How Does Athletics Have A Negative Influence On Academics?

Athletics have a Negative Influence on the Academics of Athletes Many students in college are not strictly going to class; they are also walking onto a turf or court. Those students are also known as athletes. Athletes who are passionate about the sport they play usually get noticed by a higher education institution. Those higher education institutions usually give that athlete money to play for the college or university. Being given money is beneficial, but that money is being given for athletic ability not academics. So, which one would a college student work harder for? Athletics even though is helpful for paying for school, has a negative influence on academics.

Athletes are very talented and driven; playing a sport opens many opportunities.

Failure- Acceptors are solely focused on playing the sport, because of that they are more dedicated to the demands athletics have. These student athletes will put forth more of their time and effort to that sport (Simons, Rheenen and Covington, 2014). Failure- Acceptors only have one academic motivation which is “to remain minimally academically eligible to play their sport” (Simons, Rheenen and Covington, 2014,p.444). This quote explains that student athletes only work on academics to maintain a certain GPA to remain playing. On the other hand Failure-Avoiders failure plays a much stronger factor to causing them to put less time and effort into academics and to make a greater commitment to athletics. This type of athlete works to avoid failure. These students “often have a low self-worth due to a history of academic failure” (Simons, Rheenen and Covington, 2014,p.435). That academic failure could be the reason for pushing them towards being more interested in athletics and changed what they were most motivated about. Both of these types of athletes show the action of undertaking a sport takes more from them mentally and