Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gun control analyses of public policy
The effect of gun control on people
Stricter gun laws pros and cons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gun control analyses of public policy
More guns - more violence Have you ever wondered how gun control would impact our environment? The children and us ourselves would live in a much better community. Many people have not thought about gun control and its effect. Not much people have ever wondered what would making stricter gun laws do to our environment. Only the unlucky friends and families of those who have lost a loved one due to shootings know the pain. I believe we need stricter gun laws for a variety of reasons. If stricter gun laws were placed, our communities would be a safer place and shootings will no longer be a big problem like they are today. As an illustration, it would make people and families feel safer if gun laws were made stricter. Restricting gun …show more content…
The amount of deaths lost due to shootings would be reduced all if stricter gun laws were placed. Guns are always a huge problem when it comes to people getting killed due to guns. Last year guns killed approximately 15,549 people in the United States in 2017. This shows how many deaths are simply caused due to guns. The number of deaths was tracked by an organization named Gun Violence Archive. They tracked the approximate number of deaths caused by guns and excluded suicides (Daniel Nass). This proves to us how guns are a huge cause of deaths in the United States. Gun control needs to be more strictly controlled in order to reduce these numbers. Gun violence is getting out of control and we as people need to try to make our communities the best as possible. We can not simply forgot the enormous amounts of people who have died and continue to die due to gun violence daily. Gun violence has always been a big cause of deaths and the numbers are only increasing. During the holocaust, allied aircrafts flew over Germany several times to take photographs of industrial plants. They asked assistance from their allies to bomb Auschwitz Birkenau, the extermination camp but they never did. Allied aircrafts instead decided to bomb the industrial plants instead of the extermination camp. This can help back up my claim because it shows that allied countries never made a move. When everything was …show more content…
“Five Years on, Sandy Hook Families Recall Gun Horror – but Is Anyone Listening in Washington?” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 9 Dec. 2017, www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/dec/09/newtown-sandy-hook-gun-control-washington.
Daniel Nass “Gun Deaths Increased in 2017, Gun Violence Archive Data Show.” The Trace, www.thetrace.org/rounds/gun-deaths-increase-2017/
Goodrich, Frances and Hackett, Albert. The Diary of Anne Frank, Dramatized by
Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett. Based upon the Book, Anne Frank: Diary of a Young Girl. With a Foreword by Brooks Atkinson. Random House, 1956.
Margie Omero “NEW POLL: Americans Believe Fewer Guns Will Keep Us Safer.” Guns Down America, 15 June 2017, https://gunsdownamerica.org/new-poll-safety-over-gun-rights/
Peter France “Does There Need to Be Stricter Laws for Gun Control?” Debate.org, www.debate.org/opinions/does-there-need-to-be-stricter-laws-for-gun-control. Yad Vashem “The Holocaust: The Murder of European Jews” http://www.un.org/en/holocaustremembrance/docs/FAQ%20Holocaust%20EN%20Yad%20Vashem.pdf Wiesel, Elie. “Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech.” Nobel Prize Awards, 10 Dec. 1986, Oslo,
In the article “Gun Control Can Prevent School Shootings,” Bennett shares the effects of gun violence in the past, present, and future. The Sandy Hook shooting occurred on December 14, 2012 when twenty children and six adult staff members were killed. Barely a month after the shooting, eleven of the families affected by the shooting went to meet privately with Joe Biden, and members from the Congress and cabinet. Bennett stated, “They were preparing to wade into some of the roughest waters in American politics: the gun debate.” President Obama gave a speech in Connecticut vowing to fight for change. And as Bennett put it, “Members of Congress started acting as parents instead of politicians.” Bennett explained to the families that they couldn't get rid of assault weapons or high capacity ammunition magazines, no matter how bad the shooting was. The families got angry and stated they did not want to know what they couldn't do, but what they could do to honor their children.
Sandy Hook is an elementary school in Connecticut that was invaded by a shooter, Adam Lanza. Twenty-eight people were shot and killed, twenty of them being children between the ages of five and ten. Before Lanza arrived, he shot and killed his mother who was a teacher at this school. The article was published the day of the shooting to the Washington Post. The article was written announce what had actually happened during this tragic event. The article was directed towards parents with kids and adults to inform everyone on the catastrophe and to hopefully make schools as safe as they could possibly be. Additionally the author also states that this is not the right time to try and discuss the gun control laws.
I am writing on behalf of my thoughts and myself about gun control laws. My position on this topic is neutral leaning towards the "No Gun" law. The idea of a federal law to ban these guns is a good idea, but it could be better. I believe strongly that guns should be banned from our country in some kind of way, but there are exceptions like for law enforcement and hunters. This law could lower the murder and death rates drastically. The US would be a whole different and safer country to live in. No one should live in a society where they are afraid of being killed by a gun, we should try harder to make this society in the US a better place. I have many reasons to back my views on this topic, and here are some main reasons that you should really think about.
Gius, Mark. "Gun Ownership and the Gun Control Index." Atlantic Economic Journal 36 (2008): 497-498 MasterFILE Premier. 30 Oct.2013
In conclusion, enabling stricter gun control laws will help to keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill, criminals, and children and teens. With these laws put into place there will be more assurance of the safety of American citizens. It is not necessary to strip citizens of their right to own a gun, but we should be able to make it harder to get guns. If you are someone with a clear record and using a gun for recreation use, you will have no trouble obtaining a gun. In the long run increase the laws on gun control hurts nobody. Despite historic events where governments seized firearms and killed millions of citizens, today we have a different problem, which is making sure guns are in the right hands.
Gun control laws aim to restrict or regulate firearms by selecting who can sell, buy and possess certain guns. Criminals do not obey laws and stricter gun control laws or banning guns will have little effect on reducing crimes. There are many myths about gun control reducing acts of gun violence, which are simply not true according to research. People are responsible for the crimes, not the guns themselves. Taking guns away from United States citizens that use them for many reasons, shooting practice, competition, hunting and self-defense, should not be punished for the acts of criminals. As stated by Mytheos Holt, “Guns in the right hands help public safety. Guns in the wrong hands harm public safety”. Research shows that defensive use of guns discourages criminals and reduces crime (Holt 2). Not only is it wrong to penalize law-abiding citizens, it is against the Second Amendment. It is unconstitutional to pass laws that infringe on the Second Amendment right to bear arms.
With all the shootings and random acts of violence, such as the shooting at the movie theatre in Colorado, or the Sandy Hook shootings, stricter gun control laws have been a hot topic in politics and the national mainstream media. The government thinks that gun control being stricter would help to make less of these tragic incidences occur. I am against this thought because I believe that the law-abiding citizens will be the only ones to give up their guns and criminals will then have an upper hand on the innocent. Even though banning guns is supposed to save lives, cities such as Chicago have already shown that stricter gun laws should not be passed because violent murders are still prevalent in these types of cities and strict gun laws have not worked like they were supposed to.
Gun violence in the United States is higher than ever, and criminals with guns will “…kill as many as 1000 people each day” (Alpers&Wilson). Taking this into perspective, it is only right to fight fire with fire or, in this case, use a gun to protect yourself and those around you. Gun control does not only decrease the ability for protection, it also decreases our rights as U.S citizens. The constitution clearly states that we are given the right to bear arms, meaning we may carry fire arms. Even if we have stricter laws for guns, it will not stop killers from shooting innocent people. These men and women causing damage to the lives of numerous individuals do not care if there is a law banning guns, because all they truly want to do is hurt others. The pain citizens endure every day from losing a family member, friend, or even just a colleague is repulsive. These permanent deaths continue to make people fearful and it causes damage in their lives; unless something is done. Most people agree that action needs to be taken to stop this inhumane cruelty, but the question is; what can be done? Americans need protection, rights, and power to break this inexcusable gun violence circling America. Gun restrictions for trustworthy and reliable gun owners have not been proven to weaken gun violence in the United States; therefore, gun control should be limited because it is only hurting America, not helping it.
Gius, Mark. "Gun Ownership and the Gun Control Index." Atlantic Economic Journal 36.4 (2008): 497-98. Print.
America has a massive gun problem, and lives are lost everyday because of it. Stricter gun control laws would reduce gun deaths. Firearms are the leading implement used in homicides and less access to guns would help lower this statistic. Massacres can and would be reduced as well. Guns cannot safely be used as a means of self defense either, and bringing a gun into any situation turns it into a life or death scenario. If a gun is locked in a safe then it is not useful, and if it is not in the safe then it is not safe (Jefferies). Criminals also have easy access to guns, easier than any regulated country (Jefferies). Stricter gun laws and background checks would help catch criminals and stop them getting guns (Jefferies). More gun control is
"Fact Sheet: Guns Save Lives." Gun Owners of America. N.p., 29 Sept. 2008. Web. 27 Apr. 2014.
Like every other good ol' boy, I am concerned about being the victim of a random shooting, but at the same time, I want to be able to take down a nice10-point buck during hunting season. Guns effect every one of us every day. They fill us with fear or they make us feel protected. My point is this: guns are a problem, but using gun control to abolish them isn't necessarily the best solution. In gun control I mean laws that keep firearms off the street by preventing their purchase. I agree that some form of gun control is needed, butwhat we really need to concentrate on is gun licensing and more gun safety. I believe in my constitutional right to keep and bear arms, and I don't feel that legislators should be allowed to take away that right. Gun control can be a good thing, but if it leads to gun prohibition I will fight it until the day I die.
If there was no gun control, then the rates of gun deaths might easily skyrocket. An example of why gun control is essential is when one considers the various instances of a mass shooting. Whenever gun related crimes happen, such as the shooting of cops, black people, or a mass shooting in schools, the country turns into national mourning, meaning that this has an effect on all Americans. The laws as they are now, and some of those that have been proposed, do not have sufficient guidelines in place to prevent such gun related deaths. Certainly, there is a need for more restrictive laws, and arguments for further restriction include societal needs, the increasing rates of the gun-related violence as well as death, questions of availability and
The issue of gun control has been around as an important decision opportunity for our country for a while. Many people are wondering whether or not guns really are a helpful tool that many of us have been saying they are, or whether they are the killing machines they have recently been publicized as. In my opinion, guns are a helpful tool in a time of crisis when help is too far away, or is unwilling to come. They are also a part of what makes this nation great. Instead of putting more restrictions on guns and gun owners, we should maintain the ability to protect ourselves, our families, and our friends through the use of firearms.
Also gun control has been proven in many ways that it does not reduce violence or crime. Gun control should be important to many people because it can help a country but in some cases it does not always help. Therefore people need to stop blaming gun control for everything and start taking into consideration that gun control is not the only factor in violence and crime. Gun control is important because it gives a citizen the right to be free and own a gun but when that citizen decides to not follow the law then he/she will have to deal with a punishment but the other citizens will have to hear about it and this will tempt governments to increase gun control laws and the more that gun control laws increase, as proven, gun related death rates will happen more and more. As you can see gun control is viewed as being a good law but others oppose and say that gun control does not reduce