Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The abolition of slavery in America
The impact of slavery in the united states civil war
Abolition of slavery DBQ
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The abolition of slavery in America
Michelle Alexander starts her book by taking us on a trip back in time to the start of it all: the Civil War. Now, we all learned about the Civil War in middle school and high school and how the great Abraham Lincoln abolished slavery and freed all the African Americans with the Emancipation Proclamation. In chapter 1, she really touches on this and on history, the beginning and end of slavery and the beginning and end of the Jim Crow Laws. Refreshing our minds of our country’s history and how the Jim Crow Laws came to end with Brown vs. Board of Education. She mentions this idea of a caste system and how it revolves around the color of one’s skin. Going off this idea that the caste system is based off race, she breaks it down into three parts: …show more content…
slavery, Jim Crow and the mass incarceration. Michelle then goes into detail about each of the topics and talks about segregation is making an approach in today’s society, or how they never really left. She gives examples throughout the book about how the economy is collapsing, racism is still very much alive, how there is a war on drugs and the amount of money going into drugs is increasing. The main idea that revolves all these categories is how the incarceration of African Americans has increased. When the average person is asked to imagine a criminal, most of the time, unintentionally, they picture an African American man. What Michelle Alexander does is explain why this is and how this came to be. She explains how long it took her to realize how the very phenomenon she is explaining.
She describes that the mass incarceration policies that were made are a “comprehensive and well-disguised system of racialized control that functions in a manner strikingly similar to Jim Crow”(Alexander2016). The War on Drugs escalated quickly in 1982 with the Reagan administration, claiming that they were responding to the crack cocaine epidemic that was going on around black neighborhoods and ghettos. The Reagan administration actually were contributing to the high rise of crack cocaine consumption in the US, mainly inner cities. Alexander points out that the Drug on War had escalated way before 1982, in the mid 1980’s the use of crack cocaine had escalated so quickly that they Federal Drug authorities had to publicize the issue and use scare tactics to try to get control over the …show more content…
situation. The CIA recognized that in the 1980’s they were smuggling cocaine into the US and distributing it into various cities, when they tried to stop the smuggling of cocaine and expose the truth to the public, the Reagan officials stopped them.
Since the Reagan officials tried harder to stop the Drug Enforcement Administration from exposing the illegal activities that were taking place, the more violence was being caused in these inner city neighborhoods, which lead to more arrests for possession. Now, Michelle explains how the War on Drugs has the most impact on African Americans in these inner city neighborhoods. Within the past three decades, US incarceration increase has been due to drug convictions, mainly. She states that, “the US is unparalleled in the world in focusing enforcement of federal drug laws on racial and ethnic minorities.”(Alexander2016). The percentile of African American men with some sort of criminal record is about 80% in some of our major US cities(Paul Street, The Vicious Circle: Race, Prison, Jobs, and Community in Chicago, Illinois, and the Nation (Chicago Urban League, Department of Research and Planning, 2002). MIchelle referred to these becoming marginalized and calls them “ growing and permanent undercaste.” (Alexander2016, pp
6-7). Throughout the book, from what I read and took from it, is that the Jim Crow laws are hidden within our society, A lot of us might not choose to notice it, because as Americans, we like to think we overcame such a horrible even in our past time and we like to think times have changed. In reality, they might have never left. Like stated before, 80% of African Americans have some sort of criminal record and there is a great percentile of African Americans serving time in prison. It might not be okay to use race as a justification for discrimination, but if you’re a criminal it makes it totally okay to discriminate you. By falling back into old ways and targeting African American men, “we have not ended racial caste in America, we have merely redesigned it”(Alexander2016). African Americans have had a lot of achievements throughout the years, one of them being Obama becoming the first African American president. She talks about how, as a country, we are ashamed of our history and how we’ve treated “our” people and the past and therefore try to ignore anything that has to do with race. We say that we learn from our mistakes, but we always end up making those same mistakes again and the phrase “history repeats itself” come to play. The way she goes about exposing this caste system is interesting. She really opens your eyes and makes you think about our history and how uncomfortable we feel when a situation arises that has to do with race. I found the book to be really dry though, I didn’t want to read it. It was hard for me to understand some of the language she was using and try to keep up with what she was saying. I had to re-read some of the paragraphs, and more than often, some of the chapters to try to grasp what she was trying to say. It was really difficult for me to really get into the book. It was an interesting topic to focus on and I really did learn and realize some things I never have before, really opened a new perspective. I don’t think I would recommend this book to anyone, I think if the book wasn’t so dry it would actually be a good book. I did like how she started off talking about the beginning and end of slavery and with some of our history. It was a good refresher and it helps when she goes back and forth and makes connections between then and now. I also liked the connections she made. They weren’t connections I would have ever thought of and would have recognized on my own. Like I’ve said throughout this whole paper, she really does open your eyes and make you realize that this caste system is alive as ever, especially now in this generation.
...ty and their survival as a group in society because of restraint from the federal government in the ability to litigate their plight in Court. The Author transitions the past and present signatures of Jim Crow and the New Jim Crow with the suggestion that the New Jim Crow, by mass incarceration and racism as a whole, is marginalizes and relegates Blacks to residential, educational and constitutionally endowed service to Country.
Human rights experts have reported that in the 70s, African Americans in the U.S were already being overrepresented in drug arrests, with twice as many arrests as Caucasians (Fellner, 2009). Since the war on drugs began, African
“Just Say No!” A statement that takes us deep into yet another decade in the history of the United States which was excited by controversies, social issues, and drug abuse. The topic of this statement is fueled by the growing abuse of cocaine in the mid 1980s. I shall discuss the effects of the crack cocaine epidemic of the mid 1980s from a cultural and social stand point because on that decade this country moved to the rhythms and the pace of this uncanny drug. Cocaine took its told on American society by in the 1980s; it ravaged with every social group, race, class, etc. It reigned over the United States without any prejudices. Crack cocaine was the way into urban society, because of its affordability in contrast to the powdered form. In society the minorities were the ones most affected by the growing excess of crime and drug abuse, especially African Americans; so the question was “Why was nearly everybody convicted in California federal court of crack cocaine trafficking black?” (Webb: Day 3). The growing hysteria brought forth many questions which might seem to have concrete answers, but the fact of the matter is they are all but conspiracy in the end, even though it does not take away the ambiguity and doubt. I will take on only a few topics from the vast array of events and effects this period in time had tended to. Where and who this epidemic seemed to affect more notably, and perhaps how the drugs came about such territories and people. What actions this countries authority took to restore moral sanity, and how it affected people gender wise.
The majority of our prison population is made up of African Americans of low social and economic classes, who come from low income houses and have low levels of education. The chapter also discusses the amount of money the United States loses yearly due to white collar crime as compared to the cost of violent crime. Another main point was the factors that make it more likely for a poor person to be incarcerated, such as the difficulty they would have in accessing adequate legal counsel and their inability to pay bail. This chapter addresses the inequality of sentencing in regards to race, it supplies us with NCVS data that shows less than one-fourth of assailants are perceived as black even though they are arrested at a much higher rate. In addition to African Americans being more likely to be charged with a crime, they are also more likely to receive harsher punishments for the same crimes- which can be seen in the crack/cocaine disparities. These harsher punishments are also shown in the higher rates of African Americans sentenced to
“Simple Justice” was written by Richard Kluger and reviews the history of Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court decision that outlawed segregation, and African America’s century-long struggle for equality under law. It began with the inequities of slavery to freedom bells to the forcing of integration in schools and the roots of laws with affect on African Americans. This story reveals the hate caused the disparagement of African Americans in America over three hundred years. I learned how African Americans were ultimately acknowledged by their simple justice. The American version of the holocaust was presented in the story. In 1954 the different between how segregation and slavery were not in fashion when compared with dishonesty of how educating African American are separate from Caucasian was justified by the various branches of government.
“On the run: Wanted Med in the Philadelphia Ghetto” by Alice Goffman (2009), explores the dysfunctional relationship between individuals in “ghettos” and the criminal justice system. Incarceration rates in the United States have increased seven times over 40 years among Black men with limited education (Goffman 2009:339). Incarceration leads to the discrimination and disadvantage of Black males; socially and economically (Goffman 2009:339). Additionally, increased incarcerations influence the amount of policing in communities. Subsequently, increased incarcerations of individuals from poor communities, results in increased policing in their neighbourhoods. Goffman (2009) focuses her study on the rate of incarceration and police
This supports the conservative’s claim that the war on drugs is not making any progress to stop the supply of drugs coming into America. Conservative writer for the magazine National Review, William Buckley, shows his outrage towards the Council on Crime in America for their lack of motivation to change the drug policies that are ineffective. Buckley asks, “If 1.35 million drug users were arrested in 1994, how many drug users were not arrested? The Council informs us that there are more than 4 million casual users of cocaine” (70). Buckley goes on to discuss in the article, “Misfire on Drug Policy,” how the laws set up by the Council were meant to decrease the number of drug users, not increase the number of violators.
While the War on Drugs may have been portrayed as a colorblind movement, Nixon’s presidency and reasoning for its implementation solidifies that it was not. Nixon coined the term “War on Drugs” in his 1971 anti-drug campaign speech, starting the beginning of an era. He voiced, “If there is one area where the word ‘war’ is appropriate, it is in the fights against crime” (DuVernay, 13th). This terminology solidified to the public that drug abusers were an enemy, and if the greatest publicized abusers were black, then black people were then enemy. This “war” started by Nixon claimed it would rid the nation of dealers, but in fact, 4/5 of arrests were for possession only (Alexander, 60). Nixon employed many tactics in order to advance the progress
Most black Americans are under the control of the criminal justice today whether in parole or probation or whether in jail or prison. Accomplishments of the civil rights association have been challenged by mass incarceration of the African Americans in fighting drugs in the country. Although the Jim Crow laws are not so common, many African Americans are still arrested for very minor crimes. They remain disfranchised and marginalized and trapped by criminal justice that has named them felons and refuted them their rights to be free of lawful employment and discrimination and also education and other public benefits that other citizens enjoy. There is exists discernment in voting rights, employment, education and housing when it comes to privileges. In the, ‘the new Jim crow’ mass incarceration has been described to serve the same function as the post civil war Jim crow laws and pre civil war slavery. (Michelle 16) This essay would defend Michelle Alexander’s argument that mass incarcerations represent the ‘new Jim crow.’
To conclude, I can continue to go on about the caste system, racism, and war on drugs. The point is that racism continues to exist and the rebirth of the caste, continues to exist it never went away. People just did not do as much, but now is more obvious than ever. The clear examples she introduce and statistic show and support the statement of the “rebirth of the caste”. In my opinion, I found the book interesting; and statistic surprising from class and the book. Things continue to go bad in the United States. When are we going to do something about it! This book shows the effects of the
The former drug enforcement official McDonough explores the immensely argued topic of the war on drugs and refutes against the possible alternatives to the problem. McDonough disagrees when he writes “In essence, the advocates of decriminalization of illegal drug use assert that incarceration rates are increasing because of bad drug laws resulting from an insane drug war, most of whose victims are well behaved citizens who happen to use illegal drugs”. In making this comment, McDonough integrates this into his work by continuing on to disprove several parts of the quote, such as how the drug laws are not aggressive, most crimes stem from drug use, and only 21 percent of people in correctional facilities were drug offenders. The way in which
Another reason racialized mass incarceration takes place is because of the high rates of poverty and unemployment for inner city African Americans, especially those with low-education and low skill levels. Urban ghettos have been associated with the problem of social disorganization and crime. The biggest reason for this is the war on drugs. There is no substantial proof that verifies African Americans are more involved in illegal drug consumptions than other groups are. However they are arrested more than other groups. Bobo and Thompson stated that blacks are almost 34% involved in drug-related arrests though only 14% of those are among regular illegal drug users. Among drug related convictions, African Americans make up half of the cases whereas only 26% of the white population is convicted. As Bobo and Thompson stated, “Illegal drug consumption seems to know no race. Incarceration for drug-related charges, however, is something visited in a heavily biased manner on African Americans.”
The US Justice Department statistics 2003 and onwards demonstrates significant disproportion in the incarceration rate of minority African American and Hispanic men between the ages of 25 and 29 years as compared to the rate associated with White men of the same age. Bell (2007), proposes that as minority groups grow in numbers within the dominant group they will experience greater equality. However, rate of incarceration among minority males remains alarmingly high and as compared to their White counterparts. As with health care there are racial disparities that will influence outcomes when an individual is brought before the criminal courts. Additionally, there is significant correlation between a person’s level of education and the likelihood of his involvement in criminal activities. Studies and statistics have shown that among male high school dropouts there is high incidence of unemployment, low income and rate of illicit drug use as compared to men with degrees from four year colleges. Further to this, although the rate of school dropout and even arrest is not significantly different across the race lines, literature alludes that African American men have a higher rate of conviction for the same crime committed.
To be honest, if a police officer or any law enforcement used the tactics used in the inner cities against minorities in a white middle class neighborhood would be fired. The war on drugs is another tool to enslave African American and ensured their continued oppression writes Deborah Small the author of the article “The War on drugs Promotes Racism”. She continues saying that drug laws are enforced in a way that is racially biased in midst stating that blacks make up thirteen percent of drug users, seventy four percent of drug users sent to prison are people of color. She also claims that sentences for using or possessing crack cocaine-typically used by blacks- are hundred percent more harsh than than those using powdered cocaine, most commonly used by whites. It is relevant to understand the current prison-industrial complex to know that slavery held a preeminent position in America’s colonial society. With nearly 2 million people behind bars, it is undisputed to that today the principal engine driving the criminal justice system and the high rates of incarcerations is the United States government’s relentless and racist pursuit of the “War on Drugs.” The drug war has replaced slavery and segregation as the main method of maintaining America’s long history of racial oppression. She then presents a metaphor explaining how today's criminal justice system is like a pipeline of a slave ship, transporting human cargo along the trade routes from black and brown communities; through the middle passage of the police precincts, holding pens, detention centers and courtrooms; to downstate and upstate prisons; back to communities as unrehabilitated escapees, and back to prison cells in a vicious cycle. All in the stance of preventing drugs from the streets. If the government wants to combat drugs they should educate the youth not imprisoned them for almost their whole life. As I
In article 1, “Philippine Catholic Church Slams ‘Reign of Terror’ Behind War on Drugs” written by Reuters in the New York Times it explains the war on drugs. They explain how it involves “rogue policemen and corrupt judges.” There are low level officials who are creating a hit list of drug pushers and users, which most of the people on the list are ending up dead. The priest also called upon this violence and said for people to not support these acts of violence and said they would probably be interviewed by the government questioning their loyalty for protesting.