Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Criminal behaviors in society
Criminal behaviors in society
Effects of crime on society Essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Straight Time is a 1978 film starring Dustin Hoffman as Max Dembo, a former burglar who has been paroled from his sentence. After escaping from his parole officer, he returns to his life of crime. During a jewelry store robbery his partner get shot and killed by a police officer, after which Dembo decides to leave the city, Los Angeles, abandoning his new girlfriend. The film stands as a criticism of the structure of American society, or more specifically capitalism. Dembo, a lifelong burglar who is paroled from prison fails to reintegrate back into society, and ultimately he meets tragic consequences when during a robbery his friend dies, he kills a different friend, and he abandons his girlfriend because he knew his life would not go well. …show more content…
At the end of the film, it is revealed that he was later rearrested. The criticism of capitalism lies in the highlighting of the structural biases of the American economic system.
Dembo, a burglar and petty thief since he was a young boy is excluded from American society. When he tries to reintegrate, he is arrested for a crime that he did not commit, but rather was committed by his friend. As such, the very friend that he has serves to hinder his efforts to reintegrate into American society, which serves the notion that regardless of what he does, by virtue of the friends that he has – and thus by virtue of who he is – Dembo can never reintegrate into American society. This is a flaw because Max Dembo is an American citizen, and in society being structured so that Dembo is unable to reintegrate into American society though he tries, is symptomatic of a society in which its citizens are not treated …show more content…
equally. Through Dembo’s being arrested for a crime that he did not commit, Straight Time also reveals the inadequacies of capitalism in the disingenuousness of its penal system. Dembo, who at the start of the film is released from a six-year prison sentence, will fail to reintegrate into society. And because of that, the prison sentence has failed in rehabilitating Dembo, the argument could be extended further into the notion that the prison system does not even care about rehabilitating Dembo, and expects Dembo, as a part of society’s underbelly to stay that way. When Dembo is rearrested for a crime that he did not commit, this serves as a parallel for the penal system’s disingenuousness, perhaps even an intentional metaphor for it. When Dembo, during his re-imprisonment encounters his parole officer relaxedly joking while Dembo has been wrongfully imprisoned, it is an example of the justice system’s not caring about justice for Dembo and people like Dembo. A hallmark of capitalism is income inequality.
The nation as a whole may be more productive, and maybe even the poor people in a capitalist society are better off than a poor person in a socialist society, but the gap between a poor person and an average person will be greater in capitalist society than in socialist society. Max Dembo, as previously mentioned, is a representative of society’s underbelly, those in the United States who were given less and have less than other people in society. As such, his failures as human is as much his own failure as it is symbolic of the systematic failing of people such as Max Dembo. Dembo returns to his life of crime after he escapes from his parole officer, and for a while he is successful at it, but as is inevitable in such a high risk profession, Dembo ultimately meets tragic consequences, in the death of his
friend. Dembo is a burglar as well as a killer. But perhaps Straight Time can stand to make the argument that had he been “one of the lucky ones” and not been born into circumstances of such little means he would not have been compelled to enter a life of crime. This line of reasoning makes its strongest argument at film’s end, when Dembo, out of a resigned realism, sends his girlfriend – who is one of the lucky ones – back to Los Angeles, knowing that failure was inevitable in his position. And as the film’s ending reveals he is recaptured, his dispassionate bid to escape his failed, and capitalism too, perhaps, has failed him.
The film starts with an uprising after a white storeowner kills a black teenager. This incident Highlights Prejudices. The teenager was labeled a thief because of the color of his skin and the unjustifiable murder causes racial tensions that exist as a result of the integration of the high schools.
Coming from an “unconventional” background, George Saunders is readily able to relate to the circumstances the everyday working laborer goes through (Wylie). However, Saunders has an advantage to spread out his ideas and concerns about life in the U.S. via his short stories and novellas. Because of neoliberalism and capitalism and its correlation to the huge wealth gap in the U.S. Saunders focuses his protagonists’ view from a proletariat standpoint, allowing the reader to see the life of consumerism has impacted our society. Saunders does not use conventional methods to portray this reality. Instead, Saunders emphasizes on the “absence” of certain moral human characteristics in order to take the reader away from viewing into a hero’s looking glass— to set a foundation of a world where our morals become lost to our materialistic and inherent need of money (Wylie).
...ther being, that lower income people are in fact hard workers and are stuck in their social economic class. Finally, this paper discusses how it relates to our PS 204 class, and how one can link the ideas in this class with those from the book. Issues like equality which are mentioned in the book, and others like voter participation, which was a question raised by this author, are major issues in our country today. These issues need to be addressed so that individuals like Gail and Holly don t have to worry if they are injured on the job, because they know they will be taken care of. Confucius says it best, “In a country well governed, poverty is something to be ashamed of. In a country badly governed, wealth is something to be ashamed of.” (quote site). Our country has the ability to help these individuals, the question is, what are YOU going to do about it?
He shows us a happy family that is destroyed by the turmoil of capitalism in early 20th century Chicago, although it is still something that runs rampant in our society today. In the book, Jurgis gets a job where he works at a packing house and the conditions are horrible. The people who own the packing house are deceitful and unfair, and when Jurgis gets hurt at work his employer shows no sympathy. He struggles to find another job where he can get paid well, and when he gets put in jail he struggles even more. He finds that his family is falling apart and the young children are having to work to support the family. At one point a character literally gets eaten by rats due to bad working conditions. Another theme is corruption. In the beginning of the book Jurgis is a hardworking family man, but by the end he is a stealing thief. It is apparent that living in a place where police are out for themselves and salesmen lie for their own profit, can change you as a person. Jurgis gets so obsessed with money that he beat a child to make him go to work, when he knew that in the freezing winter the child might get frostbite (which he eventually did). Another theme is about society and class in early 20th century Chicago. Jurgis' family comes to America because they think that if they come to America and work hard, then they will get money and succeed. It is as if they think that
Before I signed up to take the Principles of Sociology class, I had no idea I would have to change the way I view the world. In order to make sense of a case like Hernando Washington, it is essential to view the world with what Max Weber describes as verstehen. In other words, you need to stay objective and not allow your own values affect how you perceive a situation. Instead, I have learned how to look at the world with a sociological imagination, which is exactly how Lisa J. McIntyre looked at Hernando’s case. Instead of studying Hernando Washington as an individual, Lisa studied his surroundings, culture, and interactions in order to get a better understanding of why Hernando could commit a crime
...o conclude with, the worst fate is waiting for rich people in Marx’s “Communist manifesto”, and is explained by 2 factors: mismanagement of given resources and negative result in the class struggle between the poor and the rich. Reich, on the contrary, argues that the wealthiest people, these are the symbolic analysts, will thrive due to the higher demand for their services and better technologies. Both authors see the capital factor in different lights and predict the rich to either succeed with the help of it, or lose because of its mismanagement. Meanwhile Reich does not mention any tension among different classes Marx sees the doom of the rich in its defeat to proletariat. Nevertheless, considering that Reich describes modern times and having witnessed the fall of USSR, a model of Marxist regime, should we incline more to Reich’s predictions on the rich’s fate?
The main themes are that you shouldn’t judge people by their appearances. Just because you are rich and belong to a tough gang does not mean you are cruel like the other gang members. You shouldn’t carry any harmful weapons and should not escape from the police.
...th what little they have, however; why is it left to the poor to have to suffer the consequences of these political choices. The persistence of extreme poverty and social ills speak to a situation that bears for a different approach. It is clear that capitalism and free market solutions cannot spread wealth as advocated. American governments have shown their reluctance to admit this discrepancy through the strategic creations of welfare policies and welfare reform coupled with placing blame upon the citizens who possess little power to change market decisions that govern and effect their lives.
The film stays in line with classic noir in many ways. The usage of dark sets and high contrast lighting, which creates heavy shadows on the actors faces, makes the movie feel like it all happens at night and in dark alley ways. The story focuses on the inhumane parts of human nature. Each of the main characters experiences some kind of tragedy. For Vargas his tragedy was in dealing with Quinlin who has set out to frame him and his wife. For Quinlin his entire life represented a man consumed with darkness who lives his life with a “Touch of Evil.” Menzies was a hopeful man who looked up to Quinlin but was let down. For the viewer, film noir represents truth, even if it is not a truth that all people would like to hear.
A character named Jefferson, an African American male, is wrongly accused when he is in the wrong place at the time during a shoot-out between two African American men and a storeowner. During the shoot-out the storeowner and both men were shot and killed, Jefferson in shock stays at the scene of the crime until authorities arrived and arrested and tried Jefferson for murder. Jefferson being found guilty and compared to a hog fills him with hate and anger. Jefferson has an aunt that reaches out to a creditable teacher at a local school named Grant; she gets Grant to help Jefferson find a purpose. Grant helps Jefferson find a sense of dignity, although it took some time he was successful. Grant later focuses his time and energy on the importance of Jefferson’s death and tries to explain it to him. Jefferson doesn’t really understand it until members of the community come to visit him; young children, old men, strangers, friends, all come to see Jefferson in his cell and speak to him. The onslaught of attention makes Jefferson begin to understand the enormity of his task. He now realizes that he has become much more than an ordinary man and that his death will represent much more than an ordinary death. Gaines emphasizes the worth and dignity of everyday heroes like Jefferson; just as Christ did during his
One of the more prevalent themes of this movie is racism, and how prejudicial mindsets ultimately lead to one’s own demise. The movie outlines how racism, among other things, can adversely affect someone’s judgment. After the father died, we see how the family gradually deteriorates financially as well as emotionally after Derek (the older brother played by Edward Norton) turns to a neo Nazi gang for an outlet, which eventually influences his younger brother Danny (played by Edward Furlong) to follow down ...
It shows the need for people to conform to societal expectations to survive and thrive in society. It also shows the consequences of going against those expectations to purse matters of the heart, whether that is helping a condemned man or trying to keep your family from being taken away. Fighting these societal expectations puts a target on these people’s backs, which is why so many people decide to just succumb to these expectations, which is much easier on these
Herman is a multimillionaire. He is the owner of a manufacturing company which spans throughout the entire world. As time went on, Herman began to worry about his profits. Times were tough of course, with an increase in living costs and rampant inflation. The government, in order to stop the oncoming disaster, began to ask the rich to contribute more of their own money to the government in order to lessen the burden on those who simply cannot afford to pay. Alas, Herman’s money was his own! Why should he have to give any more money than the “common people” have to? He had to ensure his own financial safety if he wanted to survive. Herman went on to talk to his government, and convince them of the fully fledged effects that taxing him extra would cause. Because of Herman, and many others like him, the government changed its mind, and gave the rich tax breaks, effectively making their tax burden less than that of the working classes. Herman had ensured his own financial security, and as a side effect he had also contributed to a rigged economy. According to David Korten’s article “The Post Corporate World,” those who are fortunate enough to have basic resources and finances to live a prosperous life end up squandering their resources while other less-fortunate people are forced to live a life without the basic needs to live. Herman is one of those fortunate people; he is one of those people who
Karl Marx, in the Capital, developed his critique of capitalism by analyzing its characteristics and its development throughout history. The critique contains Marx’s most developed economic analysis and philosophical insight. Although it was written in 1850s, its values still serve an important purpose in the globalized world and maintains extremely relevant in the twenty-first century.
Money is an essential part of life where every people can satisfy whatever they need and every person in America has a chance to find a job. However, some of the people in the country wanted to go on with their life freely by being a part of a welfare. Furthermore, distribution of wealth is a huge demand of every citizen. Everyone today is trying to look down for every people in the lower class, as they did not give any benefit to the country, waiting for the benefits that they will receive from the government. For instance, when most lower class people have gone through a financial crisis due to overspending, insufficient fund or pay for their work to support themselves and/or their family. The example shows that lower class people made the economy of the country unstable, however, the middle class and the higher class is at fault as well. Furthermore, even though the benefit of that the lower class received is from the middle class, the middle class as well benefits from the higher class. To sum up, every class is at fault towards giving the country’s economy a positive