crusade Against Child Labor. New York: Clarion, 1994. Print. (both primary and secondary)
“Necessary Edges: Arts, Empathy, and Education” is an article written by world famous cellist, Yo-Yo Ma. In this article, Yo-Yo Ma identifies and discusses the role of arts in the world, stressing the point that these arts are a necessary element in the education system. Ma believes that the skills learned from these arts, are in fact, “essential” to the kind of balanced thinking that is needed in today’s world. Throughout this article, Yo-Yo Ma brilliantly portrays his thoughts, and gains the support of his audience through the use of ethos, logos, and pathos, while also maintaining a clear and concise stance.
She creates this feeling between the audience and the message by using the word “We” by doing this the audience feels responsible for the cruelty of child labor. “We do not wish this. We prefer to have our work done by men and women.” She is implying that the audience holds these same opinions and even if they don’t the audience will feel included and will therefore be encouraged to help make a change. Kelley ends her speech by recommending to the audience that “we should enlist the workingmen voters, with us, in this task of freeing the children.” This leaves the audience with a possible solution that will help end the unfair and atrocious system of child labor in the United
“Tonight while we sleep, several thousand little girls will be working in textile mills, all the night through…” She makes the reader and listeners feel guilty for sleeping nonchalantly as girls do rigorous work. By appealing to emotion, she hints how troublesome and inhumane child labor really is. Not only are the girls working rigorously but they’re working to make things that really aren’t needed: “...weaving cotton and wool silks and ribbons for us to buy.” The small detail also expounds at how unnecessary child labor really is. She continues to produce facts of how child labor is all over the country: “Alabama limit the children’s work at night to eight hours, .. . New Jersey permits [children working] all night long.” Despite the advantages children could have while
When child labor is examined, individuals and societies feel moral and emotional tugs. The Freudian super ego is appalled that, especially in the modern world, there would be such a preposterous issue. The Freudian id would rationalize numerous reasons, even justifications, of why child labor exists and would be necessary. Every corner of the earth has known this conflict to one degree or another. In the United States, the conflict is activated or denied with the purchase of an expensive sneaker. The child who is exploited on the other side of the world rarely receives a nod of concern for the slavery he endures. Countless items are similarly purchased with similar child working conditions. The children of note are under fifteen years of age and economically active. There are 120 million of these exploited human beings who work full time, often ten hours per day.
The term ‘child labor’ is used to define any work that is mentally, physically and morally harmful to children, and interferes with their education (ILO). Children have been used as a labor force throughout most of our history. After decades of struggle aimed to combat the massive employment of child labor, the Convention on the Rights of the Child in 1989 ratified that children have the right to develop harmoniously their personality in a loving family environment. Moreover, it recognized the right of the children to be protected from exploitation, and any form of labor that jeopardizes their physical, mental and moral well-being. However, child labor is still eagerly diffuse in developing countries,