Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Causes and effects of poverty in america
Three Ways to Meet Oppression
How poverty affects america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
How the Other Half Walks Away from Omelas In the short stories, “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas”, by Ursula LeGuin, and “How the Other Half Lives”, by Jacob Riis, these two authors are able to shine a light on the injustice that is happening with humans in America. They both focus on things that is commonly overlooked by those who have enough to live comfortably. Riis focuses on real events that pertain to the slums in America, while LeGuin takes us to another world using her imagination to symbolically show us what we are doing to these poor people. LeGuin asks us what exactly is the cost to pursue happiness , while Riis wants people to help completely eliminate the slums because they are in no way fit for humans. Both of these authors …show more content…
have a heart for the people who are being treated unjustly. They believe that the way these people are living is not how any human should be living. Riis and LeGuin use their writings to stir up emotions in Americans hoping that the readers will take action to help the people in need. In LeGuin’s short story, she brings us to an imaginary town called Omelas.
This town is a town where everyone is happy and they have everything that they could ever need. They live such carefree lives all paid for by the sickly, little child locked up in the dark cellar. The people of Omelas are very aware that this boy is being starved and mistreated just so they can live the lives they are living, but they never do anything about it. They know that if they try to help the boy they will no longer get to live the joyous lives they were living before. These people turn a blind eye to the little boy on purpose so that the do not feel bad for what they are doing. Riis, on the other hand, uses real things happening in the slums in America. Instead of telling people what the slums looked like, he used photography. The people that live in the slums are the people who helped build America. These people came to America and helped make it a place of freedom, yet they get no freedom themselves. When Riis saw this injustice, he decided to befriend the people living in the slums and study them so that he would be able to show other Americans that were living in freedom what was going on in the slums. Both of these writings show people who are paying for the price of other’s …show more content…
freedom. By using pictures to show Americans what the slums looked like, Riis was most likely able to pull on the heart strings of more people.
He went above and beyond to make sure that the Americans that were ‘on top’ saw what it was like for those who were living ‘on the bottom’. LeGuin, on the other hand, did a great job at being descriptive so that people could see who the little boy was living in the dark cellar all alone. Riis is able to strengthen their argument that these humans should not be living like this by using the pictures that he put in his writing. In Riis’ writing, he said “The world forgets easily, too easily, what it does not like to remember.” By using pictures and putting them in his work, he put the injustice right there in people’s face. It is harder to forget an image once you have seen it, but easier to forget what you have
heard. Both of these authors agree with each other one hundred percent. Even though LeGuin and Riis might have taken opposite roads to show people what was going on in society, they are both basically telling people the same thing. In LeGuins writing, just like the kid was being mistreated, these are real people being treated unjustly in America. She believes that people need to act now to end slavery and stop voluntarily blinding themselves from the situation just so they can live a little wilder and sleep a little better at night. Riis makes the argument that the people living in the slums are humans too and they need to be able to have a chance to live like the people who they helped build America with. Both of these stories can still be applicable in America today. There will never be a time in America when they will not matter. Humans are naturally evil and will always single out a minority just to get ahead. In today’s society there are thousands of homeless people living on the streets. The streets are not fit for humans to live in, and neither is slavery a way for other humans to live. “The One’s Who Walk Away From Omelas” and “How the Other Half Lives” work well together to show one made up, and one real stories that are very similar with human living conditions and how people are not taking action to help those around them. Jan Schakowsky said “There is a lot that happens around the world we cannot control. We cannot stop earthquakes, we cannot prevent droughts, and we cannot prevent all conflict, but when we know where the hungry, the homeless and the sick exist, then we can help.” Riis and LeGuin help to make people aware of the things that are happening to these people in poverty, but they cannot make people take action. Americans know where the people who need help are, but it is up to them to take action and help these people.
In doing this it creates this idea around Omelas as this happy, peaceful utopian society that seems wonderful to live in. There are no cars or advanced technology like central heating or washing machines but the people in Omelas are happy and live in comfort and they don’t base this happiness on technology or possessions like today's society. This is because they life on the principle of what the narrator says in par. 2 “Happiness is based on a just discrimination of what is necessary” but even though they people of Omelas follow this ideology, they still live a complex life like we do in our society. “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas” challenges our country's economic style of government from capitalism to communism economics. This is shown in the “economy is not based on competition - so no stock markets or advertisements” (James's, 93) for products that they make. This challenges our economic style of government because this is the total opposite of how our economy works, in a capitalist economy, anyone can start a business and with the right hard work they can become as successful as they
Jacob A Riis said “one half of the world does not know how the other half lives” (1) in the introduction of his great book How the Other Half Lives, which was published in 1890. It was simply because the one half did not care how the other half lived. Although unknowing how the other half lives had not been a matter, it brought into relief the gap between people over middle-class and the poor around 1900s in New York City where was the youngest city in the world.
In the dystopian short story “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas” by Ursala K. LeGuin and the dystopian novel Unwind by Neal Shusterman both authors challenge readers to consider the sacrifices made in pursuit of a utopian society. In “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas” the citizens sacrifice a child’s happiness and freedom in order to gain happiness and freedom for themselves. In Unwind, the citizens sacrifice their children if they choose in order to gain happiness. Although both authors employ the use of strict conformity among citizens, Ursala K LeGuin warns the reader against the dangers of greed and staying silent, while Neal Shusterman cautions the reader against the dangers of blindly following one’s government.
Thus, both novels, full of tragedy and sorrow, began with the promise of new land, new beginnings and a better life, but all three were impossible to find within the pages of these novels. In the end, it was broken relationships, broken families, broken communities, but most importantly, broken dreams and broken hopes that were left on the final pages of both woeful, yet celebrated, stories.
Riis writes his book effectively and manages to grasp the attention of the nation with his exposé of real life stories and his snap photography of the tenements of New York City. His point of view wasn’t always objective and he had many stereotypes burned into his brain, but at the same time without some of those preconceived ideas I don’t think his writing would have been as effective as it was. There were real emotions and deep feelings that went into his work. Without his connection to the poverty stricken, he would not have an understanding of where those immigrants were mentally, the pain they were going through and the ‘rough road’ ahead of them. The main purpose of his book was to try to help open the eyes of the people in New York to the conditions in which the immigrants are living. By opening their eyes, he hoped that there would be compassion growing in their hearts and maybe open up to that community and aid in the reconstruction of the tenements in which they resided.
The city of Omelas is the most magical, idyllic place anyone’s imagination could possibly conjure. The people live happily, with everything they want and need, and most importantly without pain, evil, without monarchy, slavery, the stock exchange, the advertisement, the secret police and the bomb. Yet, the people are not simple minded, but rather are “mature, intelligent, passionate adults whose lives [are] not wretched” and “their children [are], in fact, happy”.
However, she never really experienced the actual life of living in poverty as the majority of people living in poverty experience. Barbara, an educated white women had just that on other people living in poverty, because of the color of her skin and education level that is more often than not restricted from people living in poverty. She was able and more qualified for jobs than other people living amongst the status she was playing. She also was able to more readily seek better benefits than people living in poverty. When she first start her journey in Florida she had a car, a car that in most cases people living in poverty do not have. She was also able to use the internet to find local jobs and available housing in the area that many people living in poverty are restricted from. Another great benefit she had was the luxury of affording a drug detox cleansing her of drugs deemed bad. Many people living in poverty do not have much extra cash laying around much less fifty dollars to afford a detox for prescription drugs. She also had the luxury to afford her prescription drugs, another option that many people living in poverty do not have. Another element that made Barbara’s experience not that genuine was the fact that she was not providing for anybody other than herself. Twenty-two percent of kids under the age of 18 are living below the poverty line (http://npc.umich.edu/poverty/#5) , Barbara did not have to provide for pets or kids which would of changed her experience altogether of living in poverty. Not to belittle Barbara’s experience, but many factors of what life is like living in poverty were not taken into consideration during her
Ursula Le Guin’s “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas” is a short story that captures racism directly towards blacks in America. In the story, the people of Omelas are celebrating the summer festival which song and dance. They decorated the streets; children are running around playing while the whole city attends. The people of Omelas don’t have a care in the world. They don’t use weapons, aren’t reckless people, but they aren’t simple people. They seem to be living in a utopia, a place where everything is perfect, granted by some type of devil or person. For a utopia to come true there has to be a sacrifice or arrangement. For the people of Omelas, they believe that to achieve a utopian society means someone has to suffer. The story portrays slavery in the United States. In the story, the sufferer, or the kid, symbolizes
People in United states tend to ignore the complex problems the country is facing but focuses on the dominance of the country. People only looks at the surface of the United States and neglects problem about poverty. The bigger cities, like Los Angeles and New York, are mostly impacted by the poverty. It is important to recognize the impact of the poverty in order to understand the complex problem of the United States. In George Orwell’s “Down and Out in Paris and London”, the author provides a vivid image of the poverty and the impact on the people’s daily lives. In 1933 London and Paris, the condition of the poverty was much critical due to lack of support from the government. When we compare the 21st century poverty
Though much emphasis is put on the natural beauty of Omela’s people and its environment, a lot remains to show its darker side which is hidden from the innocence of the kids until they reach the age of 10 (Le, Guin, 65). This is a total contrast to the lovely exhibition of the city and its harmony. It indicates a cruel society that exposes a child of years to unnatural suffering because of utopic beliefs that the success of the town is tied to the kid suffering. Other members of the town leave Omela in what seems like the search for an ideal city other than Omela. But do they get it?
The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas is a short story written by Ursula Le Guin. In her story, Le Guin creates a model Utilitarian society in which the majority of its citizens are devoid of suffering; allowing them to become an expressive, artistic population. Le Guin’s unrelenting pursuit of making the reader imagine a rich, happy and festival abundant society mushrooms and ultimately climaxes with the introduction of the outlet for all of Omelas’ avoided misfortune. Le Guin then introduces a coming of age ritual in which innocent adolescents of the city are made aware of the byproduct of their happiness. She advances with a scenario where most of these adolescents are extremely burdened at first but later devise a rationalization for the “wretched one’s” situation. Le Guin has imagined a possible contemporary Utilitarian society with the goal to maximize the welfare of the greatest number of people. On the contrary, Kant would argue that using the child as a mere means is wrong and argue that the living conditions of the child are not universalizable. The citizens of Omelas must face this moral dilemma for all of their lives or instead choose to silently escape the city altogether.
Both books are told in the first person; both narrators are young girls, living in destitute neighborhoods, who witness the harsh realities of life for those who are poor, abused, and hopeless, although the narrators themselves manage to survive their tough environments with their wits and strength intact. Books are more than simple literary exercises, written merely to amuse or delight their audiences. Both authors attempt to provoke their readers to think about the social issues their novels present.... ... middle of paper ...
A slum neighborhood located in “Yes, Ma’m” and a brilliant train carriage in “The Storyteller” create the setting for this compare and contrast essay. These short stories are similar in that their themes both focus on negative objects, but play them into a positive light. However, their suggested themes are different in that “Yes Ma’m” tells the reader to not believe in people by where they live, but “The Storyteller” communicates to not judge something based on its formality. Langston Hughes’s “Yes Ma’m” has an implied theme found anywhere, “nice people can be found even in the lowest places on the planet.” Another true theme belonging to Saki’s “The Storyteller,” reads, “Sometimes the most improper story is the best one.” Both main messages are true, and provide a very keen focal point for the reader to enjoy.
In order to live their “perfect” lives, the citizens of Omelas must accept the suffering of the child. Making the right ethical decision is difficult, but necessary to end the injustice of the society. Failing to overcome the ethical issues in the city of Omelas is displayed through three different characters in the story. There are those who choose to ignore the situation, those who observe the child in misery, and those who feel that they must walk away. In the story “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” characters fail to overcome the ethical issues in their society, and the reader is taught the importance of moral responsibility and the implications of the difficult task of making the right ethical decision.
This essay has compared the differences between the societies in these two novels. There is one great similarity however that both make me thankful for having been born into a freethinking society where a person can be truly free. Our present society may not be truly perfect, but as these two novels show, it could be worse.