Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
British Imperialism in India
British Imperialism in India
Impacts of the british empire in india
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
British Imperialism in India
India was first controlled by the British East India Company for growing crops like cotton and indigo. During the Sepoy Rebellion in 1857, the British took over the political, economical, and social aspects of India. India became Britain’s most important colony because of the amount of valuable natural resources the country had. Although Britain was the world’s largest employer, structured India’s government and gave Indians freedom of religion and culture, They actually made life for Indians unlivable, structured the government for their own benefit and caused discrimination.
While Lalvani claimed that Britain built the framework for India’s government and that the transition to unified India was peaceful, they
…show more content…
actually didn’t include Indians in the framework and had a violent transition. The British imperial rule established the framework for India’s Justice System (Lalvani). However, the framework consisted of 900 Englishmen and only 60 Natives (Doc #2). This meant that the Indians really didn’t have control over their own taxation, or any voice at all. In addition Lalvani claims that the transition to unified India was peaceful. In reality, over 1 million people died during the fights between Muslims and Hindus (Gandhi). This means that the transition was not peaceful because of the many deaths that had happened. Although Lalvani argues that the British built a railroad system and was the world’s largest employer, in actuality they extracted India’s wealth and also made their lives unlivable.
First, the British were building 10,000 miles of railroad track which gave Indians jobs (Lalvani). On the other side, that railroad track was used to extract raw materials from India and flood their markets with British textiles (Doc #3, Gandhi) This means that even though they were getting paid to build the railroad, it wasn’t enough to cover the costs of all the raw materials that they were losing to the British. Secondly, the British claimed that they were the world’s largest employer with a staggering 1.6 million workers on the railroad (Lalvani). In reality, they raised taxes on the Indians which forced them to replace their food crops with cash crops such as indigo, which was not wanted at the time. This happened during many famines and caused the death of over 58 million Indians (Doc #7). This is important because the Indians simply didn’t make enough money to support their families, so they died of …show more content…
starvation. While Lalvani claims that Britain increased literacy rates and didn’t discriminate against Indians, there actually was a very low literacy rate and lots of discrimination.
According to Lalvani, some of the finest universities in the cities of Bombay, Calcutta and Madras as a way to increase literacy rates, but as document #5 shows, only 15% of the population could read and write by the time India got its independance. This is important because it shows that Lalvani lied about increasing literacy rates, and that not even a sixth of the population of India could read and write. Secondly, the British said that minorities and people of different religions felt more secure and less discriminated against (Lalvani). In reality even though that British had a hands-off policy regarding Indian religious and social customs, that didn’t stop the Christian missionaries from harassing because of what they believed in everywhere they went (Quote #3 from pink sheet). This is important because it proves that what Lalvani is saying is wrong because of the Indians that were harassed because of their religion and cultural
beliefs. Although Britain was the world’s largest employer, structured India’s government and gave Indians freedom of religion and culture, They actually made life for Indians unlivable, structured the government for their own benefit and often caused discrimination. Lalvani claimed that Britain built the framework for India’s government and created a peaceful transition to unified india, but they actually didn’t include Indians in the framework and had a violent transition(Doc #2, Gandhi). Secondly, he claimed that the British built a railroad system to supply jobs for Indians and said that Britain was the world’s largest employer. In actuality, Britain extracted India’s wealth and also made their lives unlivable(Doc #3, Gandhi, Doc #7). Lastly, he claimed that Britain increased literacy rates and didn’t discriminate against Indians, but there actually were very low literacy rates and lots of discrimination throughout the period of British imperialism (Doc #5, Quote 3 from pink sheet). These impacted India in many negative ways. They didn’t have a voice in what was happening to their country, and were being starved to death because of the lack of money they were making. They were often discriminated against by christians and not many could read, so they didn’t have a very bright future. All in all, people should care about this topic because the Indians went through lots of pain and suffered through many conflicts that challenged their way of life. They are still dealing with problems to this day because of British imperialism.
One country that had imperialism was India. By the mid-1880s, the British East India Company controlled three fifths of India. The cause of British domination was that the land was very diverse and the people could not unite and that the British either paid local princes or used weapons to get control. Positive effects of imperialistic rule in India were that the British set up a stronger economy and more powerful industries. They built roads and railroads. British rule brought peace and order to the countryside. They revised the legal system to promote justice for the Indians regardless of class. Indian landowners and princes, who still owned territory grew rich from exporting cash crops such as cotton and jute. The British introduced the telegraph and the postal system as a means of communication. These improvements and benefits from British rule eventually lead to Indian nationalism. The exposure to European ideas caused an Indian nationalist movement, the people dreamed of ending Imperial ...
This caused the Indians to starve because they depended on the British’s gifts to hunt and trade. The British didn’t respect the Indian and disregard their culture and what they follow.
Not only did the inequality and separation of the Indian society frustrate the citizens of India, but the imperialism Britain had upon them as well. In the early 20th century, Indian nationalists wanted to take a stand against the British rule and make India independent. The British created unfair laws that created a nationalist movement in India to regain their freedom. He believed that there should not be a Caste System because of one’s birth.
...yway. How can what Britain did be considered good for India? It can’t. At least, not if India’s value is in it’s people. The British did however bring peace to a nation collapsing on itself. And provided India with ‘proper’ education and standards. Communication, transport, industrialization, sanitation all improved and slavery, internal relations conflicts and unacceptable practices all ceased. So Britain’s rule could also be considered the best thing to happen to India. If India’s value were instead measured by western standards considering India before British rule in comparison to after. Everything has it’s price, all that can be truly verified is that British imperialism's impact on India was both positive and negative. It just depends from which side you choose to view it, the colonizers or the colony.
British Imperialism in China and Africa The treatment of the Chinese by the British, during the takeover of their country, was just like that of the Africans. The British took over the land and the government, took advantage of the people and exploited them for their resources. The English accomplished these things differently in each situation, but each time, the results were the same. One of the most important aspects of imperialism is the takeover of government.
Although imperialism helped the colonized people by improving the economy and the lives of the people, for the most part imperialism hurt the colonized people because the people were forced to grow cash crops which led to death by starvation.
Imperialism in India British imperialism in India had many positive and negative effects on both the mother country, Britain and the colony, India. Many people would argue which effects were more prominent in these countries, and some would agree that they were equal. But in both cases, there were actually both. In India, the British colonization had more positive effects than negative. For instance, when the British colonized India they built 40,000 miles of railroad and 70,000 miles of paved roadway.
"All the leadership had spent their early years in England. They were influenced by British thought, British ideas, that is why our leaders were always telling the British "How can you do these things? They're against your own basic values.". We had no hatred, in fact it was the other way round - it was their values that made us revolt." -Aruna Asaf Ali, a leader of the Indian National Congress. (Masani, quoted in Wood, 32, 1989)
India was where the riches of the world came from, the jewel in the crown of the British Empire. The British needed to dispel the threat of other Europeans in Africa to maintain control of India, and they did so efficiently. They quickly gained control of both the major sea routes to India and then turned their eyes to the rest of the continent. Whether the British were trying to foster public support or prevent another nation from becoming a threat, all British actions in Africa were directly or indirectly linked to India. The British were motivated by their desire to become powerful, and they skillfully combined enterprise and conquest to create a globe spanning empire centered around the wealth of India.
In 1857 the British had invaded the nation of Hindustan (India). Many feel that if it were not for the British Empire, India would still be an under developed country. The British established a government system that before did not exist. It was a three level system including the imperial government located in London, the central government located in Calcutta, and later on provincial governments scattered throughout the regions of what was known as the British Raj1. Alt...
An effect of British Imperialism economically is the products produced and an environmental affect is Britain's profits. Britain is producing goods, materials, and luxury goods and receiving splendid feedback, which will cause other countries to adapt the same methods of gaining materials. Numerous battles and wars will be fought over those materials and over inhabited territories. Britain is heavily controlling India and gaining profit from then while India gains nothing but mistreatment. While Indians are in harsh conditions, they are only profiting an average of $800, while the British have an average of $9,300.
Indian concerns with British rule began to gain momentum as certain events taking place in British India were beginning to unfold against the British. Hearsay and other propagandistic elements had begun taking its place among Indians, quickly changing sentiment towards the British. One of these was the widespread belief that the British were preparing to dismantle the caste system and convert India to Christianity. Although this was
The control of India would always be the crowning jewel in the vast vaults of the British Empire. India brought them riches that only they could supply, in spices and exotic food, cotton, silk, indigo dye, tea, and opium. With the help of all these riches it can almost be said that the British Empire was built on the backs of Indians. Due to this fact, Indian independence was a tough issue and England was hard pressed to let her go easily. But India was not always a British colony and has its own rich history to speak for itself. They would gain independence from the British with the help of Mahatma Gandhi and would achieve one of the only mostly peaceful power turnovers in history.
The decision to grant independence to India was not the logical culmination of errors in policy, neither was it as a consequence of a mass revolution forcing the British out of India, but rather, the decision was undertaken voluntarily. Patrick French argues that: “The British left India because they lost control over crucial areas of the administration, and lacked the will and the financial or military ability to recover that control”.
With major control over India, the British used a combination of firepower & guile to consolidate their power over the country by expanding from their base areas along the coast into the interior (Duiker 31). Some territories were also taken over the privately run East India Company, which at the time was given authority to administer Asian territories under British occupation, while others were ruled by local maharajas (Duiker 31). British governance brought order and stability to a society that had recently been wrecked by the wars from the different empires (Duiker 31).