The funeral was a presentation of persuasion of two critical speeches mourning over death and tension of vile hate. A death which presented an immoral confliction beyond limitation of ambition to slay Julius Caesar. Caesar death was dramatized by leaning on the logic of death presented by Brutus, and pathos used by Anthony. The reasoning of both speeches appeal to the emotion of the crowd to choose sides. William Shakespeare molds Brutus to be a man of honor had silenced the crowd, tending his speech to seek the crowd in favor of choosing death. Brutus had honored Caesar because “he was valiant” as his “love to Caesar was no less than his.” Brutus amplifies the love for Caesar as much love for Rome, yet states Caesar is better …show more content…
off dead for the future of Rome. Brutus eludes his persuasion to have remorse for Caesar, but signifies the greater of good. Antony on the other hand played grief through a logical response. Antony mourns for Caesar while targeting the crime of the death out of Brutus’s name with repetition. “Brutus says” “Brutus is...” for Brutus was questioned for his ambition several times. Brutus speech used the logic to persuade the crowd that Caesar death is for the better of Rome.
Not only did Brutus not want the crowd to disperse in conflict over a valiant man of honor, and “not more that [Brutus] loved Caesar less, but that [he] loved Rome more.” Brutus speech was settling, but what Brutus brought to his speech was reasoning. Brutus made a perspective of himself compared Caesar as a noble man. Anthony’s purpose was luring the crowd as if they had an upper hand. Ethos had flooded through Anthony speech as his “heart is in the coffin,” and the crowds ear leaned in to be persuaded through a dramatic tone of …show more content…
remorse. Anthony had caused the crowd to grapple the thought that Caesar’s death was no fulfillment of love, and more of a “grievous fault.” Antony speech led the crowd to be ingrained by leading a frame of reference of Caesar providing treatment to the citizen of Rome with land and money after his death. Anthony provides himself to be more worthy and prove himself to be more apt as a leader of truth than Brutus. Anthony led a point about Casear of what he had refused, Anthony “presented [Caesar] a kingly crown,” but was question “was [it] ambitious?” Brutus led his viewpoints by using rhetorical questioning, his technique caused the crowd to overlook Caesar, and which Brutus “awake [the] senses” as if the crowd “may be the the better judge.” As the audience seek Brutus and Anthony’s speech to be dramatic and memorable , the set of visualization was between honor and to question ambition. The crowd had changed their course of minds to be leading with Antony as it was intentional. Antony drew love as a source because Caesar was celebrity of fame to Rome. Antony greets the crowd in Caesar’s name “you know how Caesar loved you.”Antony became compelling in Caesar ambitious love for Rome, and called out on Brutus was the cause for the “bloody treason flourish[ing].” Antony speech had the effect to be uplifting as it targeted hate a “rise in mutiny.” Brutus and Antony used outburst tones to signify purpose of death. The influence in which Brutus and Caesar confides the crowd settled through the tone presented. The spectacles of the dramatic response of Caesar death was vile madness. Brutus insured a response of a point that Rome is in the better hands of a noble Roman. Brutus distances himself from the funeral by honoring himself for saving Rome. Brutus uses the effect chiasmus in which the phrases he uses are repeated in reverse order with the same context, “Brutus’ love to Caesar was no less than his” and Brutus revised his sentence “I love Caesar less, but I love Rome more.” Brutus repeats himself in a way to imply his words to the crowd. Antony uses the same affect in response to Antithesis, expressing a contrast of ideas that are the opposite of each other.
Antony embarks his words that he “will not do them wrong… to wrong the dead.” Antony leads irony and metaphors to influence the crowd for they are “not wood, [they] are not stones, but men.” The indulging effect that Antony precedes on was to search their feelings by implying of how Caesar death was not honorable. Antony questions the crowd by flinging Caesar’s corpse, “whose daggers have stabbed Caesar; I do fear it,” to grab the attention on Caesar’s dead body, and persuade the mind that only he is to be envied. Antony aroused the crowd that Caesar death was noble as Brutus was ambitious to spill blood. Antony speeched swayed his words through a chiasmic rhythm. Antony paused his speech for the crowd to respond in a negative attitude of shouting and bickering over Brutus’s speech. Brutus appealed the crowd to grieve for Caesar “for him [he] offended,” Brutus pauses for remorse and offers a dagger for his death. The dagger is a representation that Caesar was slayed with honor. The dramatic response hindered by the crowd is that Brutus shall live. To subside the crowd favoring, Antony reflects Brutus as a murderer with no
honor. Caesar death was compelled by the control of Antony, and Brutus had preserved the crowd in a manner of appraisal. The outcome of the speeches changed over from emotion to a debate of picking sides with the death of Caesar. Both speeches has shown factual and critical questioning of the assassination. Antony and Brutus poetic dialogue in their speeches had spreaded a revolt through the plebeians. Antony and Brutus modifies a memorable testimony through the true inner self of reflection.
Pathos: "This was the unkindest cut of them all". Antony creates an emotional connection with the crowd when he makes them look at the stab that Brutus and the conspirators had done to him , this makes the people angry because the conspirators had killed a great person ( in the people's eyes ) making the people starting to rebel the conspirators and wanting to kill all of
In the Shakespearean play Julius Caesar, the speech recited by Mark Anthony for Caesar’s death was far superior to Brutus’s because it appealed to the audience's primal emotion while simultaneously relating
In his speech, Brutus appeals to the loyalism of his audience by making intertwining arguments of ethos, pathos, and logos. He begins by establishing his ethos by asserting his status as an honorable fellow Roman worthy of their respect. He expands on this ethos by dividing it into three parts: his love of Caesar, his loyalty to Rome, and his relationship to his audience. Brutus tells his audience that he was a “dear friend” to the man he murdered, invoking a pathetic sense of sympathy from his audience. However, as he says himself, it was “not that [he] loved Caesar less, but that [he] loved Rome more,” strengthening his ethos as a loyal countryman with the interests of his audience at heart. After establishing an emotional connection to his audience and earning their trust, Brutus explains his logic
Imagine yourself listening to a political debate, undecided as to which leader you agree with. One candidate begins to speak about unjust societal issues, such as the horrifying amount of people in the world that do not have food on their table. The candidate also begins to touch upon the topic of taxes and how he will lower them if he is elected. You find yourself being persuaded in the direction of emotions and morals. The power of language used to appeal others is not only present in the modern world, but also in the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, written by famous English playwright William Shakespeare. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar portrayed a story of how an aspiring leader, Julius Caesar, is assassinated by a group of schemers, lead by Marcus Brutus, who disagreed with Caesar’s decrees and ways of governing. Over the course of the text, it demonstrated the use of two rhetorical charms: ethos and pathos. While ethos refers to the moral and ethical appeal and pathos invokes to the emotional aspect, each one was evidently shown in the funeral speech for Caesar given by his best friend, Mark Antony. Prior to Antony’s speech, Brutus had given the plebeians a synopsis of what had occurred. However, Mark Antony knew that what Brutus had told the plebeians was false. In such manner, he allured the plebeians onto his side of the tragedy by touching upon ethical and emotional appeals.
Persuasion is a natural method many people use to influence a person's beliefs, attitudes, intentions, motivations, or behaviors in a situation. Many include, bribing parents to buy clothes to even lending someone money. Either way, people all over the world use words or phrases to convince or sway a person into believing them. Just as many people have used rhetorical appeals to persuade someone, Anthony also uses the rhetorical appeals; heartfelt pathos, questionable logos and evident ethos in William Shakespeare’s play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar to convince his audience that Caesar was not ambitious and that Caesar was innocent
The most predominate and important aspect In the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare are the speeches given to the Roman citizens by Brutus and Antony, the two main charaters, following the death of Caesar. Brutus and Antony both spoke to the crowd,using the same rhetorical devices to express their thoughts. Both speakers used the three classical appeals employed in the speeches: ethos, which is an appeal to credibility; pathos, which is an appeal to the emotion of the audience; and logos, which is an appeal to the content and arrangement of the argument itself. Even though both speeches have the same structure Antony’s speech is significantly more effective than Brutus’s.
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is a historic tragedy about the brutal murder of the Roman senator, Julius Caesar. Within the play, Caesar has two close friends—Brutus and Antony. Antony is a loyal friend, supporting Caesar and encouraging him in his climb to kingship; Brutus is a king-fearing traitor who leads the plot to murder Caesar. After Caesar is murdered, both friends make speeches—Brutus to justify his actions and Antony to passive-aggressively disprove his claims. In the speeches, they use three rhetorical literary devices: ethos, the appeal to gain the crowd’s trust; pathos, stirring the crowd’s emotions to influence behavior; and logos, the use of logic to reason with the crowd. By comparing the use of ethos, pathos, and logos in each speech and by
In William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus is a skillful orator who makes use of rhetorical devices to convey his points. In his speech made after the death of Caesar, Brutus uses devices such as ethos, parallelism, and rhetorical questions to persuade the people to his way of thinking. Ethos is when a speaker gives an example of credibility in order to appeal to the listener’s ethics. When Brutus asks the people to “believe me for mine honor, and have respect for mine honor” (3.2.14-15), he is using ethos to appeal to their morals in order to make them consider his opinions. The use of ethos exhibits Brutus’ need for the people to approve of him, and by extension, the assassination of Caesar. Later, Brutus utilizes parallelism
Words have a way of making people feel different emotions. The way words are said have such a huge affect on society. During the civil rights era speeches made all the difference and could make or break how people would react to the cause you brought up. Still today public speaking is used in many ways from elections to marketing. Mark Antony and Brutus are able to make speeches using ethos, pathos, and logos to convince Rome for their reason of action and how they are experiencing grief and anger over the loss of a friend. In William Shakespeare’s play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar he displays how convincing people can be in order to get that they want and change an audience’s emotion.
Brutus also places his faith in the honor of others, refusing to take a group oath assuming the honor of the individual is the strongest thing there is. Brutus lives his life based almost entirely on the idea of honor, yet he somehow fails to see the dishonor in killing his close friend to prevent him from rising to power.
In Julius Caesar two men, Antony and Brutus, make two different speeches but with the same concept of ethos, logos, and pathos at Caesar's funeral. Brutus claims that it is okay that he killed Caesar and makes a speech about it. Antony is the more persuasive speaker than Brutus because he uses ethos, pathos, and logos better then Brutus.
Throughout the play, Brutus speaks about honor and his loyalty to his country. These two concepts become major conflicts for him when it comes to his friendship and loyalty to Caesar. Brutus life is conducted by the concept of honor. He constantly throughout the play speaks of how honorable he is and how honorable men should live. He 's very proud of how Romans view him as a noble and honorable man, who fights for what is right and is always following the moral and ethical code. Brutus ends up using the concept of honor and loyalty to his country as a reason why Caesar must die. He 's convinced that his countrymen will thank him for saving them from a tyrant and that Rome would be much better off without Caesar, but it ends up being a big miscalculation
In William Shakespeare's play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, two speeches are given to the people of Rome about Caesar's death. In Act 3, Scene 2 of this play Brutus and Antony both try to sway the minds of the Romans toward their views. Brutus tried to make the people believe he killed Caesar for a noble cause. Antony tried to persuade the people that the conspirators committed an act of brutality toward Caesar and were traitors. The effectiveness and ineffectiveness of both Antony's and Brutus's speech to the people are conveyed through tone and rhetorical devices.
A later example occurs during the funeral oration by Mark Antony. Brutus logically gives his reasons that necessitated Caesar’s death. He informs them that he acted out of love of Rome and his desire to prevent tyrants from controlling her. The citizens embrace his words with cheers and understanding. However, their mood alters when Antony offers his interpretation of the situation. He passionately described the deeds Caesar performed in behalf of the citizens of Rome, which clearly contradict the opinion of the conspirators that Caesar was too ambitious. Antony carefully uses irony in referring to Cassius and Brutus as honorable men; the strategy wins over the citizens and they listen with growing anger to his words. He leads the citizens to the body and begins to show the brutal results of the murder while simultaneously influencing them to believe that the conspirators are murderers and traitors. Ultimately, Antony reads Caesar’s will, which leaves his parks, private estates, and newly planted gardens to the citizens of Rome.