Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critically analyze the role of brutus in julius caesar
How did the Senators justify Julius Caesar's assassination
Brutus as a leader julius caesar
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
On March 15, 44 B.C I attended the forum as a plebian. When I witnessed the assassination of Caesar I couldn’t help but think that was what was best for everyone. I believe that Brutus had justifiable motives to kill Caesar. He was just trying to stop a tyrant from gaining more power. If Brutus would have let him live he would have become a dictator and all hell would have broken loose. I believe that Caesar would have stepped on everyone and Europe would have been in big trouble. If Brutus motives were as pure as I think they were and were for the good of Rome I don’t see how he could be considered a bad man. The definition of a hero is someone who makes sacrifices for the benefit of everyone else and that is what he did. Getting rid of Caesar may have been what was best for everyone. …show more content…
I think that Brutus did us justice and by killing Caesar, he has restored liberty by slaying a tyrant. Even though no one deserves to die I do not pity Caesar, he was power hungry and didn’t have Rome’s best interest at heart. Another thing that led me to Brutus’s side was that Antony cannot be trusted. I cannot allow him to become Julius’s successor and rule Rome the way Caesar tried to, keeping in mind that his friend Julius was killed and I’m sure he’s not going to let the people responsible get away with that so he is a very dangerous person to have rule. Brutus on the other hand is way too trust worthy and when you instill so much trust in other people it’s only because you’ve instilled so much trust in yourself. He trusted Antony not to turn the tables on him in his funeral speech which he did trying to get everyone to be on his side. He also trusted Cassius only to find that he used him to get close to Caesar. He realized that these people did not have Rome’s best interest at heart which he did and its clear to see which is why I think he is
The people of this county, the Romans of this city please listen to me. I have came to Tell you the good about caesar. Brutus has given me permission from all the conspirators to tell the good about Caesar and that I will speak nothing bad of them. Brutus had told you guys that. Caesar was way to committed to do something, he always wanted to thrive in anything and everything and that's why he was killed . both Brutus and caesar are both very nice and noble to their countries and will die if they need to. I am not trying to say that brutus did something wonderful for the community but he could have did it differently. Remember what caesar has done for us, remember what he has done for the poor. I can't read his will aloud because it will make
On the other hand some people may believe that he is honorable. Some may say that Brutus had the best interest of Rome in mind while he murdered Caesar. Also, some might try and argue that Brutus would have made a better ruler and that is why is chose to do this act. What these arguments fail to consider is the fact that Brutus failed to stand up for his morals, agrees to take the life of a dear friend, and he goes to kill himself because he is too afraid to face the consequences. Brutus is a dishonorable man because he allows Cassius to make him go against his morals. Another thing is that he shows his weakness by going and not facing the consequences that came with his
he does because he say Caesar would “ fain have had it” but we think
Summary Opinion: Brutus is guilty with the collaboration of assassinating Julius Caesar. When Caesar is crowned the new Emperor of Rome, Brutus was very envious of the power he possessed. Due to this jealousy and ambition for power, Brutus betrayed his closest friend. Although Caesar intended to better the conditions of Rome both economically and politically, Brutus believed them to be lies. He is guilty of killing Caesar since there was no reason to, and it also directly violates the law.
Some might argue that Brutus was not a patriot, but a betrayer, Brutus claimed to have a deep love for Caesar, but he conspired with traitors and assassinated Caesar by stabbing him in the back. I can’t argue that Brutus did not betray his friendship with Caesar, but when looking closely at the evidence it became apparent to me that Brutus was acting in what he felt was in the best interest of Rome. Brutus struggled with the idea of betraying his friend. He did love Caesar, but was concerned that his ambition would destroy Rome. Brutus made the final decision to be part of Caesars assassination after Cassius deceived him by planting fake letters convincing him that Caesar was up to no good. Brutus felt that he must act and act quickly before Caesar was crowned king. Brutus had no personal vendetta against Caesar, he was only concerned with the future of Rome. In Act 2 Scene 1 Brutus is struggling with how he will handle Caesar when he comes to the conclusion that his only choice is to kill him: “It must be by his death, and for my part I know no personal cause to spurn at him but for
Caesar would’ve tromped all who stood before him, and ancient Europe would’ve become an ant under Caesar’s boot. If Brutus really did kill Caesar for the good will of Rome, I do not believe he was in any way a bad man, and even proved how strong of a man he was. In most cases, homicides are ugly, heinous crimes. But in a select few instances, they can be not only justifiable, but the overall best outcome of a situation.
Brutus was a man of noble birth. He had multiple servants and was often referred to as “Lord”, which indicates a certain level of respect for him. He was a very highly thought of person in Rome. At no point did he ever betray anyone, although he did kill Caesar, he did it to better Rome, not to mislead him. Everything he did was for the advantage of someone else. Even after Brutus dies, Marc Antony says “This was the noblest roman of them all; all the conspirators, save only he, did that they did in the envy of Caesar; he only in a general honest thought and common good to all...” This shows that regardless of brutus killing Caesar, he is still considered noble because he had good intentions. Brutus was also the best friend of Julius Caesar, the most powerful man in Rome. Had he been a commoner, Caesar most likely would not have associated with him or trusted him as a friend.
In my opinion, I totally agree with Brutus with the fact that something needed to be done regarding the issue of Caesar becoming king. Although I think that planning to kill him wasn’t the best way to go about it. I believe that there must have been a more civilized way to deal
Like Brutus said, he killed Caesar because it was “not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more” (Julius Caesar Act 3 Scene 2 Shakespeare). I think that is very noble of him, because if it weren’t for the act of murder, he would most definitely be a hero. If it were not for him not giving Caesar a chance first, he would most definitely be a hero. If it weren’t for his morals being manipulated by another person, he would most definitely be a hero. There is a lot of controversy about the topic and what makes Brutus a hero or villain.
Brutus was a supporter of the republic as well as Caesar’s truthful friend. However much he loved Caesar, he opposed the fact that a single man ruled Rome and he feared Caesar would rise to hold that power. Brutus was a good leader. He was truthful and honourable. Brutus tries to justify his reason for killing Caesar and he says
Cassius wanted Brutus to help with the plan of murdering Caesar, and Brutus decided to kill Caesar for the good of Rome. Cassius and Brutus are both responsible for the murder of Caesar.
Brutus’ being his naiveness. Brutus was an optimistic man who thought everything and everyone were pure. Brutus thought that no one would ever delude him. Brutus has not done anything to wrong the world, he would never be wronged by the world,Brutus always believed in karma. This attribute of his lead to his demise. Everyone who Brutus relied on would delude him at one point or another in the story. Yet he allows this to happen to him, he is the way to trustful and doesn’t realize anyone 's evil intentions. This flaw consequently led to his demise. His first act of being naive was in Act II, Scene 1 when he had received all those fake letters from his future conspirator group which he believed to be the citizens of Rome. He had believed the letters which of course, was all a lie into getting Brutus to join the group. In Act III, Scene II, he allows Antony to speak in honor of Caesar, which in the end ruined him. Brutus allowing this to happen was the precursor to the war. ultimately this was not due to his naive nature but by pure inclination. In Act V, Scene II, Brutus starts the battle without telling Cassius. This choice consequently led to his suicide, because he would rather do that than to be dragged throughout Rome. This being said Brutus is evidently the tragic hero. He is an honorable and noble man and Antony says it perfectly at the ending, in which he says “This was the noblest Roman
Those people aren't wrong, Julius Caesar often did made rash decisions without thinking too much about the outcome, and disobeyed the senate once or twice, but they almost always payed off in the end. His ruling began when he worked with Crassus and Pompey in the first triumvirate which later broke apart and Caesar became governor of Gaul. After Crassus died, Pompey became worried about what Caesar might do with all of his power, Caesar eventually went to war against Pompey when he and his troops marched across the Rubicon River after being told not to. Caesar later became named dictator for life until he was stabbed to death by politicians and a few of his friends ending his power.
.... Octavius knows Mark Antony cannot be trusted. He let it be known that he doesn’t trust Mark Antony when he said “Let us do so, for we are at stake/and bayed about with many enemies; / and some that smile have in their hearts, I fear, / Millions of mischiefs” (IV.I.48-51). Antony turned Rome against the conspirators; he could potentially turn them against Octavius. Trust is the trait of a noble man.
Caesar would have killed many people, and all for what? More power. Brutus would have done anything for the sake of his city. Even if that meant killing his friend. “Nor that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” (III.ii.23-24) A good leader would put his city/empires problems and demands before himself. Sometimes to fix a problem you need to fix it at the roots. This came from his heart and was honest. If Brutus actually hated Caesar, he would have struck him first. However, Brutus was one of the last people to stab Caesar and one of the last to agree to the conspiracy. It took a lot of convincing from Cassius who admired Brutus a great deal. He would always keep telling Brutus how he was the better leader than Caesar and how his plan would truly