Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays about book censorship
Lord of the rings and Harry Potter
Essays about book censorship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays about book censorship
Should Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire be banned or challenged? Harry potter is a fantasy novel with about three young wizards making their way through the Wizarding School called Hogwarts and they face many challenges along the way but they always end up on top. So no Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire should not be banned and should be allowed in schools.
When the author of the author of the book, J.K. Rowling, was very young she had read a book about a rabbit quite, logically named, Rabbit who got the measles and a giant bee named Ms. Bee. After reading this story she knew that one day she wanted to become a writer. “Ever since I read Rabbit and Ms. Bee, I have wanted to be a writer” (J.K. Rowling)
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
was challenged several times and even banned in some places. People wanted it banned because it supposedly promotes the Wicca religion. “The Gwinnett county schoolboard rejected a parents pleas to take Harry Potter books out of school libraries, based on the claim they promoted witchcraft.” (Banned Book Week) Unless the evidence that is provided has proven that the book promotes witchcraft and the Wicca religion it should be allowed in school libraries. People say that by banning certain books we can save our children and their innocence. But most people learn about how everything works and all the curse words by the time they hit puberty. While Harry Potter has hardly any cursing in it, people still might take offence to that. “Evidence of this comes through in sources as famous as the “Diary of a Young Girl,” written by the 13-year-old Anne Frank.”(Jake Rich) In conclusion Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire should not be banned or challenged and should be allowed in schools. Whether Harry is facing a dragon or escaping sires through the use of magic harry potter is still a great book series. But that is a story for another time.
The Library has no right to ban Huck Finn on these grounds. The reason that books should be banned is to protect the innocence of young readers and to keep them from reading something inappropriate for their age. The reasons that they (the committee) gave for banning Huck Finn are unsatisfactory and are not valid reasons to ban a book. Now, it is true that for most younger readers the elaborate satire and criticisms of the American culture in Huck Finn are lost, but that is no reason to ban it, it is simply a statement that some will understand the deeper meaning of the book, while for others, it will be lost.
Harry Potter should not be banned from school libraries. Taking it from schools would not stop students from reading it. Even though it was not at the school. It would be at the public library. They also could barrow it from a field of family members or friends. Finally, they could just go online and read or buy it.
People ban books for dumb reasons that make absolutely no sense. Another is dumb religious reasons. Ministers and educators challenged it (it being the wonderful wizard of oz) for its “ungodly” influence and for depicting women in strong leadership roles They banned the wizard of oz because it showed girls in a leadership role (what?).This is really important because they are banning a classic book because the princess was a thing that people got really people got upset with it. “Others accuse the novel of attacks on religion, the disabled and women.” Lord of the flies (“http://www.banned-books.org.uk/sections/corrosive”). Once again PC police have come again to shut down another book that is actually pretty good.Also once again imagination is not encouraged. Don’t ban books for religious reasons that are not valid. Finally racism (that is not racism). “"A review of the book in question shows it to include pervasive vulgarity and racially insensitive language,"(The Hate you Give) Hindt said.” The story is about the struggles of a black girl in a racist environment (wouldn’t this be considered anti-racist). They can basically just ban whatever book they want.The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark
The practice of the censorship of books in schools has been prevalent due to the explicit content of them. Parents have been complaining to schools about books that count as required reading because they disapprove with the points made in the book. If a book consists of offensive or sexually explicit material, then parents would challenge the schools about them in order to prevent their children from reading them. Censorship in general has been an intensely debated issue because it is considered an infringement to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution while others argue it is used to conceal inappropriate things (Aliprandini and Sprague). The banning of books in school curriculum has also been debated since parents see certain books as inappropriate while others argue that banning them hinders student learning. Against the censorship of books in schools, Fenice Boyd and Nancy Bailey, authors of Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, believe that banning books creates a barrier between students and intellectual development (Boyd and Bailey, 655). Banning books from schools and removing them from the curriculum prevents students from exploring different ideas and developing creativity and critical thinking skills.
The Constitution states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." Even though books may influence young minds with negative thinking, society shouldn’t ban books because it prohibits learning and it violates the First Amendment in the Constitution. Banning books takes away the author’s right, some books can be very educational, and it takes away the children’s choice of what they get to read.
Books are free like the birds with open wings, that will see light and dark. The one thing everyone should know is you can’t cage a free bird. In the school direct there has been a lot of books banned from examples of To Kill a Mockingbird to Where the Wild Things Are. Our schools should have the freedom to pick and choice want is read but shouldn’t the students get a say. With the long process of getting a book banned, why shouldn’t we make sure the students get a say. I have three reasons why The Call of The Wild shouldn’t be banned. Tho your opinion is different I would like to hear me out on this. My three logical reasons are that there is a good message,it’s great for school debates, and the journey the Buck goes on.
I personally believe that the story, To Kill a Mockingbird should not be banned in schools, and the story should be allowed in students’ curriculum. The first reason to why I believe this to be true would be the fact that it allows students the opportunity to learn about human mistakes and how to be better people in the future. A second reason would be that students are able to learn important parts of our history within the book. It also teaches students important morals that may be hard to teach without the context of a book such as this one.
Banning Books “It’s not just the books under fire now that worry me. It is the books that will never be written, the books that will never be read. And all due to the fear of censorship. As always, young readers will be the real losers” (Blume 1999). Judy Blume can not explain the problem of book censorship any clearer.
Ever since J.K. Rowling first introduced Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone in 1997, children and adults have read and loved the series. It has gained such popularity that all of the books have been made into major motion pictures, and a Harry Potter attraction has been opened in Universal Studios, Florida. Though the readers love Rowling’s intricate and exciting story lines, many controversies have arisen from these stories, not only in the United States, but also in various countries around the world. Perhaps the biggest controversy is the religious implications perceived by some critics. Although these critics believe that the series promotes paganism and encourages evil actions, these theories should not be taken so seriously.
People should be allowed to read whatever they want to read, even if it is a touchy subject to someone else. Although some people mainly believe in the banning of books due to explicit content, it actually causes a negative effect on people and children. Not only does it take away the people’s first amendment rights, but it also shelters children from real life situations that might affect their future. Banning books is unconstitutional and shelters children.
“’My dear Noel- I don’t know how to write to you, so I shall tell you a story about four little rabbits whose names were Flopsy, Mopsy, Cottontail, and Peter. They lived with their mother in a sandbank…’” (Collins 35). Beatrix Potter was inspired by Noel’s joy at her story. Children’s joy is what inspired Beatrix to publish her stories for children all around. Just like many other authors, Beatrix went through rough times when she thought she could not make it. It was particularly hard for Beatrix, because she was a female, her parents did not support her, and she had many personal things happen during her career.
The act of banning something is an aggressive measure. However, this being said whether to ban Mark Twains The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn has long been debated. While some say that the book is offensive and disrespectful, others claim it to be a valuable learning lesson. Because of its beneficial lessons, its way of shocking the reader, its reputation as being one of the best novels in american history along with other controversial books being allowed in high schools, The Adventure’s of Huckleberry Finn should be read by every High School across the country.
To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee has been challenged/banned countless times since it’s original publication in 1960. The reasoning people could have behind banning it is that they feel that the racism, language and subject matter in the book is offensive, inappropriate, immoral and that it encourages and condones such things. To Kill a Mockingbird takes place in Maycomb, a small town in Alabama, during the depression from 1935-1937, and is told from the perspective of a little girl named Scout. In the book Scout’s father Atticus teaches her and her brother Jem many valuable lessons. The things Atticus teaches Scout and Jem are things we all need to know. To Kill a Mockingbird is an inspirational book that teaches valuable moral values, and should not be banned.
Banning books does not teach students anything. Also, books inspire a passion for reading. Books can help students grow up and mature, too. When school administrators ban books, students don’t have the right to freedom or choice, and that will not help anyone in life. Books also posses many amazing ideas to the readers (“Banned”). Most people believe that banning books deprive students from learning at their best capability. When school administrators ban books, students start to lack in imagination and creativity
“The great beauty of the Potter books is their wealth of imagination and their sheer shining fullness. (pg. 434) J.K Rowling’s imagination lead to the writing of the Harry Potter series. Rowling made up magical treats, jokes poltergeists, ghosts, magical animals, and spells. Rowling using her imagination to write stories led to her becoming well known and famous.