Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social impact of drug abuse
Sociological effects of drug addiction
Effects of inequality in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Question 1: The use of drugs by the human race has had a long and sordid history of abuse. While many drugs are beneficial and helpful to the human condition, addictive behaviors and loss of control due to substance abuse are the negative flip side of drugs in our society. There are many theories which attempt to explain drug use, including the biologically based ‘disease of the brain’ model, structural inequality, and symbolic interactionism. I will first review these three different theoretical frameworks by which drug use can be understood. I will also identify the advantages and disadvantages of the different theories. Finally, I will make the case that structural inequality is the best theoretical model by which to understand drug use. …show more content…
A prime example of how economic and social inequalities impact drug use and general societal perception of drug users is the way crack users in the Hill District are treated and perceived as opposed to their wealthier cocaine-using counterparts in greater Pittsburgh. Both cocaine and crack are derived from the same source, the coca plant, and both have very similar pharmacology. The main difference between the drugs is that crack is the freebased form of cocaine which makes it smokeable and much cheaper, due to the freebasing agent still being present in the final product. The freebasing agent adds bulk to the product, allowing small amounts of pure cocaine to be made into large amounts of crack. The other main difference between these drugs is the price; pure cocaine is much more expensive than crack, making cocaine a drug for the rich and crack a drug for the poor. The impact of this disparity is frequently seen in treatment of crack users from the Hill District who are often perceived and treated as criminals; whereas the cocaine users in greater Pittsburgh, are more likely to be perceived and treated as ‘chemically dependent’ individuals who need to be sent away to fancy rehab facilities to receive treatment. Their crack using counterparts are, as statistics show, more frequently sent to prison (Kushner, 2010). This difference in the way that crack users are treated and perceived by the general society clearly shows the structural inequality associated with the use of drugs. Another disproportionate impact that drug use has on the Hill District is the slum-like and chaotic atmosphere surrounding the drug culture. The Hill District is well known as a destination where one can engage in drug associated risky behaviors including commercial sex. This concentration of risky behaviors in a single neighborhood
Since the Reagan officials tried harder to stop the Drug Enforcement Administration from exposing the illegal activities that were taking place, the more violence was being caused in these inner city neighborhoods, which lead to more arrests for possession. Now, Michelle explains how the War on Drugs has the most impact on African Americans in these inner city neighborhoods. Within the past three decades, US incarceration increase has been due to drug convictions, mainly. She states that, “the US is unparalleled in the world in focusing enforcement of federal drug laws on racial and ethnic minorities.”(Alexander2016). The percentile of African American men with some sort of criminal record is about 80% in some of our major US cities(Paul Street, The Vicious Circle: Race, Prison, Jobs, and Community in Chicago, Illinois, and the Nation (Chicago Urban League, Department of Research and Planning, 2002). MIchelle referred to these becoming marginalized and calls them “ growing and permanent undercaste.” (Alexander2016, pp
“Just Say No!” A statement that takes us deep into yet another decade in the history of the United States which was excited by controversies, social issues, and drug abuse. The topic of this statement is fueled by the growing abuse of cocaine in the mid 1980s. I shall discuss the effects of the crack cocaine epidemic of the mid 1980s from a cultural and social stand point because on that decade this country moved to the rhythms and the pace of this uncanny drug. Cocaine took its told on American society by in the 1980s; it ravaged with every social group, race, class, etc. It reigned over the United States without any prejudices. Crack cocaine was the way into urban society, because of its affordability in contrast to the powdered form. In society the minorities were the ones most affected by the growing excess of crime and drug abuse, especially African Americans; so the question was “Why was nearly everybody convicted in California federal court of crack cocaine trafficking black?” (Webb: Day 3). The growing hysteria brought forth many questions which might seem to have concrete answers, but the fact of the matter is they are all but conspiracy in the end, even though it does not take away the ambiguity and doubt. I will take on only a few topics from the vast array of events and effects this period in time had tended to. Where and who this epidemic seemed to affect more notably, and perhaps how the drugs came about such territories and people. What actions this countries authority took to restore moral sanity, and how it affected people gender wise.
The reason with the old ways do not work, Alexander say, is because “self-destructive drug users are responding in a tragic, but understandable way” (226). It is not their drug- problem that caused the dislocation, but the dislocation that cause the drug problem. He uses the term dislocation to describe the lack of integration with “family, community, society and spiritual values” (226). Alexander goes on to explain that history proves that inability to achieve health opportunities can take on the form of violence, and damaging drug use. Therefore, the “drug problem” (226) is not the problem. The problem is more the “pattern of response to prolong dislocation” (226). Alexander supports this by explaining the reason for the dislocation as being globalized by a society that is market driven which can only be established by the displacement of tradition, economy, and relationships. This has been seen in history before in England during the 19TH century, when “a brutal, export-oriented manufacturing system” was accompanied by work...
The past quarter century of American history has been profoundly impacted by the “war on drugs.” Ever since the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 was passed by President Richard Nixon, the number of yearly incarcerations for drug violations has grown exponentially. America’s drug policies have cost billions of dollars and imprisoned hundreds of thousands of Americans, yet rates of drug, property, and violent crime have failed to decrease. Yassaman Saadatmand summates the consequences of Nixon’s policies: “Not only has the drug war failed to reduce violent and property crime, but it has also shifted criminal justice resources (the police, courts, prisons, probation officers, etc.) away from directly fighting violent and property crime.” The issue is further complicated by racial inequalities in the rates of drug use and crime. Whereas Whites consist the majority of the population of any state, they are outnumbered by African-Americans in both state and federal prisons (E. Ann Carson 2013). This incongruity is paralleled with many other races, such as an overrepresentation of Native Americans and an underrepresentation of Asians in rates of drug use. What causes this imbalance? What purpose do the higher rates of incarceration for certain minorities serve? As this topic is explored, it becomes evident that the racial disparity in drug crime is perpetuated by America’s legacy of bigotry and racism, capitalism, and a cycle of poverty.
Racial disparity in drug related convictions has been a wide spread problem in the United States since the War on Drugs in the early 1980s. It was prevalent before that time, but minorities became the target of drug related crimes in startling numbers at this time. There are several hypotheses for this alarming situation, but the bottom line remains that racism is the leading cause of racial disparity in drug related convictions. Minorities from inner cities, with low-incomes and socioeconomic statuses who get caught in a downward spiral, are the easiest targets for the government to point the finger at for drug problems in the United States. The statistics will show that while more White people use illicit drugs in the United States, more African Americans and other minorities will be convicted, and more harshly than their White counterparts, for the same crimes.
Drug culture has always been a key debate within sociology and has become even more integral as Drug Culture increases ever more in modern day, Western societies. It is estimated that in the U.K and Wales over twelve million people have consumed some kind of illicit drug with 5 million having admitting to using a Class A drug. These statistics seem startling for some and many link this to increasing crime statistics within certain inner city areas where both drug use, and drug related crimes are high and on the increase Although, there is a start of a change in attitude towards ideas related to the drugs and crime link and furthermore idea on how to reduce drug-related crimes can be reduced. Pervious attitudes towards drug culture was confirming ideas that drugs caused crime in most cases and prohibition would be the only way to stop this. Although more recent ideas relate to legalisation how this will dramatically reduce drug-related crimes through many different processes. There are two main studies, which are hugely helpful in this debate, Paul Goldstein’s tripartite framework, and David Matza and Gresham Sykes’ Subterranean play. The tripartite framework is one of the most cited research article on drug-related crimes and can be argued both for prohibition and legalisation whereas Subterranean play focuses more around the idea of legalisation and how this will reduce Drug related crimes.
In the 1970s, cocaine was expensive and considered a "status" drug. The introduction of inexpensive crack increased the accessibility of this substance, and crack has become the drug of choice for many users, especially for inner...
Every inner city neighborhood has one. Take one trip through the projects and witness the luxury vehicles with the chromed out rims, watches that could pay an entire semester’s worth of college, and that new pair of wait in line for 24 hour Jordan’s on the feet of several. Every urban area in the United States is home to at least one individual who will do everything in their power to “floss”, despite the consequences stacked against them. Regardless of race, religion, and orientation, there is that one person. With limited resources and scarce opportunities available, dealing illegal substances has become the norm in poverty. While most of mainstream and middle class America has frowned upon this lucrative activity, the entertainment industry has promoted and even influenced those who partake in it. Emulation at its best. Turn on any hip hop or even rock radio station, and songs glorifying drug use and distribution are sure to be played. Television shows like Weeds and Breaking Bad have even showed the public that drug dealing does not discriminate. Drug dealing has been around f...
There are many assumptions of why an individual may use different substances and perhaps go from a “social” user to becoming addicted. Understanding the different theories models of addiction many help in the process of treatment for the addict. Although people in general vary in their own ideologies of addiction when working as a clinician one must set aside their own person beliefs. Typically as a clinician it is best for the client to define how they view their addiction and their view may encompass more than one of the five theories. Some theories suggest genetic and other biological factors whiles others emphasize personality or social factors. In this study three theories are defined and given to three different people with different cultural backgrounds, different ideologies, different experiences, and most importantly different reference point of addiction.
One of the most prevalent misconceptions, Benson and Rasmussen, contend is the notion that a large percentage of drug users commit nondrug crimes, what might be called the “drugs-cause-crime” assumption implicit in the government’s drug-war strategy. If true, then an effective crackdown on ...
The decline in casual drugs use may be unrelated to the war on drugs. Furthermore, stressors at a macro level such as economic deprivation, inequality, structural discrimination, and other pervasive stressors in the environment may serve as risk factors for drug use. Also family and peer influence is a strong correlate of drug use. The widespread prevalence of use of marijuana among youth, continues to generate a moral panic, even though evidence states that marijuana usage causes few significant health or behavioral problems to vast majority of the people who consume
But also, today we have a radio of 100:1 ration between crack and powder and 90% of the crack defendants in courts are African American that is why 35 million American report using illicit drug. Furthermore, in this film I found some examples of concepts that we had discussed in class such as the word role, which is when you expect a behavior associated with a particular status in this case was with black people as they made wrong assumptions that just because they were black they tented to consumed more drugs than white people. Also, risky shift which is when people in a group are more likely to make risky decisions than if they are alone as they decided to sell drugs and rape and do illegal acts. the last one but not least will be social stratification which is a system of structured social inequality like the American
At household levels, the drug users usually divert the income meant for the family’s upkeep for purchasing drugs (Barnard, 2007). Also, junior members of the family who abuse drugs tend to commit crimes that may force the relatives to pay for the expenses. The living standard of the family is; therefore, affected leading to unnecessary suffering.
With the use of drugs being such a controversial issue in today’s society we felt as a group it was important to further explore this issue. As we possess a high interest in how drugs affect a number of social groups. These groups of course range from young teens to high-class older individuals who will have different reasons and different acceptable standards of behaviour.
The use of drugs is a controversial topic in society today. In general, addicts show a direct link between taking drugs and suffering from their effects. People abuse drugs for a wide variety of reasons. In most cases, the use of drugs will serve a type of purpose or will give some kind of reward. These reasons for use will differ with different kinds of drugs. Various reasons for using the substance can be pain relief, depression, anxiety and weariness, acceptance into a peer group, religion, and much more. Although reasons for using may vary for each individual, it is known by all that consequences of the abuse do exist. It is only further down the line when the effects of using can be seen.