Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Character analysis of the most dangerous game
Character analysis the most dangerous game
Character analysis the most dangerous game
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Most Dangerous Game Essay Have you ever thought about how an animal feels while being hunted? Well a man named Rainsford, in the book, “The Most Dangerous Game, by Richard Connell,” find out exactly what it feels like to be hunted. Rainsford is both intelligent and kind. Rainsford is highly intelligent when it comes to hunting. “That Cape buffalo is the largest I ever saw, said Rainsford.” Rainsford was able to tell what type of animal it was just by looking at the Cape buffalo head by looking at it. He hunts animals all around the world so he has skills in how to hide from the animals without them noticing him until he fires his gun. “A twenty-two,” he remarked. “That’s odd. It must have been a fairly large animal too.” Rainsford was
able to tell that the person hunting must have been hunting a rather large animal just by looking at the bullet used. He is able to track animals and find out the size of them just by looking at their tracks. Rainsford is very intelligent in how he is able to know animals and their size by looking at prints and how he is good at hunting them without them spotting him. Rainsford is very polite and kind to other people. “ Rainsford is hunted like an animal as a game for someone else. Rainsford hunts and people hunt.
The most dangerous game began as a sport for one man. His name is Sanger Rainsford. In Richard Connell’s story “The Most Dangerous Game,” Sanger Rainsford, an avid hunter, is lost at sea, stranded on “Ship-Trap” Island-every sailor’s worst nightmare. Rainsford goes through a series of events that prove to be life-altering. Even though Sanger Rainsford went through many trials and tribulations, he never lost his intelligence, composure, or his bravery.
Where does the line of sport and murder intersect in hunting? Is it when the species being hunted is able to reason? Or is it when the species being hunted looks just like the hunter? In both movie and film, we see a man fight for his life and another going against all codes of ethics. While Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” and Ernest B. Schoedsack’s film adaptation both have several similarities, the difference are also apparent in each respective media.
Rainsford is known for his extravagant hunting skills, even General Zaroff speaks of Rainsford as is if he has inspired him to become a hunter. Rainsford talks about hunting with passion, while he is speaking to Whitney he tells her it’s “the best sport in the world” (19). Rainsford has no guilt when he kills animals, he even tells Whitney that it’s nonsense when she mention the jaguars have feeling. But Rainsford shows immediate disgust when Zaroff brings up his hunting of humans, “hunting, great heavens, what you speak of is murder” (26). This only the first of many times that he reacts with great displeasure.
For many people, hunting is just a sport, but for some it is a way of life. In Rick Bass’s “Why I Hunt” he explains how he got to where he lives now and what he thinks of the sport of hunting. There are many things in the essay that I could not agree more with, and others that I strongly disagree. Overall this essay provides a clear depiction of what goes through the mind of a hunter in the battle of wits between them and the animal.
A skilled hunter sprints desperately through the woods, realizing the futility of hiding from his greatest foe: his own kind. Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” is the story of a hunter that becomes the hunted. The story explores the sense of extreme terror the protagonist feels being pursued by a psychopath living on a mysterious island. This protagonist, Rainsford, has many traits that aid him in his battle with the general. By demonstrating his cunning, sly, and remorseful traits, Rainsford shows the story’s theme of “walking a mile in someone else’s shoes”.
In the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, the protagonist, Rainsford, is a smart, clever, resilient man who keeps a cool head in stressful and dangerous situations. Rainsford is not allowed to leave the island he washes up on after he falls off the yacht he was traveling on, because the mentally disturbed general wants to hunt people with Rainsford. Rainsford makes a deal with the general to win his freedom. If Rainsford can evade Zaroff for three nights, then Rainsford is free to leave the island. During the hunt, Rainsford must think quickly and be resourceful in order to stay alive. Rainsford is an extremely experienced hunter who writes books about his hunting experiences. When Rainsford is running from the
In the story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell the protagonist, Sanger Rainsford, is a very resourceful person. When Rainsford is thrown overboard his ship he finds himself in a rather odd predicament. He meets a man who he discovers hunts humans for sport. He quickly learns that he will be the next quarry of this man. While on the run he must use his survival skills to stay alive. “With fingers flying he wove a rough carpet of weeds and branches and then he covered the mouth of the pit” (Connell 56). Rainsford is able to use his hunting and wilderness knowledge by creating a trap for his hunter. This example shows that Rainsford is able use what's around him to stay
Hunting big game animals for sport was a popular pastime with the wealthy classes following World War I. The morality of killing for sport was not questioned in reality, but in this short story the author does question it by taking it a step further and having the protagonist, Sangor Rainsford, hunted by the antagonist, General Zaroff.In a short story full of irony, one of the greatest ironies of Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” is that General Zaroff repeatedly tells Rainsford that he maintains a sense of civilization on his island.
General Zaroff used hunting tactics when they were eating “the last supper” at Zaroff’s house. Every time Rainsford looked up, he said, “he found him studying him, appraising him narrowly” (Connell 66). By this, the reader can tell that Zaroff is trying to notice Rainsford’s tendencies. Knowing these can make hunting him easier. Also at dinner, Zaroff explains to Rainsford that “God made him a hunter” and how his father believed that “his hand was made for the trigger” since he was ten (Connell 85). Zaroff sharing this with Rainsford is proof that this man is a talented hunter and has been for a long time. Rainsford is quite the hunter himself. So much so, that Zaroff knew who he was when he arrived. The General stated, “It is a very great pleasure and honor to welcome Mr. Sanger Rainsford, the celebrated hunter, to my home” (Connell 52). Also during the hunt when Rainsford set up the Burmese tiger pit and claiming one of Zaroff’s dogs, Zaroff tells him, “You’ve done well, Rainsford” (Connell 194). If his enemy believes that he is a great hunter, then he must be. Especially because Zaroff thinks so highly of himself. Going back to when Rainsford was
Whitney introduces the secondary theme, being that hunters usually have no empathy for their prey. This is one of the first uses of irony in the story. Metaphors and Similes are often used in this story, so the reader has a better image of the setting, this is something, and I find Connell did incredibly well, for instance when he refers to the darkness of the night as moist black velvet, the sea was as flat as a plate-glass and it was like trying to see through a blanket. Rainsford begins his epic struggle for survival after falling overboard when he recklessly stood on the guard rail, this is our first example of how Rainsford manages to conquer his panic and think analytically and there by ensuring his survival.
To Mr. Rainsford, hunting is like football to a NFL player. Hunting plays a huge role in his li...
Well, there is a lot of different ways that external events affected an internal change in Sanger Rainsford in this story. There are all kinds of conflicts that change the way he thinks about stuff and how he does things. A lot of things changed in this story because of that.
In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, Sanger Rainsford is a skilled, widely known hunter from New York City. When he falls off his yacht, he swims to Ship-Trap Island where he meets the owner of the island, General Zaroff, who is also a hunter. Rainsford soon discovers that Zaroff plans a dangerous game in which he traps ships, so he can hunt and kill those on board. The protagonist Sanger Rainsford, and the antagonist, General Zaroff share common beliefs about hunting, but when they are pitted against each other in Zaroff’s inhumane game their truly different personalities, attitudes, and morals conflict, resulting in Rainsford killing Zaroff for the greater good. In different ways, Rainsford and Zaroff each divide the world into two classes. On the
Robert's encounter with the coyote is a significant step in his understanding of animals and, in turn, this leads to a greater understanding of himself. For Robert to be a soldier, it is important for him to see the point of view of a hunter. He learns from the coyote that a hunter must be generous and kill only in order to survive ("Animals and Their Significance" 1). Robert follows the coyote and watches as it passes two gophers and does not even "pause" to scuffle the burrows or even sniff at them. It just [goes] right on trotting--forward towards its goal" (26).
Hunting has been around for over two millions years, but what is the possibility that the hunter would be the hunted? Sanger Rainsford, a world class hunter and author, has found himself as the new target of a general who likes his prey human. Sometimes, the grass isn’t as green on the other side, and Rainsford will soon have an experience in this lesson. With changing perception, soon the hunter will learn the ways of the hunted. Richard Connell's “The Most Dangerous Game” gives insight on the triumphs of role reversal.