Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
War on drugs foreign policy
War on drugs foreign policy
War on drugs effect on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: War on drugs foreign policy
All through the nineties, nothing had changed. There still was the high rates of incarcerations and drugs were still making their way into the streets. When George W. Bush arrived at the White House the war on drugs had diminished yet he distributed more money than before presidents. The era of Bush saw a rapid increase of domestic militarization of domestic law enforcements. For instance, there would be around 50,000 paramilitary-style SWAT raids on Americans every year during the his reign. However of that 50,000 at least 40,000 were people of color and of the 40,000 there was nearly a ninety to hundred percent chance of prison time for nonviolent drug offenses. While the law enforcement was getting militarized they would primarily target …show more content…
people of color and would often station themselves in these communities. For instance, in New York, the NYPD ( New York Police Department) they would conduct a policy of stop and frisk in which the police could detain a citizen and pat them leading to the officer to reasonably believe that the suspect is armed or dangerous. The issue with this is that police would target and detain people of color in most low income communities. Their primary reason is that they had an appearance of drug dealer or a gang member, which in most scenarios the suspect was either clean or was not affiliated with any gangs. The problem led to minorities having a straineded relationship with the higher law enforcements and most lead to police brutality because the suspect would not cooperate with the officers. And while the suspect would be clean, he would still end up in prison or some juvenile detention for refusing to cooperate with the police. The issue goes further than drugs, because if an officer pulls over people of color driving, the officer would say that they had surpassed the speed limit and while in the process would searched their vehicle for drugs assuming that the individual possessed drugs or weapons. Now the victim had to be trialled for the ticket and the possession of drugs even though he was clean. Speaking of the police, the “war on drugs” has corrupted the whole institution of policing, specifically in black and Latino communities. To further clarify this claim, is that police officers are committing illegal searches, like stop and frisk. And while it was ruled unconstitutional, the police will still continue because they believe such activities are justified by necessity of winning the “war on drugs”. For instance, a former police officer from the fifties explains that during the heroin epidemic in Harlem, they would arrest everyone on sight and he claims that it wasn’t helping to reduce drug use or drug selling. Nothing has changed since then, because in the year 2001, state and local police made around two million arrests and almost none of them had search warrants. Since the police cannot cleanse the streets of illegal drugs, and since drug dealers find alternatives, the police resort to the informant and illegal searches. This is a major problem underlying police integrity throughout the United States. That unfortunately will continue because the law enforcement has become a revenue-raising agency that takes precedence over law enforcement. The “ War on Drugs” has become one of the top priorities that the police made 700,000 arrests for marijuana per year. The public is not really terrified of marijuana anymore because of recent studies show its benefits rather its misconceptions. People are afraid of molesters walking around freely near schools, children, and women, crimes like shootings and rape. The police are not putting the resources into crimes like the ones listed, where they could be effective if they were top priority. I mean it’s not only the law enforcement that has become corrupted, but the justice system too, like how can a rapist can walk off free, while a black teen possessing marijuana gets ten to fifteen years in prison. One possessed an actual threat to society, while one did not do anything that seemed to threat to the community. Recently , President Obama allocated two billion back into programs like the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009. He wanted to show to the public that he is tough on crime and drugs because his pot-friendly remarks left a bad image of the white middle America. However, these programs have a troubled history like it ties, drug arrests to funding. In other words, the more arrests the more money. Most of the money goes towards drug task force that have a record of disproportionately arresting black men for possession. ( Michael w. Lynch “ The War on Drugs Has Corrupted Law Enforcements” and Jamie Chandler and Skylar Young “Marijuana Policies Simply need to be Refined”) The drug war is an assault on the African American community or any community of color.
To be honest, if a police officer or any law enforcement used the tactics used in the inner cities against minorities in a white middle class neighborhood would be fired. The war on drugs is another tool to enslave African American and ensured their continued oppression writes Deborah Small the author of the article “The War on drugs Promotes Racism”. She continues saying that drug laws are enforced in a way that is racially biased in midst stating that blacks make up thirteen percent of drug users, seventy four percent of drug users sent to prison are people of color. She also claims that sentences for using or possessing crack cocaine-typically used by blacks- are hundred percent more harsh than than those using powdered cocaine, most commonly used by whites. It is relevant to understand the current prison-industrial complex to know that slavery held a preeminent position in America’s colonial society. With nearly 2 million people behind bars, it is undisputed to that today the principal engine driving the criminal justice system and the high rates of incarcerations is the United States government’s relentless and racist pursuit of the “War on Drugs.” The drug war has replaced slavery and segregation as the main method of maintaining America’s long history of racial oppression. She then presents a metaphor explaining how today's criminal justice system is like a pipeline of a slave ship, transporting human cargo along the trade routes from black and brown communities; through the middle passage of the police precincts, holding pens, detention centers and courtrooms; to downstate and upstate prisons; back to communities as unrehabilitated escapees, and back to prison cells in a vicious cycle. All in the stance of preventing drugs from the streets. If the government wants to combat drugs they should educate the youth not imprisoned them for almost their whole life. As I
previously stated the government allocated fifteen billion for law enforcements to a huge contrast of one billion, and while the education programs had improved since, the it led to a strain relationship between the whole institute of policing and people of color. In a country that was founded and advocated for equal rights for all, today policies are refusing that right for minorities in that one in every three Black men in their twenties is now in prison, probation, or parole. In seven states, blacks constitute between seventy five and ninety percent of all drug offenders are sent to prison, In New York, for example, at least ninety four percent of inmates incarcerated for drug offenses are either black or Latino. Black men are sent to prison for drug offenses at rates that are from twenty to fifty seven times greater than for white men. The disappropriate arrests-and media coverage-feed the misconception that blacks use drugs at much higher rates than whites and thus serve as justification for continued racial profiling in today’s society. She compares the overcrowded prison cells filled men and women of color as plantation sites. That’s a pretty harsh analogy, but unfortunately that’s the sad truth perfectly describing today's society. Almost half the 700,000 marijuana arrests are of Latinos. This outcome is no surprise because the unequal treatment of minority group members pervades at every stage of the criminal justice system. “Black and Latino Americans are victimized by disproportionate targeting and unfair treatment by police and other front-line law enforcement officials; by racially skewed charging and plea-bargaining decisions by prosecutors; by discriminatory sentencing practices; and by the failure of judges, elected officials, and other criminal justice policy-makers to redress the inequities that have come to permeate the system.”Federal financial support for education is no longer an option for many after a drug conviction. Two of the most populous states, New York and California, send more African-American and Latino men to prison each year than they graduate from colleges and universities. The government has sent a message that it prefers to incarcerate Black and Brown youth rather than to educate them. The war on drugs has caused tens of thousands of children are permanently separated from the love and guidance of parents who have been incarcerated for drug offenses. Most Americans would agree that punitive drug policies relying on harsh sentences would have been changed long ago if Whites were incarcerated on drug charges at the same rate as Blacks and Latinos. The inherent racism in America's enforcement of its drug policy has reached crisis proportions. As a result, there is a growing chorus of voices of African-American and Latino leaders who are challenging the political orthodoxy that public safety requires the incarceration of tens of thousands of Black and Brown people, mainly for nonviolent offenses. Parents and family members of incarcerated drug offenders are speaking out against laws that have stolen the lives of their loved ones at tremendous social and economic cost. ( Deborah Small “The War on Drugs Has Promoted Slavery”).
The justice system is in place in America to protect its citizens, however in the case of blacks and some other minorities there are some practices that promote unfairness or wrongful doing towards these groups. Racial profiling is amongst these practices. In cases such as drug trafficking and other criminal acts, minorities have been picked out as the main culprits based off of skin color. In the article “Counterpoint: The Case Against Profiling” it recognizes racial profiling as a problem in America and states, “[In order to maintain national security] law-enforcement officers have detained members of minority groups in vehicles more than whites”…. “these officers assume that minorities commit more drug offenses, which is not the case” (Fauchon). In relationship to law enforcement there has also been many cases of police brutality leaving young blacks brutally injured, and even dead in recent years, cases such as Michael Brown, Dontre Hamilton, Eric Garner, Tamir Rice, and Freddy Gray just to name a few. Many of these young men were unarmed, and the police involved had no good justification for such excess force. They were seen as threats primarily because of their skin color. Despite the fact this nation is trying to attain security, inversely they are weakening bonds between many of its
Human rights experts have reported that in the 70s, African Americans in the U.S were already being overrepresented in drug arrests, with twice as many arrests as Caucasians (Fellner, 2009). Since the war on drugs began, African
The work by Victor M. Rios entitled Punished: Policing the Lives of Black and Latino Boys and Michelle Alexander’s The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness depict ways in which policing and incarceration affect inequalities that exist in society. In this body of work I will draw on specific examples from the works of Victor M. Rios and Michelle Alexander to fulfill the tasks of this project. Over the course of the semester and by means of supplemental readings, a few key points are highlighted: how race and gender inequalities correlate to policing and incarceration, how laws marginalize specific groups, and lastly how policing and incarceration perpetuate the very inequalities that exist within American society.
The war on drug not only change the structure of the criminal justice system, it also change the ways that police officers, prosecutors and judges do their jobs. Even worse, the way politicians address crime. The tough stand on drugs started during the Nixon presidency, most of the resources was focus on medical treatment rather than punishment. Although it was a better strategy and alternative than the drug war policies that exist today, it was a very divisive issue between the conservatives and the liberals. The war on drug ignited during the Reagan administration, two third of the financial resources were being spent on law enforcement. In addition, the end of the cold war left the United States with weaponry and resources that needed to be repurposed. As a result, small town were given high power grade artilleries and weaponry, and means to form specialized tactical units such as SWAT teams in case of unusual event. To maintain and justify the need for these new expenditures, SWAT teams are used in any drug warran...
The War on Drugs is believed to help with many problems in today’s society such as realizing the rise of crime rates and the uprooting of violent offenders and drug kingpin. Michelle Alexander explains that the War on Drugs is a new way to control society much like how Jim Crow did after the Civil War. There are many misconceptions about the War on Drugs; commonly people believe that it’s helping society with getting rid of those who are dangerous to the general public. The War on Drugs is similar to Jim Crow by hiding the real intention behind Mass Incarceration of people of color. The War on Drugs is used to take away rights of those who get incarcerated. When they plead guilty, they will lose their right to vote and have to check application
The biggest question people ask is if the “war on drugs” was successful. According to the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), “The goals of the program are to reduce illicit drug use, manufacturing and trafficking, drug-related crime and violence, and drug-related health consequences.” The best way to measure the effectiveness of the “war on drugs” is to focus on these basic questions; Is drug use down? Is crime down? and Are drugs less available? Since 1988, drug use by individuals ages 12 and over has remained stable according to the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA). The number of individuals reporting any drug use has increased by approximately 7 million and the number of those who reported drug use in previous months or previous years has remained unchanged. The Organization Monitoring the Future studies drug use, access to drugs, and perspectives towards drugs of junior and senior high school students nationwide. Results of a study conducted in 2005 showed a minor decline in substance abuse by older teens, but drug use among eighth graders stopped remained the same. However, the changes were not statistically significant and ultimately there was no reduction in substance abuse among young students. Crime in the United States has decreased significantly since 1993, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. On the other hand,
While the War on Drugs may have been portrayed as a colorblind movement, Nixon’s presidency and reasoning for its implementation solidifies that it was not. Nixon coined the term “War on Drugs” in his 1971 anti-drug campaign speech, starting the beginning of an era. He voiced, “If there is one area where the word ‘war’ is appropriate, it is in the fights against crime” (DuVernay, 13th). This terminology solidified to the public that drug abusers were an enemy, and if the greatest publicized abusers were black, then black people were then enemy. This “war” started by Nixon claimed it would rid the nation of dealers, but in fact, 4/5 of arrests were for possession only (Alexander, 60). Nixon employed many tactics in order to advance the progress
The law enforcement does not look for the increase in drug activity because but the law enforcement doesn’t focus on the high income neighborhoods in search of drugs, what they do is focus on the poor low income neighborhoods because that is where they think drugs are being abused. The drug policies are very discriminatory and attack those that are non-white, or those who live in a neighborhood where everyone thinks drugs are abused there. According to the article “Race, Drugs, and Law Enforcement in the United States” it uses statistics from Seattle that show a clear example of the discrimination of the supposed war on drugs. “A recent study in Seattle is illustrative. Although the majority of those who shared, sold, or transferred serious drugs[17]in Seattle are white (indeed seventy percent of the general Seattle population is white), almost two-thirds (64.2%) of drug arrestees are black”(hrw.org 1).
Many people claim that racism no longer exists; however, the minorities’ struggle with injustice is ubiquitous. Since there is a mass incarceration of African Americans, it is believed that African Americans are the cause of the severe increase of crimes. This belief has been sent out implicitly by the ruling class through the media. The media send out coded messages that are framed in abstract neutral language that play on white resentment that targets minorities. Disproportionate arrest is the result of racial disparities in the criminal justice system rather than disproportion in offenders. The disparities in the sentencing procedure are ascribed to racial discrimination. Because police officers are also biased, people of color are more likely to be investigated than whites. Police officers practice racial profiling to arrest African Americans under situations when they would not arrest white suspects, and they are more likely to stop African Americans and see them as suspicious (Alexander 150-176). In the “Anything Can Happen With Police Around”: Urban Youth Evaluate Strategies of Surveillance in Public Places,” Michelle Fine and her comrades were inspired to conduct a survey over one of the major social issues - how authority figures use a person’s racial identity as a key factor in determining how to enforce laws and how the surveillance is problematic in public space. Fine believes it is critical to draw attention to the reality in why African Americans are being arrested at a much higher rate. This article reflects the ongoing racial issue by focusing on the injustice in treatment by police officers and the youth of color who are victims. This article is successful in being persuasive about the ongoing racial iss...
The criminal justice system is united under one basic law body, in which no racism is present. Personal beliefs and anecdotes prove nothing, the criminal justice system isn’t racist. Although it may seem African Americans are highly discriminated upon in the justice system, there is ample amounts of data to prove otherwise. The criminal justice system is united under one basic law body, in which no racism is present. The system is not to blame for the racial differences found in the United States criminal justice system. The racial issues found in the system are due to inner city isolation and common crime patterns involving drugs even if it may seem as if the system is racist.
Michelle Alexander asserts that mass incarceration in contemporary American society is the result of targeting African Americans in the “War on Drugs” and serves to maintain a racial caste system similar to the system that existed during pre-Civil War slavery and has been propelled by what Michael Cohen calls “Jim Crow political logic” of Southern
America's War on Drugs: Policy and Problems. In this paper I will evaluate America's War on Drugs. More specifically, I will outline our nation's general drug history and look critically at how Congress has influenced our current ineffective drug policy. Through this analysis, I hope to show that drug prohibition policies in the United States, for the most part, have failed.
This essay will be focusing on the incarceration and war on drug of black community and minority in the United State. The New Jim Crow by Michelle Alexander discuss who the war on drug effect minority in American. What will be discuss in this paper or the question I will be answering are How has the War in Drugs impacted low-income people and communities of color, particularly African Americans? How has the Drug War disenfranchised a large segment of the American population? How have race and class influenced the functioning of the criminal justice system, especially in relation to policing, the enforcement of drug laws, and sentencing? Do you agree or disagree with Alexander’s contention that the current criminal justice system has resulted in a “New Jim Crow”? Why or why not?
Another reason racialized mass incarceration takes place is because of the high rates of poverty and unemployment for inner city African Americans, especially those with low-education and low skill levels. Urban ghettos have been associated with the problem of social disorganization and crime. The biggest reason for this is the war on drugs. There is no substantial proof that verifies African Americans are more involved in illegal drug consumptions than other groups are. However they are arrested more than other groups. Bobo and Thompson stated that blacks are almost 34% involved in drug-related arrests though only 14% of those are among regular illegal drug users. Among drug related convictions, African Americans make up half of the cases whereas only 26% of the white population is convicted. As Bobo and Thompson stated, “Illegal drug consumption seems to know no race. Incarceration for drug-related charges, however, is something visited in a heavily biased manner on African Americans.”
In the early 1980s, policymakers and law enforcement officials stepped up efforts to combat the trafficking and use of illicit drugs. This was the popular “war on drugs,” hailed by conservatives and liberals alike as a means to restore order and hope to communities and families plagued by anti-social or self-destructive pathologies. By reducing illicit drug use, many claimed, the drug war would significantly reduce the rate of serious nondrug crimes - robbery, assault, rape, homicide and the like. Has the drug war succeeded in doing so?