How Is Julius Caesar Manipulated

517 Words2 Pages

In the story Julius Caesar, the character of Brutus is portrayed as many things, but primarily Brutus was a betrayer. This is true for many reasons, for he betrayed both his friend and his country. He did this by trying to become ruler, by killing Caesar, and also allowing himself to be manipulated. Some would argue that Brutus killed Caesar because he wanted what was best for his people. Also that he was lead to believe that he was saving his country. Yet he still went through with the plan and literally backstabbed Caesar instead of finding a better solution. Brutus was figuratively and literally a backstabber, since he was setting up a front in order to get to Caesar. He pretended to be Caesar’s friend while simultaneously planning to kill him and take over leadership. If Brutus were a real patriot then he would have found a more honorable way of dealing with Caesar and saving Rome. He could have had Caesar imprisoned, or if he was worried that Caesar was gaining too much power, he could’ve had Caesar exiled. He could’ve even removed him from his position by impeaching him. Instead Brutus allowed himself to be persuaded into brutally murdering Caesar. Afterwards, Brutus and the conspirators covered their hands elbow deep in Caesar’s blood to not only acknowledge, but also celebrate Caesar’s death. …show more content…

Then, he even would’ve warned Caesar about the upcoming danger. Instead he allowed himself to be manipulated by a few rough fan cards and the empty words and promises of a traitor. In the end Brutus did what he thought would benefit him the most, which was to get rid of Caesar once and for all. This decision was neither honorable nor moral, and it proved him to be a liar. It is definitely not something that someone who loved their king dearly would ever think of

Open Document