Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gun violence effects in america
Gun violence effects in america
Gun violence effects in america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
If there was no gun control, then the rates of gun deaths might easily skyrocket. An example of why gun control is essential is when one considers the various instances of a mass shooting. Whenever gun related crimes happen, such as the shooting of cops, black people, or a mass shooting in schools, the country turns into national mourning, meaning that this has an effect on all Americans. The laws as they are now, and some of those that have been proposed, do not have sufficient guidelines in place to prevent such gun related deaths. Certainly, there is a need for more restrictive laws, and arguments for further restriction include societal needs, the increasing rates of the gun-related violence as well as death, questions of availability and …show more content…
If there are restrictions on the gun ownership laws, and also a restriction in use, then these are crimes would reduce significantly, and there would be fewer reports of suicides and homicides in America. No other country in the world has such high rates of gun ownership as the United States. It is the use of these guns that has been associated with the constant reports of homicides, and the same guns are used to commit suicides. Clearly, if there is a reduction in the private ownership of guns, then it becomes possible to drastically reduce the violence resulting from the accessibility of …show more content…
Throughout the many years of American history, the strongest opinion held by the constitutional scholars is that there is no mention of private gun ownership rights in the Second Amendment. What the constitution has done, however, is to guarantee a certain kind of collective right for the States to be able to maintain working militias. There are arguments that demonstrate that stricter guns laws are the very core of creating a better and safer America. However, it is also true that States such as Chicago with very strict gun laws also have the highest gun related crimes. It is also argued that any of the crimes that happen are done with legally acquired guns. In my opinion, the number of guns that exist in the US are so many that gun related crime is inevitable. However, if there are stricter laws, there is a chance that these crimes will be reduced very significantly, and citizens will feel
Some people believe that extremely tight gun control laws will eliminate crime, but gun control laws only prevent the 'good guys' from obtaining firearms. Criminals will always have ways of getting weapons, whether it be from the black market, cross borders, or illegal street sales. New gun control laws will not stop them. Since the shootings of Columbine High School, Virginia Tech, and Sandy Hook, the frequency of mass shootings has increased greatly. Gun control is not effective as it has not been shown to actually reduce the number of gun-related crimes. Instead of considering a ban of private firearm possession, and violating individual ownership rights, it may be more practical to consider the option of partially restricting firearm access.
The second amendment grants all Americans the right to bear arms. The ability to hold a firearm at any time as long as the firearm is registered. In the United states, all it takes to hold a firearm is a background check and a safety class. In a short reading from the “American Now” book a short article By Christina Tenuta called Responsible gun ownership saves lives she asks “do Americans really need guns?”, but are the guns really the problem? Although the second amendment requires some decent documents , the qualifications to obtain a firearm needs to be revised to a mental check, a family history check , and also to make it a priority for reinforcement to check on the registered firearm every six to twelve months.
In conclusion, enabling stricter gun control laws will help to keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill, criminals, and children and teens. With these laws put into place there will be more assurance of the safety of American citizens. It is not necessary to strip citizens of their right to own a gun, but we should be able to make it harder to get guns. If you are someone with a clear record and using a gun for recreation use, you will have no trouble obtaining a gun. In the long run increase the laws on gun control hurts nobody. Despite historic events where governments seized firearms and killed millions of citizens, today we have a different problem, which is making sure guns are in the right hands.
Gun control laws aim to restrict or regulate firearms by selecting who can sell, buy and possess certain guns. Criminals do not obey laws and stricter gun control laws or banning guns will have little effect on reducing crimes. There are many myths about gun control reducing acts of gun violence, which are simply not true according to research. People are responsible for the crimes, not the guns themselves. Taking guns away from United States citizens that use them for many reasons, shooting practice, competition, hunting and self-defense, should not be punished for the acts of criminals. As stated by Mytheos Holt, “Guns in the right hands help public safety. Guns in the wrong hands harm public safety”. Research shows that defensive use of guns discourages criminals and reduces crime (Holt 2). Not only is it wrong to penalize law-abiding citizens, it is against the Second Amendment. It is unconstitutional to pass laws that infringe on the Second Amendment right to bear arms.
The Economist states in an editorial that when people can get guns more easily there are more deaths which are caused by guns. There is a research result in 1996 about murders with guns. According to this research, there were two murders in New Zealand, fifteen in Japan, 30 in United Kingdom, 106 in Canada, 211 in Germany. On the other hand, in the USA, there were 9,390 gun related murders (America, 1998). This is a plain fact. Though there is a difference in population between each countries, it seems that there are too many gun related murders in the USA. Firearms-related incidents are taking place even in countries that it is illegal to possess guns. Therefore, it is needless to say that more gun related incidents would be occurring if the government permits gun ownership.
Should the 2nd amendment be revoked or changed? Many Americans would say “No,” stating that guns are dangerous and times have changed. Others might argue that having the right to bear arms keeps people safe and less threated by the outside world. In this debate, both sides of the 2nd amendments constitutional rights will be argued. The upcoming presidential election has been influencing voters to revoke our 2nd amendment rights which could change the democracy on which our country was founded.
Just in the US there are over 100,000 people shot each year. 72 perecent of all violent killings use guns as the weapon. 40 percent of US homes have guns, 57 percent of people in which do have guns believe there should be major restrictions or a ban on guns. In January 2016, Obama announced new actions on gun control, these actions include an update and expansion on background checks. The Supreme Court held a collective right that to own guns is a purpose for maintaining a militia. There should be more gun control laws because it would help reduce the high rate of violent crimes. More laws need to be made to protect oneself from harm of others.
Gun control is a really good idea. Not only does it prevent all of the above but it also prevents a lot of accidents. Accidents from innocent people and especially children. As Norman L. Lunger explains in his book Big Bang: The Loud Debate over Gun Control. He writes, “Saving Lives With Gun Control. It's a common item on the evening news: A child picks up a loaded gun and it suddenly goes off, killing the child or a bystander. In Florida, two young boys found a shotgun under a bed in their grandparents' home. A six year old pulled the trigger, and a five year old fell dead. In Illinois, two teens found a handgun in their grandmother's apartment. The gun went off in the hands of a sixteen-year-old boy, killing his fifteen-year-old cousin. In Michigan, a six-year-old boy found a handgun in a shoebox at the house where he was staying with an uncle. He took the gun to school, pulled it out of his pocket, and shot a girl in his first-grade class. She died on the way to the hospital.” (Lunger, Big Bang: The Loud Debate over Gun Control) As he shows innocent children are being killed by other innocent children just because a gun was lying around. There is no way to go around it. Innocent children killed because there is no gun control. Not convincing enough? Lunger also says, “They note that firearms take the lives of some 30,000 people in the United States each year. About six hundred of the victims are under age fifteen, and about thirty-five hundred are aged fifteen to nineteen. According to the Centers for Disease Control, a federal agency, firearms take the lives of a far greater proportion of children in the United States than in other industr...
Gun control has become one of the hottest themes in America. Although many people in the United States believe that stricter gun laws will reduce crime rates, gun control will benefit no one except the authorities and criminals, because gun ownership protects law abiding citizens from criminals, government is slowly taking away our rights, and criminals will always find ways to acquire guns.
Gun control can be defined as “the use of law to limit people's access to handguns, shotguns, rifles, and other firearms” ("Gun Control"). In other words, the government initiates a set of new regulations that gives the government the right to strip and monitor the firearms owned by the gun owners. The new demand for legislators to acknowledge and reform the gun laws present today because statistics show how guns has contribution to killings in America and the horrific tragedies. Every year in the U.S., an average of 100,000 people are shot, according to GunPolicy. Out of that 100,000 people shot, some of those victims consist of children, bystanders, fathers and mothers. The lethality of guns in 2011 firearms was responsible for 32,163 deaths in America (Alpers). Firearms have been used recklessly and claimed thousands of lives of Americans, increasing the death rate. If gun control was in effect and passed by legislators the deaths in America from firearms would not be so large. What also contributes to these facts is the ability to obtain guns for violent acts of crime which why the government need to suppressed and monitored firearms.
These crimes may include crime of passion, armed robberies etc. Gun control should be stricter because owning guns not only provides self-defense, but it also harms the people. Some criminals might get it themselves, others might end up stealing them from licensed owners The main problem with private citizens legally possessing a gun is that when a crime will take place, the criminal will have a licensed gun and will be legally recorded which will decrease the chance to be tried for illegal ownership of gun.. Not only criminals can have those guns but also children or teenagers of the licensed owners can access the guns which can get them in trouble. Family members can get hold of it and use it for entertainment but rather harm themselves. If the laws are stricter many crimes can be avoided. Some armed people don’t have proper training to use the weapons and they might end up hurting themselves or others near them which might have serious consequences. If everyone walks around with a gun with them, people become suspicious about them and they become suspects of a crime. Limiting the gun ownership to professionals will decrease the risk of crimes and
There should be greater restrictions on buying and obtaining guns that need to be followed. In the article “Restricting Gun Ownership Protects Society and Reduces Crime,” it talks about the history of firearm laws, the Brady bill and how it is stopping criminals. Secondly, the article talks about limiting crime, gun trafficking, and dangerous guns on the streets. Thirdly, it talks about the loopholes in gun sales and different firearm laws. According to “Restricting Gun Ownership Protects Society and Reduces Crime,” “ In 1998 alone, 30,708 Americans died from gunfire” (“Restricting Gun Ownership Protects Society and Reduces Crime”). There are many United States citizens that possess firearms, for this reason many U.S. citizens get injured or
Gun violence is the leading cause of death in the United States. In recent news, we see school shootings and shootings in general occurring more often than usual. It is not hard at all to acquire a gun in the United States. Currently, many states have weak gun laws, which can lead to guns falling into the wrong hands. Guns are the cause of most of the crime in the United States, we need to enhance gun laws/gun control so that it is harder to possess a gun in public space.
Crime is a large issue in that occurs throughout the United States. People have used guns as a tool to committed crimes, therefore guns contribute to the crime in the United states. As a result guns should have increased regulations, but not be completely removed from society because extracting guns will not eliminate violence in the country. Guns should not be taken away because then law abiding citizens will be negatively affected. For example if there is a ban on guns the criminals can still obtain guns due to the fact that criminals participate in illegal activities such as the black market. According to PBS criminals acquire guns from “legally licensed but corrupt at-home and commercial gun dealers.” This expands on the fact that criminals
In the last couple of years, 19,392 or more committed suicides with guns. In 2014 1.6 percent of 100,000 killed themselves with guns from ages 16 to 17 years old. The gun suicide rate is still growing, last year there were 15,549 suicides by guns. The highest percentage of suicides are teens with firearms. In 2016 more than half of the suicides are with firearms. Teen suicide rates have gone up over the last five years, but it’s not only in teens. all suicides rates have gone up, most of this suicides are done with firearms. In the united states today, lots of families at least have one gun per house, but what people don't realize is that it gives people the easy way out. In some states, it’s very easy to register for a gun and get one. Guns make it very easy because you just have to pull the trigger. Also, people have murder-suicides, where they take others lives then take their own. There have been many murder-suicides, most are done with guns. In 2016 one father killed his wife, 5-year-old daughter, and 17 month-old daughter. After killing them, he took his own life, he did all this with a firearm. If we had more gun control, then if he had tried to get a gun he could not because he had a mental issue. He had left the family a few months before and had just recently had come back. They believe he got the gun when he left and was planning this. This is not the only murder-suicides using a firearm there have been many, and we