Beowulf vs. Beowulf and Grendel:
Simplistic Duality and The Contrast of Characters
Our culture is constantly evolving, from the way we speak, to our views on the world, from each generation to the next, we gradually shift. This change is especially apparent in literary works. The media that society has produced in the past is vastly different than what we can see today. For instance the classic literary work Beowulf (Heaney, 2000), originally written in the time period between 500 and 1000 AD, was recently converted into a dramatic movie version: Beowulf and Grendel (Gunnarsson, 2005). With over a thousand years of cultural influence, it is no surprise that the movie adaptation is quite variant to it’s epic poem counterpart. Among the countless
…show more content…
differences, the most obvious change is the addition of a few characters. The incorporation of these characters such as Grendel’s father, the disabled man, and the witch is a perfect example of how our changed cultural views requires us to have a complexity among our characters, blurring the lines between good and evil. The inclusion of Grendel’s father in the movie adaptation provides an insight to Grendel’s backstory that adds a completely different side to Grendel that we do not see in the poem.
In the epic poem the contrast between the hero and villain is very apparent. Beowulf is a strong, valiant hero, whereas Grendel is pure evil, killing solely for pleasure. In early culture simplistic duality played a vital role in much of their writing. They were content with very flat characters with little explanation of motive. Good and evil were two completely separate non negotiable concepts. Grendel is given no motive for his actions besides simply a distaste for the Dane’s and their boastful, loud parties. The only logical motive for Grendel’s killing is perhaps jealousy. However, it is not discussed in the poem and is left for the reader to determine. The poem depicts Grendel as a cruel beast who kills with no explanation which makes it difficult for audiences today to relate to him. However audiences in today's culture require more complexity from their …show more content…
character. In today's society a villain that we can sympathize with appeals to audiences, we seek characters with depth and complexity. The addition of Grendel’s father’s death provides a motive for Grendel’s savage actions. It actually allows the audience to sympathize with the antagonist by providing Grendel’s motive: revenge. The death of Grendel’s father evokes a deep sense of pity for the lonely troll and sparks the hate in Grendel’s heart for the Dane’s. As we watch young Grendel mourn the lose of his father to the cruel king, we feel sympathy for the villain we were originally intended to detest. Many of us can relate, on some level, the pain and betrayal Grendel is feeling thus allowing us to justify his actions against the Danes. This backstory allows the audience to connect with Grendel so we can understand the reasoning behind his actions. While Grendel’s father is added to provide depth to the character of Grendel, the addition of the disabled man works in the same way for Beowulf. In the poem we do not see much change in Beowulf’s character; he is a superior and courageous warrior from beginning to end. Although in the epic poem Beowulf is a mighty warrior, he lacks the sympathy and sensitivity society craves. In the poem Beowulf shows no remorse for his actions. Beowulf comes with only one task in mind: to kill Grendel and nothing will hinder his success. The poem does a brilliant job of highlighting Beowulf’s amazing fighting skills and pure brawn. He is honored as an amazing fighter however the poem doesn't give much insight to Beowulf’s emotions. He is solely an emotionless fighter with no trace of remorse, love, or compassion. However, in today’s society we crave a hero with more than just muscle but a heart and brain as well. Culture today appreciates a more well rounded hero. Not only do our heros need to be dauntless fighters, but quick thinkers and compassionate civilians. The addition of the disabled man allows us to see a softer side of Beowulf that we do not see in the poem, which in turn allows for his emotional growth throughout the film. When Beowulf witnesses the death of the innocent disabled man he begins to question the morality of the entire quest to capture Grendel. Beowulf mentions, “My wits still war with how this all began (Gunnarsson, 2005).” Beowulf’s conscience is beginning to make him question why they were fighting Grendel in the first place. He is able to see the damage that his actions are causing and he contemplates just how evil Grendel really is. Beowulf is attempting to comprehend the motives of Grendel’s actions. The disabled man creates a struggle inside Beowulf about whether his actions are justified. This struggle reveals Beowulf’s deeper emotions and sensitivity we do not see in the poem and is the basis for Beowulf’s emotional shift throughout the movie. While Beowulf begins to realize Grendel may be more human than they, Dane’s, had lead him to believe, the addition of the witch’s relationship with Grendel further solidifies that idea.
In the epic poem, Grendel is depicted as a vicious beast with no real emotion. He is hardly human and has a very grotesque appearance. He lacks any type of sympathy and acts solely on a whim. The author of the epic poem never truly goes into detail about how Grendel feels about the debacle and fails to relate him to the Dane’s in any manner. The Danes and Grendel are two completely different entities with no similarities between them. This makes it very simple for the Danes to feel no pity or remorse towards Grendel. Additionally, the fact that Grendel is such a malicious savage makes it difficult for the audience to sympathize with him. He lacks human attributes and sympathy which further separates him from the
Danes. In the movie, Grendel is given more human like qualities as opposed to the grotesque monster portrayed in the poem. The human like qualities that Grendel has in the movie not only make him more relatable to the audience but emphasizes that the Danes and Grendel aren’t very different at the core. The inclusion of the witch makes Grendel seem more human thus making him more relatable to the audience. Additionally, the inclusion of the witch serves to teach a lesson to the Danes about their judgement of Grendel. When some of the Danes compare Grendel to a worm, Beowulf notes that “he is no more worm than” they are (Gunnarsson, 2005). This idea that Grendel may not just be a vicious, mindless being is revolutionary to the Danes. They began to realize that Grendel is more like them then they would like to think and that the real monsters may be themselves. Since Beowulf was written, our culture has changed drastically and will continue to change. These major shifts in our culture provide the changes that were made to the epic poem when it was converted to the modern movie version. In more recent times, we require characters with more depth and complexity which accounts for the addition of the characters of Grendel’s dad, the disabled man, and the witch when the poem was made into a movie. These characters and the other added components to the film adjusted to the new cultural preferences our society possesses today. The contrast between the two time periods in which these works were composed are vast. As our culture continues to change our literary works and media will adjust to our needs and wants.
Rudd cites various sections of the poem, describing Grendel as a “night-monster of the border lands” (Rudd 3), and the translation of the poem says that Grendel was, “...Conceived by a pair of those monsters born Of Cain, murderous creatures banished By God…” (Raffel 42). Rudd also gives evidence for Grendel being seen as demonic, and reasons that Grendel attacks the Danes out of “...not mere thirst for gore, as we might suspect… but rather… envy of the Danes’ happiness- and envy was a chief characteristic of the medieval devil.” (Ruud 5). He then ties this devilish persona to Grendel’s humanistic aspects, stating Grendel has a heathen soul, and therefore he must be human. Ruud also notes, however, that there are critics who question the validity of portraying Grendel as this three-sided figure, asking questions such as, “How can Grendel be a devil when he has a physical body? How can he be a man when he is so manifestly bestial?” (Ruud 7). Ruud believes that the original poet of Beowulf is doing this for effect rather than consistency, but a more reasonable explanation that encompasses all three characteristics is that Grendel represents the evil in
In both works, Beowulf and Grendel, Grendel himself is generally given the same connotations. He is given kennings, called names, referred to as the evil spawn of Cain, and even viewed as a monster; but why? Why in both books is he a wicked, horrible, person who is harshly excluded from everyone? After stumbling upon John Gardner's book, it was halfway expected that some excuse would be made for Grendel; that he wasn't really the inexorable monster the thanes in Beowulf portrayed him as. But all it really did was make him worse. What is the message we are being sent about Grendel?
Our first character, Grendel, is an exceptionally diverse character. It is implied that in both book and poem, Grendel is a blood-thirsty monster. All Grendel does is go through meadhalls and kill the drunk, often asleep people. But when narrated through the eyes of Grendel, the true nature of this beast is discovered. The author of Grendel entails that Grendel is a depressed and misunderstood monster, restrained to the confinements of his own underwater cave. He is a lot like the monster in the book Frankenstein. Both Grendel and Frankenstein are born with no real purpose to life, going off of what they hear other people say and taking it as the truth. Both monsters, knowing that everyone detests them for being unattractive and different, retaliate by way of murder and mayhem. From the perspective of the people in the stories itself, Grendel is exactly how the narrator in the poem Beowulf makes him out to be. The people, or the thanes, of Hrothgar’s kingdom see Grendel as a demon from hell, representing all that’s evil in the world. He’s a supernatural creature and in this time period anything supernatural that wasn’t human was considered a spirit, a god, evil or, in Grendel...
Grendel in the Epic of Beowulf is portrayed as a monster, a creature that has no thoughts on who he kills.While in the movie Beowulf and Grendel(Gunnarsson 2005); he is much more human-like. In parts of the movie, thoughts are led to believe that in fact he is not out to kill random people he only harms those who have “hurt him”.This, in fact, leads to believe that Grendel from the film really wasn’t the bad guy:it shifted towards the fact that Hrothgar was the bad guy for killing Grendel 's father This ties to the fact that as we modernize we tend to need a reason to do things, most people will not endure things if in the end the end result they won 't benefit from it. Nevertheless, the film has changed the perspective and/ or natural view that one as a reader would have taken from the
Grendel as a character is very intelligent, he is capable of rational thought at all times. Because of this, at sometimes during the story I would forget Grendel is a monster, the way he acts in his thoughts and actions I would mistake him for a human; at times I was even feeling bad for Grendel because he is a very lonely person who tries to understand all of the meaningless of the world around him. Grendel can never get to close to
This is controlled by appetite and impulse, as seen in Grendel 's drastic urges to go on a killing spree in the mead hall killing the drunken Danes. Grendel hides away watching everything and everyone: hiding behind sheds or in a tree. Grendel speaks of his longings for friendships; of his captivity in his mythical role; of his disdain for his roots, as seen in the quote describing is an affinity for his mother. "When I sleep, she presses close to me, half buries me under her thistly fur and fat. Dool-Dool," she moans. She drools and weeps. "Warrovish," she whimpers, and tears at herself. Hanks of fur come away in her claws. I see gray hide." (Gardner 146) Where as, in the poem Beowulf, Grendel is made out to be a savage monster full of evil just looking to kill with no sense of remorse or good qualities. These qualities are seen when the narrator speaks "Out from the marsh, from the foot of misty hills and bogs, bearing God 's hatred, Grendel came, hoping to kill." (285 - 287) Giving the appearance and goals Grendel portrayed in the epic poem
There are many similarities and differences between the movie "Beowulf and Grendel", to the poem. Major differences between the movie and the poem would be Grendel himself. In the poem, he is described as an evil monster born from two demons. In the movie, Grendel is actually human, but known as a troll to the warriors and Danes. The poem doesn’t give the background of Grendel or show how the Danes killed his father and the possible reason of his revenge, like in the movie. If the witch, Selma, was not included in the storyline of the movie, the audience would not have known key information that she was used to show from more flashbacks. The witch gives more of an idea about Grendel’s past life that could have been the possibility to reasons for his actions. Some major similarities are the battles. Both epics include the battles between Beowulf and Grendel, as well as Beowulf and Grendel’s mother. The end results are the same, leading to their death, but the journey and process to the two tales are different.
We have a concrete hero character in Beowulf, and a concrete villain in Grendel. We see this as a theme throughout the epic poem. The dichotomy of good versus evil is the fundamental backbone of this piece of literature. It is so significant due to the fact that everything that happens in this book is someway related to good versus evil. If Beowulf wasn’t so good at heart, he would not even be enticed to leave his homeland and go help the danes. Without the drive in Beowulf 's heart to do what is right, all of his heroic moments of glory would not exist. Once this is pointed out to the reader, it becomes so clear that one could wonder why the book isn 't just named: “Beowulf, a Story of Good vs. Evil.”.
He does not seem to be affected by the deaths of people or whatsoever. The poet tells us little to no reason as to why does Grendel kills people. Is it because he was exiled to the swamps, or is it because of the loneliness, maybe it is because he can’t hear any of the people enjoying their lives and celebrating their success where as he is being exiled to death. There is no solid evidence as to why Grendel lashes out in front of the Geats. The poet leaves us with a question till the end of the poem that why does Grendel kills people, even in the end there is no evidence providing the reason. And all the readers are left with is that Grendel is a monster who can kill 30 men with one single blow. “Then his rage boiled over, he ripped open the mouth of the building, maddening for blood, pacing the length of the patterned floor with his loathsome tread…...” (Heaney 49; 723-733) It seems that Grendel not only kills people but he rather enjoys killing them, it gives him a great pleasure to kill all those innocent men and women. Even though Beowulf kills to for the sake of his reputation and his honor, Grendel just kills them for fun. That is what defines Grendel as a monster and Beowulf as a hero. Furthermore, it tells us that heroes never take pleasure in their killings they kill for their honor and glory, but monsters kill people for his own sake and their own pleasure, they have no glory, no honor. In fact, that is what Grendel lacked, he had no glory, he had no honor, he had nothing no human feelings whatsoever. The poet has not given him a lot of human like feelings, that portrays that he doesn’t seem to understand the value of honor and glory. Eventually
While Grendel may possess a brute strength, his lack of wit and logic is what ultimately leads to his downfall and demise. In Beowulf, the actions and character that of Beowulf, or an Epic Hero, define the perfect Anglo-Saxon warrior. Epic heroes are indicated by a variety of traits, including that they, “must look like a hero, they must be noble, famous, strong, courageous, humble, prideful, thick-skinned, self-sacrificing, faithful, focused, be a leader, and have a tragic flaw” (Jones 3). Unfortunately, aside from the ‘tragic flaw’ and ‘strong’ categories, Grendel’s character is antithetical to all characteristics of an Epic Hero. This makes him quite the villain, and a generally despicable character. “Suddenly then, / the God-cursed brute creating havoc: / greedy and grim, he grabbed thirty men”
From this novel, the audience is able to get into the mind of this monster and feel his pain, loneliness, and misunderstanding as well as come to realize that Grendel is no monster at all, but rather he represents a reflection of man. Although you could argue that man is a monster himself in this story through the merciless and barbaric actions of the humans, especially Beowulf. Beowulf is represented minimally throughout the story, whereas in “Beowulf” he is shown with much more valor. However, In Gardner's Grendel, Beowulf is depicted as a cruel and narcissistic man. For example, Grendel describes Beowulf as a irrational and greedy man, “He’s crazy. I understand him all right, make no mistake. Understand his lunatic theory of matter and mind, the chilly intellect, the hot imagination, blocks and builder, reality as stress”(Gardner 172). Beowulf does not possess the same qualities in Grendel has he does in the epic poem, “Beowulf.” This is due to the contrasting perspectives of the same character in each book. Like the narrator in Beowulf, Grendel is biased because of his intuitive dislike for humans as well as Grendel’s knowledge that Beowulf is seeking to destroy him. Grendel is also an outcast and monitors the day-to-day lives of the Danish people. His opinions of the people are formed based off of what he observes, sees, and hears. This gives Grendel’s opinions of the
Grendal, a descendant of Cain, is one of the main antagonist of the poem Beowulf. He lives under an inherited curse and is denied God’s presence. Throughout the story Grendal causes enormous grief and fear to the people of Herot. After so much pain and agony the king of Herot, Hrothgar, sends for the protagonist of the poem, Beowulf. He is a Geat and the epic hero of the poem. The wide variety of distinctions between Grendal and Beowulf is what develops the climax of the composition. Beowulf kills Grendal, so he is honored by the people of Herot for his heroic act. Since Grendal and Beowulf play opposite roles in the poem, Beowulf, they let the reader know how contrasting characters can develop the plot of the story.
...r dying son, Grendel himself, who may appear vengeful, is truly acting out of jealousy and a sense of resentment towards people happier than him. The dragon also acts out of a sense of vengeance, but its actions are ultimately used to create a fateful deathbed for Beowulf. While he Beowulf masks his true intentions with a pretense of vengeance, Beowulf himself best describes the sense of revenge in the poem.
The story of Beowulf is a heroic epic chronicling the illustrious deeds of the great Geatish warrior Beowulf, who voyages across the seas to rid the Danes of an evil monster, Grendel, who has been wreaking havoc and terrorizing the kingdom. Beowulf is glorified for his heroic deeds of ridding the land of a fiendish monster and halting its scourge of evil while the monster is portrayed as a repugnant creature who deserves to die because of its evil actions. In the epic poem, Beowulf the authors portrays Grendel as a cold-hearted beast who thrives on the pain of others. Many have disagreed with such a simplistic and biased representation of Grendel and his role in the epic poem. John Gardner in his book, Grendel set out to change the reader’s perception of Grendel and his role in Beowulf by narrating the story through Grendel’s point of view. John Gardner transforms the perceived terrible evil fiend who is Grendel into a lonely but intelligent outcast who bears a striking resemblance to his human adversaries. In Grendel, John Gardner portrays Grendel as an intelligent being capable of rational thought as well as displaying outbursts of emotion. He portrays Grendel as a hurt individual and as a victim of oppression ostracized from civilization. The author of Beowulf portrays Grendel as the typical monster archetype as compared to John Gardner’s representation of Grendel as an outcast archetype.
In the poem, Beowulf, Grendel is depicted as a monstrous, evil villain that possesses a few human-like qualities: such as the ability to walk on two feet. However, his most notable characteristic that occupies his mind and body in the poem is the constant mindset and actions of primitive human tendencies. This quote conveys Grendel’s primitive ways as the humans perceived it. “The monster’s thoughts were as quick as his greed or his claws: he slipped through the door and there in the silence snatched up thirty men, smashed them unknowing in their beds and ran out with their bodies…” (Raffel 8). His lust for blood of the human race, alongside their Christian views, forced Beowulf and others to view